[HN Gopher] The physics of bowling strike after strike
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The physics of bowling strike after strike
        
       Author : noleary
       Score  : 42 points
       Date   : 2025-04-16 02:16 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
        
       | RickJWagner wrote:
       | At this time, the balls rate of revolution is a strong factor in
       | how often the ball hits the pocket and how often it strikes.
       | 
       | This has not always been the case. As the materials used for
       | balls, lanes and oil have changed there have been premiums for
       | different attributes like accuracy, speed, axis tilt, etc.
       | 
       | Todays best bowlers don't look much like the best from 30 years
       | ago, and probably won't look much like the best ones 30 years
       | from now.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | Especially since the pins are on strings now, which changes the
         | game.
         | 
         | https://usbowling.com/articles/string-pinsetter-q-a/
        
       | laxatives wrote:
       | I love this topic, but this article is literally just "there
       | exists a paper" without any useful information about the paper
       | aside from the inputs they consider in their model.
        
       | hwpythonner wrote:
       | Fascinating work! I'm not a physicist, but I wonder from what
       | distance down the lane this model's predictions become reliably
       | accurate. It might be interesting to pair it with a second model
       | --one that helps bowlers achieve the needed initial conditions
       | (release speed, angle, spin) with the required precision. A kind
       | of two-stage approach to managing the chaos in the system.
        
       | NickC25 wrote:
       | Isn't a strike effectively a solved problem? Like the pin you're
       | supposed to aim for, and the angle you're supposed to approach
       | the pins at, where you're supposed to stand, and all that?
       | 
       | Like I get that it's super hard to replicate time and time again,
       | and that's why pros are as good as they are.
        
         | adenta wrote:
         | I think there are diff oil patterns on the lanes that change
         | where you want to aim.
        
         | Rooster61 wrote:
         | Sort of. Sure, the angle and position of the ball as it hits
         | the first pin is solved to a fair degree. The problem is the
         | number of variables between when the bowler even picks up the
         | ball vs contact.
         | 
         | This is very much like saying we know what angle and speed we
         | need for a rocket to achieve orbit, but you need to account for
         | many, many other factors, some of which you don't have true
         | control over. Weight, dimensions, and geometry of the rocket,
         | wind, drag based on variable air density, weight of that
         | individual rocket, are all engines burning at the right rate,
         | etc, etc.
         | 
         | A veritable mission control is going on in a professional
         | bowlers head at any given time. Varying speed of approach, how
         | far back the ball should swing, axial tilt in the hand, which
         | board to stand on, which board to hit, where the breakpoint
         | should be, how the oil is changing as the game wears on (oil
         | moves over the course of a game), is the pinsetter actually
         | placing the pins correctly. Ball weight, core type, coverstock
         | (surface of the ball) type, oil absorbtion into that
         | coverstock, etc, etc. It's not so much replication, it's
         | constant adjustment, and no two frames, much less games, are
         | really the same. Not to mention you can't SEE how oil is
         | changing directly. You have to infer it from the reaction of
         | your ball as well as other bowlers.
         | 
         | Bowling is a deceptively deep and vexing sport
        
         | RandallBrown wrote:
         | Sorta. This is a pretty entertaining video about how hard it
         | is, even when you sorta cheat.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1fUliFuz2U
         | 
         | The oil on the lane can be set in different patterns, so the
         | throw can change depending on the pattern. You can't _see_ the
         | pattern (I 've never been able to see it anyway), but the alley
         | will show you a picture of what it should look like. It also
         | will change as balls are thrown over it.
        
         | whartung wrote:
         | Is the number of perfect games being bowled in competition
         | going up in any meaningful way?
         | 
         | Just curious.
        
         | hatthew wrote:
         | It's solved in the same way that baseball is solved: an
         | omniscient superhuman player can get the perfect hit every
         | time, but the fun is that we're imperfect and have to minimize
         | our mistakes and maximize our recovery from mistakes.
        
       | mindslight wrote:
       | It's big ball bowling. The ball is nearly as wide as the lane, so
       | it knocks over all the pins. QED.
       | 
       | Candlepin and mini golf are the more advanced versions of their
       | respective sports. Fight me.
        
         | copypasterepeat wrote:
         | I've never heard of candlepin bowling before this, but now that
         | I'm reading about it, I'm surprised it's not more popular. It
         | looks like a lot of fun. The fact that fallen pins are not
         | cleared seems like it would lead to some interesting
         | strategies.
        
         | Rooster61 wrote:
         | Ehh, 10 pin and candlepin are challenging for differing
         | reasons. I wouldn't say one is more difficult than the other.
         | It's kind of like comparing NASCAR to rally racing.
        
         | RandallBrown wrote:
         | What about mini golf is more advanced than regular golf?
        
           | ktallett wrote:
           | I have not considered it enough to form a view yet but I
           | expect he would be referring to the precision required for
           | mini golf.
        
             | RandallBrown wrote:
             | Seems like there is more precision required for regular
             | golf since it includes all of the precision of miniature
             | golf (putting) with the added difficulty of multiple player
             | surfaces, longer distances, and the difficulty of hitting a
             | small object with another small object at speeds around 100
             | mph.
        
           | dpc050505 wrote:
           | the commentary
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULP0cbGXU8k
        
       | dfxm12 wrote:
       | _The calculations involved in such research are very complicated
       | because there are so many variables that can affect a ball 's
       | trajectory after being thrown. Case in point: the thin layer of
       | oil that is applied to bowling lanes, which Hooper found can vary
       | widely in volume and shape among different venues, plus the lack
       | of uniformity in applying the layer, which creates an uneven
       | friction surface._
       | 
       | FWIW, pro bowling events will use one of several predetermined
       | oil patterns. The bowlers will know the pattern in advance &
       | practice for a few frames to get a feel for it. Part of the game
       | is knowing how the oil shifts from the balls rolling over it
       | throughout the course of the round and making adjustments. My
       | buddy was recruited to play on our high school team precisely
       | because he was a lefty in a league where there were relatively
       | few others and thus his ball would be less affected by these
       | variables. https://www.pba.com/player-resources/oil-patterns
       | 
       | Even for fun leagues will probably have someone prepare the lanes
       | ahead of time with a certain pattern and let the bowlers know.
        
       | Rooster61 wrote:
       | Solid article, but one very important detail that they left out
       | is that this only really applies to at least league level and
       | above players. Most of this is moot for the recreational, a few
       | times a year type bowlers.
       | 
       | 80% of the folks that walk in the door of a bowling alley are
       | going to grab plastic house balls and bowl straight (or try to
       | put hook on it, which isn't overly effective for a number of
       | reasons). Most of this information only applies to bowlers using
       | a ball with a coverstock and core that cause the ball to
       | naturally hook a certain way.
       | 
       | Nothing wrong with being a recreational bowler or bowling
       | straight. It's just trying to apply these statistics to a
       | straight ball doesn't quite work.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-18 23:01 UTC)