[HN Gopher] Emotional support across adulthood: A 60-year study ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Emotional support across adulthood: A 60-year study of men's social
       networks
        
       Author : clockworksoul
       Score  : 92 points
       Date   : 2025-01-25 18:36 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.psypost.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.psypost.org)
        
       | execat wrote:
       | That's a wide range, isn't it?
        
         | creinhardt wrote:
         | Yeah, you could also say "Most men die between 30 and 90".
        
       | marssaxman wrote:
       | > reflecting an average decrease from two to one
       | 
       | What this really seems to be saying is more like "men generally
       | don't have emotional support networks".
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | This is why there's the joke that the miracle wasn't Christ
         | rising from the dead, it was having 12 close personal friends
         | in his 30s.
        
           | goodpoint wrote:
           | That so bleak.
        
           | OldGuyInTheClub wrote:
           | Were they friends or his downline?
        
       | mmastrac wrote:
       | "Emotional support networks among men shrink by 50% between the
       | ages of 30 and 90, reflecting an average decrease from two to one
       | emotional support providers"
       | 
       | Or, to rephrase,
       | 
       | "Men grow up with an average of two emotional support providers
       | and lose one in mid to late adulthood"
        
         | jfengel wrote:
         | Any idea how many women have?
         | 
         | The form of this study was specific to men and very long-
         | running, so I don't know where you'd get comparable data.
         | Still, it would be interesting to take a stab at it. Is it 2?
         | 1? 10?
        
           | bitwize wrote:
           | Unlike men, women tend seek out emotional support networks as
           | a matter of course. There's probably some reduction as they
           | age, but it's probably from like, the entire glee club to
           | their husband, kids, five or six girls they keep up with from
           | high school and the neighbor lady. A particularly gregarious
           | woman like my wife can grow her support network. This is
           | definitely an area meriting more research.
        
             | kelseyfrog wrote:
             | As a trans women, I have a unique perspective on how gender
             | impacts social relations having lived life in each of the
             | two worlds.
             | 
             | Like commenters above mention, emotional support is table
             | stakes in friendship among women. It is a kinder, gentler
             | world - the kind of world you perhaps remember growing up
             | in. That world still exists, but it's typically not
             | accessible to men once they reach adulthood.
             | 
             | How could men access the world of emotional support? By
             | disassociating the idea of gender and emotional support.
             | Growing up in the 90s and 2000s, I remember emotional
             | vulnerability being associated with homosexuality - it was
             | "gay" for men to be emotionally vulnerable with eachother,
             | typically leaving men with women[spouses] or family members
             | as their only source of emotional support. The way out is
             | decouple these two things, to un-"gay" emotional
             | vulnerability between men.
             | 
             | What does it look like? Checking in on friends, learning to
             | open up yourself, increasing emotional intelligence,
             | learning how to hold space and reflectively listen. Not
             | trying to solve people's problems when what they want is to
             | be heard. All of these skills and norms exist within
             | feminine spaces as a matter of course and when folks say
             | "putting in the work" it means learning to employ these
             | things.
             | 
             | It means that being emotionally vulnerable doesn't imply a
             | sexual advancement. It means enforcing that as a reality.
        
               | watwut wrote:
               | What is emotional vulnerability?
        
               | kelseyfrog wrote:
               | It's a state of being emotionally exposed in way that
               | includes uncertainty. Like sharing emotions when you're
               | unsure how the other person will respond. In this case,
               | it might mean opening up more to an acquaintance as a way
               | to develop a friendship but being unsure how they would
               | receive that or reciprocate.
        
               | pessimizer wrote:
               | Female stereotyping.
        
               | clockworksoul wrote:
               | That's a very valuable insight. Thank you.
        
           | Spivak wrote:
           | I don't feel very exceptional in terms of my social network
           | among my peers and I would say probably 20-25. I think it
           | mostly comes from emotional support being pretty much table
           | stakes for female friendships. I feel like most "biological"
           | explanations are bunk but like if you're gonna be friends
           | you're gonna be friends when you're on your period and going
           | through it.
        
