[HN Gopher] Goblin.tools: simple, single-task tools to help neur...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Goblin.tools: simple, single-task tools to help neurodivergent
       people with tasks
        
       Author : ValentineC
       Score  : 263 points
       Date   : 2025-03-24 14:15 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (goblin.tools)
 (TXT) w3m dump (goblin.tools)
        
       | pnutjam wrote:
       | AI backend.
        
         | compootr wrote:
         | vibe coding? nope. 100% vibe life
        
         | wobfan wrote:
         | Hacker News Comment.
        
           | bhollan wrote:
           | Niche meta deep cut quip
        
             | scubbo wrote:
             | Notches
        
       | nailer wrote:
       | I do like the idea, but here is my first experience: I added
       | "Launch MyProjectName website" (using the real name) and here's
       | what it generated as sub tasks:
       | 
       | - Open a web browser
       | 
       | - Type "MyProjectName website" into the search bar
       | 
       | - Press "Enter"
       | 
       | - Locate the official MyProjectName website link in the search
       | results
       | 
       | - Click on the link to access the website
       | 
       | - Wait for the page to load
       | 
       | ------
       | 
       | EDIT:
       | 
       | Rate limited, so to reply: I think most people understand there
       | is a difference between launching a website and viewing a
       | website.
       | 
       | If the AI wanted to know more about my role - whether I am a
       | programmer, a designer, or someone that would use a high level
       | Wix/Squarespace type tool - it should ask me.
        
         | wobfan wrote:
         | I mean this could've happened with a human counterpart too
         | (although, I know, less likely, but still). You probably gotta
         | be at least a little more descriptive and specific about the
         | task.
        
         | ziddoap wrote:
         | I mean, yeah, that makes sense given that you used a 3 word
         | prompt. It doesn't use real magic, despite having "magic" in
         | the name. You should probably give it some more context.
         | 
         | I typed in "get a haircut" and it worked great.
         | 
         | In reply to your edit:
         | 
         | > _I think most people understand there is a difference between
         | launching a website and viewing a website._
         | 
         | I don't think so, at all. Non-tech people at my work come to me
         | and say "I couldn't launch Outlook this morning", or "Google
         | won't launch". They don't mean that they are building an email
         | client or search engine. Most people use "launch" in the non-
         | entrepreneurial way.
        
         | whazor wrote:
         | I tried 'Clean home' and it gave me:
         | 
         | Gather cleaning supplies (broom, mop, vacuum, cleaning
         | solutions, cloths)
         | 
         | Declutter each room by picking up items that don't belong
         | 
         | Dust surfaces such as shelves, tables, and electronics
         | 
         | Wipe down surfaces with appropriate cleaning solutions
         | 
         | Clean glass surfaces and mirrors
         | 
         | Sweep or vacuum all floors
         | 
         | Mop hard floor surfaces
         | 
         | Clean carpets (vacuum or spot clean if necessary)
         | 
         | Freshen up the bathroom (clean toilet, sink, and shower)
         | 
         | Organize items back to their designated places
         | 
         | Take out the trash and recycling
         | 
         | Final walk-through to ensure everything is tidy
        
         | nkrisc wrote:
         | Seems perfectly reasonable, given the prompt.
        
           | nailer wrote:
           | I think most people would consider that launching a website
           | is a separate task from viewing a website.
        
             | wolfgang42 wrote:
             | Most _computer_ people, perhaps. For the average user the
             | difference between an app and a website (especially an app-
             | like website) is much fuzzier, and "launching" an app
             | sounds more technical (and thus more appropriate for an
             | operation that they don't entirely understand) than
             | "opening" it, so that's the word they use.
        
               | nailer wrote:
               | I expect an LLM to be smarter than that, particularly for
               | an audience that frequently works in the technology
               | industry.
        
         | dmos62 wrote:
         | Try "ask a question unambiguously", haha!
        
         | wolfgang42 wrote:
         | I suspect this tool is probably tuned to help with "14-step
         | coffee days"[1] rather than big projects; the list you got is
         | genuinely the more plausibly helpful one for that situation.
         | 
         | [1] https://crafty-
         | butch.tumblr.com/post/638122754578726912/by-w...
        
       | shmageggy wrote:
       | Nice. AI-powered replacement for my missing executive function.
       | Now I just have to remember to use it...
        
       | nonethewiser wrote:
       | Abstract it more.
       | 
       | This is essentially a thin wrapper around an LLM. Hardcoded
       | prompt templates. The value isnt in the template itself, but
       | more-so the _curation_ of the template. So curate better.
       | 
       | Instead of hardcoding the prompt template, allow people to
       | create/share/vote on arbitrary templates. A prompt library of
       | sorts.
        
         | hombre_fatal wrote:
         | Open-ended prompting seems to go against your prescription of
         | more curation. Also, I don't think most people want to think
         | about LLM prompting. The tool should be prompting for me. I
         | think they are going towards the right direction of how to use
         | LLMs, not away from it.
         | 
         | A "break down task into steps" would be a great feature for
         | every todolist app.
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | >Open-ended prompting seems to go against your prescription
           | of more curation
           | 
           | Not at all. There is the selection mechanism and the universe
           | of templates. Both can be greater in a system where there is
           | user creation and voting. Otherwise we're saying Goblin.tools
           | has searched and found the best templates possible. Seems
           | unlikely. And even if true now you dont need Goblin.tools
           | anymore because you have just recreate the static templates.
        
             | zerkten wrote:
             | A problem is that the proposed audience are individuals who
             | struggle with options. Giving them more options doesn't
             | help them. Enabling a power user mode with user creation,
             | voting, etc. would be valuable for others. I suspect
             | template sharing in some situations is problematic because
             | getting great results for an audience can have text which
             | some will find objectionable.
        
