[HN Gopher] The Lost Towers of the Guelph-Ghibelline Wars
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Lost Towers of the Guelph-Ghibelline Wars
        
       Author : wallflower
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2025-03-23 12:58 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.exurbe.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.exurbe.com)
        
       | DeathArrow wrote:
       | >Wealthy families built these as mini-fortresses within the city,
       | where they could defend against riots, enemy families
       | 
       | They needed some mini-fortresses, but why build them in the form
       | of a tower? They could have built a secure, easy to defend
       | structure less tall.
       | 
       | Maybe they've built them for showing off, the taller the
       | building, the higher the prestige? At least, that is the reason
       | we have skyscrapers.
        
         | dexwiz wrote:
         | Gotta be taller than the tallest ladder would be my guess.
         | Tower forts are common. You can find them in places like
         | Ireland also.
        
           | trhway wrote:
           | in a dense city you also have to take into account the height
           | of the neighboring towers too - you don't want to be showered
           | with arrows and later musket balls from a higher tower near
           | by - thus race to the top :)
        
             | achenet wrote:
             | yep. From reading Bret Devereaux's Acoup.blog, I've learned
             | that especially with arrows, height is an advantage - if
             | you're firing down on someone from a position above them,
             | you can aim easier, and your arrow is accelerated by
             | gravity. Conversely, if you're firing up at someone from a
             | position below them, gravity is working against you, and
             | it's harder to aim.
             | 
             | This is why they build seige towers back in the day - to
             | give the attackers a position higher than the beseiged
             | city's walls from which to fire down on the defenders.
        
         | dmbche wrote:
         | "Signs of wealth and prestige, these all-stone buildings were
         | also fireproof, leading to a terrible but effective tactic:
         | take your family, treasures & goods up into your tower then set
         | fire to enemies' homes and let the city burn around you while
         | you sit safe above. This was VERY BAD for cities."
         | 
         | I'd want to stay as far away as possible from the fire I guess.
         | 
         | Also, it seems to be quite a busy city - presumably they
         | weren't necessarily able to acquire more land to make an actual
         | fortification and are stuck with a fixed perimeter, the only
         | place to go is up.
        
         | toyg wrote:
         | Although an element of prestige was obviously there, they went
         | high also for the usual reason: cost. Italian cities like
         | Firenze and Bologna, at the time, were among the richest in the
         | world, and real-estate costs were sky-high. Buying land to
         | erect some wall or other fortification, in the middle of the
         | city, would have been a huge waste of money.
         | 
         | Even roman popes, when they decided they wanted a fortified
         | structure, just reused the roman-era mausoleum of Hadrian -
         | building from scratch would have been prohibitively costly.
        
       | DrSiemer wrote:
       | Is there any historical data to support the height of the towers
       | in the first image? It looks like at least some of that is
       | leaning on an artistic license.
        
         | toyg wrote:
         | There are documents from the time and even paintings from later
         | times, supporting these projections. You can see a partial list
         | of the towers that have since disappeared here :
         | https://www.torridibologna.it/torri-scomparse/ . There were
         | probably more that we just don't have documents for.
         | 
         | Dante famously described Bologna as _selva turrita_ , a forest
         | of towers. It really was as crowded as that.
        
         | gg80 wrote:
         | Looking at this picture [1] of Bologna's skyline from the
         | sixties it seems it could be pretty realistic. The skyline has
         | changed drastically and now you have many more tall buildings
         | that make the remaining tower seems shorter. Also, I think the
         | strangeness of the picture is due to the number of towers, but
         | afaik there were around 100 towers in the city in the 13th
         | century.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torri_di_Bologna#/media/File...
        
         | IlPeach wrote:
         | Someone did look into exactly that. There is no supporting
         | document regarding the actual height. And it does look like it
         | is exaggerated for impact purposes. So they did have towers,
         | they were clearly higher than the rest of the other
         | buildings... Might have been this tall? Maybe. Or maybe not.
        
           | timcobb wrote:
           | What are you referring to? Who looked into it? Are you citing
           | something?
        
             | recursivecaveat wrote:
             | I think they might be referring to this video?
             | https://youtu.be/ikg3-GQLg3g They traveled to the city and
             | spoke to an actual historian on the matter. The "more
             | accurate" model appears in the last 20s of the video if you
             | are just curious about what our best guess of the actual
             | appearance of the city is.
        
         | epolanski wrote:
         | I don't know how tall are those in the first image, but
         | consider that several towers reach beyond 300 feet (90 meters
         | today), and documents point out that few reached beyond 330 in
         | middle ages.
        
         | damnitbuilds wrote:
         | [edit]
         | 
         | This, existing, tower appear to approximate the height of those
         | in that image:
         | 
         | https://static.bolognawelcome.com/immagini/bb/ec/bd/1b/20220...
        
       | trhway wrote:
       | reminds Yemen tower houses
       | 
       | https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20211004-yemens-ancient-s...
       | 
       | Also Georgian tower houses
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svan_towers
        
         | zby wrote:
         | :) I was just to add these.
         | 
         | I visited the Georgian ones - they really look otherwordly -
         | some towns are packed with them.
        