           | iterance wrote:
           | Anecdotally I'd say I can't imagine living with like, one or
           | two people I turn to for emotional support. Would be a
           | nightmare. I know probably 20 or 30 people I could turn to if
           | I needed something, even just to vent.
           | 
           | I wouldn't even necessarily say I'm that close with most of
           | them. It's sort of just... table stakes?
        
             | sosuke wrote:
             | Imagine three other possibilities:
             | 
             | You have a dozen people who would give you emotional
             | support but you don't ask for any because you aren't sure
             | you could give emotional support in return.
             | 
             | You have a dozen people you think might give you emotional
             | support but you don't want to burden them with your
             | problems.
             | 
             | You have a dozen people that would give you emotional
             | support, maybe once, but you are too afraid to burn the
             | single emotional support coupon until its more important.
        
               | em-bee wrote:
               | i have one friend that i can trust to be able to talk to
               | with challenges in my life and especially with challenges
               | in my relationship. i know that because he has been open
               | and sharing many of his personal challenges for by now
               | decades with a group of friends that i am privileged to
               | have been invited to.
               | 
               | for everyone else it is pretty much like you describe. i
               | have probably over time met people from each of those
               | categories. and some of them may actually have turned
               | into real friends that i could trust like this one friend
               | above. but moving around meant that we didn't keep in
               | touch. (and it's worth mentioning that almost none of
               | them are from my home, so without moving around i would
               | not have even met them)
        
         | jasoneckert wrote:
         | And with such a small sample size, the variance will be high.
         | 
         | For example, I estimate that my own emotional support network
         | quadrupled from about 1-2 before the age of 30 to 5-8 after the
         | age of 40.
        
         | cauliflower2718 wrote:
         | Is this to be interpreted as most men have two parents, and in
         | adulthood one of them dies?
         | 
         | Or, men have a parent they are close with plus a spouse, and
         | then the parent dies?
        
           | seneca wrote:
           | I interpreted it as the latter being the most common pattern.
           | I'm sure it differs fairly widely though.
        
       | fawley wrote:
       | Men typically rely on their wives as their sole emotional
       | support, and then people are surprised when 70% of divorces are
       | initiated by women.
        
         | wryoak wrote:
         | Well, let's look at two things here:
         | 
         | 1. Men often suck at providing emotional support, as is a
         | common complaint from women. So are men expected to rely on men
         | for emotional support, or extramarital female relationships?
         | 
         | 2. Men are typically limited access to female peers when they
         | get married. For example, my first wife told me flat out which
         | of my friends were too attractive for me to maintain
         | friendships with. Reiterating that men are pretty lousy at
         | providing emotional support so women who don't have the weight
         | of marriage forcing them to maintain the relationship are going
         | to feel an imbalance and stop offering the uncompensated labor
         | means we can't rely on other women either.
         | 
         | Until men are raised to give emotional support, we're not going
         | to be effective at or equitable about obtaining it, either.
        
         | avidiax wrote:
         | I've heard it said that romance for a man is that she still
         | loves you even if you can no longer provide.
         | 
         | Sadly, I think very few men have such a relationship that would
         | survive an extended job loss, or getting seriously ill. There's
         | plenty of anecdata of men opening up emotionally, only to have
         | their partner recoil in disgust.
        
       | dijit wrote:
       | Only half?
       | 
       | Thats a really wide range too.
       | 
       | By 90 it is increasingly likely your spouse and close friends are
       | mostly dead.
       | 
       | My emotional support network consists of two people, my long-term
       | partner and my parent(s). My long term partner loves me
       | conditionally (and don't let anyone fool you into thinking that
       | this is abnormal).
       | 
       | Only your parents might love you unconditionally, and they have a
       | pretty decent head start with their mortality.
        
         | passwordoops wrote:
         | > My long term partner loves me conditionally
         | 
         | I've come to learn the only unconditional love is that between
         | parent-child
        
           | zie wrote:
           | Even that can be conditional. Parents deliberately remove
           | themselves from their children's lives sometimes for various
           | reasons. Child is gay/trans or othered in some other way.
           | Child commits some serious crime, etc.
           | 
           | It could also be the parent is too much of a mess(drug
           | addict, etc) that they can't love their child.
        
