[HN Gopher] The Curious Case of Quentell
___________________________________________________________________
The Curious Case of Quentell
Author : hwayne
Score : 64 points
Date : 2025-01-27 17:15 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (blog.startifact.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (blog.startifact.com)
| ziddoap wrote:
| I'm not very anti-LLM/AI, but this is one of the scarier parts,
| to me at least.
|
| Data that is obscure, not easily fact-checked, and (outside of a
| handful of people) there's no motivation to fact check it.
|
| Incorrect data will sit there, mostly viewed by other bots,
| incorporated into the next model. The issue is just going to
| snowball.
|
| Good luck to any future historians that want to look back at this
| time period.
| nine_k wrote:
| Such consequences might be undesired, but hardly unanticipated
| or surprising. Not to the smart folks who came up with LLMs.
|
| (A lot of what we're having around us now has been anticipated
| by sci-fi, but earlier sci-fi largely failed to predict the
| internet, so we have fewer predictions about such stuff. Lem's
| "Futurological Congress" could be seen as a weird anticipation
| of a deeply faked world.)
| wduquette wrote:
| The Law of Unintended Consequences is unavoidable; as so often I
| read this post, and said, "Yes, that's just what would happen.
| Oh, dear."
| aaroninsf wrote:
| A lovely field trip to the morgue of Dead Internet theory!
|
| "Nothing is real; everything is permitted."
| yellowapple wrote:
| I wouldn't be so quick to attribute the embellished biographies
| to AI. That's certainly a possibility, but it's also just as
| possible that these are humans going off of verbal/oral histories
| that morphed in the ongoing game of Telephone. Plenty of humans
| get things mixed up, after all.
|
| Still, it's worth being vigilant about this sort of thing, AI or
| no - and LLMs are certainly increasing in the quality and
| quantity of bullshit they can produce. People give Wikipedia a
| lot of flack for being "editable by everyone", but the emphasis
| on providing actual citations for claims is an important one - to
| the point that I'll readily trust an "amateur"/"hobbyist" work
| that cites its sources over a "professional" work that doesn't.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-01-27 23:00 UTC)