[HN Gopher] Saturn's moon Titan could harbor life, but only a ti...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Saturn's moon Titan could harbor life, but only a tiny amount
        
       Author : geox
       Score  : 52 points
       Date   : 2025-04-07 21:31 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (news.arizona.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (news.arizona.edu)
        
       | nkrisc wrote:
       | > "Our new study shows that this supply may only be sufficient to
       | sustain a very small population of microbes weighing a total of
       | only a few kilograms at most - equivalent to the mass of a small
       | dog," Affholder said. "Such a tiny biosphere would average less
       | than one cell per liter of water over Titan's entire vast ocean."
       | 
       | Assuming for a moment that some life does exist in the subsurface
       | ocean, I imagine it would be most likely that you would then
       | expect to find very, very rare, but highly concentrated pockets
       | of life?
       | 
       | Unfortunately I couldn't read the linked study because I was
       | stuck in an endless CAPTCHA loop of trying to find an image of a
       | refrigerator among a varying set of only helicopters, ships, and
       | avocados. I feel absurd just writing that.
        
         | pavel_lishin wrote:
         | There's only one refrigerator per liter of images in the
         | CAPTCHA.
        
           | marcosdumay wrote:
           | And unfortunately, the GP's monitor is 2D only, so the total
           | amount of refrigerators was zero.
        
         | 38 wrote:
         | > Unfortunately I couldn't read the linked study because I was
         | stuck in an endless CAPTCHA loop of trying to find an image of
         | a refrigerator among a varying set of only helicopters, ships,
         | and avocados
         | 
         | I got through on the first try, and I block third party
         | JavaScript with a whitelist
        
           | nkrisc wrote:
           | The one I got told to me find refrigerators and then never
           | showed me a refrigerator. I clicked "skip" many times and it
           | just kept going until I gave up.
        
             | misnome wrote:
             | I'm sorry to suggest this, but have you considered that you
             | might be a robot?
        
               | kridsdale3 wrote:
               | These days it's hard to tell.
        
             | throwaway777452 wrote:
             | You probably misread it and it said to pick objects that go
             | inside the refrigerator, so you were supposed to pick the
             | avocados.
        
               | seanhunter wrote:
               | You don't put avocados in a refrigerator in many
               | countries of the world. IF you do, they will just go
               | brown without ever becoming ripe.
        
             | AStonesThrow wrote:
             | I am reminded of the intersection between _Indiana Jones
             | and the Crystal Skull_ , and xkcd 2228:
             | 
             | https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BombproofApplia
             | n...
             | 
             | https://m.xkcd.com/2228/
             | 
             | Hey, wouldn't a refrigerator be an ideal space vessel for
             | humans to explore Titan?
        
       | Qem wrote:
       | Are bolide impact events the only possible mechanism for
       | communication between ice crust and subsurface ocean? Is there no
       | analogue to tectonism on Titan ice crust, to subduct nutrient
       | rich ice?
        
         | indoordin0saur wrote:
         | Yeah the study seems to make 4 assumptions:
         | 
         | 1.) The life's only metabolic source of energy is glycine
         | 
         | 2.) The life is analogous to glycine metabolizing organisms on
         | Earth
         | 
         | 3.) The only source of glycine getting deep into the ocean is
         | through these rare impact events
         | 
         | 4.) The life can only survive in the deep subsurface ocean
        
           | datameta wrote:
           | Speaking of ocean, water is mentioned several times in
           | discussing Titan but the hydrologic cycle analogue consists
           | of various hydrocarbons.
           | 
           | But to the fourth point, I wonder to what extent radiation is
           | a factor in mutation of biological material. It turns out
           | Titan has a rather low surface irradiation coefficient due to
           | being rather distant from Saturn's radiation belt, a weak
           | induced magnetosphere (rare for moons!), and the ions are
           | mostly water-based coming from Enceladus while Jupiter's
           | radiation belts are largely sulphur ions coming from Io.
        
             | indoordin0saur wrote:
             | The hydrocarbon oceans are on the surface, but there are
             | liquid water oceans beneath the surface.
        
