[HN Gopher] Lynx Browser: The Land That Time Revived (2022)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Lynx Browser: The Land That Time Revived (2022)
        
       Author : leonry
       Score  : 75 points
       Date   : 2025-02-20 19:46 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (popzazzle.blogspot.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (popzazzle.blogspot.com)
        
       | aadhavans wrote:
       | > It doesn't need a blocker for third-party scripting, service
       | workers ... because the browser's technology simply doesn't
       | recognise these page components
       | 
       | I'd never thought about it like that, but it's a nice side-
       | effect. You don't have to worry about obtrusive JS, if your
       | browser doesn't know what JS is. :D
        
         | zimpenfish wrote:
         | > if your browser doesn't know what JS is
         | 
         | It's worse than that[0] - Lynx statically renders the page at
         | load time which means any "dynamic" updates just can't happen.
         | I did have a bash at integrating the Mozilla JS engine but gave
         | up after realising that anything more than just
         | `document.write("flange")` handled at load time would need the
         | entire inner engine rewriting and that was/is far beyond me[1].
         | 
         | [0] This is based off my memories of the Lynx source back in
         | the Olden Times, ~1995-2000ish.
         | 
         | [1] But I did do the original cookie jar and colour styles (as
         | seen in the screenshots) work (`lynx.lss` is all my fault,
         | sorry)
        
       | spudlyo wrote:
       | This how I used to read HN at work, nobody bats an eye at text in
       | the terminal. I'm sure I could have gotten away with sipping my
       | coffee in the morning with the orange website plastered all over
       | my screen, but I felt like it was important to keep up
       | appearances--call it productivity theater.
        
         | bitbasher wrote:
         | That's why I play dungeon crawl stone soup in the terminal. I'm
         | defending myself against fire dragons and dodging iron shots,
         | but it looks like I'm aggressively debugging something.
        
       | w4rh4wk5 wrote:
       | While the article mentions alternatives like links and w3m, I'd
       | like to hear HN's opinion on links vs w3m vs lynx.
        
         | synergy20 wrote:
         | i use w3m, last time checked it's more updated than lynx. w3m
         | is also utf8 ready,lynx not. w3m-img can display images in
         | terminal,lynx can't
        
         | inopinatus wrote:
         | some web pages are best read using curl
         | 
         | or nc <hostname> 80
        
           | jmclnx wrote:
           | Last I heard, RMS does something similar to this.
        
         | artiliran wrote:
         | I always found links the most pleasant. A big factor was how
         | often lynx asked about cookies, but now I know from the article
         | I can set it to reject all I might revisit lynx. w3m seemed to
         | set itself apart with the ability to show graphics which I
         | didn't care about so never really gave it a chance.
        
           | every wrote:
           | I have my lynx set to accept all cookies (makes for far less
           | bother) but somehow seem to have forgotten to tell lynx where
           | to store them. Logout of the browser and "poof" they all
           | disappear...
        
         | dcassett wrote:
         | Linux user here.
         | 
         | I use links in graphical mode (links -g) quite a bit. It's easy
         | to turn image display on and off with the '*' key. Image sizes
         | can be scaled with the menu and they take effect immediately.
         | If one hovers over an image link and types "i", the image
         | itself is displayed, and there's an option to scale the image
         | to fit the window. Getting a new links window is easy (Alt-F
         | n). One gripe is that hitting Ctrl-C will close the window (the
         | 'Q' key does this already)
         | 
         | I use lynx as a second line of defense when some sites refuse
         | to work with links, because lynx is sometimes able to display
         | them (different user agent?). I also have been recently using
         | lynx within xterm (disabling the alternate screen) for forums
         | where posted URLs are not clickable (text only) in combination
         | with xterm's dabbrev-expand() function to quickly copy such
         | URLs in lynx's goto prompt. As an aside: in xterm's misc.c
         | there's a a macro (IS_WORD_CONSTITUENT) that can be easily
         | expanded to exclude characters that are not part of a URL, such
         | as braces.
         | 
         | I do worry that more and more websites will simply show
         | "Suspicious Activity Detected" for these browsers. As mentioned
         | so many times on HN, text browser users are a minority and text
         | browsers are obsolete. I did once send a message to a website
         | owner and later saw that I could access the site, but didn't
         | get an acknowledgement by email, so I can't be sure if it was
         | in response to my request. There still are some websites that
         | degrade gracefully, and, despite complaints by the server,
         | allow text input windows and submit buttons to still work.
        
       | ylee wrote:
       | I use two of the mentioned browsers.
       | 
       | I have elinks as a default `tmux` pseudoterminal. I don't use it
       | often, but it's always there.
       | 
       | My emacs setup uses w3m as the parser for HTML mail in VM, my
       | email client. It works really well.
       | <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39793342>
        
       | wrycoder wrote:
       | IMO, a most useful thing is Lynx in DIRED mode. A great read-only
       | directory browser - just enter a local url when you start it. For
       | example, <lynx .> or <lynx /> .
        
       | 2mlWQbCK wrote:
       | I have not used Lynx interactively in ages, but when I want to
       | save some pages of text from somewhere (typically an old web
       | forum thread or blog) I often call lynx -dump (followed by gzip)
       | from a script. It is an easy way to get nicely formatted text
       | with all the HTML nonsense removed, and it also includes a list
       | of all links from the page. Not exactly what a real archivist
       | would do, but it works for hoarding text.
        
         | atiedebee wrote:
         | I did not know that it had that feature, and having just tried
         | it out it does work really well. Its output kind of reminds me
         | of the gemini protocol and its markup format[0],
         | 
         | [0]: https://geminiprotocol.net/
        
         | aghilmort wrote:
         | that is very useful information -- does it work with sites that
         | need logins?
        
