[HN Gopher] Jooki - Taking Control of a Forgotten Device
___________________________________________________________________
Jooki - Taking Control of a Forgotten Device
Author : nfriedly
Score : 54 points
Date : 2025-02-10 05:53 UTC (4 days ago)
(HTM) web link (nv1t.github.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (nv1t.github.io)
| userbinator wrote:
| _This design appears to be intended for over-the-air (OTA)
| updates but, if exploited by a malicious actor, could enable
| remote code execution (RCE)._
|
| RCE is what every automatic update functionality essentially is.
| JimDabell wrote:
| > But that dream turned into frustration when the company behind
| Jooki went bankrupt, leaving countless devices bricked and
| families frustrated.
|
| It's situations like this that make me believe that software
| should only qualify for copyright protection if its source code
| is published. We do this with patents precisely so that
| inventions don't disappear when their creators do. Why don't we
| do this with software too?
| spoaceman7777 wrote:
| Unfortunately, there are certain major manufacturing countries
| which don't respect copyright law, and constantly poach
| everything from startups to kickstarters. :/
| JimDabell wrote:
| Do they respect patents any more than copyright?
| sweeter wrote:
| I think copyright is counterproductive and destroys
| innovation more than copycats. Companies will evergreen
| patents eternally and then sit on it forever and either die
| out or become litigious trying to protect their patent. Just
| look at Disney with Mickey mouse, Amazon bought up the best
| text to speech system known to man and they literally don't
| use it at all, or look at the medical industry... They spend
| billions on slightly tweaking delivery methods to keep
| patents alive for decades. It's grotesque. Or the nemesis
| system in gaming.
|
| Those countries are not going to abide anyways (and I
| honestly don't care because this system is so messed up
| anyways, 5 years should be more than enough time to make your
| money) but instead we get rot.
| robertlagrant wrote:
| A couple of possibilities:
|
| - copyright isn't patents, and copyright doesn't work this way
| for other works
|
| - why would this help? Companies could just not copyright the
| server code, and not release it
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-02-14 23:01 UTC)