[HN Gopher] How to build Intrinsic Motivation: a review of the s...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to build Intrinsic Motivation: a review of the science
        
       Author : buzzmerchant
       Score  : 129 points
       Date   : 2025-04-29 09:59 UTC (13 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (erringtowardsanswers.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (erringtowardsanswers.substack.com)
        
       | buzzmerchant wrote:
       | When i was younger, i had intense bouts of what psychologists
       | call intrinsic motivation.
       | 
       | As i get older, this happens less and less - which is a massive
       | shame.
       | 
       | I wanted to understand whether there was any good evidence as to
       | what intrinsic motivation is and how i might be able to cultivate
       | it in my adult life. To do this, i did a massive deep dive of the
       | scientific literature surrounding intrinsic motivation. This is
       | the outcome of that research.
        
         | kridsdale1 wrote:
         | Something I have been thinking about and experimenting with is
         | the hypothesis that as I age, my neuronal mitochondria are
         | simply producing less ATP per hour than they used to. Great
         | health and sleep are the expected fixes, but I'm also now
         | supplementing with enzymes and substrates for each phase of the
         | Krebs Cycle, treating mito function like an Internal Combusikb
         | Engine and my biochemical attempts like a Mech Engineer
         | optimizing horsepower and efficiency.
         | 
         | Anecdotally (because I'm not going to syringe my brain) I am
         | feeling a lot more enduring wakefulness and motivation than
         | when I skip them in my morning routine.
         | 
         | I did a chatGPT dive to validate this but that's not exactly a
         | biochemical lit review.
        
           | scroogey wrote:
           | Do you mind sharing what you're taking?
        
             | kridsdale1 wrote:
             | PQQ, CoQ10, NAD+, Creatine.
             | 
             | NAC to clean free-radical oxygen damage to dna.
        
           | maj0rhn wrote:
           | There is risk in this approach. Nobody has any real idea what
           | supplements are doing in all of the bodily tissues, and
           | sometimes the effects are not benign. "Folate acceleration"
           | of cancer is just one such cautionary tale. Vitamin E and
           | heart failure is another, though I'm not sure how that one
           | ultimately settled out.
           | 
           | There is a wide list of other maneuvers to try first.
           | 
           | - Time in bed does not equate to "great sleep." Make sure you
           | don't have sleep apnea. Practice good sleep hygiene.
           | 
           | - Delivery of oxygen to your brain is just as important as
           | mitochondrial aging, if not more. Get some aerobic exercise
           | (even walking is fine) -- it wakes me up and maybe will do
           | the same for you. Heed your vascular risk factors, because
           | crap in your cerebral vessels will not help.
           | 
           | - The one supplement exception is vitamin B12, which neurons
           | must have. Deficiency can be very hard to judge by symptoms,
           | so I'd get it measured and act accordingly.
        
       | sameasiteverwas wrote:
       | This is impressive and interesting, thank you for creating and
       | sharing it.
       | 
       | People with high intrinsic motivation and agency will rule the
       | world of tomorrow, weilding AI to acheive their personal visions.
       | Everyone else will be weilded by AI.
        
         | buzzmerchant wrote:
         | Thanks very much!
         | 
         | You may well be right. Interesting to think about the
         | relationship between agency & intrinsic motivation...
        
       | spiderfarmer wrote:
       | I need to know how to dampen it. I can get truly obsessed with
       | building things, to the point where I feel guilty for not working
       | on it or thinking about it.
        
       | mettamage wrote:
       | Ah fun! SDT is one of my favorite theories that I'm still
       | actively using to this day to get myself intrinsically motivated
       | on something. I've thrown a lot of theories away due to the
       | reproducibility crisis and similar things concerning psychology.
       | SDT isn't one of them :)
       | 
       | One of my other favorite theories is HEXACO. And personality does
       | play into intrinsic motivation, to some extent.
       | 
       | Disclaimer: I skimmed the article.
       | 
       | Fun autonomy hacks:
       | 
       | 1. Reframe the narrative. For example, when I studied CS at
       | school, I didn't study CS. I studied how to learn as fast as
       | possible. I happened to have studied CS.
       | 
       | 2. Listen to Spotify to get into a solo task. I usually turn it
       | down if I happen to get focused.
       | 
       | Also a note: intrinsic motivation is tough when you're sleep
       | deprived. I've had moments where I was motivated and sleep
       | deprived but they often don't coincide.
       | 
       | This is all to say that stuff like this go onto a fundamental
       | layer of physical health. Something I dind't quite get when I was
       | younger.
        
