[HN Gopher] Magpies and crows are using "anti-bird spikes" to ma...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Magpies and crows are using "anti-bird spikes" to make nests (2023)
        
       Author : perihelions
       Score  : 199 points
       Date   : 2025-03-10 14:33 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.audubon.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.audubon.org)
        
       | bell-cot wrote:
       | Could birds be trained to tear down military barbed wire & razor
       | wire defenses?
       | 
       | (Or are the birds here AWOL from their training camp?)
        
         | lexicality wrote:
         | While corvids can use tools, I think they'd probably struggle
         | with a pair of wire cutters
        
           | lores wrote:
           | To the laboratory!
        
           | sambull wrote:
           | obviously lasers, corvidae with lasers
        
             | marcosdumay wrote:
             | And that was how everybody on the North hemisphere went
             | blind...
        
           | pjmlp wrote:
           | Team work, each one holds one end. :)
        
             | _kst_ wrote:
             | Mounted on a coconut.
        
         | nonrandomstring wrote:
         | Well we've used pigeons fr missile guidance before [0], and for
         | messaging [1], so birds have a firm place in the military
         | including having their own special units [2]
         | 
         | More generally, the history of warfare is all about taking the
         | enemy's resources and using them as weapons against the foe.
         | This will be a defining feature of future cyberwar and AI -
         | everything we build to "protect ourselves" will at some point
         | be repurposed to advantage an enemy.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_pigeon
         | 
         | [2] https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/warfares-unsung-
         | pi...
        
           | codedokode wrote:
           | Sadly Wikipedia doesn't describe a specific mechanism that
           | helps pigeons to navigate. I wonder do pigeons simply fly
           | high enough that they can see hundred miles around?
        
             | nonrandomstring wrote:
             | They use magnetism AFAIK
        
               | thenthenthen wrote:
               | (And) smell apparently (sample size of one..)
               | 
               | https://youtu.be/t4cw-Av2Pk4?feature=shared (Around 28min
               | mark)
        
           | mr_toad wrote:
           | Geese have also been employed for security including by
           | military forces.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guard_goose
        
         | webdoodle wrote:
         | Dolphin's were trained to bypass enemy underwater defenses to
         | plant explosives on enemy ships while they were in there home
         | port. They were also used to find mines and other underwater
         | devices to be disarmed.
         | 
         | Most birds just aren't big enough to do real damage to barbed
         | wire or razor wire defenses. Now if you could somehow train the
         | birds to harass a herd of cattle into running down the fence,
         | that might work. Sort of like the Hitchcock movie The Birds.
        
         | pelagic_sky wrote:
         | Cockies would gladly do the job for free.
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/rga3pf/cockatoo_...
        
       | dwighttk wrote:
       | (2023)
       | 
       | Seemed familiar...
        
       | nottorp wrote:
       | In other news, only small children can easily open the anti child
       | caps on medicine bottles...
        
         | a4isms wrote:
         | And in disturbingly relevant news from 1933...
         | 
         | "Why a four-year-old child could understand this report. Run
         | out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or
         | tail out of it." --Groucho Marx as Rufus T. Firefly, "Duck
         | Soup"
        
           | nottorp wrote:
           | I wasn't quoting entertainment though.
           | 
           | When my daughter was 4 or 5 and down in bed with 39 C fever,
           | I was having trouble opening her bottle of ibuprofen syrup.
           | Child proof cap of course, so too hard for a 29 year old.
           | 
           | So I heard her - barely speaking because of the fever -
           | "daddy let me help you". I brought the bottle to her bed and
           | of course she opened it the first try.
        
             | Suppafly wrote:
             | I never understood this, I assumed it was geriatric people
             | complaining because they literally don't have the strength
             | to push down and turn, not that normal abled bodied adults
             | were too dumb to figure out that you have to push down and
             | turn, especially since the instructions are on the lid
             | itself.
        
               | nottorp wrote:
               | And, that shit works for you on the first try every time?
               | 
               | Do you practice daily?
        
               | Suppafly wrote:
               | >And, that shit works for you on the first try every
               | time?
               | 
               | Within the first couple of times at least unless it's
               | physically defective or something. It's not really
               | something able bodied people have problems with.
        
               | selimthegrim wrote:
               | Some of them are also squeeze caps so their fingers might
               | be too shaky
        
           | RajT88 wrote:
           | It is amazing how quotable that movie is even today.
        
