[HN Gopher] Detroit's revival takes shape after decades of decay
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Detroit's revival takes shape after decades of decay
        
       Author : PaulHoule
       Score  : 85 points
       Date   : 2025-01-31 12:10 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | cebert wrote:
       | I live in the greater Detroit area and would love for it to
       | become a thriving tech community. While articles like this
       | portray a thriving tech scene here, it's not entirely accurate.
       | Many automotive companies claim a need for tech talent but
       | establish labs and locations in the Bay Area. For instance,
       | Rivian's vehicle software isn't developed in Michigan, despite
       | being HQed here.
       | 
       | The prominent tech employers in our area are Rocket, United
       | Wholesale Mortgage, and GM. I believe our tech talent lacks the
       | competitiveness of other tech hubs. I hope the state of Michigan
       | can take proactive steps to enhance the appeal of our state and
       | Detroit as desirable tech locations, but we must acknowledge that
       | we are not yet a thriving tech hub.
        
         | toyg wrote:
         | The tech company I work for is listed on the NASDAQ and
         | headquartered in Birmingham, a few minutes out of Detroit -
         | originally it was in Rochester. There is _a lot_ of money in
         | Michigan. The main issue I can see is that you have to be in
         | the right circles - there is definitely a class divide in the
         | state, and it 's pretty brutal.
        
           | whaleofatw2022 wrote:
           | Yeah class divides are weird in Southeast MI.
           | 
           | At smaller shops it leads to a lot of hubris from management.
           | I've worked at more than one shop where circles of UofM grads
           | insist on outsourcing everything new and having in-house
           | employees only do maintenance or minor features. If you
           | didn't go to UofM your opinion is worthless.
           | 
           | Leads to incredibly toxic shops and terrible software.
        
             | neilv wrote:
             | I've seen that kind of thinking by _some_ grads of MIT,
             | Harvard, and Stanford, too. I think it 's a minority of
             | them, but not-unusual.
             | 
             | My position is, if you want a lifestyle company (and maybe
             | a self-congratulatory echo chamber), then maybe it's fine
             | to be a "<school> shop". But if you want to hire the best
             | people, and be informed by a d-v-rs-ty of perspectives and
             | experiences, then you really need to not be so insular.
        
             | pc86 wrote:
             | Which is kind of funny since you're talking about UofM, not
             | Stanford or MIT. It's a good school but there are literally
             | hundreds of good schools in the US.
             | 
             | In my experience lots of folks educated at top top tier
             | institutions are pretty humble about it, and acknowledge
             | places where other institutions are as good or better than
             | their alma mater. A coworker of mine recently got his MBA
             | from Penn which is not only Ivy League but consistently
             | ranked top 2-3 MBA programs in the country, and currently
             | tied with Stanford for #1 according to USNWR. He never
             | brings it up, doesn't really talk about it much when it
             | does get brought up, and I don't think I've ever heard him
             | criticize anyone's education or experience unfairly (we've
             | sat on several hiring panels together).
             | 
             | The problem is when you go to a good-not-great school. If
             | the top 10 schools for a particular program are considered
             | "Tier 1" the people who went to #15 or #20 are going to be
             | absolutely horrible to work with. It's like they think they
             | need to prove they could have gone to a better school but
             | didn't for whatever reason.
             | 
             | I avoided this trap by only going to small schools nobody
             | has ever heard of.
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | I have refereed basketball at a very high level (think
               | Div 1 College, NBA G-league/minor league), and in my
               | earlier days I did a lot of junior high-level games, and
               | I noticed very much the same, although more "vocal" with
               | the parents than players. There seem to be three tiers:
               | 
               | 1 - the low-level games, where it's fun, and no-one
               | thinks it is more than it is, and everyone is generally
               | chill. 2 - the very high-level games, where even the
               | parents know that the last thing their kid or the team
               | needs is them messing with the referees, etc.
               | 
               | But most of the issues came in between. The kids who were
               | absolutely talented, but were never going to play
               | professionally. But they were still well ahead of the
               | first group. Those were the troubles, where parents,
               | coaches, and players felt that they truly belonged in
               | group 2, but the only thing holding them back was the
               | referees or whatever else and had a need to prove
               | themselves. Never has a quote been more appropriate from
               | Top Gun, "Son, your ego is writing checks your body can't
               | cash."
        
       | Drunkfoowl wrote:
       | I work at a hyperscaler, for autos, in Detroit.
       | 
       | It's the worst it's been since 2020 imo. Stella is cost cutting
       | and just lost their ceo, ford is attached to google, GM literally
       | just left the rencen.
       | 
       | The t1s are being canabalized.
       | 
       | This article is a joke.
        
         | Andrew-Koper wrote:
         | Everything in that long, Guardian article is true
        
         | richk449 wrote:
         | What is a hyperscaler for autos?
        