       | zoklet-enjoyer wrote:
       | As a treat
        
         | dfedbeef wrote:
         | A tiny wafer thin layer of life
        
       | bpodgursky wrote:
       | > The researchers specifically focused on one organic molecule,
       | glycine, the simplest of all known amino acids.
       | 
       | This is such a goofy assumption. That any life on Titan would use
       | the exact same amino acids as earth-based life. If you have no
       | clue whether something is possible, sometimes it's better to
       | predict nothing at all.
        
         | Tagbert wrote:
         | It's not goofy. We find these amino acids in meteorites and it
         | is clear that they are widespread in space. Glycine being the
         | simplest is probably the most common and most likely to be
         | incorporated by life. It is a good proxy for an estimate.
        
         | bilekas wrote:
         | > This is such a goofy assumption. That any life on Titan would
         | use the exact same amino acids as earth-based life.
         | 
         | I might be wrong, but I think they use this assumption because
         | they KNOW life has already formed this way, it would be goofy
         | to assume methods that we haven't witnessed right ?
        
           | ceejayoz wrote:
           | That's still a bit goofy; it's essentially the same thing as
           | the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult phenomenon.
        
             | bilekas wrote:
             | Maybe I missed the mark here but is it not similar to
             | saying "it seems goofy to look on planets with water just
             | because that's what life required on earth"?
             | 
             | I'm not in any way educated on these things but are these
             | not basic building blocks kind of things?
        
               | ceejayoz wrote:
               | We know the basic building blocks for Earth life.
               | 
               | We currently have zero evidence for any life off the
               | planet, water/carbon-based or otherwise. It would likely
               | be a mistake to assume that we're the only possible
               | setup. Maybe life spreads primarily and very slowly in
               | Oort clouds, and we're a bit of an abberation.
               | 
               | Even here on Earth, we've been surprised to find life in
               | boiling water and miles underground.
        
         | behringer wrote:
         | And if they found loads of this amino acid, would you say the
         | same thing? Science isn't about getting the best answers, it's
         | about getting accurate answers. Now that we know all about this
         | amino acid in relation to titan, we can follow the rabbit hole
         | to find sources of it on Titan or we can decide to look for
         | alternatives.
        
         | AStonesThrow wrote:
         | The search for water in outer space, and other life-sustaining
         | elements, has ulterior motives.
         | 
         | I believe that the search for alien life is subordinate to the
         | search for things that will sustain human life and/or industry,
         | as we expand further outwards.
         | 
         | Most scientists and engineers don't actually expect to
         | encounter significant alien life in our solar system, and it's
         | merely a meme they use to tease middle-schoolers, Senators,
         | CEOs, and naive newspaper readers. Searching and discovering
         | _life forms_ would be really really fraught with terror and
         | doom, if we indeed expected to find it when we looked.
         | 
         | Any natural resource that exists on a moon of Jupiter, or of
         | Saturn or in the Asteroid Belt, and if we can exploit it and
         | extract it and turn it into something useful, for example
         | refueling, or life support, or repairing existing vehicles en
         | route, or simply dragging raw materials back down the gravity
         | well to Earth, then that is a natural resource we'll want to
         | investigate as we expand. Dyson spheres won't be built in a
         | day, but we'll need a good start on the resource extractions
         | real soon now.
         | 
         | This is the quiet part they won't say out loud, because it's
         | much more exciting and non-threatening to say we're looking for
         | alien life forms rather than sustaining our own self-interest.
         | But it's all about self-interest when it comes to humans.
        
       | causality0 wrote:
       | God what a fucking leap from the actual results of the study to
       | that article title. The only thing the study indicated with even
       | the barest hint of significance is that there is probably only a
       | very limited amount of glycine being transported from the surface
       | to the interior ocean. That's it.
        
         | NoTeslaThrow wrote:
         | Imagine what humanity could be capable of if we had the grace
         | to ignore the title.
        