           | layer8 wrote:
           | Some people come to learn that it can be quite conditional
           | between parent and child as well.
        
           | exe34 wrote:
           | And only some at that. Mine only "loved" me if it made them
           | look good.
        
         | purple-leafy wrote:
         | This is sadly true, my long term partner left me last night. I
         | really thought it would go the distance, and I'm almost not sad
         | - it's just typical
        
           | whamlastxmas wrote:
           | Hope you do something kind for yourself to feel better <3
        
           | nadermx wrote:
           | As a man I'm vigilant on making my happiness a priority in a
           | relationship. Since if I'm happy it trickles to my partner.
           | Vs if she's happy her mood might change on a whim due to
           | period or other things, so its not consitant or dependable.
           | And if she leaves me, it's because I failed in some way or
           | another, so I work on seeing where I gave up happiness for
           | her, and work on fixing that.
        
             | avtar wrote:
             | > And if she leaves me, it's because I failed in some way
             | or another
             | 
             | With all due respect, chances are this view won't be
             | helpful in the long run. It's challenging enough to
             | influence our own minds or predict with certainty what
             | journeys they'll embark on, let alone assume we can be
             | responsible for another person's happiness.
        
               | nadermx wrote:
               | I don't mean I failed to make her happy. I mean I failed
               | in asserting myself or sacrificing my happiness for her.
               | As her happiness generally feeds of mine.
        
             | breaker-kind wrote:
             | the problem might be that you are a misogynist
        
         | thrwaway223 wrote:
         | Well for me, half of 0 is still 0 and I'm not even 30 yet.
         | 
         | > My long term partner loves me conditionally (and don't let
         | anyone fool you into thinking that this is abnormal).
         | 
         | I haven't told anyone but a therapist the abuse I've been
         | facing from a partner because it would break my parents heart.
         | I've been back-stabbed now 3 times from different people I was
         | closest with relationship or friendship-wise over the past
         | decade (because you're right it's conditional).
         | 
         | I honestly don't see how informing friends and family around me
         | that I've been physically attacked many times, forced to wipe
         | all evidence, hunted down, de-escalated 20 bloodcurdling
         | screaming panic attack episodes, stop 2 of their suicide
         | attempts, lied to at every turn, was cheated on, and then
         | abandoned (BPD & drug abuse). I should make the people around
         | me share in how awful I feel? That won't resolve anything, just
         | like the therapist that can't change it.
        
           | swatcoder wrote:
           | FWIW, much value in talking about intense and traumatic
           | experiences is in discovering that you're not alone in
           | general, and often not even alone among your peers. Life can
           | indeed go pretty smoothly for some people, at least for long
           | stretches of time, but many more people than you might
           | realize have experienced the kinds of things you describe.
           | 
           | Being open about it helps each of you spot the other amidst
           | the crowd, provide a sense of community and comraderie that
           | it sounds like you might be lacking. Not only do you both (et
           | al) get helped by it, the experience of helping _them_ can
           | often provide yet another inspiration for feeling less
           | burdened and alone.
           | 
           | Maybe look up some intimate group talk opportunities. These
           | could be informal men's groups, therapy- or church- mediated
           | groups, or 12-step groups (like maybe CODA, in your case).
           | These are almost always private opportunities to achieve what
           | I mention above, where nobody outside the group is going to
           | hear a whiff of what you share, and many of them are free or
           | reasonably priced. And they're lurking all over the place. If
           | you're feeling as defeated and hopeless as you sound, it
           | could make a difference.
        
           | zelphirkalt wrote:
           | For many people telling the stories is a form of processing
           | them, or processing their experiences in different ways than
           | they have before.
        
         | horrible-hilde wrote:
         | Why would you even want unconditional love? Are you planning on
         | abusing and taking advantage of your spouse? People who want
         | this are not ready for marriage.
        
           | dijit wrote:
           | Maybe I want to be vulnerable sometimes, or weak sometimes,
           | or to have unfinished opinions on things and be listened to
           | in good faith without risking an entire relationship because
           | I would like to talk about it.
           | 
           | Like privacy, people can come up with nice catch-alls like
           | "nothing to hide", but the default is not abuse.
        