       | dbreunig wrote:
       | Nice! Great idea and focus.
       | 
       | I have a similar function built into my app, which takes the
       | proposed name for a checklist and description and uses it to
       | generate steps. Have heard many use it for executive function
       | management: https://steplist.app
        
         | jaggs wrote:
         | Took a look. So annoying that you can't delete any of those
         | lists. What happens if I don't like/drink coffee?
        
           | dbreunig wrote:
           | When you log in you can create your own lists, bookmark ones
           | you might like, and only see the ones you want.
        
       | BaudouinVH wrote:
       | I've ADHD and I'm on the spectrum. Others may differ - it's a
       | spectrum after all- but I feel no list-only app will ever silence
       | the drunk baboon on my shoulder constantly pulling my attention
       | from what I'm doing.
       | 
       | I'd advise goblin.tools to market itself differently and aim for
       | the neurotypical market as well.
       | 
       | #my2cents
        
         | y42 wrote:
         | I second that, I saw a lot, I tried some... most of them are
         | just task planners, but I was always missing same basic
         | features.
        
         | mvieira38 wrote:
         | Yeah, no gameification or breaking down can make doing the
         | dishes or writing documentation more interesting than whatever
         | my interest of the month is, unfortunately. I'd be beyond
         | cooked without medication
        
         | r00fus wrote:
         | I have to say my neurotypical family members love goblin chef
         | tool as well as the spectrum individual.
        
         | dirtyfrenchman wrote:
         | ADHD + spectrum as well. I couldn't agree with this more.
        
         | laurentlbm wrote:
         | There are other tools in the menu.
        
       | stared wrote:
       | I am neurodivergent. Yet, this website (while well-intentioned)
       | feels chaotic, offering too many things (I bet the author is
       | neurodivergent as well :)). So, instead of doing something from
       | the TODO, I want to give the professor mode a try.
       | 
       | In any case, I saw quite a few time something "expanding the
       | list". Usually it works less than anything that actually asks you
       | on the next step - in this case, my go-to are recent LLM models.
       | For example, it split "take out the trash" into 8 steps - quite a
       | lot of detail, even for an autist.
        
       | kixiQu wrote:
       | This is a great use for LLMs because anywhere that they can get
       | someone over the activation energy requirement of the blank page
       | effect, it's okay if they're wrong - it's much easier to correct
       | a wrong broken-down list than start it oneself.
        
         | p_l wrote:
         | One of the bigger uses of Llama I found for myself is throwing
         | a description of email to write, having them generate a
         | skeleton for me, this kickstart enough that I can do a rewrite
         | even when I totally lack the energy to start one.
         | 
         | Sometimes also making them rewrite it in a different style then
         | rewriting that manually again
        
       | huvarda wrote:
       | I asked it to break down eating a pie, this is what I got:
       | 
       | Choose a pie
       | 
       | Gather necessary utensils (fork, plate, napkin)
       | 
       | Place the pie on the plate
       | 
       | Cut a slice of the pie
       | 
       | Pick up the slice with the fork
       | 
       | Bring the slice to your mouth
       | 
       | Take a bite of the pie
       | 
       | Chew and savor the flavor
       | 
       | Repeat until finished
       | 
       | Dispose of any leftovers responsibly
       | 
       | Clean up the utensils and plate
       | 
       | Maybe an absurd example but I feel like something like this makes
       | it seem even more intimidating to do basic tasks
        
         | ziddoap wrote:
         | You can adjust the spiciness level (level of detail) to the
         | right of the prompt.
         | 
         | At the lowest you get                   - Select a pie
         | - Grab a fork or your hands         - Take a piece of the pie
         | - Bring it to your mouth         - Chew and swallow the pie
         | 
         | Still probably a bit much, but I think using a to-do list for
         | eating a pie is also a bit much.
         | 
         | I did "get a haircut" and it was a pretty good breakdown. Same
         | with "Paint a room in my house". I think these types of tasks
         | are more suitable for step-by-step breakdowns than "eat a pie".
        
           | BigGreenJorts wrote:
           | > still probably a bit much
           | 
           | I think what's worse is that it still over detailed the steps
           | but left out the actually additive steps of the OP's list
           | which I would say is the bit about the getting/cleaning the
           | dishes and trash
        
         | n4r9 wrote:
         | If you want to see a _really_ intimidating breakdown, check out
         | Carl Sagan 's approach to baking an apple pie from scratch.
        
         | flobosg wrote:
         | Vaguely related: Julio Cortazar's "Instructions on How to Climb
         | a Staircase" - https://doarchstairs2016.wordpress.com/wp-
         | content/uploads/20...
        
         | sundarurfriend wrote:
         | That sounds perfect to me. Often on low-spoons days, I'll ask
         | ChatGPT to do exactly this, break down a task or recipe into
         | the simplest, concrete steps to be taken. It's meant to be used
         | when your mental energy is low enough that "obvious" things
         | don't seem obvious anymore, and you need them broken down into
         | a form that doesn't assume or ask anything of you.
         | 
         | It's like taking an old school BASIC program and modularising
         | it into small self-contained functions. That may increase the
         | lines of code by a lot, but it still makes it simpler and
         | easier to process because you only need to keep one function in
         | mind at a time.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | It sounds like eating a pie will be a huge pain and I'll give
         | up halfway through it, assuming that I don't get distracted
         | even before.
        
         | edaemon wrote:
         | Hm, these instructions are interesting -- is it suggesting I
         | repeatedly pick up an entire slice of pie with a fork and take
         | bites out of it?
        
       | satisfice wrote:
       | The way it breaks down tasks quickly gets into a rut. If a
       | certain item or context is not available there is no way to
       | suggest that it pop up a level and say how to synthesize it or
       | get to an alternative plan.
       | 
       | Once again, we see that AI stands for automated irresponsibility,
       | not artificial intelligence.
        
