[HN Gopher] Narrative and the Structure of Art (2023)
___________________________________________________________________
Narrative and the Structure of Art (2023)
Author : bryanrasmussen
Score : 30 points
Date : 2025-02-25 11:01 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (medium.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (medium.com)
| kayanne_numba_1 wrote:
| Interesting!
| cicdw wrote:
| It's great that people are interested in art and interpretation,
| but this piece reads like someone trying to come up with a naive
| critical theory of art in a vacuum, completely independently from
| the centuries of theory that have already been developed. And to
| claim that Dada and James Joyce had no lasting influence is
| comical.
| grimpy wrote:
| ...and not just decades of art theory, but any familiarity with
| the actual art objects themselves.
|
| Looking at the author's other (prolific) posts, I can't help
| but wonder if this is AI spam.
| mock-possum wrote:
| Yeah it's like - an interesting start, but some things it
| spends oddly little time on, as if they're self-evident -
|
| > the only real narrative found in graphics are in design and
| advertising, which feedbacks to leading fine artists to
| distrust narrative as it implies commercial considerations
| (note the use of predominantly, there can still be fine graphic
| arts that possess narrative)
|
| Why no explanation about or examples of the narrative inherent
| to design / advertising / commercial work? I can guess, but why
| make me guess?
|
| > the authoritative or interpretive imposition of Narrative,
| wherein the artist or a prominent critic imposes a narrative on
| the work that has had the narrative removed.
|
| In what sense has it been removed? How is that accomplished?
| What's an example of art that's had the narrative removed?
|
| ... it's all just kind of unsatisfying. I want either
| historical or modern examples of all these things, otherwise
| it's all just... sort of abstract pontificating, imo.
|
| Really, for an author so concerned with narrative in art...
| it's seems like they kind of fumbled adding it to their own
| work here. I'm left wishing there was more to the story.
| smokel wrote:
| _> But it is true of all the arts that narrative is a potential
| factor of the artwork._
|
| You lost me there. Either you're saying nothing (everything has
| potential for a narrative), or you're not making sense. There is
| "anti-art" [1], which is art, so you will never be able to say
| one conclusive thing about all art. Just say something that you
| want to be true about art, and I'll instantly create some new art
| that goes against it.
|
| Stop trying to define art using analytical terms, and stop
| assigning random properties to it. We've had Wittgenstein to show
| that this is all nonsense [2], and now we have vector embeddings
| to show that all these concepts are potentially no more than
| social constructs. Trying to reduce that complexity to a few
| simple rules is just folly.
|
| [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-art
|
| [2] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Familien%C3%A4hnlichkeit
| autobodie wrote:
| See "potential".
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-02-28 23:02 UTC)