             | em-bee wrote:
             | this. unconditional love is not blind love. but it means
             | that i am not being needlessly criticized for my faults but
             | receive care and encouragement to work on them. it means
             | that i am treated with compassion, even if i am a criminal.
             | it doesn't mean that i get a free pass to do whatever i
             | want. if i hurt someone, i need to fix that, especially if
             | it is my partner.
             | 
             | and the same goes in reverse. i love my wife and only wish
             | the best for her. but that does not mean i need to be blind
             | to her problems, or not expect her to stop doing things
             | that hurt me or others. but it does mean that my love for
             | her does not stop even if we should separate.
             | 
             | however, this assumes a different kind of love than the
             | love that most people think they have for their partner. a
             | kind of love that is exclusive and can only ever go to one
             | person. unconditional love is the kind of love that accepts
             | everyone for what they are. the kind of love that all the
             | major religions out there are talking about.
             | 
             | (edit: expanded further)
        
             | bowsamic wrote:
             | You can have that with conditional love. It sounds like
             | your marriage is just bad
        
         | Fire-Dragon-DoL wrote:
         | I think parents love you conditionally true. In the end if you
         | turn into a really bad person, they might not love you anymore.
         | 
         | That's not bad though. If I stop talking to my partner, I
         | suspect at some point they wouldn't want to stay with me
         | anymore. If I attacked my parents repeatedly, same goes for
         | them
        
         | heresie-dabord wrote:
         | > My long term partner loves me conditionally
         | 
         | Sounds right, relationships require effort to stay healthy.
         | It's not always an easy dance, as veterans of marriage will
         | attest.
         | 
         | No healthy relationship should be a _cage_ containing 2 or more
         | martyrs. If people are accumulating resentment, it 's time to
         | seek help or dialogue or renegotiation.
         | 
         | That said, it's a mark of mature introspection and humility to
         | be able to ask for help and support. It's also a mark of
         | maturity and kindness to give help and support.
        
         | Rhapso wrote:
         | Loving is the easiest part of having a healthy relationship.
         | Love can be unconditional where a relationship shouldn't be.
        
       | m3kw9 wrote:
       | This is AI emotional support come in
        
       | stevenAthompson wrote:
       | "However, generalized responses, such as "family" or "friends,"
       | as well as mentions of non-human sources like pets, were excluded
       | from formal analyses."
       | 
       | They excluded everyone that had a large support network from the
       | study.
        
         | some_furry wrote:
         | Oh, that explains it.
         | 
         | I was sitting here wondering how anyone has only _two_ to begin
         | with.
        
           | drdec wrote:
           | I had none for a very long time. Happy to report I have
           | someone now.
           | 
           | Your dismissal of people with small emotional support
           | networks angers me if I'm being honest.
        
             | some_furry wrote:
             | > Your dismissal of people with small emotional support
             | networks
             | 
             | That's not what I was doing.
             | 
             | Like, I'm an extreme introvert. Most people are more
             | extroverted than I am. Despite this, I have more than two
             | close friends.
             | 
             | Whatever's causing some people to have small emotional
             | support networks is something that should be studied by
             | scientists, rather than taken for granted like this article
             | does. Preventing unnecessary suffering is a net-positive
             | for society.
             | 
             | But the article excluded the people who have more than two
             | close friends, and kind of took that for granted. So I was
             | responding to the article, not the circumstances other
             | people suffer through.
             | 
             | I can see how someone could misread my comment to mean
             | something else, but that wasn't what I was stating.
        
               | drdec wrote:
               | Thanks for responding and clarifying. My apologies for
               | misreading your intent.
        
       | cultofmetatron wrote:
       | You guys are getting emotional support???
        
         | rufus_foreman wrote:
         | It has declined by 50% since one of the two local liquor stores
         | closed.
        
         | matrix87 wrote:
         | nah it's too expensive
        
         | pixelpoet wrote:
         | And an entire NETWORK?!
         | 
         | Literally had no IRL friends since half my life, and am mostly
         | single. Not uncommon among my coder friends, either.
        
