[HN Gopher] Big Tech Has Disrupted the Social Contract
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Big Tech Has Disrupted the Social Contract
        
       Author : herbertl
       Score  : 55 points
       Date   : 2025-02-16 20:10 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (basedfob.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (basedfob.substack.com)
        
       | Terr_ wrote:
       | A lot of it boils down to a promise that existing systems (and
       | existing ways to handle error and deter wrongdoing) have
       | _somehow_ been replaced by  "With An App" that efficiently
       | reimplements what came before... but in reality most of the
       | expensive features have been secretly removed, and you won't find
       | that out until you're the one getting screwed.
       | 
       | Come to think of it, a similar phenomenon applies to
       | cryptocurrencies: Even when they aren't an outright fraud,
       | somebody has just thrown away the _hard_ parts learned over
       | centuries, quietly dropping them or trying to convince you that
       | it 's better to be _entirely_ without.
        
         | AnthonyMouse wrote:
         | The general pattern is this: You create a system, it has
         | problems, people establish some apparatus to address the
         | problems, the apparatus is a central chokepoint which is then
         | captured by incumbents and abused for oppression, people demand
         | a new system, you create a new system, it has problems, ...
         | 
         | You either need to prevent the apparatus from being captured by
         | incumbents or you need to prevent it from being a central
         | chokepoint that can be abused for oppression.
        
       | hellojimbo wrote:
       | All of these peer to peer apps have the same fate; it works in
       | the high trust parts of the country, but the moment you scale,
       | the quality of service decreases, fees increase, etc.
        
         | missedthecue wrote:
         | That's all businesses. Ever visited an inner city corner
         | market? Items cost more, there's less selection, and quality of
         | service? The employees are behind bulletproof glass.
        
       | SpicyLemonZest wrote:
       | I don't understand this story. Why would you have an "expectation
       | that the service will be professional", when you first heard
       | about the company from news reports their service was used in
       | multiple terrorist attacks? When was there ever a social contract
       | that every company with an app can be trusted to provide high-
       | quality service?
        
       | namaria wrote:
       | So you rented a car from 'some guy' through 'some app' to travel
       | with your family across state lines and are shocked at a poor
       | outcome?
        
         | IncreasePosts wrote:
         | And someone with multiple assault charges lamenting the
         | disruption of the social contract. But, it's okay, because he
         | assaulted people when he was "supposed to" assault people.
        
       | _heimdall wrote:
       | I avoid the whole "sharing economy" as much as possible. I think
       | I've taken an uber or lyft twice when I was in a pinch in a city
       | I wasn't familiar with, and once ordered a truck part to be
       | delivered from a store in town that ended up being through a
       | third party app (I couldn't drive down without the replacement
       | fuel pump).
       | 
       | I really don't get the hope of trusting individuals that are
       | arguably being taken advantage of by a faceless tech business
       | rather than trusting employees or contractors that are at least
       | more invested in customer service for the company.
       | 
       | It makes about as much sense to me as distrusting humans so much
       | that you want to put all your wealth in a glorified git repo
       | coded by humans and run by a small number of people.
       | 
       | Either trust people or don't, its a pretty simple choice.
       | Convincing ourselves that a layer of tech can abstract humans
       | away so much that we don't _need_ to trust anyone is just absurd.
        
       | narcraft wrote:
       | "These tech companies used lobbies to destroy the enterprise
       | structure of our civilization from taxi cab medallions to hotels
       | to brick-and-mortar businesses."
       | 
       | Taxi cab medallions are a very poor example to cite. I'm
       | empathetic to the story of terrible customer service and share
       | sentiments about the overall erosion of user experience with many
       | tech-adjacent, so-called disruptive services, but the second
       | anyone suggests we were better off with the taxi cab than Uber or
       | Lyft, they lose all credibility in my eyes. I think the biggest
       | benefit that many fail to mention is that you can actually get
       | rides when and where you need to. For example, people have far
       | fewer excuses to drunk drive from bars in my hometown now than
       | they did 15 years ago. I've had my skin saved by several rides
       | that would be impossible without ride-sharing services.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-02-16 23:00 UTC)