[HN Gopher] Beginnings of Roman London discovered in office base...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Beginnings of Roman London discovered in office basement
        
       Author : petethomas
       Score  : 115 points
       Date   : 2025-02-13 04:46 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | tristanj wrote:
       | This is not unusual in this district of London.
       | 
       | The remains of London's Roman amphitheatre are beneath Guildhall,
       | in the basement of the public art gallery:
       | https://www.thecityofldn.com/directory/londons-roman-amphith...
       | 
       | And in the basement of Bloomberg's London headquarters, there's
       | also a reconstructed Roman temple dedicated to Mithras. It's free
       | and open to the public. Interestingly, after it was discovered,
       | they dismantled it, moved it elsewhere, then later rebuilt it
       | piece by piece: https://www.bloomberg.org/arts/advancing-the-
       | arts-around-wor...
       | 
       | Finally, the Roman baths at Billingsgate are open to visitors on
       | weekends: https://www.thecityofldn.com/directory/billingsgate-
       | roman-ho...
        
         | madaxe_again wrote:
         | This is not unusual in general...
         | 
         | My cottage in wales is built smack atop a roman road, and the
         | garden follows the line of the agger. At some point it degraded
         | so much that people started walking in the roadside ditch
         | instead, which is now a holloway.
         | 
         | I have a friend in Bath who has an extremely fine Roman mosaic
         | under his basement floor - found during construction a few
         | centuries ago and they just left it in situ, put clay atop it
         | and laid flags. He rediscovered it about 15 years ago when they
         | pulled the flagstones up to put in a damp-proof course. Likely
         | part of the baths complex as his house is a stones throw from
         | them. Archaeologists documented it, and it was then buried
         | under sand and a damp-proof course.
         | 
         | He's still got damp down there.
        
           | toyg wrote:
           | It's Britain, fighting damp is like fighting the ocean: you
           | can win a battle but you'll never win the war.
        
           | walthamstow wrote:
           | Yep, Roman ruins are all over the place. I cycle past a chunk
           | of the old London Wall regularly. Lullingstone Villa in Kent
           | was a cool school trip as a kid.
           | 
           | And then there's this little wall running across
           | Cumbria/Northumbria...
        
         | stuaxo wrote:
         | I visited the Mithras temple the other day, and was pretty
         | confused that they had moved it since the first time I had
         | gone.
        
           | zeristor wrote:
           | Actually they had moved it to where it was originally.
           | 
           | It was excavated then reconstructed by some 1950s office
           | block.
           | 
           | I imagine Bloomberg either thought of this as a key feature,
           | or it was part of planning consent for their head quarters.
           | 
           | Access is free, but it has been restricted to reduced
           | crowding. When I've been there it seemed there seemed to be a
           | Bloomberg employee tour on, I'm not sure how much access is
           | controlled by Bloomberg, but it was a surprisingly long way
           | down in the ground.
           | 
           | I'm not sure how much lower ground level was in Roman times.
        
             | y33t wrote:
             | IIRC temples to Mithras were almost always underground or
             | in a cave.
        
             | klelatti wrote:
             | I worked in that 1950s office block (Temple Court) and was
             | involved in the sale of the site to Bloomberg.
             | 
             | The Temple of Mithras sat outside the office a few feet
             | from the pavement with free public access at all times. It
             | attracted very little interest though as there wasn't much
             | to mark it out.
             | 
             | IIRC it had to be moved as part of the redevelopment and
             | the idea to relocate to its original location were a very
             | early part of the proposals. Not a big deal as part of a
             | very large project and obviously a way for Bloomberg to
             | gain favour with the City of London planners.
             | 
             | There are a few interesting videos on YouTube on the
             | history e.g.
             | 
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAEtYSJ4GLE
        
               | cco wrote:
               | Appreciate the primary source insight!
        
       | supernova87a wrote:
       | I can see how when owning a building in a place like that, you
       | might be tempted to say, "not even going to dig, don't want to
       | know what we might find under there" that will cause your
       | property to completely change value and control.
       | 
       | I wonder who takes the loss, in case suddenly your building can
       | no longer be developed and is essentially state property
       | (although owned by you).
        
         | cgcrob wrote:
         | I'm sure the property development mega corporation will get
         | over it.
        
