[HN Gopher] Brain Scans of Infants Reveal the Moment We Start Ma...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Brain Scans of Infants Reveal the Moment We Start Making Memories
        
       Author : Brajeshwar
       Score  : 113 points
       Date   : 2025-03-21 16:32 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (singularityhub.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (singularityhub.com)
        
       | ofrzeta wrote:
       | the truth is the scans "offer some intriguing clues" but future
       | studies "might shed light on the minimal brain architecture
       | needed to support vivid autobiographical memories."
        
       | CarRamrod wrote:
       | >Failure of any of these steps [encoding, long-term etching, and
       | recall of memory] causes amnesia. So, which steps are responsible
       | for the erosion of baby memories?
       | 
       | >Who knows! Kids squirm around too much in MRI machines! But they
       | start encoding things around a year, or maybe before, or maybe
       | after!
       | 
       | I've been clickbaited
        
         | larodi wrote:
         | total clickbait, indeed, author makes no substantial claims of
         | any sort.
        
         | Dylan16807 wrote:
         | That is not an accurate summary. The article clearly discusses
         | how they limited squirming enough to gather actual data.
        
           | catlikesshrimp wrote:
           | A Very long time average, by the way. 8 minutes is a long
           | time for a baby to stay at once: not squirming, not upset,
           | not touching mother and awake.
        
           | CarRamrod wrote:
           | i'll let you go ahead and explain how they controlled for
           | squirming, I'm interested
        
             | Retric wrote:
             | They presumably don't have any extra information except
             | what's in the article which said they "often squirmed"
             | rather than always, which means simply repeating the
             | process enough gives times when they didn't.
             | 
             | If you want technique: "infants were _ to reduce movement."
             | 
             | If you missed what was in the blank you might want to
             | reread to see what else you missed.
        
             | ziddoap wrote:
             | You can find the answer in this link:
             | 
             | https://singularityhub.com/2025/03/20/new-baby-brain-
             | scans-r...
        
         | SwtCyber wrote:
         | Haha, fair... there's definitely a bit of "science marches
         | forward... sort of!" energy here
        
       | locallost wrote:
       | I didn't read the article, but when I got kids I was surprised
       | they can actually remember for a very long time. Both of my kids
       | could at e.g. 3 remember things that happened a year earlier,
       | which still surprised me with the younger one. There was however
       | a point when the older one could no longer remember some things
       | from the past, as if there was a cutoff line to a previous life
       | and he had transitioned into a new phase of his life.
        
         | leoedin wrote:
         | That's been my observation too. My completely amateur theory is
         | that a young child's perception of the world - their ability to
         | contextualise what they're looking at - changes so much that
         | even if those old memories are still hanging around, they don't
         | really make sense any more. It's more like a sliding window
         | than a hard cutoff.
        
           | giancarlostoro wrote:
           | I read a similar discussion here on HN before and the
           | explanation that its how our brain decodes memories shifting
           | over time really hit me. I have a theory that if that in fact
           | is the case, then things like journaling would help to retain
           | memories in a superior way, since we can review such things
           | as our encoding changes and retain it while we can still
           | decode. Even if we dont remember it as richly though we will
           | still be able to go back to a journal to remember something
           | at a bare minimum.
        
         | magicalhippo wrote:
         | I don't know what the state-of-the-art is, but there was some
         | work done that suggested that memories are formed encoded in
         | the language you know at the time of formation.
         | 
         | I dug up some of this a while back[1].
         | 
         | My dad, who taught our language to immigrants, mentioned that
         | it was known in that field that immigrants who lost their
         | native language would also lose a lot of the knowledge they had
         | from their home country, like stuff taught at schools.
         | 
         | Thus the memories might be there, one just can't make sense of
         | them anymore and so they become forgotten.
         | 
         | [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37204047
        
           | sideshowb wrote:
           | I suspect it goes deeper than language even. We have
           | associative memories, right? Given our learning, modelling,
           | pigeonholing of the world along with our changing bodies, our
           | older selves are unlikely to experience anything close enough
           | to what our younger selves experienced to trigger that
           | association and recall the memory.
        
             | amanaplanacanal wrote:
             | I'm approaching 70, and my mental model is that the graph
             | is getting so big that it's getting harder to navigate
             | through it to the memories I'm looking for.
        
