[HN Gopher] Superhyperbola
___________________________________________________________________
Superhyperbola
Author : jihadjihad
Score : 36 points
Date : 2025-03-28 18:25 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.johndcook.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.johndcook.com)
| TheRealPomax wrote:
| Also known as a "squircle",
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squircle, which is a way better
| name.
| russellbeattie wrote:
| Oh, I disagree entirely! This name makes you think of alternate
| dimensions and other cool stuff.
|
| Sadly, maxisuperhyperbola and ultramaxisuperhyperbola don't
| seem to be things.
| mitthrowaway2 wrote:
| Since a hypercube is a higher-dimensional cube, I think a
| higher-dimensional hyperbola would be a "hyperhyperbola".
| itishappy wrote:
| hyperboloid, my day is ruined
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperboloid
| jihadjihad wrote:
| The author of TFA has a couple neat posts about squircles that
| might be of interest, too:
|
| 0: https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2018/02/13/squircle-
| curvature...
|
| 1: https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2019/04/02/history-of-the-
| ter...
| alex-robbins wrote:
| A superellipse is only a squircle if _a_ and _b_ are 1. As with
| squares and rectangles, all squircles are superellipses but not
| all superellipses are squircles.
| hnuser123456 wrote:
| I think the novelty of the article was in the 2nd image, and
| why it's so much less well known. But my theory is there are
| not as many applications for symmetrical curvy lines that
| diverge than symmetrical curvy lines that converge.
| nlawalker wrote:
| Yeah that bit was funny to me. "I'm not sure why closed
| shapes are so ubiquitous and pairs of diverging lines
| aren't."
| BrenBarn wrote:
| > The name is also off-putting: juxtaposing super and hyper
| sounds silly. The etymology makes sense, even if it sounds funny.
| Piet Hein used the prefix super- to refer to increasing the
| exponent from the usual value of 2. Its unfortunate that
| hyperbola begins with a root that is similar to super.
|
| How about just "superbola"? :-)
| munchler wrote:
| > It's not clear why the superellipse would be common and the
| superhyperbola obscure
|
| I think the explanation is pretty obvious: The hyperbola itself
| is way more obscure than the ellipse to begin with, so it's not
| surprising that hyperbola variations are also obscure.
| 1970-01-01 wrote:
| Super-hyper-bola: the unstoppable bola. It's ARCH nemesis?
| Mathman.
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_One_Television#"Mathman...
|
| https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQYdOIKzgOwDk-QXhRVDz...
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-03-28 23:00 UTC)