       | d1sxeyes wrote:
       | > This research was limited by its all-male, predominantly White
       | sample and its reliance on self-reported data. Additionally, the
       | quality of emotional support and its impacts on well-being were
       | not assessed.
       | 
       | So: we don't know if it's just men, we don't know if it's true
       | for all ethnicities or just white men, it's a reduction from two
       | to one, I don't mean to be dismissive, but someone got funding
       | for this?
        
         | OldGuyInTheClub wrote:
         | Of course, "Further research is required." ;-)
         | 
         | More telling, "This study utilized a unique longitudinal
         | dataset drawn from a sample of 235 men who were originally
         | recruited as Harvard University students between 1939 and
         | 1942."
        
         | standardUser wrote:
         | Middle-aged white men have long had the highest suicide rates,
         | so that may explain the narrow focus.
        
         | swatcoder wrote:
         | That's basically the critique that some weigh against huge
         | swathes of psychology-adjacent research (among other domains),
         | but is quite hard to overcome in practice, so money keeps
         | flowing because its the established norm and because many
         | people would rather have low-confidence pseudoscientific
         | insights than no "scientific" insights at all.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology#WEIRD_bias
        
         | notjoemama wrote:
         | > predominantly White
         | 
         | So, the ones that commit suicide at the highest rate. But I
         | agree, this is not a good study and little if any meaningful
         | information comes from it. Perhaps its failure can bolster some
         | _actual_ research into the issue?
        
       | supportengineer wrote:
       | We get an emotional support network? Nobody told me.
        
         | formerly_proven wrote:
         | I know it's supposed to be a joke but it actually encapsulates
         | one of the core issues about this already on the language
         | level, men thinking they'd "get" something out of thin air. Do
         | you think women have 31.41x larger emotional support networks
         | out of thin air? Of course not, they put the effort in. Men
         | don't.
        
           | constantcrying wrote:
           | >Men don't.
           | 
           | Even the idea repulses me.
        
           | exe34 wrote:
           | > they put the effort in. Men don't.
           | 
           | Or you know, they do, and get used and cast aside enough
           | times and stop.
        
           | swatcoder wrote:
           | Compassion is helpful here.
           | 
           | Consider that many men (among others) don't consciously
           | experience regular or frequent _need_ for verbal or tactile
           | emotional support as such, so they don 't get a lot of
           | practice culturing it as a skill, either as a giver or
           | receiver, and don't often get to feel out which people in
           | their network are going to be well-suited for it anyway.
           | 
           | Infrequent needs are hard to "work on" and often benefit from
           | _institutional_ support rather than _ad hoc_ support:
           | therapists, churches /etc, discussion groups, etc
           | 
           | It's sort of like changing tires, in that way. Now that
           | manually changing a car tire is rare, because tires are more
           | durable and crises can generally be remediated by calling
           | some number on the cell phone you're certainly carrying,
           | fewer and fewer people have actually done it and have a
           | working, practiced familiarity with how to do it. But
           | thankfully, roadside assistance and tow trucks are widely
           | available and there's mostly no shame to using them now.
           | 
           | Supporting _instutitonal_ access for emotional support would
           | go along way towards helping the many _people_ who just don
           | 't have an opportunity to "work on" building support networks
           | the way you suggest.
        
             | watwut wrote:
             | Women do not build these networks by needing frequent
             | emotional support. It is build on mundane stuff, when you
             | do not need support, when no one need support.
             | 
             | The emotional support thing is a consequence of building
             | relationships when you do not need help, when you are fine.
             | If you build them only when you need emotional support, you
             | will be perceived as needy and people will get tired of it.
        
               | swatcoder wrote:
               | If that's all it was, there'd be no distinction at all.
               | 
               | Men, broadly, have plenty of "relationships" that they
               | invest themselves in and are extremely loyaly to.
               | 
               | What the study was about, and the discussion is about, is
               | emotional support, and that _quality_ is often not seen
               | (or at least acknowledged) in the intense, loyal,
               | committed, and earnestly worked on relationships that men
               | do form, because its only one quality among a whole
               | plethora that might define a relationship.
        