           | petemir wrote:
           | I'm currently finishing the related work of my PhD thesis
           | which deals with memory, so I want to chime in to say that
           | some studies [2] have tested this, i.e. that memory recall is
           | tied to the linguistic environment in which the learning took
           | place.
           | 
           | [0] https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1242
           | 
           | [1] https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.129.3.361
           | 
           | [2] Nevertheless, I am usually dubious about multiple
           | experiments confirming related things from the same
           | author(s).
        
             | giancarlostoro wrote:
             | I think I read here on HN a theory that memories are like
             | encoded and as we grow the encoding changes and we forget
             | how to access certain memories, this was a theory of
             | course. Probably explains people with Dementia (I think?)
             | where they randomly remember something and a ton of joy
             | rushes them, but they also get very confused as well,
             | probably trying to decode memories but they cannot, they
             | instead seem to ramble and get angry.
             | 
             | I dont remember the thread but the context I think was
             | regarding reading memories digitally somehow.
             | 
             | I am slowly becoming convinced of this the more I hear
             | about it. We encode and store memories, we decode them, but
             | as we grow and adapt our thinking, we forget. I wonder if
             | revisiting memories often enough will reencode them before
             | they are lost?
        
               | magicalhippo wrote:
               | > I wonder if revisiting memories often enough will
               | reencode them before they are lost?
               | 
               | There's work that suggests our memories are kinda like
               | magnetic core memory[1] in that a read operation is
               | destructive and requires a rewrite.
               | 
               | I heard about it in the context of phobia therapy, where
               | participants would get some drug that for a short term
               | prevented new memories from forming, and then exposing
               | them to their phobia. That would trigger a recall but not
               | the rewrite thanks to the drug, and after just a couple
               | of such sessions their phobia would be gone as there was
               | nothing to recall.
               | 
               | I have a couple of distinct but mundane memories from
               | early childhood, when I was 1-2 years old. I'm nearing my
               | 50s and they're not nearly as vivid now as when I was a
               | teenager say, but I've long suspected that the reason I
               | can still relive them is because I kept recalling those
               | moments.
               | 
               | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | I've heard of beta blockers, specifically propranolol,
               | being used in this way in an experimental PTSD therapy
               | protocol, I think back in the 80s or 90s. It didn't seem
               | to go anywhere, or at least I stopped hearing about it.
               | 
               | This 2016 metareview suggests the reason is insufficient
               | evidence of efficacy, for that and a couple of other
               | anxiety indications:
               | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4724794/
        
               | petemir wrote:
               | > I dont remember the thread but the context I think was
               | regarding reading memories digitally somehow.
               | 
               | Funnily enough, apparently the language in the different
               | parts of memory process (i.e. encoding+storage+retrieval)
               | stems exactly from "digital computer memory" :),
               | psychologists in the 40s/50s looked at the development of
               | computers and started making analogies with the brain.
               | 
               | > I wonder if revisiting memories often enough will
               | reencode them before they are lost?
               | 
               | Well, you have Ebbinghaus' forgetting curve, which shows
               | how (in this case, semantic) memory decays with time but,
               | with rehearsal, the memory trace (i.e. the neural
               | substrate) gets "stronger" ("neurons that wire together
               | fire together") and lasts longer in memory.
               | 
               | There are multiple types of "forgetting" (Schacter's "The
               | Seven Sins of Memory"), what we usually mean by it is the
               | "transience sin", i.e. forgetting because of elapsed
               | time. There are several views why it happens, mainly
               | storage failure, i.e. that memory trace getting weaker,
               | or retrieval failure, being unable to get the right
               | "memory cue" to retrieve that memory.
               | 
               | So, probably, if you start associating one particular [0]
               | cue with the memory, and training that over time, yes, it
               | should be possible to not-lose the memory (I don't think
               | it will help with Alzheimer's, though).
               | 
               | The funny thing is that every time you retrieve a memory
               | from long-term storage, it gets re-encoded before it goes
               | back to storage so, basically, every time you remember
               | you are modifying the memory a bit with your current
               | biases (another sin!), thus also forgetting :).
               | 
               | [0] And choosing the best cue is already a hard topic, as
               | it should be different enough as to not trigger many
               | different memories ("cue overload principle" from
               | Surprenant and Neath's "principles of memory"), and the
               | memory should be not so different enough that you may get
               | the risk of other singular memories interfering with it.
        