         | taeric wrote:
         | I'm curious how you actively use it to build motivation?
        
           | mettamage wrote:
           | > I didn't study CS. I studied how to learn as fast as
           | possible. I happened to have studied CS.
           | 
           | That's an example
           | 
           | As for the Spotify example. I just like listening to my
           | playlists, every task becomes more chill. Also, I like
           | working on a Mac more than a Windows laptop. I've had one
           | company restricting my choice there to Windows. Me sort of
           | hacking their company policies such that I could work on a
           | Mac made me feel a lot better.
        
             | taeric wrote:
             | This feels like answering a different question? That is,
             | I'm asking how you increase motivation. If you are saying
             | to just reframe the task, I guess that makes sense? Did you
             | find specific framings that work for you? Did you stay
             | quantitative on it?
        
               | mettamage wrote:
               | Well, I think autonomy specifically is in part in how you
               | frame things. Just like in CBT, when you influence your
               | thoughts it will influence your emotions.
               | 
               | Simple example: if you believe an action you did was a
               | really bad thing, you will most likely feel negative
               | emotions about it. However, if you can figure out a
               | perspective that will reframe the information you have in
               | a different light and therefore you now believe it was a
               | positive thing, you will likely feel good about what you
               | did.
               | 
               | Example (I'm improvizing so not fully according to the
               | sketch outlined above):
               | 
               | Negative: I don't dare to talk to that person because
               | they don't know me and it is not done to talk to someone
               | you don't know without a context.
               | 
               | Positive: While it is unusual to talk to someone you
               | don't know without a context, I give that person a chance
               | to meet me. If I tend to do this often enough, then there
               | will be people that are open to this.
        
               | taeric wrote:
               | I think I'm largely looking for what makes this different
               | from telling someone to just not be depressed?
               | 
               | I can see approaching things in a different way. I was
               | fond of a more Socratic approach for a while, as an
               | example. But that is more than just reframing, that is
               | using a different approach.
               | 
               | For your example, it looks like you are making sure to
               | consider things in a way that does not assume the
               | outcome?
        
         | efkiel wrote:
         | Could you share the methods you used to learn as fast as you
         | could ?
        
       | sheepolog wrote:
       | I was surprised at how closely your experience (and a commenter's
       | experience) mirror my own. During my life, I've had a few periods
       | of a few months where I focus intensely and work nonstop, and the
       | work does not feel like effort at all. For me, it also comes with
       | a sense of complete confidence, a feeling like I am fulfilling my
       | purpose in life and that everything is exactly as it should be.
       | It is the best sustained feeling I've ever experienced.
       | 
       | Unfortunately I've only experienced this three times in my life;
       | typically around major life events (once when starting a new job
       | in a new industry, once when quitting that job to make my own
       | stuff, and once in grade school: the summer between 10th and 11th
       | grade, for some reason). I look forward to seeing more research,
       | and hopefully one day can apply these learnings to manually
       | trigger this intense focus and motivation.
        
       | bArray wrote:
       | From an AI perspective, I have a rough idea of what intrinsic
       | motivation means to me:
       | 
       | To allow an embodied agent to perform actions within an
       | environment that would generally be considered positive, without
       | the definition of an objective function.
       | 
       | To break that down, to be embodied in this case is to act, sense
       | and have some internal model that can be adapted, all operating
       | within an environment that can be considered external to the
       | agent.
       | 
       | An objective function is where there is some external push
       | towards optimality that requires knowledge of the sensors,
       | actuators, environment, etc. A good test for whether you
       | accidentally baked in system knowledge is if you change the rules
       | considerably and the agent will not operate.
       | 
       | Whether or not an agent acts positively can itself be measured by
       | an environment specific objective function. A properly operating
       | intrinsically motivated agent may perform well on some metrics,
       | i.e. long time lived, reduced search time, etc.
       | 
       |  _Why do you want an intrinsically motivated agent?_ Almost all
       | reward /objective functions are somewhat flawed, even if the
       | problem is simple. I am reminded of a group training a robot to
       | walk fast, measured by speed over time with a cut off. _Simple
       | enough?_ Well, they reviewed the trained agent and they
       | immediately feel to the ground to be reset far away. In another
       | test, the agents would purposely break the simulation
       | environment, causing the agents to glitch and be launched far.
       | One thing to note is that in each of those scenarios, the agent
       | optimised for the reward, but made themselves  "useless" after
       | doing so.
       | 
       | For AI I have found Empowerment an interesting solution to
       | intrinsic motivation [1]. Essentially agents choose actions to
       | "keep their options open", and try to avoid actions that would
       | reduce the action state space. The actual environment itself is
       | not encoded into the algorithm and the state spaces are arbitrary
       | and could be replaced with any symbol. As a result, you can make
       | large changes to the environment and use the same motivation
       | algorithm.
       | 
       | [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1863
        