       | RALaBarge wrote:
       | 30 miles West in Ann Arbor, there are tech gigs but not tons of
       | them. If you are apart of the University of Michigan, there are
       | tons of opportunities via the college and the groups there, but
       | if not there aren't tons of openings.
       | 
       | Detroit itself is an amazing city, but it isn't a tech hub, nor
       | is it for everyone. It is the shell of the automotive companies
       | that started to move their operations of out the country in the
       | 50s-70s. Check out the book "Origins of the Urban Crisis" to get
       | an understanding of the decay in Detroit and other large cities
       | who the Big 3 have abandoned for a profit.
       | 
       | All of my friends that I have brought to the D are always weirded
       | out by how big the city is, yet how few people you actually see
       | outside of the entertainment district. The streets and sidewalks
       | can be fully empty, with a 6 lane road that has so many holes
       | that it is more pothole than road now.
       | 
       | This piece is nothing but an advertisement for Dan Gilbert.
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | I was in Detroit for a big tech event a couple years back. The
         | more or less universal consensus was that, yes, the Riverwalk
         | during the day (and the Convention Center there) were quite
         | nice. But people felt uncomfortable away from large groups of
         | event-goers at night and there were a few incidents. It
         | definitely felt different from other events I've been to. Some
         | of this is admittedly probably a matter of familiarity; I
         | generally know to just avoid the Tenderloin for example.
        
         | francisofascii wrote:
         | I'm curious if Lansing, the capital of Michigan, offers
         | opportunities for government contractor work due to its
         | proximity. With Lansing, Detroit, and Ann Arbor relatively
         | close to each other, semi-remote roles might be feasible.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | > fully empty
         | 
         | Like that.
        
         | gcanyon wrote:
         | St. Louis is similar: you can walk from downtown to empty
         | grass-filled blocks in about fifteen minutes.
         | 
         | My favorite story is the origin of the City Museum (which,
         | shoutout to the City Museum, it's awesome). The City Museum
         | building is in a former factory, it's about 11 stories tall and
         | fills a city block. It's on the edge of downtown about a dozen
         | blocks from the Arch. The artist behind the museum bought the
         | building in the '90s for something like $700,000. That's a
         | whole-ass industrial building, walkable from anywhere in
         | downtown St. Louis, for under a million dollars.
        
           | dgfitz wrote:
           | I think most US cities are like that in the "downtown to
           | disheveled in 15 minutes" sense.
        
         | nojs wrote:
         | > This piece is nothing but an advertisement for Dan Gilbert.
         | 
         | For an outlet that "thanks to our reader-funded model, what we
         | cover isn't dictated by the algorithms of the tech titans" they
         | did manage to cram a surprising number of ads in there
        
         | tokioyoyo wrote:
         | I was there about a year ago with a couple of friends, stopped
         | for a night while driving through Michigan to go up north. It
         | was just so eerie throughout the entire day. Incredibly wide
         | streets, but sometimes you would walk for 5 mins before you saw
         | a single soul. Maybe because it was a bit of a chilly day as
         | well, but it felt like the city was built for way more people,
         | and there just isn't enough now.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | Other people makes a big difference.
           | 
           | Even back when NYC was a lot more iffy than it is today in
           | general, I never really felt uncomfortable walking down
           | somewhere like Fifth Avenue late at night because there were
           | enough people at night. Various midwest cities can be pretty
           | eerie--especially after business hours. The downtowns are
           | often not that busy during the day and they're deserted--
           | except maybe some local pockets--after dark.
        
             | Yeul wrote:
             | This is an interesting point. In the 1980s Amsterdam was
             | dirt poor but it was never empty. In fact it attracted all
             | kinds of people who wanted to live an "alternative"
             | lifestyle in cheap real estate. Communists, artists, gay
             | people.
             | 
             | New York no matter what happens will always be located in
             | the most densely populated part of America.
        
         | wing-_-nuts wrote:
         | I've actually looked at Ann Arbor before as I adore college
         | towns and was looking at trying to find one in the great lakes
         | region as a forever / retirement destination. Given you're from
         | the area would you have any others to recommend?
         | 
         | Things I'm mainly looking for:
         | 
         | * A climate change refuge
         | 
         | * No 'lake effect' snow
         | 
         | * Continuing education opportunities (i.e. auditing classes as
         | a retiree)
         | 
         | * A good public / uni library system
         | 
         | * Walkable density
         | 
         | * Reasonable cost of living (yea, this is gonna be higher in
         | college towns)
         | 
         | I realize that moving to the great lakes region and wanting to
         | avoid snow are naturally in conflict. I have a disability so
         | I'm just bearing in mind my balance and ability to shovel snow
         | in my old age.
        
           | ElevenLathe wrote:
           | You might want to look at Kalamazoo.
        