               | quesera wrote:
               | > _every time you retrieve a memory from long-term
               | storage, it gets re-encoded before it goes back to
               | storage_
               | 
               | I don't know how literal you're being (e.g. read once,
               | fully overwrite previous), but it's a good model for
               | "reinterpreting past events, with a new perspective".
               | 
               | This may be a tool/strategy for therapists -- I've spent
               | zero hours in clinical psychology classes.
               | 
               | But anecdotally, very few people are open to reflecting
               | on past events with greater charity for the remembered
               | villain of the story. :)
        
             | light_hue_1 wrote:
             | The explanation can't be that neat. You can have a stroke
             | and lose language and still retain and form memories. Maybe
             | there's a subtle effect but that's very different.
        
               | petemir wrote:
               | > The explanation can't be that neat.
               | 
               | It's not an absolute, I was telling OP that, in fact,
               | there was some research on what he mentioned. Basically,
               | that memory is linguistic-context dependent, but as a
               | subset of cognitive-context dependent (as well as
               | physiological-, affective-, and several types of
               | context). This doesn't mean that memories are ONLY linked
               | to language, they have lots of different associations,
               | things that work as a cue of the memory, this (language)
               | is only one of them.
               | 
               | > You can have a stroke and lose language and still
               | retain and form memories.
               | 
               | What does it mean to "lose language"? Are you unable to
               | speak, to express yourself, to comprehend others, all
               | together? What memories do you retain and form? Are you
               | talking about semantic memories, or episodic memories?
               | How do you measure that those memories are retained and
               | formed, if you cannot test the subject due to the
               | impossibility of communication?
               | 
               | It's a lot more difficult than absolutist statements.
               | 
               | Edit: typo (thinks->things)
        
           | ben_w wrote:
           | Huh. I know very little on this topic, and am pattern-
           | matching that to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.
        
           | boilerupnc wrote:
           | Interesting. I wonder how this relates with my anecdotal
           | observation that my aging immigrant parents and their
           | similarly aged friends increasingly rely and use the language
           | of their youth found in the home vs what they learned in
           | school and used in their adopted country and while raising
           | us. Are old encodings being rediscovered and decoded? Or is
           | there a degradation in the power of their decoder and so it
           | is slowly going back to a foundational level? Fascinating
           | stuff.
        
         | SwtCyber wrote:
         | It's like there's a window where early memories seem pretty
         | solid, and then suddenly parts of that window just vanish
        
           | sdiupIGPWEfh wrote:
           | I'd go so far as to liken it to a series of memory wipes
           | between age 3 to 4. Memory otherwise appears to function
           | quite fine, from day to day and year to year, but then large
           | blocks all vanish in rapid succession.
           | 
           | Also interesting, as the article alludes to, is that
           | infantile amnesia seems specifically related to episodic
           | memory. Motor skills, language, and other learning obviously
           | survives.
        
         | rng-concern wrote:
         | I might be misremembering, but talking with a friend years ago
         | he was talking about a "New Scientist" article that described
         | how the brain is flushed/cleaned of most memories at age 4 and
         | again at age 7. Or something like that.
         | 
         | I was also surprised with my kids at 4-5 remembering when they
         | were 3 or so, but now those memories seem to be completely, or
         | near completely gone (at age 10). Perhaps they are just
         | remembering the remembrance.
        
         | vel0city wrote:
         | I experienced this with my older child. Ever since he could
         | begin to talk he seemed to have exceptional memory, seemingly
         | recalling things from even before he had words to describe
         | them. But somewhere between 3 and 4 it's like there's been some
         | culling of memories where a lot of things he would have known
         | if you asked him on this third birthday he's seemingly
         | forgotten by his 4th.
         | 
         | Not enough to be concerned of any cognitive things, and he
         | still otherwise seems to have an excellent memory.
        
           | Buttons840 wrote:
           | My child, at 8 or 9, remembered a game I used to play that
           | scared her when she was 2 or 3. At 10 she could no longer
           | remember the game.
        
