[HN Gopher] Scientists uncover key mechanism in evolution: Whole...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Scientists uncover key mechanism in evolution: Whole-genome
       duplication drives
        
       Author : docmechanic
       Score  : 71 points
       Date   : 2025-03-29 13:39 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.sciencedaily.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.sciencedaily.com)
        
       | docmechanic wrote:
       | 'Scientists uncovered how whole-genome duplication emerges and
       | remains stable over thousands of generations of evolution in the
       | lab.'
        
         | tomrod wrote:
         | No, the title is accurate as currently state: "Scientists
         | uncover key mechanism in evolution: Whole-genome duplication
         | drives long-term adaptation"
         | 
         | Evolution is as fascinating as it is predictive. Very neat
         | read.
        
           | flobosg wrote:
           | Assuming the title was trimmed, I would remove that last
           | "drives" since it can be interpreted as a noun.
        
             | docmechanic wrote:
             | Yes, I had to trim the title to the character limit. Thanks
             | for the tip for next time I run into this.
        
               | twic wrote:
               | Especially because there's a thing called a gene drive,
               | and i thought this was a corresponding thing for whole
               | genome duplication:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_drive
        
               | flobosg wrote:
               | My thoughts exactly!
        
           | docmechanic wrote:
           | I agree that the summary I copied and pasted doesn't mention
           | the impact on long-term adaptation. The title is a better
           | summary than the summary!
        
             | tomrod wrote:
             | No harm no foul!
        
       | yarnover wrote:
       | It has happened in plants over and over again.
        
         | echelon wrote:
         | Gene dose increases in plants lead to bigger vegetables and
         | fruiting bodies. We've taken advantage of this during
         | domestication of several species.
         | 
         | Gene dose increases in animals lead to total dysfunction and
         | death in embryonic development.
        
           | eimrine wrote:
           | Dosis sola facit venenum?
        
           | kjkjadksj wrote:
           | There are species of fish that have gone through whole genome
           | duplication.
           | 
           | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02299-z#:~:text=P.
           | ..
        
           | dekhn wrote:
           | dose is such a weird term for "copies"
        
             | flobosg wrote:
             | It's quite... historical.
        
               | echelon wrote:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_dosage
               | 
               | Historical-sounding, maybe? It's still used in the
               | literature:
               | 
               | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32144-z
               | 
               | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48960-4
               | 
               | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10757140/
        
               | dekhn wrote:
               | Yeah, when I saw the original comment I tried to find the
               | source of the term but wasn't able to find it.
               | 
               | To me it sounds like medical genetics terminology (known
               | for terms like "penetrance", "allele", "epistasis",
               | "locus") whereas I'm a molecular biologist/biophysicist,
               | which has far more precise ways of describing the
               | underlying physical model.
        
         | flobosg wrote:
         | In bacteria as well!
        
         | kkylin wrote:
         | And in yeast there has long been evidence for WGD. See, e.g.,
         | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4529243/ & references
         | therein.
         | 
         | Edit: I posted this without looking at the paper (which is
         | about yeast). Doh.
        
       | evrimoztamur wrote:
       | Any self-replicating program that's in an environment that's
       | degrading it over time, should ideally remember what the 'source
       | code' was. It makes sense that it's about where this property
       | emerges early on.
        
       | flobosg wrote:
       | I just realized that the publication comes from Will Ratcliff's
       | group, working on the evolution of multicelullarity. An entry was
       | posted here with a podcast featuring him not long ago, in case
       | you're curious: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43464770
        
       | mmooss wrote:
       | The paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08689-6
       | 
       | Tong, K., Datta, S., Cheng, V. et al. Genome duplication in a
       | long-term multicellularity evolution experiment. Nature 639,
       | 691-699 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08689-6
        
       | pm wrote:
       | This is fascinating, but I don't know enough biology to
       | understand the concepts at play. Could someone knowledgeable in
       | the field explain it further?
        
       | matznerd wrote:
       | This is one of the ways we get all of the secondary metabolites
       | from plants, most of the compounds in supplements and drugs that
       | are active in humans. They come from mutations of the existing
       | DNA, then are able to change from there without impacting the
       | plant's core functions due to being duplicates:
       | 
       | "Gene duplications drive the recruitment of genes for secondary
       | metabolism. Gene copies are gradually modified to create genes
       | with specificities and expression patterns adapted to the needs
       | of the new pathway in which they are involved. Duplicated genes
       | are often in tandem repeats, forming clusters within the plant
       | genome. However, in some cases, clusters of nonhomologous genes
       | have also been identified as forming a functional unit. The
       | selective forces that have caused the establishment of new
       | pathways are far from understood and might have changed
       | repeatedly during evolution owing to the continuously changing
       | environment. Recent data show that the way several classes of
       | secondary compounds are scattered among species is attributable
       | to independent recruitment and the inactivation of biosynthetic
       | enzymes."
       | 
       | https://www.cell.com/trends/plant-science/abstract/S1360-138...
       | 
       | If you want to understand secondary metabolites, which is not the
       | "how" do they work part of plant-derived molecules, but the "why"
       | do they work?
       | 
       | You can follow this line of research:
       | 
       | "Over recent years, the consensus as to the mechanisms
       | responsible for these effects in humans has shifted away from
       | polyphenols having direct antioxidant effects and toward their
       | modulation of cellular signal transduction pathways. To date,
       | little consideration has been given to the question of why,
       | rather than how, these plant-derived chemicals might exert these
       | effects. Therefore, this review summarizes the evidence
       | suggesting that polyphenols beneficially affect human brain
       | function and describes the current mechanistic hypotheses
       | explaining these effects. It then goes on to describe the
       | ecologic roles and potential endogenous signaling functions that
       | these ubiquitous phytochemicals play within their home plant and
       | discusses whether these functions drive their beneficial effects
       | in humans via a process of "cross-kingdom" signaling predicated
       | on the many conserved similarities in plant, microbial, and human
       | cellular signal transduction pathways."
       | 
       | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S216183132...
       | 
       | The functional aspect of the duplicated DNA goes back to the
       | point that humans, insects, and plants are all eukaryotes...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-02 23:01 UTC)