       | senkora wrote:
       | I cautiously like this. I asked it to break down "clean the
       | bathroom" and it gave me a reasonable series of steps.
       | 
       | It then gave a time estimate of 3 hours 25 minutes, but I know
       | from my own time tracking that doing a similar series of steps
       | takes me 40 minutes on average.
       | 
       | It seems to overestimate the time taken to do very simple tasks,
       | so if you break the task down too far then it will always wildly
       | overestimate. Perhaps a fix would be to ask the LLM to make one
       | estimate for the overall task, make separate estimates for each
       | subtask, and then ask it to reconcile the two? Something like
       | chain-of-thought/reasoning.
        
       | groby_b wrote:
       | Yeah, randomly AI-generating a large list of imagined sub tasks
       | is _just_ the thing to manage e.g. ADHD.
       | 
       | You want to do this well, lean into pre-defined (and user-
       | defined!) checklists instead. Sure, use AI to help people
       | generate the checklist if you must, but the value is having a
       | repeatable procedure.
        
       | fluidcruft wrote:
       | Haha Magic ToDo is fun. I got a reasonable set of steps for a
       | project and when I'm in the "whatever, just tell me what to do"
       | overwhelmed/surrender mode this would be great. Also love that
       | subtasks can be easily broken down into subsubtasks with a click.
       | 
       | Would love this as a todoist extension for brainstorming
       | subtasks.
        
       | HiPHInch wrote:
       | one of the greatest ai idea on 2025, although the product has its
       | own issues
        
       | bityard wrote:
       | Okay, I wasted a few minutes in The Judge. It's too damn
       | hilarious giving it a passage that insults the reader's mother in
       | fine detail and then having the AI explain very politely and
       | patiently why someone might take offense to that.
        
       | quibono wrote:
       | This could be overgeneralising a bit... but I see a lot of people
       | with ADHD (on- and offline) who tend to make it an essential part
       | of their identity. I realise it's a very impactful thing to have
       | to deal with (I have ADHD too) but I feel like a lot of the time
       | it's brought up for no real reason. E.g. you started daydreaming
       | when reading a book? Forgot something to do when you walked
       | through a doorway? Got angry? You lost track of what you were
       | thinking about? Must be the ADHD. There are YouTube channels
       | whose whole gimmick is that they're run by and for people with
       | ADHD. And guess what kind of content you'll see there: "Why
       | cooking with ADHD is hell", "How ADHD can make you lie", "Music
       | for people with ADHD". What happened to "music for
       | concentration"? HN is a place where I see this play out a lot.
        
         | bluedino wrote:
         | Similar things exist for dyslexia, introverts, etc
        
         | dijit wrote:
         | It's likely a definitive example of selection bias, you won't
         | hear people _not_ talking about having it, but ADHD affects
         | (approximately) 30% of the population.
         | 
         | Assuming even a tiny amount of those are loud when exploring
         | their discovery would mean a _lot_ of people talking about it
         | online.
         | 
         | This is likely also combined with Millennials (my cohort at
         | least) being one of the most self-aware generational cohorts in
         | history (while also being a tad self-centered).
         | 
         | I have my own journey with ADHD ("many markers" but no official
         | diagnosis, as that could negatively affect my life in Sweden)
         | and it was really liberating to learn that, no, I wasn't just
         | lazy, that I may have an issue with executive function and if I
         | work around it I can at least partially tackle it.
         | 
         | The amount of stress that gets applied by society for people
         | who are "not performing up to their potential" or slacking off
         | or what-have-you is actually quite immense when you cannot
         | force yourself to work, so I understand people who feel
         | liberated in the moment and who seek solutions, loudly.
        
           | nsagent wrote:
           | It seems odd that as a society it's been deemed a-okay to
           | pathologize a cluster of traits shared by 30% of the
           | population.
        
             | dijit wrote:
             | We as a society seem to enjoy doing that.
             | 
             | Half of the population are provably on a different
             | circadian rhythm than the other half, but we force everyone
             | to function only one way.
             | 
             | There's a dozen more examples, related to psychiatry and
             | medicine.
        
             | 0_____0 wrote:
             | neurotypes exist in an n-dimensional space with loose
             | clusterings, making binary attributes at best vague and
             | clumsy.
             | 
             | i hope we move away from pathologizing and toward making
             | social and economic structures adaptive for people that are
             | currently challenged by them, and likewise find better ways
             | for people to adapt their lives to fit how their minds work
        
           | dwaltrip wrote:
           | My understanding is that ADHD prevalence is closer to 5-10%.
           | That's the number I've seen most by reputable sources.
           | 
           | Nonetheless, the rest of your post resonates with me and and
           | your points stand on their own :)
        
             | dijit wrote:
             | I think its unknowable, but I definitely read 30% expected
             | undiagnosed in the population.
             | 
             | Here is a reputable source that claims 25%
             | 
             | https://wexnermedical.osu.edu/mediaroom/pressreleaselisting
             | /...
        
         | couscouspie wrote:
         | The problem with ADHD is, that the symptoms are very common and
         | it is mostly the degree to which an actual case of ADHD is
         | different from the neurotypical person. So, a big portion of
         | the overall population feels like they might have it and many
         | of them are willing to put in whatever work it takes to find a
         | doctor that confirms their diagnosis.
        