           | filoleg wrote:
           | I have an alternative proposal to Ann Arbor for this that
           | hits every single one of your criteria, but with a plus-minus
           | (with a caveat, but i will elaborate on that later) regarding
           | reasonable cost of living. That would be Seattle area.
           | 
           | I will go point by point.
           | 
           | The good:
           | 
           | * According to their own Climate Vulnerability Assessment[0],
           | the region is fairly resilient to the impacts of the climate
           | change.
           | 
           | * There is no lake effect snow (despite being adjacent to
           | multiple fantastic lakes). I've lived there for 7 years, and
           | the amount of snow was much less than even in places like
           | Atlanta. The amount of rainfall is ridiculously small too
           | (despite the stereotype), and it is usually just drizzle that
           | doesn't necessitate even an umbrella 99% of the time. It got
           | nothing on typical east coast rains that just pour like hell.
           | I was able to commute to work on motorcycle for about 90-95%
           | days of the year. For any east coast city I've been to
           | (ATL/NYC/DC), I don't foresee that number being even above
           | 50% (most of the time it would be either too cold or too hot
           | or too rainy/snowy/dangerous).
           | 
           | * UW is a very popular and common option for continuing
           | education opportunities. Had friends who would take classes
           | there for fun outside of work, just to fill gaps in whichever
           | topics they were curious about (typically math). Seems like
           | there is a large population that does this, and UW is a great
           | school.
           | 
           | * Public library system is the best I've experienced hands
           | down. Free, many accessible locations, and libraries even
           | have stuff like 3d printers and hackerspaces available for
           | anyone's use.
           | 
           | * Had plenty of friends who lived there with no car for
           | years, and they have zero plans to ever buy one. Especially
           | with the public transit lightrail having some really
           | significant expansions completed recently (with many more
           | nearing the completion; the lightrail to eastside is
           | something i am personally excited for)
           | 
           | The mixed:
           | 
           | * Reasonable cost of leaving is the one plus-minus I
           | mentioned. The minus is that it isn't cheap. It is much
           | cheaper than Bay Area/NYC/etc., but it is still a major city
           | area. The plus is that there is no state income tax. So, in
           | retirement, your 401k withdrawals would not get any taxes
           | skimmed off on the state level. This point is by far the
           | biggest potential concern I have as far as Seattle being a
           | good suggestion for you.
           | 
           | The bad:
           | 
           | * While the weather is amazing temperature/precipitation-wise
           | year-round, clear skies and sun outside of summer are not
           | that common. Grey skies for more than half of the month
           | during winter eventually got to me.
           | 
           | Bonus points:
           | 
           | * If you are into outdoorsy stuff
           | (skiing/snowboarding/hiking/kayaking/lake stuff), I cannot
           | think of a better area. So many options within just a couple
           | of hours. Hell, Discovery Park (calling it a park feels like
           | a misnomer, because it is a massive cliffside forest, fields,
           | and a beach) is just a 15 min drive from downtown.
           | 
           | * Flying to asian countries is much faster and cheaper than
           | from east coast (13 hour non-stop flight to Japan from NJ vs.
           | a 7-8hr flight from Seattle).
           | 
           | 0. https://seattle.gov/documents/departments/opcd/seattleplan
           | /s...
        
             | psunavy03 wrote:
             | There is no state income tax . . . yet. But the "soak the
             | rich" band is already tuning up, and with the cost of
             | living being what it is out here, "rich" will probably
             | include anyone who can afford a house.
        
               | lotsofpulp wrote:
               | I would not be too worried about that. Washington
               | legislators just outlawed income tax last year. While
               | those who want earned income tax are vocal, the support
               | for the initiative against income tax was so widespread
               | that the politicians did not want it on the ballot for
               | fear of voters being swayed to vote for the other ballot
               | initiatives.
               | 
               | https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Initiative_2111,_Prohi
               | bit...
        
               | psunavy03 wrote:
               | I wasn't just referring to income tax, but things like
               | capital gains and so forth. The state Supreme Court ruled
               | an excise tax on capital gains was not an income tax, and
               | though the limit is like $250K currently, that could
               | change. And the party that runs Washington is the one
               | that's currently on the warpath about "rich tech bros."
        
               | lotsofpulp wrote:
               | Yes, that (and the LTCi payroll tax) was some nonsense
               | and does bring into question the integrity of the
               | leadership. But the 2111 legislation gives me hope that
               | they aren't stupid enough to get rid of the states' most
               | attractive feature for a young, productive workforce.
               | 
               | Especially in a future where young, productive people are
               | going to be in shorter and shorter supply.
        
               | filoleg wrote:
               | They've been on that warpath since the glory days of msft
               | and amazon (i.e., for multiple decades at least). All
               | with that same party running things back then in WA. All
               | they've accomplished is shooting themselves in the foot
               | here and there, without any meaningful progress.
        
               | tzs wrote:
               | But note that support of the ballot initiative to repeal
               | the capital gains tax was not widespread. 63% voted to
               | reject it and keep the tax.
        
               | filoleg wrote:
               | There are attempts at it at least once every decade, and
               | every time they get squashed in the very end, even if
               | they are passing the vote and get pretty much to the
               | finish line. Any form of taxing it is against state
               | constitution, and the state struck down any previous
               | attempts at loopholes around that provision of the
               | constitution.
               | 
               | I agree with the sibling comment that this is not
               | something to realistically worry about at all.
        
               | lotsofpulp wrote:
               | > Any form of taxing it is against state constitution
               | 
               | The WA state constitution says non uniform property taxes
               | are not allowed, and 1930 WA Supreme Court ruled income
               | was property.
               | 
               | A flat income tax would have been allowed, until last
               | year when income tax was outlawed, but not with enough
               | votes to amend the state constitution.
        