         | naikrovek wrote:
         | yeah i think enough rewiring and adaptation happens in the
         | brain that the older memories are still around but are no
         | longer stored in the way the brain needs them to be stored in
         | to be accessible at an older age, or something like that. they
         | become inaccessible as the brain matures its ability to
         | remember effectively.
         | 
         | anyone with kids knows that children remember all kinds of
         | things, very, very early. habits, games, routines, schedules,
         | things like that. these things are almost never able to be
         | recalled later in life but they become part of your psyche
         | somehow. for example you will often feel comforted when they
         | are repeated later and you feel a bit "off" when they are done
         | differently, even as an adult. I think a lot of parenting
         | instinct is actually rooted in this kind of memory. The
         | inclination to raise your children as you yourself were raised.
        
       | milesrout wrote:
       | I can remember very vividly experiences that cannot have happened
       | after I turned 2.
       | 
       | It is nice to have something I can show people when this
       | infrequently comes up, because I have had people insist that
       | these must be false memories, as children cannot form memories
       | before 3. Or before 5. Or in one case, before 10? Like what?
        
         | sethammons wrote:
         | I've had people full on state as fact children can't recall
         | anything before age [4-7]. 10? Wow haha.
         | 
         | My earliest memory is at around 18mo. When I was nearly a
         | father myself, I told my mom of my early memory and she
         | remembered it too and told me how old I was.
         | 
         | My kids, especially the first, would routinely recall things
         | when she was 3 that happened when she was 2 or slightly
         | younger. I can recall thinking, "I barely remember that, how
         | the heck do you remember that!?" However, she had forgotten
         | most of those early early memories a few years later.
        
           | porridgeraisin wrote:
           | > 18mo
           | 
           | I wonder if it's something to do with the memory being
           | reinforced (maybe in surprising ways). E.g one of the
           | memories I have from around a similar time is me receiving a
           | toy gift (video memory) . It makes for a decent display item
           | and has been kept out in one bedroom or the other in every
           | house my family lived in since. So I would have seen it every
           | now and then throughout my childhood. Perhaps, this
           | reinforcement can occur in other, more non-obvious ways in a
           | child's brain, offering a similar explanation for your
           | experience.
        
             | quesera wrote:
             | It's surely true that a memory fragment can be kept alive
             | or reinforced by stories or physical tokens (objects,
             | photographs). This can be true of a high-fidelity "correct"
             | memory as well as of a sketchy incorrect one!
             | 
             | It's also well-established that "memories" can be
             | purposefully _created_ by the application of the same
             | tools.
        
         | CarRamrod wrote:
         | How vivid are we talking, on a scale of 1 to Young Sheldon?
         | https://youtu.be/od6Zq5T57R0?&t=26
        
         | dsego wrote:
         | But it becomes all so elusive when you grow older. I remember
         | remembering moments before I could speak or walk, but I think
         | those memories were clearer when I was a little kid (I'm 40
         | now). Too bad I didn't write them down back then. Things like
         | trying to utter a word but parents giving up before I could
         | produce the sound, or using a baby walker (those were a thing
         | in the late 80s). I think I have a picture in my mind of a
         | scene where my little brother was just born and I was 1 year
         | old, but my mother says it couldn't have happened like that, so
         | it might be my memory or hers that's playing tricks. But for
         | some memories it's also hard for me to determine whether they
         | are confabulations from stories I've heard and pictures I've
         | seen, or happened later than I think, eg. at age 5-6 instead of
         | 2-3.
        
         | dfawcus wrote:
         | Likewise. I have a handful of memories from between 18 and 24
         | months.
         | 
         | I know they're from that period, as they relate to a place
         | where my parents lived at that time.
        
         | sersi wrote:
         | My parents moved when I was 3 and an half. I remember
         | distinctly our previous house. I described (much later) to my
         | parents the layout and the colors of different rooms and they
         | were shocked that I could remember.
         | 
         | My 3.5 years old son, still remembers things that happened when
         | he was 2 (visit to disney land for example). But I think it's
         | maybe a bit different nowadays because we have a lot more
         | photos that might help him form and recall his memories
         | compared to when I was a child in the 80s.
        
           | vel0city wrote:
           | Nearly all my memories I have from when I was 2-3 years old
           | were reinforced by having photos from around the time that I
           | looked at as I grew up. Like I remember painting cabinets
           | with my dad as a toddler as they prepared the house to move,
           | and I have photos of the kitchen before the cabinets were
           | painted. I have memories of the move, and I have photos
           | related to the move as well.
           | 
           | I remember being frustrated in a 4th of July bike parade as a
           | small child, as I had lots of long ribbons off the handlebars
           | which I kept getting tangled up in on the bike with training
           | wheels. We had a photo of me on the bike in that parade. I
           | probably couldn't tell you anything else about that parade,
           | but I do remember how annoying those ribbons getting wrapped
           | around me and the sweat and heat of the day.
        