           | dwaltrip wrote:
           | Underdiagnosis is a much bigger issue. There are millions who
           | are dealing with this alone and without awareness that can
           | help them.
           | 
           | Sincerely, person diagnosed at age 35
        
         | lolinder wrote:
         | I think it's particularly common to see that with people who
         | discover their ADHD in adulthood, and there are a lot of us now
         | that awareness has been raised in recent years.
         | 
         | I went my whole life thinking that I was broken. I had intense
         | anxiety surrounding social interaction, was horribly depressed,
         | got terrible grades through high school, and just generally did
         | not enjoy most of life. I eventually learned how to cope and
         | function normally to an outside observer, but still would go
         | through cycles of intense anxiety and depression that I didn't
         | know how to explain.
         | 
         | A few years ago I finally was diagnosed with ADHD and suddenly
         | everything clicked. My anxiety, my depression, my grades, my
         | intense hyperfocus on one thing at a time but also inability to
         | keep consistently focused on one thing for more than a few
         | weeks. All of that suddenly made sense, and there were people
         | in the world who knew exactly how I felt. And the thing is, the
         | anxiety and depression have largely gone away. Now that I know
         | what's going on inside my brain I don't have to beat myself up
         | about it, instead I can learn from and lean on hundreds of
         | thousands of other people who have to cope with the same thing.
         | 
         | So yeah, today I will often notice "oh, that's an ADHD thing"
         | at random times in my life. But it's not so much that it's an
         | essential part of my identity as it is that it's enormously
         | comforting to finally have an explanation for all of the weird
         | quirks that I have, and it's a huge relief to have a community
         | of people who experience the same things that I do. When I say
         | "that's my ADHD", it's me reminding myself that I am not
         | broken, just different, and different is okay.
        
           | sheepscreek wrote:
           | Russel Barkley, in his book "Leading With ADHD," actually
           | suggested mentioning or "blaming" your ADHD after a mistake
           | as a way to foster empathy for your personal challenges. It's
           | not intended to be an excuse, but rather a means for the
           | other person, who assumes XYZ is effortless, to comprehend
           | better/gain empathy.
        
           | throw80521 wrote:
           | To be honest, I thought exactly like you for years. I still
           | benefit from society choosing to label me with something, and
           | that I do not choose to fight. For a while my diagnoses
           | provided so many explanations to my problems and I could live
           | with new purpose.
           | 
           | But a while later, I found it was not enough. I hadn't
           | reached "true happiness" or at least whatever I can call my
           | current state of being. I took a different path, shed all my
           | labels, self-prescribed or otherwise, and am happier than I
           | was before.
           | 
           | I still think I am "different" and have quirks, etc. So in
           | practice, not a whole lot different than before. I just don't
           | use the labels to describe these differences that others
           | might use instead.
           | 
           | I think this only emphasizes that one approach does not
           | necessarily apply when generalized to all people. In my case
           | it only served as one step towards a greater solution, and
           | hopefully even more effective solutions I can build on top of
           | that later.
           | 
           | The same goes for heightened awareness for ADHD. More
           | knowledge can be a blessing (as in your case). At the same
           | time, the population such awareness can serve is shaped like
           | a very complex blob, the form of which nobody truly knows,
           | but I believe some clinicians/promoters see the "blast
           | radius" of promoting awareness as a perfectly round circle
           | overlaid directly onto the population.
           | 
           | My experience also made me realize what one can term "ADHD"
           | may change with overarching cultural shifts or personal
           | growth. I think ADHD should be seen closer to a symptom of a
           | constellation of any number of potentially unrelated causes
           | than a "disorder" to be focused on alone. Unfortunately the
           | established terminology seems to have won out there.
           | 
           | The way we see health conditions and the words we choose to
           | describe them can have profound effects on our understanding
           | of ourselves.
        
             | wnolens wrote:
             | I was going to reply to the same post with similar. If just
             | having a label to apply alleviates the negative emotion,
             | isn't it a placebo?
             | 
             | I think a far far greater number of people experience the
             | exact same problems of focus and distress, and learn to
             | cope effectively in their own deeply personal way. I
             | identify strongly with all the symptoms stated. A label
             | feels useless, or worse - constraining, as it becomes your
             | identity. I still have to drag my ass out of bed, do enough
             | good work everyday next to colleagues who figuratively lap
             | me every day, make a to-do list to remember to buy soap, go
             | without soap for a week, .. etc lol.
             | 
             | I call it being me.
        
           | welshwelsh wrote:
           | >my intense hyperfocus on one thing at a time but also
           | inability to keep consistently focused on one thing for more
           | than a few weeks
           | 
           | Sounds extremely normal to me. I wonder what I'm missing.
           | 
           | For example, suppose a typical person decides to learn a new
           | language.
           | 
           | At the beginning, they are very excited and enthusiastic
           | about it. They might buy a textbook, download an app or sign
           | up for language classes, and spend lots of time on it for a
           | couple of days.
           | 
           | After a week or two, as the tediousness sets in and the goal
           | seems farther off than they expected, they start to shift
           | their focus to something else. After a month, there's a 50/50
           | chance they completely forget about language study and stop
           | doing it. Only a very small minority will last more than a
           | year.
           | 
           | That's what I'd consider normal. How is ADHD different?
           | 
           | Another example: meditation. A new meditation practitioner
           | may try to focus on their breathing, but then find they
           | usually get distracted and start thinking about something
           | else within 10 seconds.
           | 
           | I have a feeling that if I were to say "I find it difficult
           | to focus my attention on something for 10 seconds without
           | getting distracted", many would reply "that sounds like
           | ADHD." But this is, in fact, quite normal.
        
             | groby_b wrote:
             | > That's what I'd consider normal. How is ADHD different?
             | 
             | ADHD is different in that sustained focus takes a ton more
             | of energy than for non-ADHD folks - if you're high
             | functioning. And is almost impossible if you're not high-
             | functioning.
             | 
             | Totally agreed that "can't focus on my breath for 10
             | seconds today" isn't ADHD. "I have repeatably sub-par
             | executive function" very much is, though.
             | 
             | For your language learning example, it's more that somebody
             | _can 't_ stay focused on the learning, even if they want
             | to/have to and are aware their focus is sliding away.
             | 
             | There's a reason ADHD diagnosis is technically a process
             | that's a bit involved, you're trying to test for both sub-
             | par function, and for the repeatable part. I'd take self-
             | diagnosis with a bit more salt, especially it's of the "I
             | often forget my car keys" kind.
        
