[HN Gopher] Coolify: Open-source and self-hostable Heroku / Netl...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Coolify: Open-source and self-hostable Heroku / Netlify / Vercel
       alternative
        
       Author : vanschelven
       Score  : 40 points
       Date   : 2025-04-02 12:41 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (coolify.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (coolify.io)
        
       | dan_can_code wrote:
       | Very cool options here. I'm always looking for options to throw
       | something on a spare raspberry pi and this looks like a great
       | tool to self-host.
        
       | interestica wrote:
       | Just as a word of caution: the word "coolie" (and it's varied
       | spellings, including "cooli") is a racial slur.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolie
        
         | tabarnacle wrote:
         | I appreciate the caution - and although they're close in
         | spelling, I'd wager coolify is recognized by the majority as
         | adding the suffix 'ify' to 'cool' rather than the term you've
         | highlighted.
        
       | hk1337 wrote:
       | I don't mean it as discouragement but, at least for me, I would
       | choose Heroku or Netlify because I don't want to self host it. I
       | want someone else to manage all those bits for me.
       | 
       | It's good experience building the app though and good to have
       | alternatives available.
        
         | colesantiago wrote:
         | I'm glad that the age of platform decay and VC backed companies
         | that these OSS alternatives exist to counter this destructive
         | trend of extraction based vendor lock in.
         | 
         | Vercel, Netlify and Heroku will inevitably not exist in 10-20
         | years but Coolify will, humming along on a regular VPS.
        
           | jbaber wrote:
           | As long as you "own" the domain name yourself, so can point
           | anywhere, what's the problem with using a platform and
           | expecting to have to move someday?
        
           | glenngillen wrote:
           | Heroku has been around for ~17 years at this point. Why do
           | you think it disappears in the next 10?
        
             | anamexis wrote:
             | Because Salesforce decides it's not profitable enough to be
             | worth it, or they want to close Heroku off to Salesforce
             | customers, or any number of other reasons
        
             | matt-p wrote:
             | I mean obviously we're not really privy to market share but
             | I'd say they've had a pretty massive decline in say the
             | past 5 years or so.
        
           | hk1337 wrote:
           | That's great. I didn't mean any discouragement as much as to
           | say, I would probably not promote its self hosting ability as
           | much. Promote that it's open source and keep working on it
           | because I am sure you'll learn a lot about the field space.
           | If it comes down to it that Heroku, Netlify, Vercel, and all
           | other PaaS companies are gone, I will most likely just do a
           | VPS or server just for my app than launch my own PaaS.
           | 
           | tl;dr if I am looking for a PaaS, I don't care that it's self
           | hostable. I don't want to host it, that's why I am looking.
        
             | bofadeez wrote:
             | The point is the UX is identical with Coolify on a cheap
             | VPS compared to overpriced Heroku/Netlify/Vercel.
             | 
             | Just comparing exact performance and price and features.
             | 
             | A blank linux VPS has a different UI/UX.
             | 
             | Why does it seem like you're deliberately misunderstanding?
             | Do you work for a platform?
        
               | hk1337 wrote:
               | I feel like you got lost in my example/rambling that I
               | probably shouldn't have said like that.
               | 
               | If I am a user looking for some place to host my
               | application, I do not care that one service can be self
               | hosted. I have already made my decision that I am going
               | to host it somewhere else, so I am not going self host
               | the PaaS just to host my application myself.
               | 
               | It can still be self hostable, just put it in the
               | developer documentation and not necessarily promoting it
               | so much on the main page.
        
       | ezekg wrote:
       | Does this project make its money via the cloud offering, or via
       | sponsors? It's kind of unclear.
        
         | kikki wrote:
         | Both - but primary the cloud offering. The main author
         | (https://x.com/heyandras) is pretty open about the project
         | revenue its sources. If I remember correctly they're at about
         | 10k MRR mostly from Coolify Cloud.
         | 
         | Edit: Latest "post" (xeet?)
         | https://mobile.x.com/heyandras/status/1901894087604916396 I
         | could find about revenue
        
       | cedel2k1 wrote:
       | Love my Coolify Setup!
        
       | maelito wrote:
       | Also checkout Dokploy. Incredible to leave Vercel.
        
       | 0xbadcafebee wrote:
       | As usual, a weird lets-try-to-get-paid-for-open-source SaaS that
       | doesn't tell you how it actually works.
       | 
       | After some digging, apparently it's a PHP frontend that you run
       | with Docker Compose on a VPC. That PHP app will do a lot of stuff
       | for you (like run builds, deploys, set up web servers, etc),
       | presumably through a host mount to Docker (but maybe not?). If
       | they really put a lot of effort into the functions here, this
       | could really handle a lot of manual work for you, which is nice.
       | 
       | But the thing it doesn't do are things like... maintenance on the
       | VPC you're running it on (EOL distros, security patches, backups,
       | etc), or whatever servers you add to it. There's no staff to
       | manage things like nodes going down. And unless it also has cloud
       | integrations, you'll have to do things like add
       | servers/storage/etc yourself.
       | 
       | If I want to self-host, I'd probably rather set all this stuff up
       | myself, so that I actually know what went into it and can fix it
       | if it gets broken. If Coolify stops working, now I have to dig
       | into how Coolify works to try to fix Coolify. I've gotten to the
       | point in my life where I'd rather pay someone else for all this.
       | Hence the point of Heroku, Netlify, Vercel, etc.
       | 
       | I wish there were still just 2000s era CGI-BIN shared web hosters
       | that charged you $15/month to take care of everything. I just
       | want to FTP my python files over and hit reload in my browser,
       | drop a .htaccess file to control the web server. SQLite would
       | work perfectly as a MySQL/Postgres replacement. _edit_ Ah, they
       | still have them, fantastic!!! https://www.free-webhosts.com/free-
       | cgi-web-hosting.php (those are free ad-supported hosters but they
       | always have paid plans too)
        
         | slig wrote:
         | I believe that Opalstack is what you're looking for. I've used
         | their service for a while.
        
         | matt-p wrote:
         | I don't think the number of people who want to FTP stuff is
         | very high anymore, we are all storing our code in git and want
         | to deploy on a commit or tag. We probably care about SSL, maybe
         | we need to build our code before it can be deployed and so on.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-04 23:00 UTC)