[HN Gopher] Let me GPT that for you
___________________________________________________________________
Let me GPT that for you
Author : luccasiau
Score : 32 points
Date : 2025-03-02 18:18 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (letmegptthatforyou.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (letmegptthatforyou.com)
| egypturnash wrote:
| https://letmegptthatforyou.com/a/PAZ26
| barotalomey wrote:
| Back when we were smug asking people to just fn google stuff, we
| would be right in that they could find a correct answer out
| there.
|
| Today, everyone's dad work at Nintendo. -\\_(tsu)_/-
| clessg wrote:
| > Today, everyone's dad work at Nintendo. -\\_(tsu)_/-
|
| I just so happen to run an old online fan made Pokemon game
| where people can be banned for misbehavior (e.g. cheating).
| Let's just say I can confirm this sentiment.
| locusofself wrote:
| lol it's made with Claude
| trash_cat wrote:
| Still a GPT with Chat though.
| exe34 wrote:
| The thing about ChatGPT, I don't know if the answer is wrong or
| made up. I have a friend who helps me with Swedish and he isn't a
| language tutor - so sometimes he asks ChatGPT to explain
| something I've asked him. The crucial difference is that he's
| knowledgeable enough on the matter to vet the quality and then
| pass the information to me. If he or I were to just ask ChatGPT
| without any verification, then I would not be able to trust the
| answer.
| eddd-ddde wrote:
| It's like P vs NP. There's tons of questions I get during my
| job that googling is not enough to answer. Whereas asking
| chatgpt yields results that are then easily verifiable with
| some googling.
| schroeding wrote:
| I don't like the idea of telling people (even smugly at worst, if
| it's used the way LMGTFY was, and as the tagline[1] implies) to
| just ask ChatGPT _instead of humans_.
|
| LMGTFY returned human results that weren't SEO rubbish at the
| time for the most part, which you could classify yourself (or by
| others) as trustworthy or not. ChatGPT itself still sometimes
| hallucinates on pretty basic information and other users _don 't
| get exactly the same result as you_.
|
| [1] "Someone else asked ChatGPT for you. Appreciate it."
| nomel wrote:
| If you don't know that the google search or llm will respond
| with what will help them, then it's directly against the
| purpose these exist for: the questioner put zero effort for a
| trivial answer, and you know that.
| brm wrote:
| I really try hard not to be down on stuff like this, to let it
| pass uncommented, but the mere creation of this site is evidence
| that creator missed the point of the original that they derived
| it from.
| mdaniel wrote:
| foul: https://letmegptthatforyou.com/stats
| RandomDistort wrote:
| There's not even a privacy notice on the website, is that
| legal?
| WheatMillington wrote:
| Wow this is even more obnoxious than the already insufferable
| LMGTFY.
| justinsaccount wrote:
| Well this exceeded my expectations.
|
| https://letmegptthatforyou.com/a/wcDtF
| dzhiurgis wrote:
| Probably missed opportunity to add authoritative answer and give
| a feedback loop to gpt
| elicksaur wrote:
| No.
|
| People pasting full llm outputs into help forum responses has
| been one of the most annoying trends.
|
| If you can't do more than what a llm would say, you're already
| replaceable.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-03-02 23:01 UTC)