             | wing-_-nuts wrote:
             | I had previously looked at the PNW. I adore seattle , but
             | the earthquake / tsunami / wild fire risk projections are
             | extreme. I know they're retrofitting a lot of infra and
             | housing there, but a cascadia fault quake / tsunami is
             | gonna be a bad time even if fema's 'everything east of I-5
             | is toast' is overhyped.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | At some point, you need to do the pro/con analysis. If
               | you add minimum natural disasters risk, based on when I
               | knew _something_ about datacenter siting details, you
               | were looking at maybe Las Vegas area (which also has
               | access to Hoover Dam power). But, now, you 're in extreme
               | desert heat (predictably) in the summer and probably
               | don't tick off a lot of other considerations either.
        
           | evantbyrne wrote:
           | Grand Rapids and Traverse City might meet your criteria, but
           | it's hard to say given how subjectively they are worded. If
           | you want to live in a town with a large university, then
           | obviously just look at the top three universities by size in
           | each state.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | Yeah, I'd look at university towns and small cities
             | generally in the northern end of the country. Though it's
             | probably not just the largest universities--there are
             | smaller schools that caan still give a place a feel of a
             | university town. Then pick some climate metrics like
             | average inches of snow. Create a shortish list and go from
             | there. I suspect some of the criteria are also less
             | important than others.
             | 
             | Continuing ed opportunities are probably actually one of
             | the tougher things. There are often things you can do
             | informally with unis if you know the landscape but it's not
             | something that's routinely offered as part as I know. There
             | are community colleges and nightime continuing ed but,
             | honestly, I'd probably mostly look online for that sort of
             | thing.
        
               | wing-_-nuts wrote:
               | Re: continuing education: I just wanted a way to take
               | some classes and gain access to the university library.
               | Technically I have access to lifetimes of material online
               | via books, papers, MOOCs, etc; but it would be really
               | nice take a philosophy class and actually be able to have
               | in depth discussions, or check out some book that's never
               | been published on kindle.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | The in-depth discussions part (i.e. things like seminars)
               | is probably difficult without registering for a class in
               | some manner--which, in turn, is difficult at a
               | traditional university without enrolling, outside of some
               | continuing ed program. My undergrad university library is
               | also accessible (at least if you look like you belong)
               | post-COVID in the sense that you don't have to card in
               | but even I (as an alum and moderately large donor) would
               | almost certainly have to pay an annual access fee to
               | check something out. It also has some generally
               | accessible activities in January but you need to know
               | where to look.
               | 
               | Universities/colleges are a pretty good source of
               | cultural activities and other things in a town but their
               | classes, and to a lesser degree libraries (it depends as
               | some libraries let people just walk-in though not check-
               | out material; others control access pretty tightly), are
               | not really public resources.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | You probably need to decide if you want no "lake effect" snow
           | specifically or just don't want a lot of snow. It still snows
           | a lot in places that aren't Buffalo or Syracuse. Just in New
           | York state Ithaca is pretty much out of the lake effect snow
           | belt but it still snows quite a bit.
        
             | wing-_-nuts wrote:
             | I have cerebral palsy. I'm from the south, and the few
             | experiences I have with snow and ice have not been great,
             | lol. A fall that might just bruise a hip in your 30's might
             | well break it in you 70's and at that age, it's often a
             | serious hit to your quality of life or even 'game over'. I
             | want to be far enough north to rarely deal with dangerous
             | heat, but far enough south that I'm not basically 'snowed
             | in' given I seem to struggle with icey sidewalks.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | As someone else commented, you're probably talking about
               | Pacific Northwest (Washington or Oregon coastal regions)
               | then. It's not completely snow-free and can get fairly
               | hot in the summers. But it's probably the best compromise
               | between mostly snow-free and not-too-hot. Pretty much
               | anyplace else in the North that (usually) doesn't get
               | _too_ hot in the summer gets snow, if not the consistent
               | heavy snowfalls of places in the lake effect belt.
               | 
               | In addition to the larger cities, you have places like
               | Corvallis where Oregon State is located.
        
               | silisili wrote:
               | This is basically what every human on Earth wants. Which
               | is why the entire west coast is so expensive, because
               | it's about the only place in the US that fits that bill.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | Plenty of people are fine with snow and ice in the winter
               | --certainly relative to places where the alternative is
               | >100 degree F summers. But I don't really disagree that
               | many people like a Mediterranean climate (that the PNW
               | also largely has except for the non-summer grayness)
               | which tilts the scales. Also generally good outdoor
               | recreation options for the most part.
        
           | yesfitz wrote:
           | The CityNerd, Ray Delahanty, just published a video on this
           | topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcn77OwF9XE (You can
           | safely increase the speed of the video to 1.5x. He speaks
           | slowly.)
           | 
           | If you don't feel like watching the entire video, I'll just
           | recommend Iowa City, Iowa. It ticks all your boxes except
           | maybe climate change refuge. But with all the money you save
           | on housing, you can buy a vacation cabin/bunker further
           | north.
        