       | porphyra wrote:
       | Interesting but I have a hard time imagining how a nest made of
       | anti-bird spikes could be comfortable. Do they actually find it
       | to be nice? I guess corvids are super smart and wouldn't
       | accidentally get tricked into making an uncomfortable nest due to
       | man made materials...
        
         | xattt wrote:
         | It would be interesting to determine whether the serum cortisol
         | differs between those living in spoke nests versus those
         | without.
         | 
         | My assumption is that it is indeed elevated, as the "residents"
         | are constantly mindful of their movements (and therefore more
         | stressed) to avoid being poked.
        
         | pbalau wrote:
         | Spikes are only uncomfortable if you sit on the spiky end.
        
         | nicoty wrote:
         | The article says the birds make different nest configurations,
         | with one incorporating a softer cup layer on top of the spiky
         | layer made with the spikes and another configuration using the
         | spikes as part of a dome on top of the nest.
        
         | mechanicum wrote:
         | Relative to their traditional construction material, twigs,
         | it's probably no worse.
        
         | SunkBellySamuel wrote:
         | It's more about sending a message than the comfort. Up the
         | tweet!
        
         | throwanem wrote:
         | I saw an osprey pull a three-foot fragment of steel wire out of
         | a wire rope on a tramp steamer one time. Damndest thing you
         | ever saw, he kept circling and grabbing at this cable with his
         | talons and I thought he was attacking or something, but I got
         | my camera up in time to see him fly off with this twist of wire
         | as long as his wingspan, pulled up under him like a fish. They
         | love human detritus as structural material in their nests,
         | which can be six feet across and four deep.
        
         | NobleLie wrote:
         | My take is its less so about being physically comfortable, but
         | there is a different type of comfort by the protection of the
         | nest from predators. It's like being uncomfortable to have
         | peace of bird mind, in other words.
        
         | pixelbath wrote:
         | TFA addresses this directly:
         | 
         | > For the crows, the spikes seem purely structural, a material
         | used to fashion a solid foundation. In both crow nests, the
         | wires were incorporated into the base-interwoven with the
         | points facing inward, below where a softer nest cup would sit.
         | But for the magpies, there was an additional layer of intrigue;
         | not only were the birds using the spikes to build nests, but
         | it's possible they were also employing the devices for their
         | intended purpose--to ward off other birds.
        
       | baerrie wrote:
       | It seems likely to me that the birds have suffered by these
       | spikes and repurpose them as much for the message they send to
       | avian predators as their structural merits. It is like humans
       | wearing the head of a wolf or other things to communicate they
       | are a threat to would be interlopers.
        
         | lupusreal wrote:
         | Crows going for a Mad Max aesthetic for defense and deterrence
         | seems both incredible and simultaneously unsurprisingly.
        
         | mmooss wrote:
         | In the OP:
         | 
         |  _But for the magpies, there was an additional layer of
         | intrigue; not only were the birds using the spikes to build
         | nests, but it's possible they were also employing the devices
         | for their intended purpose--to ward off other birds. "It's a
         | very natural behavior," Hiemstra says. "We think these spikes
         | are for nest defense. "_
        
           | TheSpiceIsLife wrote:
           | That's exactly what they are, it says as much on the box.
        
       | fullstop wrote:
       | And then there are the doves, birds notorious for making the most
       | lackluster of nests. They will lay eggs right on top of the
       | spikes.
       | 
       | When you see the nests, it is amazing that doves / pigeons exist
       | at all. They must survive out of spite and numbers.
       | 
       | Check out /r/stupiddovenests on reddit for some good examples.
        
         | maeln wrote:
         | It is because most pigeons we see in cities are rock pigeon and
         | were usually making their nest in cliff, crevases and rock
         | formation[1]. Not in tree. Therefore, they never needed to make
         | such artfully crafted nest since the rock was already providing
         | enough shelter. This is also why they are very adapted to live
         | in cities, because our concrete jungles are actually closer (in
         | their verticality, materials, and relative lack of trees) to
         | mountainous terrain than to a jungle.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_dove#Distribution_and_hab...
        
           | fullstop wrote:
           | Ah, interesting, that makes sense. I will still laugh at
           | their "nests", though. :-)
        
           | alnwlsn wrote:
           | I've heard it said that the terrible nests are more to stop
           | the eggs from rolling away. Apparently it was easier to
           | evolve the ability to go get a stick than make square eggs.
        