               | watwut wrote:
               | I get it, but my point was that it is not the frequency
               | of the need that makes the difference. The
               | acts/discussions/whatever that let you find and get
               | comfortable with people able to provide emotional support
               | are happening when no one needs emotional support.
               | 
               | You build emotional support network by building it when
               | you do not need emotional support.
        
           | acuozzo wrote:
           | It's a problem of the commons.
           | 
           | It's particularly hard to bootstrap. You can take the plunge,
           | attempt to open up to dozens of different guy-"friends", and
           | repeatedly run into replies like "sucks, bro" or even "man
           | up".
           | 
           | I have a hobby which exposes me regularly to men of different
           | ages, backgrounds, financial circumstances, etc. This seems
           | to be the case for all of them.
        
       | SJC_Hacker wrote:
       | Men have emotional support networks?
        
         | thelastparadise wrote:
         | I had two, then only one once the liquor store down road closed
         | up shop.
        
       | thih9 wrote:
       | > However, generalized responses, such as "family" or "friends,"
       | as well as mentions of non-human sources like pets, were excluded
       | from formal analyses.
       | 
       | Pets - fine; but rejecting generalized plural responses might
       | mean rejecting cases where people genuinely had more emotional
       | support providers.
        
       | ashoeafoot wrote:
       | well good thing today they often dont even aquire one in the
       | first place. good thing they would vote ever more radical to end
       | that torture..
        
       | seneca wrote:
       | While the average is 1, a strikingly high number will have 0. The
       | loneliness epidemic is a very real thing, and impacts men to a
       | brutal degree.
        
       | viraptor wrote:
       | There are programs/orgs that try to address that. In Australia
       | for example there's https://mensshed.org/ , https://dadlan.au/
       | and probably a few others I'm not familiar with. If someone's
       | aware of the US equivalents this may be a good place to link
       | them.
        
       | mrxd wrote:
       | Incredible findings. Apparently your mom dies sometime when you
       | are between age 30-90.
        
       | w10-1 wrote:
       | 293 Harvard men, last sampled in 2010, with "network" sizes of
       | 2...
       | 
       | Pseudo-science is dressing up a few true facts as a vehicle for
       | opinion. It's typically relatively harmless, except perhaps when
       | it happens to reflect a regressive zeitgeist.
       | 
       | My own experience suggests all men take a lot more care on this
       | point, but the effect of that been mostly overwhelmed by
       | increased competition.
        
       | wayoverthecloud wrote:
       | I am doing my PhD and occasionally my supervisor and I come
       | across papers that don't have any meaningful results/statistics
       | but you gotta publish somehow. Like, they conclude with "We
       | observed that the latency can be reduced by 2x-300x." I feel like
       | the group that did this research spent a decade, and their
       | supervisor was like, well, we gotta publish something. Choose an
       | age interval that fits the whole data. 30-90.
        
         | citizenpaul wrote:
         | Exactly what I thought put into words. There is not even a
         | comparison to the obvious first question. Do women have the
         | same effects or is it limited to men?
        
         | OldGuyInTheClub wrote:
         | Agreed. They followed this cohort for decades and this was the
         | conclusion? It reads like an update from the pitch drop
         | experiment.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitch_drop_experiment
        
       | matrix87 wrote:
       | Once you're an adult, do you even need one in the first place?
       | 
       | I'm 24, I don't go to anyone for help pretty much ever, I just
       | follow my own goals. That's gotten me way farther than most
       | people I know
       | 
       | I don't think this talk about "male emotional support networks"
       | is actually intended to help men, it's meant to infantilize them.
       | They'd be better off just buying into the nietzschean "support
       | yourself" type of worldview
        
         | 1shooner wrote:
         | >Once you're an adult, do you even need one in the first place?
         | 
         | >I'm 24
         | 
         | No offense, but you're barely an adult. Life is hard, everyone
         | needs help at some point. This is not a new concept.
        
         | drdec wrote:
         | You don't think you will want some support when a tragedy
         | befalls you? A child or partner is hospitalized or dies? You
         | develop a potentially terminal illness? A partner betrays you?
         | Are you just going to "follow your goals" in these situations?
        
           | constantcrying wrote:
           | How is "emotional support" going to help with any of that?
        
