[HN Gopher] The future of Rebble
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The future of Rebble
        
       https://github.com/google/pebble
        
       Author : will0
       Score  : 313 points
       Date   : 2025-01-27 20:03 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (rebble.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (rebble.io)
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Well now we have a conundrum - the top 3 posts on the frontpage
       | are all about this!
       | 
       | The submitted title of this post was "Google has open-sourced the
       | pebble smartwatch operating system" but it actually points to
       | https://rebble.io/2025/01/27/the-future-of-rebble.html, so I've
       | changed the title and moved the comments from here to
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42845070, which has the
       | Google announcement.
       | 
       | The 3 threads are:
       | 
       |  _We 're bringing Pebble back_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42845091
       | 
       |  _Google open-sources the Pebble OS_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42845070
       | 
       |  _The future of Rebble_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42845017 (<-- you are here)
        
         | msolberg wrote:
         | DANG SAVE US hahaha
        
         | zamalek wrote:
         | Let them them revvel in this glory IMO :), it's rare to see
         | this kind of thing happen in the hardware space.
        
         | HaZeust wrote:
         | Good exercise of your sequence priority philosophy, but I also
         | think they all have their own right to be posted and discussed
         | - this is exciting, and different angles and POVs can be
         | brought to each thread. One is about Google's affairs with
         | Pebble, one is about the community-grown Rebble, and one is
         | about the founding team of the original Pebble itself.
        
       | TheMagicHorsey wrote:
       | I'm curious if anyone has tried one of the newer e-ink smart
       | watches you see on Alibaba, which use ESP-32 or other low-power
       | SOCs. I saw one recently at a meet-up and the guy who was wearing
       | claimed it was completely open-source and he could run whatever
       | he wanted to on it. It did not have heartrate monitoring or
       | anything other than clock on it, as far as I could tell.
        
         | andyjohnson0 wrote:
         | What did it look like? All the ones I've seen have been pretty
         | ugly - plastic cases, etc.
        
         | throwup238 wrote:
         | The original was Watchy: https://watchy.sqfmi.com/
         | 
         | Not only can you run anything you want on it but it supports
         | the Arduino IDE and Micropython. I assume all of the Alibaba
         | ones are based off of Watchy.
        
         | Avamander wrote:
         | The biggest issue is the software. It's mostly abysmal. The
         | best effort I've seen so far has been InfiniTime for the
         | PineTime. It's very difficult without full-time employees
         | working on improving things.
        
       | MostlyStable wrote:
       | Some commenters mentioned that the e-ink screen (and the
       | accompanying battery life) was one reason why the Pebble is so
       | beloved, which reminded me of the Basis Peak, which was primarily
       | a health tracker watch with some (very limited) smart
       | functionality (mostly just some notifications, if I recall), that
       | also had an e-ink screen and a nearly 1 week battery life and had
       | a sort of similar trajectory:
       | 
       | Bought by Intel, then killed two years later after a battery
       | related recall issue.
       | 
       | It was, in my opinion, by far the best fitness tracker watch
       | ever, and remains so to this day. Not so much because of it's
       | actual features (which were relatively standard), but the
       | software paradigm of simple yet effective exercise gamification
       | that helped encourage exercise habit formation. 8 years later and
       | I still miss it.
        
         | ClassyJacket wrote:
         | Pebble had an LCD screen. It didn't use Eink at all. You can
         | look this up, it was an LCD display manufactured by Sharp.
        
           | MostlyStable wrote:
           | I never had one, but doing some quick googling, it looks like
           | at least some models had an e-ink display. Certainly several
           | commenters seemed to think it did.
        
             | will0 wrote:
             | It was a transflective memory LCD, which Pebble marketed as
             | "E-Paper" (not the same as E-Ink)
        
             | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
             | No, it had an "epaper" display that visually looked a lot
             | like eink but was a different technology
        
       | normalaccess wrote:
       | OH HAPPY DAY! I loved my pebble. It was the perfect balance of
       | features and battery-life.
       | 
       | My favorite watch face inspired me to get into may e-ink
       | projects.                 Horizon by JR Mobley
       | https://store-beta.rebble.io/app/5616d36a6ddd7fea8800001f
        
       | freedomben wrote:
       | I'm a little confused at the moving pieces here. We have
       | RePebble, Rebble, and PebbleOS. PebbleOS is the easy one. OS
       | recently opened by Google.
       | 
       | But how are RePebble and Rebble related? Are they the same thing?
       | Is Rebble making hardware as well as RePebble, or are they the
       | same effort? Is RePebble also open source and community owned
       | like Rebble?
        
         | will0 wrote:
         | Rebble is the open source infra that has been keeping Pebbles
         | alive since ~2016. See: rebble.io and
         | https://github.com/pebble-dev
         | 
         | (Disclaimer: I'm part of the team)
         | 
         | RePebble is a new thing by Eric, the original founder of Pebble
         | and is unrelated to Rebble.
         | 
         | > Is Rebble making hardware as well as RePebble?
         | 
         | Potentially! We have always talked about it, but some of the
         | announcements today have thrown us for a loop so plans are
         | still being discussed.
         | 
         | > Is RePebble also open source and community owned like Rebble?
         | 
         | Remains to be seen, but if I had to guess it's unlikely.
        
       | poisonborz wrote:
       | > will accelerate our efforts to produce new hardware
       | 
       | Don't do that. Don't give me hope...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-01-27 23:00 UTC)