[HN Gopher] Tesla settles with worker who claimed employees told...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Tesla settles with worker who claimed employees told "welcome to
       the plantation"
        
       Author : Veserv
       Score  : 30 points
       Date   : 2025-04-20 18:21 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.the-independent.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.the-independent.com)
        
       | Veserv wrote:
       | Coming after Diaz v Tesla [1] where Tesla was found guilty of
       | racial harassment and discrimination in that same Fremont,
       | California plant (as can be seen here on page 3-11 [2]) to a
       | degree that the jury deemed it worthy of a $136.9 million award,
       | the single largest award in a race harassment case in American
       | history [2]. That award was later reduced for procedural reasons
       | as it was beyond the maximum limit the law allows. And further
       | reduced in a subsequent trial evaluating direct damages due to
       | emotional distress and loss of work which, as a matter of law,
       | restricted the maximum allowable punitive damages. Despite that,
       | the jury found it necessary to award punitive damages in excess
       | of the standard maximum of 9:1 [4] which was upheld by the courts
       | as, in the words of the judge: "Tesla's conduct was reprehensible
       | and repeated"[5] and as such the award in excess of standard
       | maximums was "appropriate in light of the endemic racism at the
       | Tesla factory and Tesla's repeated failure to rectify it"[6].
       | 
       | [1] https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-
       | cand-3_17-cv-06...
       | 
       | [2] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-
       | cand-3_17-cv-06...
       | 
       | [3] https://www.civilrightsca.com/key-verdicts/diaz-v-tesla-
       | race...
       | 
       | [4]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Farm_Mutual_Automobile_I...
       | 
       | [5] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-
       | cand-3_17-cv-06... Page 29
       | 
       | [6] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-
       | cand-3_17-cv-06... Page 1 End of Paragraph 1.
        
         | devwastaken wrote:
         | fake damage rewards are designed to benefit corps so they can
         | cause public outrage in their favor while in reality paying a
         | small fraction due to payout limitations.
        
           | milesrout wrote:
           | What a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
           | 
           | American civil courts having juries for no good reason is the
           | issue. Nobody anywhere else in the world still uses juries
           | for civil trials and for this sort of reason.
           | 
           | Damages are compensatory. Allowing a jury to pluck 9-digit
           | numbers from thin air to be reduced later is stupid.
        
             | dragonwriter wrote:
             | > Damages are compensatory.
             | 
             | No, _compensatory_ damages are compensatory. Statutory and
             | exemplary /punitive damages are not compensatory
             | 
             | > Allowing a jury to pluck 9-digit numbers from thin air to
             | be reduced later is stupid. tory.
             | 
             | Juries aren't allowed to pick numbers out of the air; on
             | compensatory damages, as the finder of fact, the jury
             | performs the same function as a criminal jury, it
             | determines what facts were proven to the required standard,
             | including the amount of harm proven.
        
               | rainsford wrote:
               | I was on a civil jury a while ago and it was pretty eye
               | opening how the process actually works. I'd say about
               | half of the court time was dedicated to arguments about
               | proving specific damages and ultimately the result was
               | that the jury found in favor of the plaintiff but awarded
               | a much lower damage amount than they were asking for
               | specifically because they failed to prove that amount of
               | harm. The idea of juries plucking random numbers of out
               | thin air doesn't even remotely match my experience, or
               | reality based on conversations I've had with lawyers I
               | know.
        
             | rainsford wrote:
             | > Allowing a jury to pluck 9-digit numbers from thin air to
             | be reduced later is stupid.
             | 
             | That's not how civil jury trials work. Not only are juries
             | specifically instructed that they can't just make up
             | damages numbers, but a significant amount of the courtroom
             | time will be dedicated to both sides presenting arguments
             | for specific damage amounts with detailed justifications,
             | expert witnesses, etc. I'm not saying trials never result
             | in wonky damages amounts, but the idea that juries
             | generally just randomly pick the biggest number they can
             | think of is largely a media created fiction.
        
         | milesrout wrote:
         | Very strange that you have this all set out and prepared for
         | us. It is almost as if this is an organised campaign against
         | Tesla and isn't actually about racism at all.
        
       | milesrout wrote:
       | Why should Tesla be responsible for what its employee allegedly
       | said? How ridiculous.
       | 
       | And why would someone be entitled to monetary compensation
       | because someone said "welcome to the plantation"? What happened
       | to "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never
       | hurt me"? When did people become so psychologically weak? And
       | what is the loss that is being compensated?
       | 
       | EDIT: Can people please stop downvoting comments they disagree
       | with? If you disagree with someone, upvote them and have a
       | fucking conversation. Downvoting and flagging is NOT for
       | disagreement.
        
         | dlachausse wrote:
         | EDIT: LOL which one of you coded a bot? This comment got
         | downvoted as soon as I hit submit.
         | 
         | Rocket man bad because rocket man help orange man. Orange man
         | bad because media say orange man Hitler.
         | 
         | That's why you're getting downvoted. Everything even
         | tangentially related to Elon Musk is bad now according to the
         | side that is disappointed that Trump didn't get assassinated in
         | Butler, PA and thinks it's okay to vandalize Teslas and assault
         | their owners, and even fire bomb Tesla dealerships.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-20 23:01 UTC)