             | theshackleford wrote:
             | > I have a feeling that if I were to say "I find it
             | difficult to focus my attention on something for 10 seconds
             | without getting distracted", many would reply "that sounds
             | like ADHD." But this is, in fact, quite normal.
             | 
             | That _would_ be quite normal. A determination of ADHD is
             | made based upon the severity of impact. _Everyone_ gets
             | distracted to some extent, but is it significant enough to
             | be destroying your life, Y /N?
             | 
             | That's the determining factor.
        
           | sebasvisser wrote:
           | And then after a while the energy fades..you get distracted
           | again. You get both over stimulated and understimulated and
           | the quest for another thing that gives you the feeling of the
           | world finally clicking into place begins.. And each of these
           | fixes (brain.fm, nootropics, adhd-planner-apps etcetc) give
           | you that feeling just for a little while... That's why we
           | crave it..and because we (can) have more energy we talk about
           | those (a lot!!). But in the end most of us just go from one
           | fix to another..some of us are just really loud about it..
        
         | y-curious wrote:
         | During COVID, the amount of people diagnosed skyrocketed. I was
         | one, and I was putting it off for a long time. I think you see
         | it a lot because of this; If I'm a content creator, tagging it
         | with ADHD puts it on the feed of a lot of people that are
         | newly-diagnosed/self-diagnosed.
         | 
         | I completely agree with you though, I don't mention it to
         | people generally. I may be quirky and might have some weird
         | rigid rules about how I work personally, but I hate the idea of
         | sharing it publicly.
         | 
         | Final note: I think it's a good marketing tool for productivity
         | tools. "It's such a good to-do list that people with ADHD can
         | find success with it! That implies that if you don't have ADHD,
         | you will be a superhero when you use it!"
        
         | sussmannbaka wrote:
         | fwiw I see more posts like yours than I see posts that your
         | post describes.
        
         | conradev wrote:
         | Labels in public health are absolutely problematic for exactly
         | that reason.
         | 
         | But I will also say that ADHD, if you have it, is an essential
         | part of your identity regardless of your awareness of the
         | label.
        
           | astrange wrote:
           | I tend to find it's causing things even if I'm trying to
           | avoid essentializing it, and this also goes for side effects
           | of medications for it.
           | 
           | eg relationship advice says you shouldn't "change your
           | personality" for your partner, but in my last relationship
           | both of ours changed quite a lot when our medication changed
           | or even if we hadn't taken it that day, so I don't really
           | feel attached to it.
        
         | MarcelOlsz wrote:
         | My life got infinitely better when I stopped believing in any
         | of that. It feels more like a spiritually bereft western
         | pseudo-religion and I resent anyone parading around these
         | titles.
        
           | fullstackchris wrote:
           | Definitely agree there. There seems like there is a label for
           | EVERYTHING these days. Coincidentally there was an article in
           | the paper I saw just today about how destructive self
           | diagnosis can be (and how many gen z / alpha are doing that
           | via tiktok) I rememeber when some first tried to explain ADHD
           | to me... and I was like... "what? elementary school kids dont
           | like sitting in a classroom for 6 hours a day? so like, being
           | NORMAL?"
           | 
           | Source: I had / (have?) ADHD, don't think about it at all
           | anymore, just keep working hard, stick with hobbies and you
           | can do great things regardless of what "labels" society has
           | assigned you.
        
         | gatienboquet wrote:
         | I have ADHD and I've decided that it's part of my identity.
         | 
         | I was diagnosed late at 28. When I got diagnosed, my
         | psychologist told me that I had to reassess my life. Many
         | behaviors that people had misinterpreted as laziness,
         | carelessness, or lack of commitment were actually
         | manifestations of my ADHD.
         | 
         | Friends who thought I didn't care when I forgot plans, teachers
         | who believed I wasn't trying hard enough, and colleagues who
         | saw me as disorganized - they were all seeing untreated ADHD
         | symptoms, not character flaws.
         | 
         | Understanding this was liberating because it meant I wasn't
         | fundamentally flawed as a person. I had to rebuild myself, my
         | confidence - it was a new start in life.
         | 
         | It's a process to relearn and teach yourself that you can do it
         | now. Labeling publicly, saying to your friends and family that
         | you are ADHD makes it so that you OWN your change, you OWN your
         | disability.
         | 
         | tldr, ADHD as an IDENTIY is for me : Reclaim control over your
         | narrative instead of letting others define your behaviors
         | 
         | Create accountability for yourself and set realistic
         | expectations with others
         | 
         | Remove shame from the equation by openly acknowledging your
         | challenges
         | 
         | Enable yourself to access appropriate accommodations and
         | support systems
        
         | lawlessone wrote:
         | > who tend to make it an essential part of their identity.
         | 
         | I tend to notice that more with younger people who find out
         | earlier and get it treated.
         | 
         | Finding out in your 30's because you realize things shouldn't
         | be going so inexplicably wrong is different.
        
           | hexator wrote:
           | I think people in their 20s find it easier to make group
           | identities, and being in a group that tends to be
           | disadvantaged is a uniting force. This is true whether or not
           | you actually have ADHD, which is a problem for sure.
        
         | no_wizard wrote:
         | > I see a lot of people with ADHD (on- and offline) who tend to
         | make it an essential part of their identity
         | 
         | Honest question: why is this an issue? If someone makes it part
         | of their identity its because they feel its important for
         | others to know, and that can be for a variety of reasons.
         | 
         | Is there a reason we _shouldn 't_ make it part of our identity,
         | if we so choose?
        
           | theshackleford wrote:
           | Because they want to gatekeep it and how you are supposed to
           | act with it.
        
         | 99_00 wrote:
         | What exactly is the point you are making?
         | 
         | That ADHD is over diagnosed?
         | 
         | That it doesn't require tailored interventions or advice?
         | 
         | That social media is exploiting interest in ADHD to provide low
         | quality advice?
         | 
         | Or something else? Can you clarify your point?
        
