[HN Gopher] Ancient Dagger Up to 2.5k Years Old W Stars/Moons/Ge...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ancient Dagger Up to 2.5k Years Old W Stars/Moons/Geometric
       Patterns Unearthed
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 133 points
       Date   : 2025-04-07 21:04 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com)
        
       | thunkle wrote:
       | How did they manage to pack so many video ads into a single
       | article?
        
         | bookofjoe wrote:
         | What with their funding being slashed as we speak, look for way
         | more!
        
         | Galatians4_16 wrote:
         | No ads here https://archive.is/aoqkl
        
           | bawana wrote:
           | All i see is an nginx welcome page
        
         | jajko wrote:
         | 0 ads on Firefox with ublock origin
        
       | bb88 wrote:
       | Reminds me of "Detectorists."
       | 
       | https://www.amazon.com/Detectorists-BBC-Series/dp/B06XC4TPTN
       | 
       | Here in the US, if you search along the roads, mostly you're just
       | going to find trash.
        
         | MyOutfitIsVague wrote:
         | It's really a beautiful little show. Quaint, funny, and warm-
         | hearted without being cloying or saccharine. Manages some mild
         | drama and even melodrama without feeling forced or annoying.
         | 
         | I still haven't watched the movie yet.
        
           | seanhunter wrote:
           | Wholeheartedly agree, and the two leads, Toby Jones and
           | Mackenzie Crook (who also is the writer) are both exceptional
           | (both in this and elsewhere). Really worth checking out. Also
           | fun fact: Diana Rigg who played Andy's girlfriend's mother
           | was her mother in real life.
        
         | verisimi wrote:
         | > Here in the US, if you search along the roads, mostly you're
         | just going to find trash.
         | 
         | You too could find something amazing, if you prepare the ground
         | you intend to detect.
        
         | numtel wrote:
         | Good journalist not saying "metal detectors found..." :P
        
         | n1b0m wrote:
         | A real gem of a show and the theme song by Johnny Flynn is
         | wonderful.
        
       | tommica wrote:
       | Simply an astonishing looking dagger.
        
       | thedudeabides5 wrote:
       | what metal is it made of?
        
         | addaon wrote:
         | Bronze.
         | 
         | Hallstatt was bronze age, and if it was an outlier like
         | meteoric iron (a) it would look like it (corrosion) and (b) it
         | would have been called out.
        
           | thaumasiotes wrote:
           | > Bronze.
           | 
           | > if it was an outlier like meteoric iron (a) it would look
           | like it (corrosion)
           | 
           | It is corroded. That's why it's green.
           | 
           | Which, yes, means it's bronze, but note that it's being
           | described as an "iron age dagger" and they think it was
           | manufactured in southern Europe and traded to the north. Iron
           | wouldn't be surprising.
        
           | marcusverus wrote:
           | This article is the first I've ever heard of the Hallstatt
           | culture, but wow were they awesome. Check out this amazing
           | bronze bucket from ~600 BC. It has rivets!
           | 
           | https://www.britannica.com/place/Hallstatt-archaeological-
           | si...
        
       | torlok wrote:
       | Since the press in Poland wrote about this, I'll add a little
       | context. According to the Muzeum Historii Ziemi Kamienskiej's
       | spokesperson, the knife is actually up to 3-2,8. They used the
       | X-ray fluorescence method to come up with that number. The dating
       | is being disputed, as it was rushed out after the discovery, and
       | it's not like you can use carbon dating on metal. There's still
       | chemical analysis to be done, but that doesn't give accurate
       | results either. Some scientists point to the XVIII-XIX CE.
       | Apparently some experts had a look at it and say it's from the
       | Middle East, and if made of brass it could mean it's from I BCE,
       | and it's been stylized to look ancient.
        
         | verisimi wrote:
         | > the knife is actually up to 3-2,8
         | 
         | I'd be surprised if it was 3-2.8 _years_ old.
         | 
         | > The dagger isn't Ukowski's first big discovery. Last year, he
         | found a broken papal bull--a pope's engraved lead seal--that
         | may have been linked to Clement VI.
         | 
         | As you also say:
         | 
         | > it could mean it's from I BCE, and it's been stylized to look
         | ancient.
        