         | 4ndrewl wrote:
         | It's still your property. Through the "polluter pays" principle
         | you (the developer) may have to pay for the archaeological dig
         | (which is, by it's nature destructive).
         | 
         | In many cases if the archaeological finds are mobile (eg coins,
         | shields etc) you may be compensated for them by a government
         | fund.
         | 
         | But digging down in that part of London you're always going to
         | hit something Tudor, Medieval, Saxon or Roman. It would be
         | priced in as part of the development.
        
         | vkou wrote:
         | If we believe in markets, we would have to believe that the
         | risk is priced into the cost of the property, much like the
         | risk of a lemon is priced into the cost of a used car.
        
         | lmz wrote:
         | I wonder if you can get insurance for that. Also, how much
         | worse must this be in Rome?
        
         | userbinator wrote:
         | In another few hundred years, I wonder if people will discover
         | bits and pieces of the buildings today and repeat the same
         | cycle.
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | I'm sure I've seen a sandstone culvert in an otherwise boring
       | wall around the strand or Lincoln's Inn which is a Roman water
       | supply. Can't find it on the wub, but.
        
         | Xen9 wrote:
         | It would be great use of my money, were I a billionaire, to
         | build a vacuum-insulated sodaduct & cervisiaduct as a ring
         | going around Europe perhaps with a monorail on the bottom (for
         | convenient repairs) & photovoltaic cells on top to power it the
         | monotail. Technically you can have two monorails for one track,
         | one above and one below, so the upper monorail could be used
         | for something else as well. The ice & carbon dioxide would be
         | delivered separately to keep the the drinks fresh, and there
         | would be few be a different pipe for drinks from different
         | German & French & Spanish districts inside the cervisiaduct.
        
           | DiscourseFan wrote:
           | Fourier-pilled
        
       | ginko wrote:
       | I mean it's the BBC so they obviously have a focus on British
       | history but you can find remains like that under many cities in
       | Western and Southern Europe.
        
       | fanf2 wrote:
       | This is right next to Leadenhall Market, which dates from the
       | 14th century. I wonder if there were other markets on the same-
       | ish site between the Roman forum and Leadenhall.
        
         | zeristor wrote:
         | I believe Leadenhall carried on being used as a market. I'm not
         | sure about the 400s to 900s when the Anglo-Saxons clambered
         | over Roman ruins.
         | 
         | The Vikings set up shop around The Strand and Covent Garden,
         | then Alfred reinstated London.
         | 
         | I think, I am not historian, and maybe attributing much to
         | recent TV shows. But I've worked through Queenhythe enough
         | times to read the placards.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queenhithe
        
       | ethbr1 wrote:
       | "Re-beginnings" would be more accurate.
       | 
       | Considering this building is dated to after Boudica's revolt [0]
       | burned the city, the revolt itself having been caused by
       | Nero/Rome ignoring a will by the nominally independent Celtic
       | king Prasutagus leaving the area jointly to his wife/daughters
       | and Nero upon his death.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudican_revolt#Londinium
        
       | jll29 wrote:
       | There should be an Augmented Reality app for London that shows
       | you how it was around 1,800 years ago, whereever you are
       | standing, mobile phone in hand.
       | 
       | On the top of the Shard, there is an AR telescope that shows you
       | what is in some of the buildings of the cityscape, which is
       | already very useful. Imagine something similar, but pointing to
       | Roman times in "Londinum".
        
       | shermantanktop wrote:
       | I worked next door to this building a while ago. London is
       | constantly under construction, and in the Leadenhall area they
       | are constantly finding Roman artifacts. The basement of my
       | (terrible 1980s) building had a whole set of Roman bits and bobs
       | embedded in the floor.
       | 
       | People from elsewhere says "how amazing" but it becomes a routine
       | fact after a while. And while it is amazing it's also a bit
       | annoying. Major projects plan to block off a street for a month,
       | which becomes three months or more once a Roman coin pile turns
       | up.
        
         | robertlagrant wrote:
         | As Sir Humphrey once said, the Civil Service has the engine of
         | a lawnmower and the brakes of a Rolls Royce. I think this
         | applies to the UK's construction industry and regulatory
         | environment as well.
         | 
         | Crossrail cost about PS280m per mile, which I'm pretty sure is
         | a record.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-02-16 23:00 UTC)