[HN Gopher] Iconography of the PuTTY tools
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Iconography of the PuTTY tools
        
       Author : Tomte
       Score  : 113 points
       Date   : 2025-03-12 19:29 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.chiark.greenend.org.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.chiark.greenend.org.uk)
        
       | acheron wrote:
       | He says he doesn't remember why he picked blue for the screen,
       | but that was a standard color for screens depicted in Win 3.x and
       | Win95 icons, so I would assume he was just following that.
        
         | timthorn wrote:
         | And I think that B&W made sense as back then, there would have
         | been a number of monochrome portable computers still in
         | service.
        
           | mhitza wrote:
           | I would also guess that Windows 95/98 in high contrast mode
           | had an influence.
        
         | susam wrote:
         | EDIT.COM and MS-DOS installers too had blue background. In
         | fact, blue (CGA colour 1) was a very popular background colour
         | for many tools. For example, white on blue was a popular colour
         | theme for Turbo Pascal, Turbo C, etc. With the limited number
         | of colours available back then, blue was one of the few
         | background colours that was easy on the eyes.
         | 
         | Also, you are right indeed. I remember Windows 3.1, 95, 98,
         | etc. used blue as the screen colour for icons depicting
         | computers. For icons that had two computers (e.g. "Network
         | Neighborhood"), one computer had blue screen and the other one
         | had cyan.
        
         | bhaak wrote:
         | You can see several examples on this page
         | http://toastytech.com/guis/win31.html that depict an icon with
         | a computer which is almost identical to the one used by putty.
         | 
         | I had to zoom in to verify that it's not the same.
        
           | HenryBemis wrote:
           | oh man what a trip down memory lane that was!!! I haven't
           | seen win3.1 for sooooooo long.. thank you for the link and
           | the trip!
        
       | smallnix wrote:
       | Thanks for the blog post, I like these personal pieces of
       | software history
        
       | adt wrote:
       | I remember this from the 90s.
       | 
       | And I _love_ your use of italics, Simon!
        
       | Lammy wrote:
       | I wonder if the "Agent" hat iconography was inspired by Forte
       | Agent, the most (IMHO) popular Usenet software for Windows, which
       | used a very similar motif: https://archive.org/details/forte-
       | agent-1.6
       | 
       | Love reading this kind of history straight from the creator :)
        
         | cluckindan wrote:
         | It's from the "Spy vs. Spy" comic strip.
        
         | rzzzt wrote:
         | I'm seeing Carmen Sandiego in it for some reason, but the
         | modern version (from 2014) has a film noir detective in the
         | same spot (the application icon is still the lady in the hat):
         | https://youtu.be/h-_UNm_gycU?t=94
        
       | rzzzt wrote:
       | This sentence resonates with me: "After a few failed attempts, I
       | realised that Pageant would never get released at all if I waited
       | until I'd drawn the icon I wanted". Many of the projects I'd like
       | to tinker with stop at such self-inflicted roadblocks. My
       | favorite is getting stuck at naming the repository/top-level
       | folder.
        
         | TZubiri wrote:
         | Deadlines!
         | 
         | Project Management is always disregarded as waste in hacker
         | circles, but figuring out how to move projects forward is a
         | worthwhile role in projects.
        
         | metalliqaz wrote:
         | AKA "bike-shedding"
        
           | rzzzt wrote:
           | I don't expect fully fledged brand names to pop out of my
           | brain and don't workshop it endlessly, but I can't call all
           | of them "New folder" either.
        
         | ghxst wrote:
         | One of the areas LLMs has been most helpful to me personally
         | has to be getting over naming choices lol, whether it's repos,
         | variables or structs for some reason I tend to have a hard time
         | coming up with names :').
        
       | Sharlin wrote:
       | _> I can't remember why the lightning bolt was yellow. With
       | hindsight that seems the strangest thing about it; cyan would
       | have been a more obvious choice for electricity. Possibly it was
       | just to contrast more with the blue screens of the computers._
       | 
       | I had to stop and consider this, because it seemed to me that
       | yellow was "obviously" the correct color. And indeed a few image
       | searches confirmed this: a yellow lightning bolt is by far the
       | most universal symbol for electricity, along with the standard
       | black-on-yellow danger icon. I'm not sure how far back in history
       | that representation goes, or what its origins are, but I think
       | it's been used ubiquitously in comics and cartoons for a long
       | time.
        
         | metalliqaz wrote:
         | this also caught my attention. the author also questions why
         | the screens are blue
         | 
         | I think he has just forgotten that in the late 90s, these color
         | choices were entirely _obvious_ and followed the Windows design
         | precedent, which is why he probably didn 't think much about it
         | at the time
        
         | gerdesj wrote:
         | Simon Tathum is British and I have never knowingly seen a
         | lightning bolt coloured cyan hereabouts. Our "Danger of death"
         | signs are black on yellow (1)
         | 
         | To be fair an image search for lightning does look decidedly
         | cyan on royal, with purple, red and more options.
         | 
         | (1) https://www.hse.gov.uk/electricity/nearelectric.htm#signs
        
       | RadiozRadioz wrote:
       | > I think that's probably because the 1990s styling is part of
       | what makes PuTTY what it is - "reassuringly old-fashioned"
       | 
       | This is definitely something that attracts me to PuTTY. There
       | _is_ something reassuring about applications that look the way
       | PuTTY does - maybe the aged look projects stability due to lack
       | of change, maybe it's just the additional cohesion from using OS
       | primitives, I'm not sure. What I am sure of is that I find the
       | opposite to be true for apps with a "modern" aesthetic; the more
       | material design, rounded corners, transitions, low contrast, high
       | padding I see, the more I experience feelings of distrust and
       | skepticism.
       | 
       | I'm not qualified to psychoanalyze it, but I'd hazard that it's
       | not an uncommon interpretation in some user groups, given the
       | pockets of fans of PuTTY-esque design.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-03-12 23:00 UTC)