         | giancarlostoro wrote:
         | My daughter remembered the names of all her daycare friends not
         | long after turning one. They always took their shoes off, and
         | she would tell the adults whose shoe it was immediately. At 2
         | she would say things like "I fell I got booboo" referring to
         | having fallen at Daycare during playtime. Its really funny
         | because she can recollect some things but others like what you
         | just told her are completely alien. I wonder if it has to do
         | moreso with physical events being easier for her to describe vs
         | trying to summarize my grown up words so she can relay them
         | back. As she gets older repeating more complex sentences and
         | fully understanding them will be easier for her to store.
         | 
         | I wonder if this is why smell helps to reactivate memories,
         | your ability to recollect smells is probably the more
         | consistent way to retain memories.
        
         | jajko wrote:
         | Yeah I don't have a lot of early childhood memories that
         | probably aren't just re-creation of things I see in old photos,
         | but one memory stands out - my late uncle leaning over stroller
         | I was in, me getting properly scared of his mustache and
         | starting crying.
         | 
         | I mean stroller where infants lie flat down and have this
         | canopy above head, sorry don't know exact english term. Can't
         | be more than 1 year in any normal case, I was a tall child.
         | 
         | But then again who knows, maybe its a memory of a dream
         | experienced later. Our mind is a weird place, and
         | subconsciousness is making various cleaning activities and
         | modifications to make us feel better about ourselves (something
         | I try to fight consciously to remember things as they truly
         | were with all the warts and all, but it ain't easy).
        
           | boomboomsubban wrote:
           | >But then again who knows, maybe its a memory of a dream
           | experienced late
           | 
           | Or that sounds like the kind of event your uncle would tell
           | you about when you were a few years older. Probably every
           | time he saw you. I know I have several childhood stories I've
           | heard so many times they feel like memories.
        
         | bildung wrote:
         | There's research that has shown that stress in the early years
         | of life delays development of the hippocampus - and without
         | sufficiently developed hippocampus you can't have these kinds
         | of memories.
         | 
         | So the generalization ("all kids") is wrong, but _some_ people,
         | being exposed to toxins or stress sources (fetal alcohol
         | syndrome, cigarettes, lead, premature birth, asthma, ...), can
         | really only develop memories later. 10 years is a bit much,
         | though...
        
       | SwtCyber wrote:
       | Curious to see if future studies tie this in with memory
       | consolidation during sleep
        
       | dwighttk wrote:
       | Brain scans are like those scientists putting together the
       | iguanodon skeleton... we may eventually get to a likely story but
       | we're gonna spend a lot of time on to be discredited
        
       | hnpolicestate wrote:
       | I have two early childhood memories.
       | 
       | I remember a brief moment standing in my crib during the morning.
       | And a dream I had in Pre-K where my pre -k teacher was the moon
       | above me at night. Pretty early memory?
        
         | Workaccount2 wrote:
         | People might call BS on this, but I can recall the full layout
         | of the home I lived in until I was 2 (to the shock of my family
         | when I laid it all out). I have a memory from my first birthday
         | as well. There are many people who have legitimate memories
         | from very early on.
        
       | bildung wrote:
       | "The early years are chaotic. The brain undergoes extensive
       | rewiring. This makes it a difficult to form lasting memories."
       | 
       | That is reduced too much from the actual state of research,
       | presumably for the sake of accessibility. We obviously already
       | learn before the hippocampus starts to really develop (18-24
       | months). But what episodic memory means is that the learned
       | things have no episodic context, i.e. they are learned and
       | applied more broadly, not just in the situation where they were
       | learned in the first place. Learning in the early years isn't
       | "chaotic", it is just very generalized.
        
       | drooby wrote:
       | Something must be slightly unusual about me.. because I have
       | retained some very early memories..
       | 
       | I have confirmed with my parents the placement and orientation of
       | my crib. I can tell you the exact process that my parents
       | performed to change my diaper. I remember being bathed in my tub
       | with my toys.. list goes on. These are visual memories, I can see
       | them right now. I'm nearly certain they are real.. it's possible
       | my brain has made some up, but I've confirmed enough with my
       | parents that I feel confident that they are real.
       | 
       | I swear I remember waking up in the middle of the night once in
       | my crib.. heart beating out of my chest.. I was really scared of
       | something.. and I just remember this pure consciousness ..
       | staring up into the darkness. Same consciousness I have now.
        
