[HN Gopher] The Scammer's Manual: How to Launder Money and Get A...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Scammer's Manual: How to Launder Money and Get Away with It
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2025-03-23 17:36 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | bookofjoe wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/1f2mL
        
       | lazyant wrote:
       | or you can just bring a bag of cash to buy a condo in NYC
       | https://theweek.com/articles/736313/how-foreign-investors-la...
        
         | nikanj wrote:
         | Vancouver is also more than happy to help you out
         | https://www.sanctions.io/blog/the-vancouver-model-of-money-l...
        
           | lurk2 wrote:
           | There have been changes in recent years that complicate this
           | model because you are now required to register the beneficial
           | (meaning the de facto, not de jure) owner of real property in
           | BC. There was also an investigation into the casinos which
           | culminated in the Dirty Money report [0]. Quite a few reforms
           | came about as a result of that, chief among them that a
           | source of funds declaration is required on buy-ins of $10,000
           | or more and mandatory identity verification is required on
           | transactions of $3,000 or more.
           | 
           | > At B.C. casinos, BCLC requires anyone buying-in with cash,
           | a bank draft, or a certified cheque of $10,000 or more in a
           | 24-hour period to complete a source of funds declaration and
           | provide proof of where the money came from. Suspicious
           | transactions in B.C. casinos have declined since this policy
           | was introduced. Additionally, BCLC requires casinos to verify
           | people's identities for all buy-ins of $3,000 or more in a
           | single transaction. [1]
           | 
           | [0]: https://news.gov.bc.ca/files/Gaming_Final_Report.pdf
           | 
           | [1]: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/anti-money-
           | launde...
        
         | mentalgear wrote:
         | At least Germany recently changed their laws (initiated by the
         | Green Party) that prevents buying real estate with cash. But
         | this has been a money laundering practice for the mob for
         | decades.
        
           | comrade1234 wrote:
           | You're forced to take out a bank loan in Germany if you want
           | to buy property?
        
             | 9dev wrote:
             | Nope, but you can't buy property with literal cash, crypto,
             | or precious metals anymore. In Germany people use SEPA
             | payments as the primary means to transfer money, and that
             | is the intended way to handle big transactions.
        
       | storf45 wrote:
       | This is the plot of the movie, 'The Beekeeper'.
        
         | LargoLasskhyfv wrote:
         | Only partially. This is Scambodia. The plot of The Beekeeper is
         | US-based, and the head of that operation is the son of the
         | President (or candidate? can't remember exactly anymore).
        
       | earnesti wrote:
       | So... I started scimming through the artcle, and they basically
       | convert the money to cryptocurrency? Don't know if the article
       | really contained anything other interesting details.
        
         | decimalenough wrote:
         | The interesting bits are before that happens. You need money
         | mules, you need brokers to find the mules for you, you need
         | escrow companies to stop the brokers from running away with
         | your money, etc.
        
           | paulpauper wrote:
           | So much work. makes me wonder why not just earn it legit.
           | It's like cheaters in school who use AI software and other
           | tools. It would be less work to just study. I guess it does
           | work or esle it the scams would not persist.
        
             | LoganDark wrote:
             | > It's like cheaters in school who use AI software and
             | other tools. It would be less work to just study.
             | 
             | It's not about the amount of work. If it were about the
             | amount of work then ADHD would hardly exist.
        
             | luckylion wrote:
             | > So much work. makes me wonder why not just earn it legit.
             | 
             | Because they make orders of magnitude more money than they
             | otherwise would. The regional drug lord wouldn't be the
             | next fortune 500 CEO if only he chose to not break the law.
        