             | fullstop wrote:
             | Wombats were so close
        
         | harimau777 wrote:
         | However, some pigeons are a little extra:
         | 
         | https://www.boredpanda.com/pigeon-poppies-nest-remembrance-d...
        
         | borski wrote:
         | Pretty sure pigeons exist entirely thanks to NYC. :)
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | Or London
        
         | Suppafly wrote:
         | >When you see the nests, it is amazing that doves / pigeons
         | exist at all. They must survive out of spite and numbers.
         | 
         | They've basically evolved past the point of needing nests but
         | still have some basic instinct to create them.
        
         | zdragnar wrote:
         | We don't have too many rock pigeons out in the country where I
         | live, but we do have plenty of robins (American Robin / Turdus
         | migratorius, to be precise), and those have to be in contention
         | for world's dumbest nest builders.
        
       | throwanem wrote:
       | Fortunately, I only use these to protect the wasps from the
       | sparrows, and the robins from themselves.
        
       | internet_points wrote:
       | reminds me of the BE UNGOVERNABLE dog
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/blursedimages/comments/u8o03f/blurs...
       | 
       | Are there other good examples of animals subverting restrictions?
        
         | harimau777 wrote:
         | Checkout the image at the top of this page! (I don't know if
         | the blog itself is any good. I'm just posting it for the
         | image!)
         | 
         | https://sayyesmore.com/blog/bethebird
        
           | internet_points wrote:
           | haha great :-D
        
           | Suppafly wrote:
           | That's such a great pic. I wonder what the sign is supposed
           | to be for, it's not like birds respect signs. What is it
           | telling humans to do?
        
             | fragmede wrote:
             | It's so the police arrest and cite the bird for breaking
             | the law.
        
             | marcosdumay wrote:
             | Oh, if the sign is real, it's certainly a joke.
             | 
             | People do create those a lot more than one would expect.
        
       | kleiba wrote:
       | Excellent, stick it to the man!
        
       | BSOhealth wrote:
       | Researchers are doing all kinds of cognitive studies on how birds
       | (and other animals) use tools. Has anyone looked into the
       | potential impacts (good and bad) for wide scale introduction of
       | proven tools for use by other animals?
       | 
       | Off the top of my head, if a tool is made of plastic for example,
       | we'd be littering our environments with questionable trash.
       | 
       | But conceptually, what's the downside to leave a huge pile of
       | defensive materials like bird spikes in the forest to help
       | promote nest health?
       | 
       | Stopping short of given them weapons of course. (Shout out to the
       | other comment about training animals to dismantle barbed wire.)
        
         | mmooss wrote:
         | > Has anyone looked into the potential impacts (good and bad)
         | for wide scale introduction of proven tools for use by other
         | animals?
         | 
         | That is interesting. What if we designed tools for use by
         | corvids?
         | 
         | > conceptually, what's the downside to leave a huge pile of
         | defensive materials like bird spikes in the forest to help
         | promote nest health?
         | 
         | We'd be supporting one species, the prey, over the other, the
         | predator. Why? Do we mean to apply vegan principles to animals?
         | What happens to the predators? How do animal rights apply?
         | Conceptually, it's really a difficult question.
        
         | gtirloni wrote:
         | Unless there's an imbalance caused by human activity, I'd say
         | we are better off leaving the birds and their ecosystems alone.
        
           | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
           | I agree, but I would be curious about cases where nature
           | could reclaim habitat faster if we give it some tools for the
           | job. I can't really think of what those tools might be off
           | hand though--apart from some kind of weapon/disease that
           | better keeps humans away at marginal detriment to the
           | user/host.
        
             | mulmen wrote:
             | Don't we already do this with artificial reefs?
        
             | Suppafly wrote:
             | >I agree, but I would be curious about cases where nature
             | could reclaim habitat faster if we give it some tools for
             | the job. I can't really think of what those tools might be
             | off hand though--apart from some kind of weapon/disease
             | that better keeps humans away at marginal detriment to the
             | user/host.
             | 
             | That's an interesting line of thought. The only thing that
             | comes to mind is something like giving them fancy hats or
             | paintjobs to encourage more reproductive success in
             | declining species.
        
               | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
               | There's a bit of interesting work that's done re:
               | introducing cloned organisms from decades past (from a
               | time when biodiversity wasn't as strained), e.g.
               | https://www.fws.gov/press-release/2024-11/advancements-
               | black...
               | 
               | One could also imagine releasing a virus which
               | reprogrammed wildlife genomes for resistance against some
               | toxin that we had previously introduced into the
               | environment (ideally we would also stop introducing the
               | toxin...).
               | 
               | But none of these things come down to "heres a tool for
               | you to use". Golly I wish I could come up with some
               | technology that would help the woodpeckers better hunt
               | invasive pine beetles--the forests around me are looking
               | pretty rough--but that's a bit too fantastical to hope
               | for.
        
           | aradox66 wrote:
           | The "leaving ecosystems alone" ship sailed almost everywhere
           | on Earth tens of thousands of years ago. Humans have always
           | been a part of, and had impacts upon, the ecosystems we've
           | lived in. Certainly moreso in recent centuries.
           | 
           | Not to say that further interventions will be helpful in
           | "reestablishing balance".
           | 
           | Even the concept of "balance" or homeostasis has long been
           | recognized to not really exist in any ecosystem.
        
           | crooked-v wrote:
           | For a lot of animals like crows, their ecosystems _are_
           | "human activity" now.
        
             | fullstop wrote:
             | Last summer I made an attempt at befriending a crow. It
             | actually went pretty well, but the treasures that he
             | brought me blew my mind:                 * French fries
             | * Cooked pasta, maybe baked ziti?       * BBQ ribs, but
             | just the bone with some sauce on it       * Chicken nuggets
             | * One dead bird, conveniently opened for me       * Several
             | whole dead baby chicks       * One baby chick's head
             | 
             | I stopped feeding it after it kept leaving us, and my
             | neighbor, the dead birds, and it was fowling (ha) up the
             | water in her bird bath. It loved blueberries, cat food,
             | pepitas, and walnuts. It did not like apples and would toss
             | them aside.
             | 
             | I would shake my car keys when I put the food out, and it
             | would show up a few minutes later, but I never figured out
             | if it just saw me or heard the keys.
             | 
             | Here's some video clips of my buddy:
             | 
             | https://i.imgur.com/4ZQb7L3.mp4
             | https://i.imgur.com/B4DBLxg.mp4
             | 
             | edit: make the links clickable
        
         | al_borland wrote:
         | They could become dependent on those tools and then if humans
         | stop, the animals will die the tool supply drops.
        
       | a3w wrote:
       | Life, uh, finds a way.
        
       | FredPret wrote:
       | I'm impressed by this crow's beak-work: all the spikes are
       | oriented inward and covered in leaves, making that nest very
       | strong and not spiky at all.
        
       | jeffrallen wrote:
       | "...the street finds its own uses for things"
        
         | MrMcCall wrote:
         | And we will never run out of uses for WG quotes. Or +1s :-)
        
       | dukeofdoom wrote:
       | So the author makes a thesis statement then contradicts in the
       | body. So great. Love birds, but hate emotional manipulation. If
       | you feel bad, your online time is better spent on working to buy
       | land outside of cities and letting it go wild. Cities are for
       | primarily for people to live in. And many bird species have
       | adapted to live with people already. So the claim is dubious.
       | Infact Birds are very adaptable, so adaptable people have to put
       | spikes up...to which the birds have adapted to. Actual parqueets
       | live in England for example thanks to people feeding them. But
       | don't feed the rats...
        
       | wizardforhire wrote:
       | So the corvids have developed punk?
        
       | vittore wrote:
       | I find it unfair that there is no Audubon location in Audubon, NJ
       | :p
       | 
       | Saved the link for more bird news.
        
         | btown wrote:
         | Both were independently named for
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_James_Audubon !
        
       | Tesas wrote:
       | They work like springs in the mattress and they add the fluff to
       | the top. Additional benefits are that the spikes don't get chewed
       | by rodents and remain there for the following year
        
       | _kst_ wrote:
       | Reminds me of the rats we used to have in our garage, that had
       | built nests from our dryer lint.
       | 
       | Our dryer lint was largely cat hair.
        
       | pelagic_sky wrote:
       | Cockatoos just rip them out for fun.
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/rga3pf/cockatoo_...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-03-14 23:00 UTC)