[HN Gopher] Hacking the call records of millions of Americans
___________________________________________________________________
Hacking the call records of millions of Americans
Author : voxadam
Score : 60 points
Date : 2025-04-02 16:37 UTC (6 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (evanconnelly.github.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (evanconnelly.github.io)
| MPSFounder wrote:
| I am hoping they paid a bounty for this (> 20k). Otherwise doing
| the right thing isn't right in my opinion. Their MBAs will not
| see a lesson to be learned, but something that is to be swept
| under the rug
| ada1981 wrote:
| Yes. How much did they pay you for this discovery?
| dullcrisp wrote:
| I doubt 20k will affect their balance sheets very much, either.
| devmtk wrote:
| Crazy that this is possible at such a giant like Verizon. But it
| seems to happen more often than before.
| umvi wrote:
| It's _more_ possible at giants, IMO. Level of technical
| competence /excellence tends to be inversely proportional to
| company size. FAANG might be exceptions, but IMO large
| companies (like big banks, etc) have a lot of hidden technical
| incompetence you can't see.
| yobid20 wrote:
| No exceptions for FAANG. There is technical incompetence all
| over in there too.
| devwastaken wrote:
| Start the big fines and criminal investigations and itll be
| fixed tomorrow.
| mxuribe wrote:
| I have a feeling that ever since late January 2025 in the
| U.S., oversight and regulatory overview might be more lax
| than in the past, and there will less of those "pesky" fines
| and criminal investigations...which begs the question: will
| 2025 be the year of increased negligent and/or nefarious
| behavior - both from corporate entities as well as hackers?
|
| ...I gotta go take a walk near some nature and flowers,
| because i just depressed myself with my comment. :-(
| twalkz wrote:
| > So surely the server validated that the phone number being
| requested was tied to the signed in user? Right? Right??
| Well...no. It was possible to modify the phone number being sent,
| and then receive data back for Verizon numbers not associated
| with the signed in user.
|
| Yikes. Seems like a pretty massive oversight by Verizon. I wish
| in situations like this there was some responsibility of the
| company at fault to provide information about if anyone else had
| used and abused this vector before it was responsibly disclosed.
| chatmasta wrote:
| Call logs are printed on every billing statement by default. I
| believe it may even include SMS messages in some cases.
|
| This data has likely proliferated widely throughout the company,
| subsidiaries and contractors, to reside on an unknowable number
| of systems. I would assume call record metadata is fully
| compromised at this point.
|
| That's not to take away from the finding in the blog - I'm merely
| commenting on the question in its conclusion, about the
| implications of a barely know technology vendor controlling the
| vulnerable server holding this data.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-04-02 23:00 UTC)