         | deepsun wrote:
         | A lot of early memories are induced, e.g. parents told you a
         | story, and your brain "fills it up", so you think it's your own
         | memory, but it's actually more of imagination. Or you imagined
         | where the crib were, and parents confirmed, so you think you
         | remembered.
         | 
         | Watching crime witness testimonies reveals how much we actually
         | imagine, not remember.
        
           | netsharc wrote:
           | I've wondered whether one can train a child to remember
           | things by recalling things that happened to them repeatedly,
           | but I guess it will create such an induction. And they don't
           | even have language to understand "Remember Monday, 2 days
           | ago, grandma visited.".
           | 
           | And perhaps under a certain age, the brain really has no
           | programming to store anything as memories...
        
             | dhosek wrote:
             | It's actually remarkably easy to induce false memories in
             | people. There's substantial research on this.
        
         | gambiting wrote:
         | >>I have confirmed with my parents the placement and
         | orientation of my crib
         | 
         | Is there _any_ way you have seen those things in some of the
         | old family pictures? Because I know I am definitely guilty of
         | that, I can _swear_ I remember bits from my family 's trip to
         | Pompeii when I Was 2 years old, not much but little bits here
         | and there, and only when I was older I noticed that what I
         | remember is suspiciously similar to what my mum has in the
         | family album from that trip(which I most likely would have seen
         | as a child too).
         | 
         | In fact I worry about it with my own son now, I don't think
         | he'll be able to tell the difference between his own memories
         | and things he has seen in 1000s of pictures and videos I have
         | been taking since he was born.
        
           | davidgay wrote:
           | > Because I know I am definitely guilty of that, I can swear
           | I remember bits from my family's trip to Pompeii when I Was 2
           | years old, not much but little bits here and there, and only
           | when I was older I noticed that what I remember is
           | suspiciously similar to what my mum has in the family album
           | from that trip(which I most likely would have seen as a child
           | too).
           | 
           | Maybe in a sense, both are true? When you saw the photos as a
           | child, you did remember them then, but that's what reinforced
           | those memories enough that you now remember them?
           | 
           | Similar to 'remembering that you remembered X', even though
           | you don't directly remember X now.
        
         | mushroomba wrote:
         | Other commenters are trying to gaslight you into believing this
         | isn't possible, but I also have a memory from before I could
         | walk.
         | 
         | I was lying on the floor, contemplating a toy that had been
         | hung above my head, when someone who was not one of my parents
         | came to pick me up.
         | 
         | Years later, I told my mother about this. She then searched
         | through the family film archive, and found the moment in
         | question. The person who picked me up was my uncle.
         | 
         | This was not a film we had watched before, it came about
         | because I was discussing with my mother our earliest memories.
        
           | boomboomsubban wrote:
           | You have one memory of all the time before you could walk,
           | and it just so happens to have been caught on film? You don't
           | find that suspicious?
        
           | marliechiller wrote:
           | Seems farfetched to believe that you happened to have the
           | exact moment you discuss on video
        
           | drooby wrote:
           | Haha yeah, I am used to the skepticism.. I've thought about
           | this a lot. There are so many things I've confirmed that
           | aren't in photographs or stories I've been told that it seems
           | to be real.
           | 
           | I also have aphantasia, I have wondered if my lack of
           | visualization has somehow empowered my long-term memory. I
           | rely on memory for "visualizing" things.
        
         | verbify wrote:
         | I'm the opposite. I started making memories very late - I have
         | only the vaguest memories of primary school. I think I formed
         | long-term memories at around 10 years old.
        
       | hereme888 wrote:
       | This supports the observations made by Dr. Piotr Wozniak,
       | inventor of spaced-repetition algorithms, from anonymous data
       | gathered from users of all ages: children up to around age 7 have
       | poorer-memory than adults because their brains are focused on
       | rewiring.
        
       | sidewndr46 wrote:
       | oh boy! another brain imaging story. I wonder if they can also
       | identify the moment trout start making memories?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-03-25 23:02 UTC)