             | drdec wrote:
             | It's right in the name, it helps you handle and process
             | your emotions.
        
               | constantcrying wrote:
               | I can do that on my own perfectly fine.
        
               | drdec wrote:
               | That's fine that it is not for you.
               | 
               | (Username does not check out)
        
           | matrix87 wrote:
           | > A child or partner is hospitalized or dies?
           | 
           | everyone processes grief differently
           | 
           | > You develop a potentially terminal illness?
           | 
           | I mean, I'm probably going to die anyway. At least if you're
           | alone you don't have to worry about the trade off between
           | extreme medical bills and a few more months of life vs
           | leaving family more money
           | 
           | > A partner betrays you?
           | 
           | I don't really plan on marrying so I'd just replace them with
           | someone else
           | 
           | In all of these situations, you can figure out ways to get
           | through them alone
        
             | drdec wrote:
             | > In all of these situations, you can figure out ways to
             | get through them alone
             | 
             | That is not the point.
             | 
             | The point is that an emotional support network will help
             | you in these situations and suggesting that someone build
             | one is not "infantilizing" them but giving them valuable
             | tools.
             | 
             | I could care less if you find one personally valuable or
             | not (I don't have trouble imagining that there are people
             | for which they are not), but I object to your
             | generalizations and implication that men who pursue them
             | are somehow lesser.
        
         | constantcrying wrote:
         | Yes, I don't even know what "emotional support" would look
         | like.
         | 
         | I have never wanted to externalize my emotions and the idea of
         | talking to my friends about my feelings seems utterly bizarre.
        
           | matrix87 wrote:
           | I mean, I talk to friends and family about stuff that's going
           | on. But I don't turn to them for actual advice because
           | usually my own advice is better
        
             | constantcrying wrote:
             | I like to talk to my friends about many things, my emotions
             | just do not include that and at no point in my adult life
             | have I ever felt any inclination to do so.
        
               | watwut wrote:
               | You have never talked about being angry, about being
               | happy? Those are emotions. And I see men writing about
               | feeling lonely on hacker news all the time.
               | 
               | Developers talk about being frustrated by tasks.
               | Frustration is an emotion.
        
               | constantcrying wrote:
               | >You have never talked about being angry, about being
               | happy?
               | 
               | No. Why would I?
               | 
               | >Developers talk about being frustrated by tasks.
               | Frustration is an emotion.
               | 
               | But they do not seek _emotional support_ , they seek
               | advice on how to overcome that frustration.
               | 
               | >And I see men writing about feeling lonely on hacker
               | news all the time.
               | 
               | Coincidentally I have also never felt lonely.
               | 
               | Not once in my life have I felt the need to externalize
               | my emotions. Of course I have had problems in my life,
               | which I talked about with parents and friends, but my
               | emotions where never part of that.
        
         | jrgoff wrote:
         | As a man in my mid-40s who has gradually become more aware of
         | my emotions and the need I have for connection, I disagree. Of
         | course I can't make claims about anyone else's needs or
         | happiness, but for myself my life has been a lot better as I
         | have built supportive friendships. I don't feel infantilized, I
         | feel more able to have my needs met, be happier, work through
         | blocks that are triggered by old wounds, etc. I feel more
         | capable of living a satisfying life.
        
         | tommiegannert wrote:
         | I don't know you, but respectfully, people didn't start dying
         | in my life until I was in my mid-30s.
         | 
         | The most heartbreaking experience I've had was my 88 year old
         | neighbor ringing the door, and informing me that his wife of 60
         | years had just died. He managed to say three words. Before the
         | fourth, he broke down in tears.
         | 
         | My wife has died.
         | 
         | Such a simple sentence, but a sentence that had 60 years of
         | unconditional love behind it. And an entire family. Their life.
         | His wife was lovely. I miss her, and cannot even pretend to
         | imagine what this was, and still is, like, for him.
         | 
         | Behind him, at my door, was my other neighbor. He was the first
         | to have been told. He just stood there, silently, while I gave
         | the husband a long hug. He never said a word, his mere presence
         | saying everything that needed to be said.
         | 
         | You are not alone.
        