         | sfpotter wrote:
         | I'm in the middle of pursuing an autism diagnosis as an adult,
         | and despite the obvious manifold benefits it would bring to my
         | family's life, judgment from people like you is the #1 reason
         | I'm hesitating going through with it.
        
         | gejose wrote:
         | This is SO true
        
         | addicted wrote:
         | Considering ADHD is poorly understood, historically highly
         | underdiagnosed and significantly prevalent it's not surprising
         | there's a lot of content about trying to to understand it for
         | both people with and without ADHD.
        
         | hedayet wrote:
         | I have ADHD. Here's my story:
         | 
         | 1. I can focus and solve hard problems, but you'll notice my
         | legs swinging restlessly, hand gestures, or me suddenly typing
         | a completely unrelated web address.
         | 
         | 2. I was always a great student, but I was also the most
         | restless; making jokes and talking constantly, no matter how
         | hard I was punished for my behavior.
         | 
         | 3. The toughest part of my ADHD is inconsistency. My
         | performance can fluctuate a lot, and it takes tremendous effort
         | to stay consistent. I get bored quickly with easy tasks, so I
         | rely on alarms, calendar events, and other reminders to help me
         | stay on track.
         | 
         | 4. People like me are prime targets for distraction businesses,
         | whether it's social media, gambling, or other addictive
         | behaviors. And a lot of my energy goes to resist them.
         | 
         | All in all, even for a functioning person like myself -
         | managing ADHD takes a lot of effort. In my late 30s, I'm
         | finally feeling a bit more in control. I've accepted that this
         | is part of who I am, and while I can't fix it completely, I'm
         | doing my best to avoid letting it impact the people around me.
        
         | addicted wrote:
         | There's so much survivor bias in these comments.
         | 
         | We know what happens when ADHD is underdiagnosed and not
         | recognized in society (which requires it to be labeled
         | appropriately). You have scores of children who get labeled as
         | "problematic" or "bad students" ans suffer from that
         | discrimination for the rest of their lives.
         | 
         | Labeling may not help a particular individual but helps all in
         | society as a whole
        
         | DavidPiper wrote:
         | As a roughly neurotypical person who watches a lot of YouTube,
         | I find that ADHD-adjacent content is one of those
         | recommendation spirals where if you click one video that even
         | mentions ADHD in its content (e.g. "How to tidy your home with
         | the Marie Kondo method") the algorithm will recommend you
         | content explicitly addressing ADHD (e.g. "The best way to take
         | notes with ADHD") for weeks.
         | 
         | After clicking through a few of them that seemed interesting, I
         | discovered the same thing you did: most of them take a very
         | typical day-to-day problem (need to organise my wardrobe, need
         | to organise my notes better) and frame it as an explicitly ADHD
         | problem.
         | 
         | I'm glad we live in a time of greater awareness, and I'm glad
         | people are receiving useful diagnoses that lead to management
         | that improves peoples' quality of life. I'm very happy for
         | people who eventually find ADHD can be their superpower rather
         | than a detriment.
         | 
         | But I do wonder if there's a quiet grift going on (maybe just
         | on YouTube? Not sure) taking advantage of this. There are a lot
         | of people saying "You have ADHD therefore you have this
         | specific problem that neurotypical people don't" - where the
         | first half might be true, but the second half is not.
         | 
         | Which seems to me to be framing the identity / otherness-from-
         | neurotypical-ness in an unhealthy way in order to push more
         | content. And possibly leading to the over-attribution of
         | everything to ADHD rather than just... life.
         | 
         | Again, I don't want to minimise the impact of ADHD or the
         | problems it can create for people, but this is definitely a
         | pattern I've seen pop up on the Internet only in the last 5 or
         | 6 years.
        
         | XCSme wrote:
         | I also feel like A LOT of people have ADHD (a lot more than it
         | was initially estimated). I think like 50% or more of the
         | population is neurodivergent (or maybe it's because
         | neurodivergent people tend to group together, so everyone
         | around you seems neurodivergent too).
        
       | 0000000000100 wrote:
       | Pretty neat. The automatic breakdowns are cool, but you
       | absolutely need to move the delete button inline. Confirm dialog
       | if there are items beneath it, otherwise just delete.
       | 
       | Generated like 10 sub-items for me, 5 of which were relevant. But
       | to remove the 5 junk ones, you have to open the dropdown for each
       | and hit delete.
        
       | raybb wrote:
       | I'd really love a voice based AI tool that will follow up with me
       | on projects and next steps.
       | 
       | So like I'm renovating a house and I've got to find someone to
       | help with drywall, get a new top of the septic, get quotes on the
       | driveway, etc. Multiply this a few times with my job and side
       | project and so on.
       | 
       | It would be great if it would just ask me what's new with each
       | thing and update tasks and remind me to follow up with the person
       | not calling me back etc. Of course, all this can be done in your
       | mind or with Todo apps but just something to talk to and nudge
       | would be great.
        
         | ireadmevs wrote:
         | I'm on the same boat as you. Had this idea some time ago and I
         | feel that this should be doable with today's LLMs tooling. On
         | the coming weeks I'll be trying to hook something up and see
         | how far can I get, with the extra requirement from my side that
         | everything should run locally.
        
         | theshackleford wrote:
         | I use ChatGPT almost exclusively for this today due to quite
         | extreme ADHD that even when treated, leaves me weaker than most
         | in the executive department. My therapists have always advised
         | that I have some kind of "second brain" where things live,
         | otherwise they just vanish into the ether.
         | 
         | Why use "AI" at all? Because now I have something to yell at me
         | and ask if I actually finished the thing I said I would before
         | jumping into some new thing. If I have not, it can give me a
         | concrete next step to help me overcome the analysis paralaysis
         | that may be preventing completion.
         | 
         | I've worked hard to configure the thing so that it won't
         | tolerate my bullshit. It is entirely structured around pushing
         | me to function as a normal adult should. Yes its sad and
         | pathetic I can not do this alone, how broken must I be that an
         | "AI" is any level of assistance in this area etc. The idea I am
         | sure seems ludicrous to 'normal people' who would never even
         | remotely consider using it for such a thing. However it is what
         | it is, and I would prefer the shame that comes with the extreme
         | benefit I have received as opposed to the opposite.
        