       | lynx97 wrote:
       | Lynx (in tmux) is still my default browser. I only go for Firefox
       | if I really have to. Its darn _FAST_ , has no remote code
       | execution, and is typically all you need to read text on the web.
       | Its also a good test if the web dev is full of shit :-)
        
       | jmclnx wrote:
       | lynx is my goto browser these days.
       | 
       | It also supports gopher and I heard rumors it will add Gemini
       | (protocol, the real Gemini). If so, that would be awesome.
        
       | rsync wrote:
       | From the article:
       | 
       | "You can say goodbye to uBlock Origin, which is now virtually
       | useless with default settings anyway."
       | 
       | Are they referring to difficulties running uBO on chrome or ...
       | that uBO is losing the arms race against advertising infra
       | generally ?
        
         | ziddoap wrote:
         | I have to assume it's a chrome-specific comment, because I have
         | not noticed anything different with it (or my browsing
         | experience) on firefox (nor heard anyone else complain about
         | differences).
        
           | fffrantz wrote:
           | Second that. I do see the difference at work where it's
           | impossible to install Firefox and/or extensions; it's god
           | awful to browse the web without it.
           | 
           | I even installed it on my parents laptop and they never
           | complained that ads suddenly started appearing.
        
       | toprerules wrote:
       | It seems like out of Lynx, Links, and w3m, Lynx is the only one
       | still under active development with a recent-ish release. w3m
       | seems to be completely dead.
        
         | enriquto wrote:
         | Elinks is alive, and with better support for many modern sites
         | (no js, though).
         | 
         | https://github.com/rkd77/elinks
        
         | arminiusreturns wrote:
         | Am I the only one who uses eww? Thats the w3m replacement.
         | 
         | Strong shoutout to nyxt, it's not terminal based but it is fast
         | and I've liked it so far.
        
       | InMice wrote:
       | Firefox (with all the foundation's junk turned off) with noscript
       | and ublock origin is a compromise that works for me. Lynx feels
       | too impractical in today's world but it's fun to use every now
       | and then. Just trying hn on it now it doesnt render it cleanly
        
       | terminaltrove wrote:
       | Related to lynx, (with images)
       | 
       | https://terminaltrove.com/w3m/
       | 
       | https://terminaltrove.com/links/
       | 
       | https://terminaltrove.com/reader/
       | 
       | https://terminaltrove.com/elinks/
       | 
       | We are so glad that these tools exist for the terminal, we even
       | still use w3m and lynx from time to time.
       | 
       | https://terminaltrove.com/lynx/
       | 
       | If you do use the terminal for your browsing I recommend ddgr as
       | it integrates with all of the above browsers, except reader.
       | 
       | https://terminaltrove.com/ddgr/
        
         | jlarocco wrote:
         | There's also "eww" that comes with Emacs.
         | 
         | IME it's usually good enough for reading docs and stuff like
         | that.
        
           | aadhavans wrote:
           | "eww" is also my reaction to Emacs users (sent with vimium on
           | firefox)
        
       | AdmiralAsshat wrote:
       | I have bad memories associated with lynx due to an earlier tech
       | job. We'd help clients install their network printers so that the
       | applications running on the RHEL/Centos box could see them. We
       | did not have RDP or VNC access, but we did have on-demand SSH
       | access to their server. So we'd end up having to SSH into the box
       | and doing something like `elinks http://localhost:631` to bring
       | up the CUPS interface over the terminal, and fill out all of the
       | forms in the browser, tabbing to jump between lines and whatnot.
       | It was a massive PITA.
       | 
       | Not lynx's fault, of course. But memories are memories.
        
         | badc0ffee wrote:
         | This sounds like a good use case for ssh port forwarding, or if
         | port forwarding was restricted, SLiRP[1]!
         | 
         | [1] https://slirp.sourceforge.net
        
         | Telemakhos wrote:
         | I have better memories of lynx from the 90s: without internet
         | access at home over university breaks, I'd walk to the local
         | community college library, which had available, internet
         | connected computers that could only browse the library
         | catalogue or open a terminal. From the terminal I could telnet
         | to my home university's unix server and use lynx from there to
         | browse the internet.
        
       | FergusArgyll wrote:
       | I haven't tested many search engines but duckduckgo is very
       | usable in lynx, it redirects you to a subdomain made for browsers
       | that don't use js etc.
        
       | lizknope wrote:
       | In the 1990's my university had a lot of dialup modem lines but
       | only a small amount of them had PPP support. You would just get 1
       | terminal session. So I would dial in and then browse the web
       | through lynx. It worked fine and was quicker because it wouldn't
       | waste time loading images.
       | 
       | I recently tried Usenet for the first time in 20 years. I
       | installed slrn the text based newsreader I used in the 1990's. It
       | has very useful color support. I wish Usenet was more active
       | instead of 90% spam. Having threads go for years and being able
       | to go to the next post by hitting "n" instead of clicking around
       | is a lot quicker.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slrn
        
       | xenodium wrote:
       | Self-promo: I launched https://LMNO.lol blogs recently. They are
       | powered by markdown and render just fine on lynx. You can try my
       | blog https://LMNO.lol/alvaro or https://xenodium.com.
        
       | blacksmith_tb wrote:
       | There are also options like Carbonyl[1] and Browsh[2] which do
       | images and js in the terminal.
       | 
       | 1: https://github.com/fathyb/carbonyl
       | 
       | 2: https://github.com/browsh-org/browsh
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-02-20 23:00 UTC)