       | javier_e06 wrote:
       | Video gaming seem to be down this alley on the study of self-
       | motiviation.
       | 
       | Some games are made to burn time, like Thumper.
       | 
       | Some games are made to burn you neurons like Baba is You.
       | 
       | Minecraft has 2 modes. Creative and Zombie. Both equally powerful
       | incentives.
       | 
       | I try to keep the plasticity of my brain. Not to let it crust and
       | crumble like Play Doh left outside the tub.
        
       | i_am_a_squirrel wrote:
       | Great read!
        
       | begueradj wrote:
       | Motivation is an emotional state. Emotions are ephemeral.
        
       | ChaitanyaSai wrote:
       | Great article! SDT has fascinating parallels in consciousness
       | science that no one to my knowledge has actually explored. This
       | is because in consciousness research, the experiencing self is a
       | given, it just happens to be taken for granted that there's an
       | "I" experiencing, and the wonder and magic is focused on the
       | experience itself. What about the self that is experiencing? On
       | the other hand, SDT operates at a level where a biological and
       | even experiencing conscious self is taken for granted, and the
       | focus is on how the cognitive self operates (in many ways). And
       | this is also where the criticism comes from. This is all in the
       | domain of the self and motivation and whatnot articulated in
       | language. To go deeper, we need a bridge between these two that
       | can explain how the self is constructed. And we do have a
       | beautiful theory/framework for that
       | 
       | Consciousness is a consensus mechanism by which the self is
       | constructed. It is a recursive loop where the self emerges,
       | experiences, and folds in the next experience to create an
       | evolving, expanding self. With language we have the ability to
       | freeze many of these ideas and we are able to go much further. "I
       | can think, feel, experience and reflect on this"
       | 
       | And why a consensus mechanism? Because "you" are actually a
       | constellation of cells and experiences that needs to be
       | sufficiently decentralized but also be able to act and plan in
       | the very short and long term. How do you get 87 billion cells (in
       | our case) to decide as one? That is actually a pretty difficult
       | engineering problem where you have to think about both compute
       | (all the different data streams coming from different sources
       | need to be digested and acted on) and commute (one cell group in
       | the prefrontal cortex needs to immediately broadcast a danger
       | message to other corners of the brain, and we dont have direct
       | wiring)
       | 
       | Now the natural question to ask is, what do synthetic beings need
       | to develop both? If you are interested you might want to read our
       | book Journey of the Mind
       | 
       | Here is a short read on the idea of consciousness as a consensus
       | mechanism https://saigaddam.medium.com/consciousness-is-a-
       | consensus-me...
        
         | adiabatichottub wrote:
         | This reminds me I need to add Douglas Hofstadter to my reading
         | queue.
        
       | adiabatichottub wrote:
       | Half-way through this and already my takeaway is: spend more time
       | with people who have related interests are are supportive of your
       | competence.
        
       | neogodless wrote:
       | Took me a bit of skimming + reading to get to it, but section 3
       | about causes (and blocking) of intrinsic motivation reflect what
       | you'll find in Daniel H. Pink's book, Drive.
       | 
       | https://www.danpink.com/books/drive/
       | 
       | Presumably built off the same research.
        
       | nuancebydefault wrote:
       | Motivation to accomplish things is good, but it should not be a
       | goal on itself. IMO the goal should be fulfillment and
       | contentment.
       | 
       | Now and then, evaluation points in life emerge, where you
       | question the 'why'. Those periods can be quite loaded with
       | emotions of feeling lost or being insecure of where to go next.
       | They might greatly shift perspective and hence your course of
       | life.
       | 
       | To me, everything is feedback loops: you pour in energy and you
       | get positive energy back. In that sense, the system is self
       | sustained. However it is fragile as well, because over time, you
       | tend to need more and more back to provide feelings of
       | contentment.
       | 
       | Motivation is like love and relationships, you need to work,
       | sometimes very hard, to sustain them.
        
