[HN Gopher] Evelyn Waugh's Decadent Redemption
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Evelyn Waugh's Decadent Redemption
        
       Author : bryanrasmussen
       Score  : 19 points
       Date   : 2025-04-11 15:29 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (libertiesjournal.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (libertiesjournal.com)
        
       | musictubes wrote:
       | Liberties is a great journal. It covers a lot of intellectual
       | ground and is unapologetically Liberal in all senses of the word.
       | Every issue has political and historical commentary, art
       | (literary, film, dance) criticism, and poetry. It's like a denser
       | Harper's.
        
       | K7mR2vZq wrote:
       | Waugh's journey from satire to orthodoxy mirrors many tech
       | careers--from disruptive iconoclasm to seeking deeper principles.
       | His ability to maintain literary excellence while embracing
       | traditionalism reminds us that technical maturity often involves
       | integrating seemingly contradictory values rather than merely
       | overturning established systems.
        
         | dhosek wrote:
         | His journey doesn't really follow that pattern though. _The
         | Loved One_ , a deeply iconoclastic satirical novel came after
         | _Brideshead_.
        
           | ewgoforth wrote:
           | The movie is pretty good too. Jonathon Winters in a dual row.
        
             | dhosek wrote:
             | Oh God no, that movie is a horrid mess. It's why Waugh's
             | novels were never adapted by Hollywood studios after that.
        
           | throwaway2562 wrote:
           | What of it? The Loved One (1948) was a bit of a squib at
           | best, tonally a throwback to the earlier Waugh. It's not very
           | good (imho) so you can see why Terry Southern - who had not
           | much taste - liked it enough to make a film of it, also
           | unsuccessful.
           | 
           | The Sword of Honour Trilogy written over the next decade or
           | so is much more representative of the later Waugh: the
           | original article has sketched him out correctly.
           | 
           | The general continuity in Waugh's life and writing is
           | contempt for modernity: a turn to religion makes perfect
           | sense in that light.
           | 
           | The diaries are worth reading too. He really was quite an
           | unpleasant fellow, as well as a fine writer.
        
             | cafard wrote:
             | Paul Fussell (I think) said that one should read Waugh's
             | letters rather than his diaries: he wrote the letters in
             | the morning, sober, and wrote the diaries at night, drunk.
        
       | giraffe_lady wrote:
       | I really like this book and while not catholic I'm close enough
       | that the experiences and decisions of the characters are
       | comprehensible to me, which probably helps.
       | 
       | The article mentions this briefly but many don't, and they
       | downplay it significantly even here. The first act of this book
       | is _extremely_ homoerotic. Like it is a clear depiction of a
       | chaste but certainly romantic love between these two young men.
       | But it is _also_ a friendship based on normal-for-the-time-and-
       | place male camaraderie and college antics.
       | 
       | It's a nuanced and sophisticated depiction, not apparently trying
       | to make any moral or ethical point about it and the book has a
       | small but devoted following among contemporary gay men for this.
       | Nor is this even plausibly deniable as a "sappho and her friend"
       | type accident on the author's part, since homosexuality is pretty
       | explicitly (though euphemistically) referenced elsewhere in the
       | book. IMO one of the best depictions of a romance of its kind in
       | modern literature. It's fascinating that it's here.
        
       | philsnow wrote:
       | > Why, oh why, must the love stories fail?
       | 
       | Well, Julia's (and then Charles's) love for God prevails, in the
       | end.
       | 
       | On the face of it, it's not a story where the guy gets the girl,
       | as such. However, there is a sense where Jesus is the bridegroom
       | of the Church, and thus it is that kind of story, just not the
       | way that readers expect (well, as Oliver points out, until they
       | read the title of the section "The Twitch on the Thread").
        
       | danielhanlon wrote:
       | How unexpected - beautifully written! It's almost surprising that
       | the quoted passages are so familiar - I hadn't realised how
       | affecting they are. Whilst loving the book I can't consider
       | Brideshead Revisited without thinking of the wonderful 1980s
       | Granada TV adaptation. I didn't dare watch the more recent film,
       | lest it spoil the tableaux of the original.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-11 23:01 UTC)