       | mytailorisrich wrote:
       | I think the most plausible takeaway is that, assuming this study
       | is "correct", if a process would only allow a few kg of life at
       | planetary scale then that process is not what life would rely on
       | in that environment.
        
       | julik wrote:
       | I hope there will be sirens...
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sirens_of_Titan
        
       | SamBam wrote:
       | I'm interested that their conclusion -- that Saturn could only
       | support tiny life forms such as bacteria -- is not dependent in
       | any way on the distance from Titan to the Sun.
       | 
       | Am I wrong in thinking that any life must require a steady input
       | of energy, and that this must come from either solar energy or
       | geothermal energy? Quick Googling says that Titan's core isn't
       | known for sure, but probably isn't very hot.
       | 
       | If Titan's life were dependent of solar energy, wouldn't it's
       | distance from the Sun imply very little energy to go around, and
       | so very unlikely to have large organisms?
        
         | delecti wrote:
         | The gas giants' moons are heated quite a bit by tidal friction.
         | They're warmer than would be expected just based on their
         | distance from the sun.
        
         | adrian_b wrote:
         | Solar energy can be captured only by living beings that have
         | reached a relatively high complexity after a long evolution.
         | 
         | In places with so little solar energy, living beings might
         | never develop means for capturing it.
         | 
         | For the appearance of life, a source of internal heat for the
         | planet or satellite is a necessary condition.
         | 
         | As another poster has mentioned, in the big satellites of the
         | giant planets such a source of internal heat exists, because of
         | the tidal forces which cause internal friction.
         | 
         | For the internal heat to be able to provide energy for life
         | forms, there must exist some kind of volcanism that cycles
         | matter between the interior and the exterior of the satellite
         | or planet, so that substances that were in chemical equilibrium
         | at higher temperatures are brought to lower temperatures, where
         | they are no longer in chemical equilibrium, which can provide
         | the energy for the synthesis of complex organic molecules.
         | 
         | (On Earth, the principal source of energy for the bacteria that
         | do not depend on solar energy has its origin in the iron(II)
         | ions from the mantle and lower crust of the Earth, which are
         | brought by volcanism at the surface, where they are no longer
         | in chemical equilibrium with water, so they are oxidized by
         | water to Fe(III) ions, i.e. rust, liberating elemental hydrogen
         | from the water, which can be consumed by bacteria and combined
         | with carbon dioxide into organic substances, without needing
         | any other source of energy. When rocks are recycled by
         | subduction into the mantle, because of the high temperatures
         | the iron ions are reduced again to Fe(II) ions, completing the
         | cycle by consuming a certain amount of internal heat.)
        
           | blacksmith_tb wrote:
           | Hmm, didn't cyanobacteria / blue-green algae evolve early in
           | Earth's history? I would agree that chemosynthesis seems like
           | a better bet so far away from the sun, though).
        
             | Symmetry wrote:
             | Relatively early but there was at least 500 million and
             | perhaps over a billion years separating the first life and
             | the first photosynthesis. At least as much time as between
             | us and the Cambrian Explosion.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_evolutionary_
             | h...
        
           | SamBam wrote:
           | Sure, but that's basically my point, or at least the point I
           | thought I was making. Chemosynthesis can provide enough
           | energy for bacteria, but to have anything much larger than
           | bacteria you'd need a bigger source of energy, such as high
           | solar radiation, right?
        
         | Symmetry wrote:
         | Life on Earth was dependent on chemosythesis for the better
         | part of a billion years before photosynthesis was developed.
         | Photosynthesis is really very complex so I think we can rule
         | that out as an initial form of life.
         | 
         | Hydrothermal vents are a great source of chemical energy in the
         | form of hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, or other chemicals that can
         | be reacted for energy where the come out into the sea. But you
         | could imagine other sorts of chemical energy driven by other
         | geologic or atmospheric processes that life might bootstrap
         | from.
        
       | bagels wrote:
       | How do they know that there wasn't already abundant amino acids
       | in the ocean before accounting for current transfer?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-10 23:01 UTC)