[HN Gopher] New Theoretical Research Trends in Cartography
___________________________________________________________________
New Theoretical Research Trends in Cartography
Author : bryanrasmussen
Score : 15 points
Date : 2025-04-04 18:23 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.researchgate.net)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.researchgate.net)
| chippadoodle wrote:
| What is the interest in this article from 2001? There is a rich
| GIS and visualization history that has happened since then ... if
| you really want to see something radical look at Wild Bill
| Bunge's work
| oersted wrote:
| > Until the middle of the 20th Century, cartography was more an
| art than a science.
|
| Strange perspective, accurate nautical charts were critical
| infrastructure in the age of sail, making them and using them was
| a very technical endeavor backed by significant financing. The
| brightest scientists of the period spent a lot energy on the
| longitude problem and similar navigation bottlenecks. Accurate
| land maps were also important for military and state finance
| purposes. Much of early mathematics and astronomy were focused on
| measuring the Earth and pinpointing your location.
|
| I'm not sure if map-making was a science explicitly, there was no
| UX academia like there is now, but it was certainly a serious
| engineering field rather than an "art", and dismissing that rich
| history of know-how seems like a poor foundation for a review of
| map-making theory.
| godelski wrote:
| I'm guessing the authors here are referring to the fact that
| many places were really poorly drawn. There was high detail in
| regions where the map makers were local to but this got fuzzy
| real fast. Some would even do things like plant fake cities on
| their map as a means of fraud detection. A secret signature if
| you will. Someone who copied their map was likely to copy the
| fake place.
|
| You're definitely right that this has a lot to do with early
| mathematics but remember that that is a small part of map
| making. How do you define coast lines? Rivers? Borders? The
| devil is in the details. With older maps the general shapes
| would be (usually) accurate but it could get fuzzy around the
| edges. Literally. It's not like they could get a picture from
| space, or even from the sky. It would take years to measure
| many things that would take us minutes now
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-04-06 23:00 UTC)