       | Zobat wrote:
       | A while ago there was a necklace discovered in Sweden [1],
       | thought to be about 2000 years old it made international
       | headlines. Then it made headlines again when analysis revealed it
       | was a fake.
       | 
       | Not saying this knife will turn out to be a fake but seeing
       | "Experts will soon conduct a metallurgical analysis" makes me
       | just that little bit hesitant.
       | 
       | 1) https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/vast/unikt-
       | jarnaldershalsb...
        
         | unwind wrote:
         | We also have "the moped ring" [1], an 800-gram gold+silver
         | necklace from 500 AD that some kid clipped a piece off to fix
         | their moped. :)
         | 
         | This is on display at the Historical Museum in Stockholm, which
         | has a fancy vault-like "Gold room" [2] showing off lots of
         | found treasures. Recommended.
         | 
         | [1]: https://historiska.se/upptack-historien/artikel/ostra-
         | hoby-h...
         | 
         | [2]: https://historiska.se/utstallningar/the-gold-room/
        
         | relistan wrote:
         | This guy already found another big deal find that was legit, a
         | papal bull. They are part of a historical preservation group. I
         | think you can bet on it being real.
        
       | astennumero wrote:
       | I have a question. Who gets to own the dagger? The museum? Or the
       | people who found it? What the general law around finding things
       | like this and ownership?
        
         | zelo wrote:
         | In Poland everything found in the ground belongs to the nation
         | treasury (government) and performing excavation in order to
         | look for things like this is illegal without specific permit.
         | So if you find something you either stash it and don't talk
         | about it or it goes to museums.
        
         | agos wrote:
         | it obviously depends on the laws of each country - in Italy,
         | for example, if you happen to find underground an object of
         | historical, artistic, or archeological value you have 24 hours
         | to hand it to the authorities (cultural conservation
         | institutions, municipal authorities or law enforcement). On the
         | other hand, if you are using a metal detector you can't claim
         | it's a random finding and you might incur in charges for
         | abusive archaeological research. If the finding is indeed
         | random you are entitled to a monetary prize by the state.
         | 
         | In other countries I would expect similar legislation
        
         | animal531 wrote:
         | The laws are usually highly regional for things like this.
         | 
         | In some places it belongs to the government, in others the
         | nearest historical authority, in others to you and/or with
         | conditions. In others like Ireland its illegal, so not too long
         | ago someone found two bronze age axe heads and mailed them in
         | anonymously, creating the problem that their National Museum
         | needed to know where the items were found.
        
           | butlike wrote:
           | It belongs in a museum! "So do you!"
        
         | mogrim wrote:
         | In the UK you have to declare the item, and local museums are
         | then allowed to bid a fair market price for it, which you have
         | to accept. This money would then be split equally between the
         | person who discovered the item and the landowner. It works
         | pretty well - there's an incentive to legally declare what
         | you've found, as you'll get paid for it, and by doing so the
         | archaeology is often preserved and the item doesn't just
         | disappear into a private collection.
         | 
         | Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasure_Act_1996
        
         | lawlessone wrote:
         | In a lot of places you'll get in trouble for digging things up
         | because a huge part of the archeology is the objects location ,
         | context etc.
        
       | camjw wrote:
       | Let's be real this is almost certainly cursed.
        
       | khaki54 wrote:
       | Imagine getting smoked by that thing! Pure class -- many worse
       | ways to die.
        
       | caradine wrote:
       | Doesn't look very sharp. Pretty sure I've cut myself worse
       | opening a can of soup. Call me when they find an ancient butter
       | knife.
        
       | max_ wrote:
       | Its so beautiful.
       | 
       | I wonder what alloy it was made of.
       | 
       | I am surprised it looks in such a good condition after 2,500
       | years buried in a lump of clay.
        
       | brcmthrowaway wrote:
       | Why do they never find ancient keys to houses?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-08 23:01 UTC)