       | dijit wrote:
       | What used to work for me is to build a single list every morning
       | (based on yesterdays list) and then just do it one after another
       | without allowing myself to prioritise after that point.
       | 
       | My largest executive function issue is the guilt of _not doing
       | some other thing_.
       | 
       | If I have a very stressful situation, I can easily organise my
       | thoughts and ruthlessly prioritise what is important from what is
       | not important.
       | 
       | In "peace" times, this doesn't work at all, and instead if I have
       | something that I know will take half a day (say, for example,
       | fixing a subtle bug in the email system) then I will feel guilty
       | about doing that over something else (say: doing paperwork for
       | the worked hours that month).
       | 
       | Thus, I do neither. Until one becomes critical.
       | 
       | It's fucking stupid, but I can't fix it.
        
         | meander_water wrote:
         | I'm very similar to you and going through similar issues.
         | 
         | I've also started to write a to-do list on paper and keep it
         | always open in front of me on my desk. This is the only thing
         | that seems to work for me. If I keep a virtual to-do list, I
         | lose track of it, forget to check/update it and it eventually
         | becomes useless.
         | 
         | You're not alone, hope you find something that works for you!
        
       | teddyh wrote:
       | This should make it easier for people to adapt when their job
       | adopts Manna(tm).
        
       | phito wrote:
       | This is neat. I wish I could self host it, I wouldn't use it
       | otherwise.
        
       | konart wrote:
       | One of the best tools I've seen this year!
       | 
       | I'm not sure about "neurodivergent people" part though. I don't
       | think I'd call myself neurodivergent or anything close. Pretty
       | sure the app will be useful for anyone.
        
       | distantsounds wrote:
       | So how many neuro-divergent people did you test this on before
       | you made the claim that it would help them?
        
       | scubbo wrote:
       | > goblin.tools is written and maintained by Bram De Buyser, an
       | AI, software and data engineer.
       | 
       | I'm not saying that a semicolon and an Oxford comma are
       | _necessary_, here - but I am saying that I did a double-take at
       | my first interpretation that we are now naming and personifying
       | AIs.
        
       | podgietaru wrote:
       | Oh hey! I made something like this that integrates with TickTick
       | 
       | https://github.com/Podginator/TickGPTick
       | 
       | It needs updating, but basically you set a tag that let's you
       | expand tasks out much in the way goblin tools does.
        
       | dwaltrip wrote:
       | When I open the app and am greeted by a mostly blank screen with
       | an empty todo list, the first thing I think is "How is this
       | different from any other task manager app? How do use it in a way
       | that would help me?".
       | 
       | And then I close the tab! (naturally, ofc)
       | 
       | A little bit of onboarding / guidance on how neurodiverge peeps
       | can get the most out of it would go a long way.
        
       | 0_____0 wrote:
       | adhd here. bad enough to not graduate from high school on time. I
       | have been medicated for a decade now and I dream of finally
       | having built my systems around life up to the degree that I feel
       | good about discontinuing them. It's not good for you to be on
       | stimulants every day like I am. If your flavor of adhd is mild
       | and the functional impairment you have doesn't literally ruin
       | your life, consider working your way up the theraputic ladder
       | from therapy with an ADHD specialized therapist, starting meds
       | only if necessary. Consider your goals wrt your brain stuff and
       | measure your results against that. Don't get on the meds unless
       | you have to.
        
         | theshackleford wrote:
         | > bad enough to not graduate from high school on time.
         | 
         | This is a good example of how wide the ADHD spectrum can be.
         | From my perspective, I'd actually call this mild, not because
         | it is, but because I never finished high school at all. My
         | parents bought into stigma and refused meds against medical
         | advice, and the fallout ruined both my childhood and much of my
         | adult life.
         | 
         | I get you're aiming for a cautious take, but I'd urge anyone
         | reading this to think hard before following it. If you do have
         | more than _mild_ ADHD, this kind of "avoid meds" advice can be
         | genuinely harmful, it's the kind of thinking that keeps people
         | suffering for years when they don't have to.
         | 
         | As an adult, I refused meds while my life continued to fall
         | apart. Convinced by stigma and those that constantly shouted
         | "MEDICATION BAD." So as my life spiraled ever downwards, I
         | increased the rate at which I beat my self up telling myself
         | constantly I just needed more willpower, better systems, or the
         | right therapist and it would all change. Spoiler alert: none of
         | it worked without the baseline support stimulants gave me and
         | refusing to medicate was one of the biggest mistakes I have
         | ever made. It did such a degree of damage to my life it's not
         | even possible to begin to describe it.
         | 
         | Stimulants aren't inherently dangerous when used properly. What
         | is dangerous is untreated or mistreated ADHD and the damage it
         | causes, to you the individual and those around you. The
         | therapeutic ladder should start with what works, framing meds
         | as a "last resort" is unhelpful and rooted in stigma, not
         | reality.
         | 
         | If you think you have ADHD, get off the internet and see a real
         | doctor. Work with them to figure out what actually helps you
         | without assumption or expectation and don't let other people's
         | experiences or stigma decide your treatment for you.
        
       | currymj wrote:
       | i can imagine a tool where you take a picture of a cluttered desk
       | or closet, and it produces a list of all the objects and then
       | comes up with a plausible organization plan.
       | 
       | that's a little more complicated than these tools, but it seems
       | within reach given publicly available technology. image
       | segmentation models are really good now, the list of objects
       | would be pretty reliable at least.
        