       | toyg wrote:
       | _> Bologna is famous for still having two intact towers_
       | 
       | Famous fact but actually incorrect: there are many more, they're
       | just a bit more difficult to spot than the two central ones.
       | 
       | In total there are 22 towers still standing in some form, and
       | (iirc) about 7 of them are still their original height.
       | 
       | https://www.bolognawelcome.com/en/blog/not-just-the-two-towe...
        
       | internet_points wrote:
       | Oh I could spend ages on this blog.
       | 
       | Interesting that the main reason they went away was coordinated
       | effort to halt a race towards the bottom (or top, as the case may
       | be). Medieval society was also able to work towards a common
       | good.
        
         | ErigmolCt wrote:
         | Makes you wonder what modern urban planning could learn from a
         | bunch of 13th-century Italians with too many towers
        
         | rsynnott wrote:
         | > Medieval society was also able to work towards a common good.
         | 
         | I'm not sure that they'd have thought of it quite in those
         | terms, but yeah, restrictions on private ownership of castles,
         | and destruction of said castles, is basically as old as
         | castles, and these towers are, functionally, really just a
         | special case of castles.
        
         | toyg wrote:
         | It's a bit more complicated than that.
         | 
         | Firenze went through several waves of
         | 
         | 1. being ruled by a certain noble family, usually with French
         | or Papal connections
         | 
         | 2. a rebellion happens; a new "communal" government sees other
         | nobles and the merchant class rule together for a short period
         | 
         | 3. one noble family rises to the top again, or the city gets
         | reconquered by the old family
         | 
         | 4. rinse and repeat
         | 
         | The development of new towers was blocked during one of those
         | briefs interreigns, more specifically a situations where _both_
         | main factions from the nobility were absent from the city, busy
         | fighting a war among themselves in the nearby regions.
         | 
         | Later, when one of the factions had come back into the city and
         | emerged as winner, they destroyed their enemies' towers. Such
         | enemies inevitably came back stronger, retook the city, and
         | destroyed the left-over towers. By that point, towers were
         | clearly not enough to ensure safety (because conflicts now
         | involved pretty large armies), so nobody tried to rebuild them.
         | 
         | Meanwhile, nearby San Gimignano was remote enough to not be
         | periodically invaded, so their towers survived largely
         | unscathed.
        
       | ErigmolCt wrote:
       | I had no idea just how many of those rough-stone "chunks"
       | embedded in Italian city blocks were actually the stubs of
       | medieval towers
        
         | epolanski wrote:
         | I'm from Rome area (now I live in Colonna, 40km from Rome
         | center) and the number of places I lived or people I know live
         | which is directly connected/built along/into over ancient roman
         | stuff is quite huge.
         | 
         | When I lived in Ostiense area, the basement of the building
         | where we held bikes and stuff was an ancient roman storage
         | facility from first century BC, the building was built over it.
         | Same stones and everything!
         | 
         | When I lived in Colli Albani area (out of the ancient city
         | perimeter and 5 mile-ish from downtown) the building was built
         | around an ancient, still functioning acqueduct.
         | 
         | Where I live now, which is in the country side, my neighbor
         | while building a new house found a Christian church from the
         | 2nd century.
        
           | regularfry wrote:
           | Istanbul is similar.
        
             | epolanski wrote:
             | I don't have a hard time believing this, because you hardly
             | find all that medieval/ancient stuff on the ground level
             | 
             | That was probably the thing that disappointed me more
             | visiting Istanbul, considering it's insane history I
             | expected way more traces of it's ancient and medieval ages,
             | but since the Ottoman rebuilt the city few times and people
             | built house after house on top of ancient stuff I can't lie
             | I was disappointed.
        
       | lucidguppy wrote:
       | I wonder if there's a D&D setting like this.
        
       | gostsamo wrote:
       | Want to mention the excellent care given to the alt text of the
       | images.
        
       | libraryofbabel wrote:
       | Blog is by historian Ada Palmer, who also wrote some quite
       | successful sci-fi that was a finalist for the Hugo Award for Best
       | Novel: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_Like_the_Lightning .
       | How she finds the time while also teaching as a professor at
       | Chicago I do not know.
        
         | rvb wrote:
         | One of my all-time favorite essays is by the same author: "The
         | Shape of Rome" --
         | 
         | https://www.exurbe.com/the-shape-of-rome/
        
           | fanf2 wrote:
           | Also very good is "The Scariest Library"
           | https://www.exurbe.com/the-scariest-library/
        
         | roughly wrote:
         | Oh shit, I didn't catch the name - strongly recommend that
         | whole series. It's one of the most wildly inventive sci-fi
         | series I've read in a long time.
        
           | henrebotha wrote:
           | It's batshit insane and truly without equal. One of the best
           | things I've ever read.
        
       | intrasight wrote:
       | Been to these places and never knew this history.
       | 
       | I'll also add that the medieval city of Lucca has several great
       | towers that you can climb.
        
       | YeGoblynQueenne wrote:
       | When your eyes buzz like flies it's a moire.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-03-25 23:02 UTC)