[HN Gopher] Show HN: Matle - A Daily Chess Puzzle Inspired by Wo...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Matle - A Daily Chess Puzzle Inspired by Wordle
        
       Matle[1], a daily puzzle game that combines chess and Wordle
       mechanics. You have to guess a hidden checkmate.  How it works: 1.
       You're given a board with five hidden squares. 2. Guess the pieces
       in those squares. 3. You must form a checkmate!  Hints work like
       Wordle: Correct piece & position Correct piece, wrong position
       Wrong piece  [1] http://www.matle.io/
        
       Author : m88m
       Score  : 67 points
       Date   : 2025-02-05 14:37 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.matle.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.matle.io)
        
       | shirol wrote:
       | That's quite challenging for a first puzzle, though it is a well-
       | known mate. Guessed in 3 tries
        
       | egglemonsoup wrote:
       | Looks really cool, although way beyond my chess ability. Nice
       | work
        
       | oyster143 wrote:
       | Seems cool, reminds me of this video where top GMs guess the
       | position without seeing the pieces. Some can even name players
       | and the date of the game.
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/_Ntn4jEv7rE?feature=shared
        
       | maaaaattttt wrote:
       | At first I thought it would be the typical chess exercise
       | question, just that everybody gets the same one each day, but I
       | like the approach you have. Makes one think differently than
       | usual.
        
       | stavros wrote:
       | It's really confusing to me that I drag a piece, I drop it on a
       | square, it stays there, and there's an animation that the piece
       | returns to the bottom. If it stays there, it shouldn't have a
       | "returning" animation. Otherwise, it's an interesting puzzle.
        
       | Out_of_Characte wrote:
       | Managed to guess it on the first try after realising it looked
       | like a real game. Bit sad to see only one puzzle per day.
       | 
       | Sharing the result also reveils the solution in copied text,
       | maybe remove that so someone could share the exact puzzle without
       | immediatly seeing the solution.
        
       | ajkjk wrote:
       | at least on the first one there was really only one way it could
       | have happened under reasonable assumptions (mainly, that the
       | white queen had just been taken). I'm not sure it works very well
       | for the Wordle format, although it is fun as a puzzle otherwise.
        
       | axus wrote:
       | Worked pretty well. It was nice that it told me "this is not a
       | mate", I'd have burned through all my tries without that
       | guardrail.
        
       | miningape wrote:
       | This is actually an interesting take on a chess puzzle, instead
       | of calculate the winning sequence it's asking you to reconstruct
       | it.
       | 
       | Very cool to have to think in the other direction to solve it.
        
       | dmonitor wrote:
       | Very cool idea, and very well implemented. My only feedback is
       | that you should clarify whether the solution has to be a valid
       | position that can be reached in a chess game.
        
       | dudefeliciano wrote:
       | Cool! not getting any response from the share result button on
       | firefox (got it on the second try and wanted to brag a bit about
       | it)
        
       | ldb wrote:
       | Very nice idea. Reminds me a bit of https://www.chessguessr.com/.
        
       | monroewalker wrote:
       | Nice! Will be trying this over the next few days
        
       | Vincenius wrote:
       | A fun idea and great execution. Looking forward to tomorrow's
       | puzzle
        
       | littlestymaar wrote:
       | The experiment is cool, but after this first attempt I wonder if
       | it's not going to be too easy to guess in just one try lots of
       | times.
        
       | lReficul wrote:
       | There should be colorblind options. Makes the puzzle quite
       | challenging.
        
       | raymond_goo wrote:
       | Nice idea!
       | 
       | Here is mine: https://www.solitairle.com/
        
         | charlieyu1 wrote:
         | I tried this, but it doesn't seem to work in mobile.
         | 
         | And the first one presented to me, I'm pretty sure it is
         | unsolvable. I can't even find a valid first move.
        
           | Silphendio wrote:
           | It does work on mobile,but the instructions are cut off.
           | 
           | And it doesn't play like normal solitaire. You can move any
           | card, no matter what's on top of it. That makes it much
           | easier.
        
       | charlieyu1 wrote:
       | I like this! Very creative tool to learn chess mating patterns
        
       | h-c-c wrote:
       | Fun puzzle! Fyi, does not play well with Brave - experimantal
       | dark mode.
       | 
       | But I think that's probably true of a lot of chess sites. I sort
       | of feel like sites should have a way of flagging themselves as
       | already in dark mode, so that they can be ignored by any dark
       | mode extensions.
        
         | neuronflux wrote:
         | I think that this solution is a bit backwards. I think it
         | should be on the extension to detect if the site is already
         | "dark".
        
       | h-c-c wrote:
       | Also, it wasn't immediately obvious that you only get the
       | feedback after a valid checkmate.
        
       | pranshuchittora wrote:
       | Sorry to say, but this is very unintuitive and hard.
        
       | inanutshellus wrote:
       | I guess I was a bit flippant about my guesses and realized I made
       | two guesses that were invalid because they weren't actually
       | checkmates.
       | 
       | IMO those should count as guesses.
       | 
       | I felt like an imposter getting the praise "Wow, you're fast!"
       | and "only two guesses!" when I'd actually submitted 4 guesses...
       | just that two were so bad that the game rejected them outright.
       | lol.
        
       | prettyblocks wrote:
       | I really liked it. I found it to be quite difficult, but somehow
       | managed to solve the problem in 4 tries. At first I didn't quite
       | realize that you can put opposing pieces on the board so I think
       | I wasted one or two turns. In general, love the concept and
       | execution, but seems like it might have a pretty narrow audience
       | of chess enthusiasts.
        
       | voisin wrote:
       | Incredible. Loved it!
        
       | jmpavlec wrote:
       | Loved it! I'm so so at chess but was able to get it in 3 tries.
       | Nice execution with the UI.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-02-05 23:01 UTC)