       | scudsworth wrote:
       | whats the product here exactly? 8 llm prompts? at least,
       | according to the about page, they're using "Ethical" ai models.
       | lol
        
       | oynqr wrote:
       | It did not want to assist with cooking desoxyephedrine, but help
       | with dumping a large garbage bag in a body of water without being
       | seen was okay!
        
       | aeblyve wrote:
       | I tend to think that a better treatment for these kinds of issues
       | is biological, rather than prescriptive. If one has issues with
       | thinking in a productive way, a new mode of thinking (i.e.,
       | "step-by-step") can be only somewhat therapeutic. It fits in the
       | same box. I think this applies to very many different kinds of
       | brain issues.
       | 
       | Obviously, the foremost treatment today is various stimulants.
       | But other, more healthful ways of increasing brain energy, such
       | as nailing down blood sugar management, lowering inflammation,
       | and reducing environmental irritants, are probably also helpful.
       | These interventions need not even be expensive or dramatic. Using
       | lower glycemic index carbohydrate sources (i.e., fructose vs
       | starches), consuming Thiamine (Vitamin B1) to improve glucose
       | metabolism in cells, alongside taking in adequate cholesterol for
       | the production of stabilizing neurosteroids such as progesterone,
       | is a more specific description.
       | 
       | Quotation from Mind and Tissue, by Ray Peat:
       | 
       | ``` The brain, with its extremely high energy requirements, is
       | usually the first to suffer from energy deprivation. At slight
       | levels of deprivation, the brain will simply lose functional
       | efficiency, but more serious or prolonged deprivation can produce
       | lingering modification, or even structural damage which is
       | relatively permanent (and may even have transgenerational
       | effects).' Just as the skin (or muscle) has a lower energy
       | requirement than the brain, the various parts of the brain have
       | different requirements. The parts which are most resistant to
       | damage are the "lowest" and "oldest" parts of the brain, the
       | parts we have in common with frogs. These parts regulate
       | physiological processes, such as breathing, and so it is
       | biologically useful that they should be most resistant to damage.
       | When a person is given an anesthetic, the first parts to stop
       | functioning, or to go to sleep, seem to be just those parts that
       | have the highest energy requirements, and which are least
       | resistant to damage. The anesthetized person keeps breathing, for
       | example, until very high doses of anesthetic are given, but other
       | functions disappear one by one as the dose increases. The front
       | part of the brain, which is most uniquely human (and "newest) but
       | which doesn't have "specific" function, in the usual sense, is
       | one of the most sensitive parts of the brain. It is a very large
       | piece of tissue, and it seems to be involved in planning and
       | choosing, in governing the other more specific functions (This
       | part of the brain, as well as the cerebral cortex in general,
       | gives us the ability to "disregard" stimuli, to use Lendon
       | Smith's term.) The famous Russian neuro-psychologist, A.R. Luria,
       | has described the behavior of dogs when this tissue is damaged or
       | removed:
       | 
       | ..destruction of the frontal lobes leads, not so much to a
       | disturbance of memory as to a disturbance of the ability to
       | inhibit orienting reflexes to distracting stimuli: ..such an
       | animal cannot perform tasks involving delayed responses under
       | ordinary conditions, but can do so provided that irrelevant,
       | distracting stimuli are removed (if the animal is kept in total
       | darkness, if tranquilizers are administered, and so on). The role
       | of the prefrontal cortex in the synthesis of systems of stimuli
       | and the creation of a plan of action is manifested not only in
       | relation to currently acting stimuli, but also in the formation
       | of active behavior directed towards the future? Various theories
       | of what causes hyperactivity, e.g., low blood sugar, weak
       | radiation from fluorescent lights and TV. 3 or food additives, 4
       | and the observation that drugs which stimulate the sympathetic or
       | adrenergic nerves (ephedrine or caffeine, for example will
       | relieve the symptoms, are all consistent with the idea that not
       | enough energy is being supplied to permit this tissue to function
       | properly. Low blood sugar will starve the nerves; food additives
       | or any low-level poison can serve as a stressor of nerve tissue,
       | leading to increased energy requirements;
       | 
       | many forms of very weak radiation' can lower the efficiency of
       | metabolism, increasing the tissue's energy requirement, and brain
       | tissue is the most sensitive to at least some kinds of radiation.
       | 
       | Intestinal irritation can cause disturbances of the nervous
       | system, and should be considered as a possibility in "disorders
       | of attention." Toxins produced by intestinal bacteria can affect
       | the brain directly, but more often act by damaging the liver's
       | ability to regulate blood glucose. The commonest cause of
       | hypoglycemia is hypothyroidism, and a thyroid deficiency
       | increases the tendency toward a high-adrenaline state, but more
       | importantly, thyroid hormone is the basic regulator of efficient
       | energy production. Memory and attention are impaired by even a
       | slight thyroid deficiency. The Russian paradigm, with its
       | emphasis on energy and inhibition, suggests that thyroid function
       | should be carefully examined in cases of hyperactivity. Too
       | often, western physicians think only about hyperthyroidism in
       | hyperactivity. ```
       | 
       | The more recent book "Brain Energy" by Chris Palmer offers
       | similar perspectives in terms of dysfunctional mitochondria as a
       | fundamental causative factor in just about every mental illness.
        
       | stevage wrote:
       | This is very cool.
       | 
       | Needs a bit of UI love for mobile. If you break down tasks 3
       | levels deep in becomes unusable.
        
       | xipho wrote:
       | Curiously, or not, I'm not sure what the expectation is, it
       | seemed to quickly enter somewhat of an infinite loop then I
       | started with "What is the meaning of life?". Around level 3 or 4
       | each simplification is essentially what was presented for that
       | item in the prior list. Maybe some hidden meaning there ...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-03-24 23:00 UTC)