[HN Gopher] Why 'Prince Rupert's Drop' Glass Is Strong Enough to...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why 'Prince Rupert's Drop' Glass Is Strong Enough to Shatter a
       Bullet (2023)
        
       Author : susam
       Score  : 60 points
       Date   : 2025-04-09 23:55 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.popularmechanics.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.popularmechanics.com)
        
       | test1235 wrote:
       | video in lieu of the article's broken link:
       | 
       | Bullet vs Prince Rupert's Drop at 150,000 fps - Smarter Every Day
       | 165: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24q80ReMyq0
        
         | HelloUsername wrote:
         | The article is also from 2023.
         | 
         | It's funny to see how topics on reddit
         | (https://l.opnxng.com/r/Unexpected/comments/1jvhcme posted 2
         | days ago), 9gag (https://9gag.com/gag/aW4vpKd posted 1 day ago)
         | and HN (posted today) are always connected.
        
           | mystraline wrote:
           | It reminds me of Cory docotorow's comment of something like
           | 'there are 5 social media sites and everything is just copied
           | from one another'
           | 
           | HN isn't immune either, given that karma provides 'rights to
           | punish views and accounts' (downvoting). And it makes a great
           | strategy to make a whole lot of socks with 520 karma, and
           | selectively kill comments and stories you don't want.
        
             | actuallyalys wrote:
             | I'm sure sock puppets and voting rings play a role, but
             | "this link was interesting to a bunch of people on sites
             | with some overlap in interests and demographics" seems a
             | simpler and better explanation.
        
       | dyauspitr wrote:
       | The best part is if you melt away the weak tail, all you're left
       | with is the strong bulb.
        
         | tifik wrote:
         | Would/does that actually work? Its been a while since I watched
         | SED Destins video about it, so I dont remember if they
         | experiment with that. But intuitively, heating the glass so
         | non-uniformly that the tail would melt and the bulb remained
         | solid enough to keep the internal stresses intact, wouldnt that
         | steep temperature gradient within the crystaline structure
         | cause the entire drop to break?
        
           | maxbond wrote:
           | In this video someone does it and it seems to work.
           | 
           | https://youtube.com/shorts/ERDmKW65t38
           | 
           | But it's a very small drop and they don't melt it all the way
           | to the bulb. I imagine that it could shatter in some
           | circumstances.
           | 
           | (Incidentally glass isn't a crystal, but that's just a
           | nitpick.),
        
             | prox wrote:
             | Is glass still considered a form of liquid? Think I
             | remember reading something about that years ago.
        
               | sparky_z wrote:
               | No, that's a classic misconception. People claimed that
               | windows "flowed" because really old ones were thicker at
               | the bottom, but that was just how some old window glass
               | was made.
        
               | dasil003 wrote:
               | Yeah if you're installing an uneven pane where would you
               | orient the thick side?
        
               | Hikikomori wrote:
               | The bottom.
        
               | gweinberg wrote:
               | I think the basis of the claim is that glass doesn't have
               | the same kind of phase transition that a crystalline
               | solid would. It just sort of gradually becomes more
               | liquid-like as you heat it.
        
               | s0rce wrote:
               | No, its disordered (ie. not a crystal) but not a liquid,
               | it won't flow like a viscous liquid.
        
               | s0rce wrote:
               | My comment was a bit over simplified, they do flow, but
               | the time scale exceeds the entirety of human history [1].
               | 
               | [1] https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19026
        
               | maxbond wrote:
               | Similar to the misconception that Earth's mantle is
               | liquid. It isn't, but time is deep enough for solid rock
               | to flow.
        
       | undebuggable wrote:
       | My first thought was to see it under hydraulic press and the
       | internet delivered.
        
       | darkwater wrote:
       | When was this article written? Last update is 2023 (so the title
       | should at least reflect this) but down in the article talks about
       | Gorilla glass by Corning as a novelty with possible future uses
       | in smartphones.
       | 
       | Sent from a Gorilla glass smartphone with a corner almost broken
       | ^^;
        
         | jccalhoun wrote:
         | youtube says the mythbusters video is from 10 years ago so it
         | was written sometime since then.
        
           | darkwater wrote:
           | And according to Wikipedia [1] the first commercial use of
           | Gorilla Glass was the original iPhone in 2007, even if the
           | name was officially coined in 2008
           | 
           | [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla_Glass
        
         | dragontamer wrote:
         | Prince Rupert's Drop is strong at compression but weak enough
         | that your pinky finger can shatter it.
         | 
         | These 'hardness' stats are just marketing bullshit dressed up
         | in barebones material science. They know most people haven't
         | studied material science or understand what 'hardness' means.
        
       | dghughes wrote:
       | Someone needs to invent a way to make tank armor out of Prince
       | Rupert's Drop glass.
        
         | undebuggable wrote:
         | Once I was stuck down a youtube rabbit hole of someone testing
         | anti-tank portable launcher against increasingly thick
         | ballistic glass. The conclusion was that no glass can resist
         | anti-tank projectile. Maybe large enough Rupert's drop glass
         | could?
        
       | qwerty456127 wrote:
       | What it takes to actually destroy it (by applying pressure at a
       | wrong point)?
        
         | ninkendo wrote:
         | A tiny amount of pressure applied to the "tail" of it shatters
         | the whole thing instantly, that's one of the coolest things
         | about it.
        
       | aragonite wrote:
       | There's a pretty amazing video here showing a Prince Rupert's
       | drop defeaing a hydraulic press:
       | https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ns7PQjjqHIo
        
         | dzdt wrote:
         | Yeah its not really what it looks like though. They put
         | cylinders of soft metal in place of where you would expect the
         | press to have hardened steel.
        
           | aragonite wrote:
           | Has this been confirmed? The original channel also posted a
           | comparison video [1] showing what seems to be the same
           | cylinders tested against titanium and tungsten cubes (though
           | it's difficult to be sure they are identical)
           | 
           | There's also footage from another channel [2] showing a
           | Prince Rupert's Drop bursting at 20 tons with significant
           | damage to both the steel plate and the press.
           | 
           | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SuPFbeqqKU
           | 
           | [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6NUNroyUys
        
             | KTibow wrote:
             | Slowed down: https://youtu.be/tRUngxK2yXY
        
             | philjohn wrote:
             | You can see the steel deforming - definitely soft steel.
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | They must have gotten the librarian in the video from Central
       | Casting.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-12 23:01 UTC)