         | atoav wrote:
         | I play musical instruments for two decades now. And I still
         | enjoy it, because it puts my mind into a state that is almost
         | flow like. Same for programming. So I just like how it feels
         | when I do it, for the most part at least. That means sometimes
         | I just program for fun and open ended without any goal at all.
         | Same goes for music. 90% of my playing outside my band is just
         | playing without a plan.
         | 
         | This is why I am good at those things -- I spent a lot of my
         | time doing them and I did so because I enjoy it.
         | 
         | Let yourself play, find the aspects that interest you about a
         | topic and go wild. No need for a goal, thiose will come
         | eventually. First you need to find joy in what you're doing.
         | 
         | And if you don't find any of that, maybe your motivation is
         | just money, fame or whatever and thst might be ok as well, if
         | you're happy with doing a thing you don't like.
        
       | QuantumGood wrote:
       | Internalized/chronic shame easily lessens motivation. Sometimes
       | healing comes first.
        
       | GabriDaFirenze wrote:
       | Good timing, I actually mentioned the SDT research for a piece
       | about naysayers. Thank you for sharing your experience and you're
       | definitely not alone. A constant battle!
       | https://open.substack.com/pub/leadwithkindness/p/rising-abov...
        
       | Nevermark wrote:
       | I have an interesting experience related to this "discussion"
       | point:
       | 
       | > For another example, consider the Marinek and Cambrell (2008)
       | experiment where they compared the effect of token-rewards, e.g.
       | a gold star, with task-related rewards, e.g. a book, on reading
       | motivation.
       | 
       | > Would the reward of a book really be experienced as less
       | controlling than the reward of a gold star?
       | 
       | > Instead, I think the token reward was probably more distracting
       | than the task-related reward - which makes sense, since the task-
       | related reward was really just a means of spending more time
       | doing the task at hand anyway.
       | 
       | My experience would suggest another effect is happening. A reward
       | of a book aligns with the activity more than just being less
       | distracting. It makes the activity less of an event, and more of
       | a path. I.e. reading gets framed as not something they did, but
       | something they are beginning, that they can look forward to.
       | 
       | I think we are attracted to learning things more, if the learning
       | has a forward path, if the forward path is made more visible, or
       | the forward path is more enabled. A book reward emphasizes those
       | intangibles, while tangibly enabling another step. Enablement
       | rewards are increased autonomy rewards.
       | 
       | Contrast that to if they were given a book reward and told that
       | they were going to be required to read it! It would suddenly
       | represent anticipated control instead of anticipated autonomy and
       | competence increases.
       | 
       | --
       | 
       | Ok, here is the "psychological experiment" which worked out
       | really well with my young children. (Grown up now.)
       | 
       | Every night, I or my partner would read them a bedtime story. We
       | usually read one or two short stories, after which we asked them
       | to get ready for bed. Invariably, they would beg for another
       | story, which we would read, then put them to bed.
       | 
       | But children don't give up, so they of course begged for another
       | story. No matter how many stories you read, their is the
       | inevitable disappointment of story time ending. Getting them into
       | bed represented the enforcement of that ending, and often
       | required some degree of over "control" to get them settled. And
       | settled again! Until they really did settle down.
       | 
       | So we tried something, by random instinct one night, and it
       | worked so well it became a staple of their young lives.
       | 
       | Instead of ending the book session, we started telling them that
       | stories were over, but they could pick a book to sleep with. It
       | is the funniest thing. They would get quite excited and enjoy
       | choosing "a favorite book" from their selection. We would say
       | just pick one, but then "give in" and let them pick two if they
       | couldn't decide.
       | 
       | All this autonomy of what books they were going to take to bed,
       | including talking us into letting them have more than one, really
       | motivated them into bed.
       | 
       | Then lights went out. They couldn't read the books. They couldn't
       | look at the pictures. Nevertheless less, they could feel them and
       | it made them very happy going to sleep!
       | 
       | Other factors played a part, but I am convinced that part of the
       | reason they are lifelong habitual book readers, something getting
       | rare, is how much they fell in love with the literal physical
       | feeling of books.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-29 23:01 UTC)