           | merlin99000 wrote:
           | Charlottesville, VA!!!
           | 
           | The area between UVA's campus and downtown is walkable and
           | continues to develop. Charlottesville has mild winters and
           | beautiful falls. UVA has a gorgeous campus and lots of
           | programming.
           | 
           | The town punches above its weight with respect to the food
           | scene and is surrounded by wineries. The Shenandoah mountains
           | are close by. There is an airport in the town that makes it
           | less remote.
        
       | snapcaster wrote:
       | There is some truth to this, but i worry detroit is just doing
       | the same thing that blew them out last time (overdependence on a
       | small group of extremely rich businessmen that can leave at any
       | time). Hope this works out for them, Detroit has really suffered
       | since the automakers left (and the riots)
        
       | aketchum wrote:
       | I interviewed for an internship at Ford in probably 2015. It was
       | striking to me that they spent basically half the interview
       | hyping up Detroit and convincing me that it would be a fun city
       | to spend time in. It was clear that the company knew one of its
       | biggest challenges to hiring was the location. Glad to hear
       | things are improving but the reputation of Detroit still has a
       | ways to go.
        
       | suddenlybananas wrote:
       | I wonder how the tariffs will affect this given how integrated
       | Windsor is into Detroit's auto manufacturers.
        
       | dhfbshfbu4u3 wrote:
       | Detroit is buzzing because it's gone through a complete and total
       | deflation. Things are up because they went so far down, not
       | unlike say... Argentina today or the rest of the US in 3-5 years.
        
         | santoshalper wrote:
         | Pretty much. At some point there is nowhere to go but up.
         | Still, it's nice to see.
        
         | jonhohle wrote:
         | Dead cat bounce.
        
       | shipscode wrote:
       | Spoiler: it's probably not
        
       | yawgmoth wrote:
       | In my experience, companies based in Michigan pay 20-50k lower
       | and do not have staff/principal roles available. You have to find
       | a remote role to stay competitive wage wise. Some companies are
       | not willing to pay as much for Michigan workers as they are
       | NY/SF/elsewhere workers, too.
       | 
       | I think the reality is Columbus and Chicago are growing quicker
       | than Detroit. The relative increase here might be "buzzing" but
       | in absolute terms, it's desolate.
        
         | pc86 wrote:
         | Don't you think the delta in cost of living between Michigan
         | and NYC/SF is a lot more than $50k/yr?
        
       | llm_nerd wrote:
       | Unfortunate timing for this to front page here given that Detroit
       | and Michigan in general are going to endure some extremely rough
       | times in the coming months and years. Detroits revival just took
       | some direct hits.
        
         | cobertos wrote:
         | How do you mean? A lot of things have stayed pretty consistent
         | here over the years. What are you expecting?
        
           | 9283409232 wrote:
           | Michigan's economy is tied to a lot of things that just
           | received a tariff like manufacturing and agriculture.
           | Michigan's largest exporter by far was Canada and 20% of the
           | state's GDP comes from Canada, Mexico, and China imports.
        
           | ocschwar wrote:
           | Michigan relies on fast trade with Ontario. Anything that
           | interrupts it hits Michigan hard.
        
           | nilamo wrote:
           | Detroit and Windsor are one city, with a country border down
           | the middle. The new tarrifs will be really bad for both
           | cities.
        
       | dcchambers wrote:
       | I really thought the major "rust belt" cities were going to blow
       | up after the big COVID WFH push. Why spend 2-10x as much to live
       | in one of four coastal metros when you could get the same pay
       | while living somewhere much cheaper. The biggest issue with these
       | cities in the last 50 years has been a lack of high paying jobs
       | and WFH tech jobs essentially negate that issue.
       | 
       | There are a ton of American cities that have fallen from their
       | former glory but are full of cheap housing, interesting things,
       | and lots of history.
       | 
       | Shame it doesn't seem like that has panned out much.
        
         | lotsofpulp wrote:
         | It seems evident that people, by and large, don't like freezing
         | temperatures.
        
           | lesuorac wrote:
           | That and you don't get the same pay by living somewhere
           | cheaper.
        
             | pc86 wrote:
             | Maybe. Lots of companies don't localize their pay, or
             | localize it based on country. Even those that do if you're
             | comparing, for example, Pittsburgh and NYC/SF, you're
             | unlikely to come out ahead in NYC/SF especially after you
             | factor in state income tax.
        
           | francisofascii wrote:
           | NYC, Boston, and Toronto are still bustling. The uncertainty
           | of work from home with RTO mandates popping up at a moments
           | notice keep people from making the jump.
        
             | lotsofpulp wrote:
             | It is better to use nationwide migration statistics over
             | large periods of time rather than selectively choosing a
             | few metros as a data point.
             | 
             | As I understand, it might also simply be biology that older
             | bodies like higher temperatures because it results in less
             | pain.
        
           | nancyminusone wrote:
           | I'll take the cold over water shortages, wildfires,
           | earthquakes, hurricanes, or excessive heat any day.
           | 
           | I wonder if we'll see more people coming to the rust belt as
           | the climate gets worse.
        
             | pc86 wrote:
             | "Just move north" is a common refrain from people who don't
             | understand what climate change means.
        
               | nancyminusone wrote:
               | Could you expand on this point? Are climate refugees not
               | expected, at least in the short term?
        