             | oortoo wrote:
             | Not sure if I fully agree on that. Using AI as a tool can
             | usually reduce the total time it takes to complete an
             | assignment or project by like 50%, not to mention it also
             | reduces the amount of time spent pulling your hair out
             | feeling stuck by like 80-90%. Of course, you lose out on
             | most of the learning experience but it's not like the old
             | days of smuggling in rolled up papers or writing inside a
             | water bottle -- "cheating" (if you can even call it that)
             | has basically never been easier.
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | _The F.B.I., China's Ministry of Public Security, Interpol and
       | others have tried to combat scammers, who often lurk on social
       | media and dating apps, luring people into bogus financial schemes
       | or other ruses._
       | 
       | It's the IRS and FBI that does the overwhelming bulk of the
       | investigative work and also opens the investigations. Interpol
       | hardly does anything by comparison and have much less doggedness
       | (it was the US who found Bin Laden for example). It typically
       | helps the US, not actually initiates the investigation. At best
       | its like a sidekick.
       | 
       | The question is, does the US get involved. If not, then
       | laundering will work, because the vast majority of countries have
       | neither the inclination or resources to do much. Otherwise, all
       | bets are off. Because the US is unrivaled at this sort of stuff.
       | 
       | The article in typical clickbait fashion overplays its claim in
       | the headline and then walks it back in the content. It's not that
       | effective if accounts are constantly being tracked and frozen and
       | if the scammers' profits are heavily diluted in an attempt to
       | launder the money. if anything ,this is a success by imposing a
       | huge cost on scammers and reducing the profitability of said
       | scam.
        
         | Jgrace wrote:
         | you realise that something's not just clickbait because you
         | don't understand it? Huione is a behemoth in the laundering-
         | sphere; it's intrinsically linked to Cambodian scam compounds,
         | as well as handling every single step of the wash process in-
         | house. These guys don't just receive the stolen funds, but they
         | link international clients with mules across literally
         | thousands of Telegram groups before converting said currency
         | into the Hui-one coin and then onto Tether. All of this is done
         | within Hui-one's infrastructure.
         | 
         | If you'd bothered to do just one iota of research into any of
         | the topics covered in the article, you may have stumbled across
         | chainanalysis' report on them from last year. Elliptic, also
         | mentioned, have done comprehensive reports on them. Lazarus
         | Group, who recently stole around a billion from Bybit,
         | frequently move funds through these guys, so did Conti, and
         | many of the other big cyber-threat groups.
         | 
         | To your point around it being a huge cost to the scammers,
         | that's a given. Effective laundering is expensive because
         | organised crime groups are most vulnerable at this particular
         | stage of the fraud. A massive decentralised network of groups
         | that can match criminals to a steady flow of international bank
         | accounts that can handle fraudulent funds is pricless.
        
           | ForOldHack wrote:
           | I have seen a few confirmations of this.
        
         | CPLX wrote:
         | The article makes it pretty clear that China is the
         | jurisdiction that is the hardest to evade.
        
         | luckylion wrote:
         | > Interpol hardly does anything by comparison and have much
         | less doggedness (it was the US who found Bin Laden for
         | example). It typically helps the US, not actually initiates the
         | investigation. At best its like a sidekick.
         | 
         | That's a strange take on a strange article, because the
         | articles is mistaken in that Interpol "tried to combat
         | scammers" - it can't, Interpol is an organization to coordinate
         | cooperation between national law enforcement agencies. They are
         | essentially a large clearing house where national LEAs exchange
         | information and can use databases. Interpol has no agents or
         | investigators.
         | 
         | Which makes your take strange too, because you sound very
         | confident that it's "at best" a sidekick, because it doesn't do
         | as much as the FBI and IRS. But knowing what Interpol is and
         | what it does (or rather: what it doesn't), it's pretty clear
         | that you don't know what you're talking about.
         | 
         | The article has found its target, your patriotism was tingled
         | and you accepted its premises but felt it necessary to proclaim
         | that the US does much more than the organization that doesn't
         | do that type of work at all.
        
       | mentalgear wrote:
       | Seems like the easiest way to launder or bribe someone is still
       | crypto. Might not be an investor's paradise, but certainly a
       | launderer's.
        
       | lazyeye wrote:
       | I wonder how much of these kinds of issues that we are told are
       | "complex" and "multi-faceted", "no easy solution" etc could be
       | significantly reduced if there was actual political will to do
       | so.
       | 
       | I think a lot.
        
         | daveguy wrote:
         | Agreed. It seems like billionaires are buying more and more of
         | our means of communication. Makes it easier to control the
         | narrative.
        
         | clumsysmurf wrote:
         | There seems to be political will to ignore it
         | 
         | https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-treasury-department-says...
        
       | xyzzy9563 wrote:
       | Buy crypto, convert it to Monero, transfer it around a bit,
       | convert it to your destination currency. Done.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-03-23 23:00 UTC)