[HN Gopher] The return of the buffalo is reviving portions of th...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The return of the buffalo is reviving portions of the ecosystem
        
       Author : geox
       Score  : 40 points
       Date   : 2025-02-10 19:24 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nativesunnews.today)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nativesunnews.today)
        
       | OptionOfT wrote:
       | That's absolutely amazing news. I've seen them (at a distance) in
       | Yellowstone.
       | 
       | The photo of the giant pile of bison skulls invokes such a
       | feeling of pure doom. The fact that this happened not because the
       | animals are a nuisance, but to eradicate the people who relied on
       | them is... insane.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bison_hunting#19th-century_bis...
       | 
       | As per the history books, only ~100 remained at the end. And what
       | I cannot find a definitive answer on is: are the current bison
       | (not the ones for meat) all descendants of those 100?
       | 
       | I do wonder, apart from money, how can a sw engineer contribute
       | to this restoration effort?
        
         | itronitron wrote:
         | You might be interested in the book "Empire of the Summer Moon"
         | 
         | >> https://scgwynne.com/product/empire-of-the-summer-moon
         | 
         | Although I will strongly caution you that there are some very
         | disturbing details in the book that relate to how some people
         | have mistreated/dehumanized other people. Definitely not okay
         | for children to be reading.
         | 
         | The book touches on how the buffalo were hunted, and the types
         | of 'characters' that excelled at it.
        
         | margalabargala wrote:
         | There has been a fair amount of interbreeding with cattle,
         | which means that the current genetic diversity is not as
         | bottlenecked as you would expect, but also means that most
         | existing bison are not "pure bison".
         | 
         | While the population was thought to drop to 100, there were
         | several other herds discovered, the lowest the population ever
         | got was probably closer to 1000 than 100.
        
         | dabluecaboose wrote:
         | > The fact that this happened not because the animals are a
         | nuisance, but to eradicate the people who relied on them is...
         | insane.
         | 
         | A little of Column A, a little of Column B. The railroads
         | sponsored a lot of bison hunters because the giant herds would
         | block railroad tracks for hours (or days!) at a time. The famed
         | "Buffalo Bill" Cody was one of these hunters. This largely
         | predated General Sherman's bison eradication plan.
         | 
         | > I do wonder, apart from money, how can a sw engineer
         | contribute to this restoration effort?
         | 
         | It may sound counter-intuitive, but eat bison! The bison's
         | rebound in the most recent 25 years (~30k in 2000 vs ~500k in
         | 2017) is due in large part to ranchers realizing they're
         | profitable.
        
       | karaterobot wrote:
       | Glad to hear it. Where was I reading that, in dry, infertile
       | places on the prairie where buffalo have been released, you see
       | new plants growing up wherever they go, almost like they're
       | leaving life in their wake? This is one of the arguments for de-
       | extincting mammoths (in addition to it being one of the most
       | metal things modern genetics puts us in reach of).
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | It makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint that animals
         | that eat grasses should also fertilize the grasses so their
         | food supply remains abundant.
        
           | HarHarVeryFunny wrote:
           | Sounds like bullshit to me.
        
       | jandrewrogers wrote:
       | The necessity of vast herds of large ungulates have long been
       | recognized as a critical part of the North American ecosystem.
       | Either bison or cattle will demonstrably work. Regions that have
       | largely been abandoned by cattle ranchers, whether due to
       | economics, environmental destruction, or regulation, have been
       | ecologically devastated in the absence of wild bison to fill the
       | ecosystem gap. Bootstrapping new herds of bison in these areas
       | will transform them in a positive way. In the Mountain West, the
       | introduction of free range cattle in areas that were previously
       | off-limits has had a similar effect.
       | 
       | This is related to why eliminating beef agriculture in large
       | parts of North America would have limited impact on ungulate
       | methane emissions. Without replacing them with vast herds of
       | bison, which similarly emit methane, the ecosystems die.
        
         | upghost wrote:
         | I wish the article dove into this a little. Very interested in
         | _why_ the large herds are so important. Seems counter-
         | intuitive, you know? Like they would consume lots of resources?
         | Would be very interested in understanding the ecology better.
         | Do you (or anyone) happen to have some resources on this?
        
           | sethammons wrote:
           | you can regenerate soil with these large herds. It is the
           | trampling of soil under hoof. Millions of tilling animals.
           | This builds up soil. Topsoil in the plains used to be 16+
           | inches. Now it is under 4. Gone on some places. We removed
           | the way it was re-built when eroded (or in our case, farmed
           | away)
        
             | tastyfreeze wrote:
             | Topsoil in the plains was many feet prior to the dustbowl.
             | Probably not everywhere but many prairie plants have roots
             | down to 15-20 feet.
             | 
             | Topsoil is what we call the upper "living" aerobic portion
             | of soil. It is the portion of soil that participates in
             | nutrient cycling. Roots into subsoil turn it into top soil
             | over time. Tilling kills topsoil. So, its not that all the
             | dirt flew away. Some did, but mostly it just died and
             | turned back into subsoil.
        
             | throwup238 wrote:
             | In addition buffalo form wallows that collect rain water
             | and support many amphibians and plant species:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_wallow
        
         | Aromasin wrote:
         | I don't disagree with the sentiment of returning ecosystems to
         | their balanced ideal, however it should be pointed out
         | alongside your statement that overgrazing is by far and away
         | more common as it stands than undergrazing, and there is a
         | concerted effort by the cattle industry to change the narrative
         | to one where they become "land custodians" rather than
         | exploiters. Large ungulates are a keystone species, however
         | they are more often than not grazed in herds far larger than
         | the land they are on can sustain. Illness, famine, water
         | shortages and predatation (by many species long extinct now)
         | kept these herds in check - they don't so much now. This
         | article summarises it better than I ever could:
         | 
         | https://westernwatersheds.org/the-history-of-public-lands-gr...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-02-10 23:00 UTC)