               | pc86 wrote:
               | It's a byproduct of the naive belief that climate change
               | means it gets hotter (and little/nothing else), to which
               | "just move north" is a logical conclusion. The truth is
               | closer to climate change means more extreme weather
               | happens everywhere, and things get hotter up until -- and
               | here's where my knowledge of science may be much less up-
               | to-date -- a critical mass of ice at the poles melts, and
               | which point the temperature plummets.
               | 
               | By definition a lot of areas will be hit hard and some
               | areas will be hit less hard but it's not going to be
               | along a north-south axis.
        
         | 1123581321 wrote:
         | It is happening, but it takes time as those cities can only
         | grow as fast as palatable housing stock comes online. The
         | largest percentage growths in home values, with short days on
         | market, have have been in Rockford, Akron, Fort Wayne, Lansing,
         | etc. There is new construction in all of these markets, but
         | much of it is from rehabbing old manufacturing buildings,
         | another limiter, or from a mix of public and private money that
         | city government can only consider so quickly. Economic growth
         | is mostly in services to support the remote jobs. Building new
         | primary businesses (sell out of local market) might never
         | happen. So they look just as sleepy as ever even though there's
         | a lot of activity in housing and new transplants.
        
         | ndileas wrote:
         | I live in Rochester NY, grew up in Buffalo. Housing markets
         | here were nuts the last couple years, probably due to this
         | effect (although laughable compared to SF I'm sure) and pent up
         | demand. I'm not sure I really want it to "blow up" any more,
         | although I'm not much of a big city guy - I like going to the
         | same diner every Saturday and reading at home. Life is pretty
         | good.
        
           | francisofascii wrote:
           | Yep, I know a guy who moved to Rochester metro from the NYC
           | metro post COVID. I was kinda shocked to see the high prices
           | of housing there.
        
         | yardie wrote:
         | The sun belt took wind out of their sails. And even they are
         | starting to see softening demand. Miami just cancelled an
         | A-class commercial high rise due to weak demand. In Austin,
         | rents are tanking.
         | 
         | It's very hard to revive a town or city when the tax base is
         | way down. I thought Detroit was going to succeed but they
         | simply have too much ground to manage with their revenue. And
         | there isn't a way to shrink a shrinking city.
        
           | nradov wrote:
           | Insurance premium increases have killed a lot of the housing
           | cost advantage that Florida used to have.
        
             | boringg wrote:
             | And Canadians have been shedding property in droves due to
             | high cost (USD-CAD), your comment on insurance and general
             | antagonistic policies at a Federal level.
        
             | arrowsmith wrote:
             | Why are the premiums going up? Hurricanes?
        
               | kccqzy wrote:
               | Many large insurance companies leaving Florida. Their
               | last-resort insurance, Citizens Property Insurance Corp,
               | is perpetually one bad hurricane away from insolvency.
               | Well technically they cannot be insolvent but they are
               | allowed a premium surcharge on everyone, including those
               | who do not have their insurance.
        
               | jetrink wrote:
               | Increasing hurricane risk yes, but also a dysfunctional
               | insurance market. There's a business model where roofing
               | companies will approach homeowners telling them they have
               | hurricane damage and are eligible to receive a free roof.
               | The hurricane might passed through years before, but any
               | damage that was overlooked is still the responsibility of
               | the insurance company. The homeowners are surprised to
               | learn that their roof has damage, since they haven't
               | noticed anything wrong (and there is in fact no damage),
               | but free is free, so they sign the contract. The roofing
               | company files a claim, the insurance company denies it,
               | the roofing company sues, and since a lawsuit costs more
               | than a roof, the insurance company backs down. Then after
               | this has happened repeatedly, the insurance company
               | raises their rates or leaves the state.
        
               | lowercased wrote:
               | We did this. Hail damage. There wasn't _no damage_. We 'd
               | had a hail storm. But... we've had them before. The root
               | was 17 years old at that point, and... the last storm
               | sort of tipped things over to the "needs repair" side of
               | things. We may have been able to leave it a while longer,
               | but do we wait until it's leaking, causing more damage?
               | Insurance company sent an inspector, took pics, etc.
               | Interestingly, they denied the claims of many of our
               | neighbors, but ours was 'bad enough' to justify
               | replacement. This still cost us several thousand of of
               | pocket - it wasn't like it was 'free roof!' time.
        
           | jollyllama wrote:
           | >It's very hard to revive a town or city when the tax base is
           | way down. I thought Detroit was going to succeed but they
           | simply have too much ground to manage with their revenue. And
           | there isn't a way to shrink a shrinking city.
           | 
           | That's one way to look at it. The problems of decades of
           | urban decay make these places unattractive to outsiders, so
           | it's a catch-22.
        
           | toast0 wrote:
           | > And there isn't a way to shrink a shrinking city.
           | 
           | You could probably disincorporate parts of the city, but I
           | assume that would require consent of the owners/residents and
           | the county. Of course, reducing the incorporated area also
           | reduces revenue, so it might leave you with similar revenue
           | vs cost mismatches, but a smaller area.
        
