[HN Gopher] Compute's Gazette Magazine Returns After 35 Yrs, Wil...
___________________________________________________________________
Compute's Gazette Magazine Returns After 35 Yrs, Will Focus on
Retro Computing
Author : dbelson
Score : 82 points
Date : 2025-04-13 11:01 UTC (11 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.computesgazette.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.computesgazette.com)
| dgfitz wrote:
| I only clicked the link because the title didn't spell out
| "years" and having clicked the link, I don't get it at all. I
| need to click a second link inside the website, hopeful I click
| the right one?
| zahlman wrote:
| I think the correct link should be
| https://www.computesgazette.com/iconic-computes-gazette-maga...
| le-mark wrote:
| Iirc the "gazette" version of Compute! Was focused on Commodore
| machines, whereas Compute was a polyglot of several popular US
| machines. Theses magazines were a lifeline to a lot of us in the
| 80's pre internet. It reminds me how amazing this age is, with
| regard to freely available information.
| pryelluw wrote:
| Not only information access but the distribution model. In
| middle school, I had a little side business selling shareware
| on diskettes. My school had gotten brand spanking new 386/486
| machines. My older brother had copied a bunch of games and
| programs from his friends into a stack of diskettes. I was king
| and made some good cash. Enough to buy a bike.
|
| I miss physical media.
| massysett wrote:
| Yes, Gazette was published as a standalone magazine, as
| COMPUTE's Gazette. Later, it was published as a supplement to
| COMPUTE, the main COMPUTE had some Gazette pages printed in the
| back or something.
|
| I subscribed for at least a few years. I did the type-in
| programs. I think I got the BASIC ones to work but I never got
| one of the assembly language ones working. Understandably
| topping them in did not forgive errors, though each line of
| assembly came with a checksum, this didn't save me.
|
| And typing them was mind-numbing besides.
| empressplay wrote:
| I can't find any evidence that they've acquired or licensed the
| name / trademarks from Ziff Davis, the last known holder of
| Compute's IP, so I would be wary of giving them any money.
|
| Also the content gives off strong AI vibes
| beej71 wrote:
| I want it to be true. There's really not much information out
| there on it or the CEO that I can find.
|
| My first question was if there's was enough retro material for
| a monthly.
| jnagle78641 wrote:
| Edwin Nagle here. I believe there's definitely enough
| material to support a monthly, especially with a focus on the
| general retro community rather than solely on C64/128.
| ddingus wrote:
| I agree with that.
|
| Why GAZETTE rather than just COMPUTE! ?
|
| Big fan of the project here BTW.
| jnagle78641 wrote:
| I registered the trademark through USPTO, you can verify it
| there. There is some AI involved right now, but not for
| anything content related.
| hedora wrote:
| Fwiw, I didn't find the ai images problematic at all, and the
| writing doesn't seem generated at all to me.
|
| I like the switch drm writeup, but wonder if they're just
| moving pirates towards downloading from the store + dumping
| the bits.
| robterrell wrote:
| I worked for Compute! magazine when I was in high school (an
| excellent job, porting games for one PC to another) and so maybe
| it's just a me thing, but it seems weird to name this "Compute's
| Gazette" when there's no connection to the original magazine,
| besides fandom.
| amichail wrote:
| What was your most and least favorite computer to port games
| to?
| robterrell wrote:
| TI-99/4a was the worst for me, but I think the entire reason
| I was hired was that everyone else hated porting to the Apple
| //.
| DidYaWipe wrote:
| Undoubtedly because the Apple II's graphics and sound
| sucked royally.
| chuckadams wrote:
| No desire to fire up MLX and type in raw hex from printed source,
| nope. I got some nostalgia feels when I browsed CG's back catalog
| on archive.org, but nothing that would make me want ever to do
| that kind of thing again.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-04-13 23:00 UTC)