[HN Gopher] Larry Ellison: vast AI surveillance can ensure citiz...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Larry Ellison: vast AI surveillance can ensure citizens are on best
       behavior
        
       Author : archagon
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2025-01-25 21:37 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.businessinsider.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.businessinsider.com)
        
       | archagon wrote:
       | https://archive.is/qqhCj
        
       | pavel_lishin wrote:
       | > _" We're going to have supervision," Ellison said. "Every
       | police officer is going to be supervised at all times, and if
       | there's a problem, AI will report that problem and report it to
       | the appropriate person."_
       | 
       | I gotta say, I know that billionaires live in their own private
       | world - in many sense of the word - but this is just wildly
       | naive.
        
         | rad_gruchalski wrote:
         | I don't think so. The billionaires found a way to control the
         | population. All they had to do was to become the government and
         | have sufficient tech.
         | 
         | If Stazi and KGB had the tech we have today, we'd be still
         | having DDR,Warsaw Pact, and Iron Curtain.
         | 
         | Ellison speaks the future. Quoting Mike Tyson ,,and whatcha
         | gonna do 'bout it". Ellison even has a database and a
         | programming language he'd like to sell you to make that happen.
        
           | DomesticMouse wrote:
           | The funny part about this is that even with all this
           | technology the USSR would still have fallen, because Russia
           | is a poor country geographically.
           | 
           | Conformance enforcement only gets you more of the same
           | behaviour. It denies access to variation that engenders
           | innovation.
           | 
           | Exploration vs exploitation.
        
       | FrankWilhoit wrote:
       | You first, Larry. Else you have no credibility and no standing.
        
         | moralestapia wrote:
         | You're probably being downvoted by a pack of Larry's servants.
         | 
         | 100% behind what you say. All the people making this kind of
         | arguments and policies are usually the ones who maintain
         | extremely private lives. Didn't he buy like a whole island in
         | Hawaii?
        
       | WheelsAtLarge wrote:
       | If I didn't know better I would think this is an Onion article.
       | Unfortunately, he's not the only powerful man who feels this way.
        
         | EA-3167 wrote:
         | The obsession with control has been a preoccupation of the
         | elite for a VERY long time. The idea that we're just a few
         | cameras away from the perfect panopticon i a surprisingly
         | dangerous and common delusion, especially given the ample
         | evidence that it doesn't work. Look at the UK, where handguns
         | are rare, knives are illegal to supply to under-18's, there are
         | cameras EVERYWHERE... and they still have frequent stabbings.
         | 
         | With kitchen knives. And yeah they catch it on camera, but they
         | didn't prevent it.
        
       | walterbell wrote:
       | Optional membership in _Club-Invisible-to-Surveillance_ , based
       | on social credit, faction, status or other "predictive" criteria.
        
       | daft_pink wrote:
       | When is the next season of Black Mirror? We desperately need it.
        
         | panzi wrote:
         | We are already in it.
        
       | yakaccount4 wrote:
       | Does Larry really lack enough self awareness to not realize these
       | kind of statements make him sound like an orwellian super
       | villain, or perhaps he does and simply does not care?
       | 
       | The latter is surely more frightening.
        
         | archagon wrote:
         | The oligarchs have now realized that nothing is going to stop
         | them, so the masks are coming off.
         | 
         | How long until corporations start organizing their own private
         | militias, I wonder?
        
           | jaggederest wrote:
           | Negative sixty eight years[1]. Oh, you didn't mean the
           | private military contractors, of which there were about 250k
           | involved in the iraq and afghanistan war, slightly more in
           | total than deployed troops at any given time.
           | 
           | Many ultra-high-net-worth individuals hire them. It's no
           | secret, they've been doing it since the 60s when kidnap and
           | ransom insurance started being a serious thing, and it's only
           | intensified over time. There was an interesting "bolt hole"
           | real estate listing that claimed years supply of food, water,
           | housing etc. for a "company sized group of security
           | contractors" as an amenity.
           | 
           | [1] G4S, the largest PMC company, founded in 1957
        
           | scyzoryk_xyz wrote:
           | Perhaps they already do, we just don't know about it yet =)
        
         | Frost1x wrote:
         | The trend has been more openness in this sort of behavior.
         | After all, the public hasn't seemed to respond to it with much
         | negativity other than people occasionally complaining about
         | these sorts of behaviors online. The highest level complaint
         | seems to be public protest, which don't seem to garner enough
         | momentum to push change.
         | 
         | If there's no repercussions, why not be transparent? Scary
         | indeed, as it's quite telling of the direction we're headed in,
         | IMHO.
        
         | ozim wrote:
         | Don't make a mistake of anthropomorphising Larry Ellison.
        
         | scyzoryk_xyz wrote:
         | For one, he's one of the OG's who's had vast wealth and power
         | for longer than many others have been alive.
         | 
         | And two, he's at an age where people lose any sense of self-
         | awareness, shame, filters - all that shit.
         | 
         | Anyways I don't think he cares that it makes him sound
         | Orwellian. I suspect he's fine with being Orwellian outright.
         | Not having what he has is as unimaginable as for all of us
         | having a fraction of what he has. It's too much of a stretch
         | for someone like that to extent so much to imagine.
         | 
         | And yeah it's frightening, it's why we did away with autocratic
         | Sun King calibre aristocracy/royalty and all that. We can
         | expect all the other zillionaires to follow this path reliably
         | over the next few decades.
        
       | Delk wrote:
       | Ars Technica article with a link to video records of the Oracle
       | financial meeting: https://arstechnica.com/information-
       | technology/2024/09/omnip...
        
       | baal80spam wrote:
       | How could he even say this with a straight face?
        
       | rainworld wrote:
       | CIA-Larry has been representing and pushing these ideas for a
       | long time:
       | 
       | https://chroniclesmagazine.org/view/larry-ellisons-golden-ag...
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Information_Awareness
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Core
        
       | slackfan wrote:
       | At least he's open about his intentions.
        
       | timoth3y wrote:
       | > "We're going to have supervision," Ellison said.
       | 
       | I literally read that as "supervillain" when I first read it.
        
       | beng-nl wrote:
       | The lawnmower wants to use vast AI surveillance on the blades of
       | grass.
       | 
       | Do not anthropomorphize the lawnmower.
        
       | qzw wrote:
       | The modern super billionaire is so rich that only complete
       | societal collapse or being personally targeted by a state-level
       | entity can threaten their basically never-ending wealth and
       | power. That's why they all have built bunkers on various islands
       | in the world and have kissed the rings of whichever political
       | leaders that look the most likely to threaten their position
       | and/or life. If some of these leaders are also going to give them
       | more money for their services, then that's just another good
       | transaction for them. Anyone can sell their soul for a price. It
       | takes a billionaire to sell it over and over for an ever
       | increasing return.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-01-25 23:00 UTC)