         | gcanyon wrote:
         | Weather is a thing, along with infrastructure.
        
         | no_wizard wrote:
         | Most companies will cut your pay based on where you live,
         | though.
         | 
         | You aren't usually paid the same. That isn't the norm.
         | 
         | Secondly and probably more important is there is zero
         | guarantees that WFH will be supported by the work places they
         | can support it will, we have seen a huge RTO surge. I'd hate to
         | be in one of these cities and get that call.
         | 
         | If WFH opportunities had legal protections and incentives it'd
         | be a different story I imagine
        
           | pc86 wrote:
           | Whether or not locality-based pay is the norm is an open
           | question. Every place I've ever worked had a budget for the
           | role and that was that, but most places I've worked only hire
           | folks within the US who don't need visa sponsorship so that's
           | already a smaller group than "anyone who can type JavaScript
           | into a computer."
           | 
           | Would you rather live and rent in NYC and work from home for
           | 4 years until asked to commute again, or live and rent in
           | Detroit or Pittsburgh or Indianapolis and take that $50-400k
           | you saved and move?
           | 
           | Moving is easy and if you need to move to support an RTO
           | mandate, _especially_ if you were hired remote and weren 't
           | local you can almost certainly negotiate some relocation
           | assistance. It's not a big deal to move unless you have kids
           | in school which if you went remote during COVID and had a kid
           | basically immediately is still likely not a huge issue.
           | Moving in middle school or high school can be impactful,
           | moving during kindergarten or first grade is a nothingburger.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | Even if there aren't location-based salaries as such,
             | there's a lot of "ROFL, we're not going to match your
             | Facebook offer." I worked for someone who eventually ended
             | up with very few California employees and, I believe,
             | eventually closed their relatively small office there.
             | 
             | >Moving is easy
             | 
             | I disagree with this. If you have a relatively small number
             | of possessions living by yourself in an apartment, maybe.
             | But, as you say, with a partner and even kids with an
             | established circle of friends--and maybe a house, is
             | definitely not easy.
        
           | dcchambers wrote:
           | Yes, in some cases location-based pay is a thing.
           | 
           | But $150K in Detroit feels a hell of a lot richer than $250K
           | in SF.
        
         | nilamo wrote:
         | That did start to happen, but rent near downtown Detroit is
         | >$2k/month, which pushes out most of the people that want to
         | live there.
        
         | tokioyoyo wrote:
         | Generally, people like to have fun and will pay premiums to
         | live in cities where stuff happens. Cheap housing and money
         | aren't the only motivators, otherwise we would have a different
         | landscape.
        
           | BobaFloutist wrote:
           | That said, cheap housing/warehouse space often leads to an
           | explosion of art and music in sufficiently populated cities.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | Generally is doing a lot of work there. There are vast
           | suburbs (including Silicon Valley) and exurbs in the US even
           | before you get genuinely rural.
           | 
           | I can drive an hour into some large cities where "fun
           | happens" although I have lots of activities around where I
           | live too.
        
         | jt2190 wrote:
         | Housing is cheap because the job market is poor. Should
         | _enough_ remote workers choose to relocate to the same rust-
         | belt city we'd see higher housing prices in that city. The
         | challenge is that rust-belt cities are just not desirable
         | enough for enough remote workers to reverse the decades of
         | decline. Furthermore, there is no reason that remote workers
         | would cluster by geography other than fear of loosing their
         | remote job and having to return to office, so I don't think
         | remote workers will be able to turn the tide of the rust-belt.
        
         | schmichael wrote:
         | > Why spend 2-10x as much to live in one of four coastal metros
         | 
         | I think you answered your own question: it's not (entirely) an
         | economic decision. Weather, culture, nature, civic amenities.
         | There's a lot in life that money can't buy. Sure I could own a
         | McMansion on a palatial plot of prairie, but what if the square
         | footage of my house and acreage of my yard isn't what's
         | important to me?
        
           | Yeul wrote:
           | Being surrounded by Christian conservative Trump voters is
           | not how everyone wants to live their life.
           | 
           | HN probably consists of a lot of people who are perfectly
           | content spending their entire life looking at a screen
           | perfectly oblivious of what is going on.
        
         | Telemakhos wrote:
         | There's a major issue in American cities that is unmentionable
         | in polite society: the so-called Curley Effect [0], named after
         | a Boston politician who drove the old Boston Brahmins out of
         | their city by taxing them out of town and pandering to Irish
         | immigrants, making the city as a whole poorer. It turns out
         | that politics is not so straightforward as to reward
         | politicians who improve their cities: instead, a politician can
         | leverage group (ethnic, racial, whatever) differences to reward
         | supporters with largesse designed to render them dependent on
         | the politician, while driving out those who, by nature of their
         | independence, could oppose the politician. In effect, there is
         | a substantial likelihood that American cities decay because
         | politicians consolidate power through the kinds of high taxes
         | and poor services that drive away high earners.
         | 
         | WFH workers are very independent: they could move to a city or
         | from it with no regard for the job market. That makes them
         | prime targets for eliminating from a city under the Curley
         | effect.
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/curley_effe...
        