         | watwut wrote:
         | I think that this ideology is one of reasons why men get less
         | emotional support and why many cant provide it. They cant
         | provided because they don't want to, because they look down on
         | people who want or need it. And consequently they cant really
         | talk openly with other men, because they will look down at
         | them.
         | 
         | > Once you're an adult, do you even need one in the first
         | place?
         | 
         | Yes adults need it. Humans are animals like that.
        
       | ajolly wrote:
       | Yeah. Prob 90% of mine went away between 36-40 years old.
        
       | Babairjfjf wrote:
       | Men have ANY emotional support network? Even talking about brutal
       | sexual assault, that happens to most baby boys is forbidden.
       | Drinking with lads is not really an emotional support!
        
       | kevwil wrote:
       | Imagine having someone, anyone, that you felt comfortable sharing
       | your feelings with. Amazing.
       | 
       | I've known my best friend for 50 years now, literally since
       | kindergarten. One person. I probably wouldn't talk about my top
       | 5% of private feelings with him, not sure why. I've been married
       | 28 years now. She doesn't understand me at all, and doesn't want
       | to see or hear any "weakness" from me. So what the f@#$ is an
       | emotional support network? Science fiction, I'd say.
        
         | kkoncevicius wrote:
         | Your comment mirrors my experience with both close friends and
         | a spouse. One time my now ex-wife asked why I don't share my
         | feelings more. When I did she said she felt unsafe and we
         | started talking about her instead. In my anecdotal experience
         | men are routinely trained not to talk about their troubles and
         | emotions. Even if I had some form of emotional support I am not
         | sure I would know how to open up. And I am not sure I would
         | want to.
        
       | scoofy wrote:
       | I will never stop being a regular at the local bar. I may switch
       | to NA beers as I get older, but it is entirely important to me to
       | engage in the rituals that predate history. Having a local
       | bar/pub, generally walking distance away from a residence, where
       | people gather and know each other (even if they are not friends)
       | seems important to me.
       | 
       | This line of thinking has also nearly convinced my to go to some
       | kind of church, but growing up with zealots as parents has pretty
       | much nullified that. I only wish that universities took on the
       | roll of a third place community center, offering/advertising free
       | lectures to locals.
        
         | matrix87 wrote:
         | I kind of wish coffee houses had more of this role like how
         | they were in Vienna
        
           | scoofy wrote:
           | I think people attended those as sort of a nightly news
           | service. Where intellectuals would talk about the days
           | events. Now, with modern tech, people can do that from their
           | own how with experts just by watching the news or youtube.
           | 
           | I really think the automobile and television are more to
           | blame for the loneliness epidemic than we give credit for.
        
         | sawmurai wrote:
         | Yes, I notice the benefit of having the same faces around
         | regularly at the $sport I do few times per week. You don't say
         | much more than hello and goodbye, but after a while you
         | appreciate each other's company and really miss it when you
         | can't go.
        
       | readthenotes1 wrote:
       | Useless.
       | 
       | 'generalized responses, such as "family" or "friends,"..., were
       | excluded from formal analyses.'
        
       | thdhhghgbhy wrote:
       | More like by 40. My relationship with even my best buds from
       | school became empty or non existent after years of marriage and
       | kids.
        
       | asimpleusecase wrote:
       | I attend a church and it's large enough that you would generally
       | not get to know people very well. But they offer "small group"
       | connection and about 3 years ago I connected with 3 other men. We
       | meet every couple of weeks. We have different backgrounds but all
       | of us have leadership responsibilities. We have step by step
       | deepened the trust and confidence in each other. At some point
       | over the past year each of us was in some type of ultra stressful
       | situation - losing sleep -etc. But when we came to our group we
       | could say as much or as little as we wished but the entire group
       | was supportive. I could get into more detail but I know that many
       | on HN don't care for church. What I wanted to share is that we
       | all have found this to be the highlight of our week - when we get
       | together. Personally, it has been the most connected I have been
       | with men in 20 years. So it's not a law of nature that men won't
       | or can't see their masculine support network grow. It takes time
       | to build trust but it is worth the investment
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-01-25 23:01 UTC)