         | agoodusername63 wrote:
         | I was really hoping for this too.
         | 
         | I love WFH and I hope I never have to work in an office again.
         | I was hoping the obvious financial efficiency improvements
         | would have made the concept stick more and enable more mobility
         | in the US
         | 
         | unfortunately it looks like we couldn't get over our need for
         | employee control even for types of work that is largely online
         | anyways. I'm still sad that it isn't likely to grow much.
        
       | eduction wrote:
       | Detroit's homicide rate as of January is about 4x the national
       | average, 31.9 per 100k vs 7.4 nationally.
       | 
       | https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/20...
        
         | add-sub-mul-div wrote:
         | Like any city most of these would happen in easily avoidable
         | areas and there's no reason to live in fear about it unless
         | you're one of those people for whom it's a hobby.
        
           | knowitnone wrote:
           | "easily avoidable areas" as if criminals don't have cars?
        
       | Fripplebubby wrote:
       | I guess my question is, are all these startups going to Detroit
       | because of the positive vibes, or are they actually getting
       | compelling direct subsidies / credits / etc from the government?
       | 
       | (Not that there is anything wrong with giving or taking subsidies
       | necessarily, but that might paint a more accurate picture of the
       | incentives in place)
        
       | parpfish wrote:
       | all the apocalyptic stories about Detroit's decay after the '08
       | collapse and one thing that stuck with me was that there were
       | serious discussion about razing entire empty neighborhoods to
       | deal with the fact the city was a lot smaller than it used to be.
       | 
       | In my area, there are a lot of communities that have also gone
       | through decades of contraction and are now sparsely populated
       | with a lot of dilapidated structures. It's depressing and
       | requires keeping around a lot of infrastructure that these areas
       | can't afford to support.
       | 
       | I'm torn between thinking a) we should raze these unusable
       | buildings, tear out some roads, eventually revert to nature OR b)
       | start a massive reinvestment program to give stuff away and bring
       | in some new blood to revitalize.
        
       | GenerWork wrote:
       | I left Michigan about 3 years ago after living around Detroit for
       | 7 years. Tech jobs there are primarily with the Big 3, and the
       | cult known as Rocket. There are places like Ann Arbor, but again,
       | the opportunities are limited.
       | 
       | As for Detroit itself, I feel like I've seen this headline every
       | year for the past decade. I'm not saying that Detroit hasn't made
       | progress (it absolutely has, go visit the refurbished train
       | station), but compared to other cities it's still lagging.
        
       | technotarek wrote:
       | As a native (suburban) Detroiter (who departed 20 years ago), I
       | don't want to throw shade but articles like these rarely give a
       | good sense of the size or scope of decades of decay. There are
       | still miles (and miles) of apocalyptic looking neighborhoods. As
       | a teenager, we had our pick of hundreds of abandoned warehouses
       | to party ("rave").
       | 
       | I'd love to see it flourish, and maybe if the area could get past
       | its car addiction, I'd even want to call it home again one day.
       | 
       | *Removed inaccurate statement about the city's size.
        
       | Andrew-Koper wrote:
       | There's a lot of good stuff going on in Detroit. I've worked in
       | tech in Detroit for quite some time. The NewLab building that
       | opened a year ago next to the recently-rehabbed, stunningly-
       | beautiful, gigantic Michigan Central, is one-block by one-block
       | and several stories tall and an amazing innovation hub. GM and
       | Ford are two of the largest companies in the world, and - this
       | isn't obvious because of their main industry - each employ
       | 4,000-6,000 tech and software engineers. Dan Gilbert is an ultra-
       | successful, entrepreneur genius, and he and his companies support
       | an entrepreneurial culture and ecosystem in downtown Detroit.
       | 
       | If you're a ycombinator type person, and you move to Detroit,
       | you're going to live in a cool neighborhood like Woodbridge,
       | Corktown, Hubbard Farms, Midtown, Milwaukee Junctions, etc; go
       | out for drinks at Ladder 4, Motor City Wine, Kiesling, etc; go
       | out to eat at Ima, Baobab Fare, Batch, etc; go out for
       | entertainment at Spot Lite, Lincoln Street Art Park, Outer Limits
       | etc; and enjoy all of the culture.
        
       | ElevenLathe wrote:
       | I don't get to Detroit much but do live in another rust belt town
       | in Michigan and things do seem to be looking up a bit. There is
       | noticeable investment downtown and property values in the city
       | limits (as opposed to the surrounding white flight townships) are
       | rising for basically the first time in my life (though another
       | way to say this is that housing is becoming less affordable).
       | 
       | There is still a long way to go though, and while I moved back
       | from Austin once my job went remote during COVID, none of the
       | other bourgeois high achievers from my public magnet school have
       | done so -- as you'd expect they are all in NYC, Chicago, LA,
       | Atlanta, etc. Brain drain is a real problem and WFH doesn't
       | really seem to be helping.
       | 
       | I don't think people outside the Midwest understand what a
       | disaster the last ~50 years have been for the industrial
       | heartland. I don't know what the answer is, but even if it's
       | whatever is happening in Detroit, it will be decades before these
       | cities feel anything like whole.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-02-03 23:01 UTC)