[HN Gopher] I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney, who does wo...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney, who does work for YC and
       startups. AMA
        
       I'll be here for the next 3 hours and then again at around 4 pm EST
       for another 3 hours. As usual, there are many possible topics and
       I'll be guided by whatever you're concerned with but as much as
       possible - because we've received so many questions about this the
       past few months - I'd like to focus on the impact of the new
       administration on U.S. immigration law and policy. Please remember
       that I can't provide legal advice on specific cases for liability
       reasons because I won't have access to all the facts. Please stick
       to a factual discussion in your questions and comments and I'll try
       to do the same in my answers. Thanks!
        
       Author : proberts
       Score  : 163 points
       Date   : 2025-01-20 16:20 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
       | ReaLNero wrote:
       | What's your outlook on work green-card timelines for the next 2
       | years, esp. given the recent change in administration?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | There's not much that an administration can do to impact the
         | delays because they primarily are the result of statutory
         | backlogs and demand. So, unless there is a significant change
         | in the law or a significant drop in demand, these delays are
         | likely to persist.
        
       | fertrevino wrote:
       | I heard russian citizens were having troubles getting any kind of
       | U.S. visa due to the political situation in the world. Does this
       | situation still persists? Asking for a friend who still hasn't
       | heard back for his tourist visa.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Yes, it still persists and can result in visa processing delays
         | of more than one year.
        
       | muddi900 wrote:
       | How much do you expect to fight the government in the next 4
       | years?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | We had a window into the administration 8 years ago and as a
         | result we changed the way that we assessed and prepared cases
         | to preempt fights and we continued with this approach during
         | the Biden administration and will continue under the new
         | administration until the fights start up again. I think that
         | the most immediate significant changes in the area of legal
         | immigration will be the imposition of international travel
         | bans. We'll probably learn a lot in a few hours when the
         | administration starts to roll out its Executive Orders.
        
           | peterldowns wrote:
           | What kind of travel bans are you expecting?
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | The Supreme Court during Trump's last time in office upheld
             | versions of the travel ban that covered the nationals of
             | certain countries (Burma, Eritrea, Iran, Kyrgyzstan, Libya,
             | Nigeria, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania,
             | Venezuela, and Yemen). It is expected that most if not all
             | of these countries will be included in a new travel ban.
             | It's unclear what other countries will be included but
             | China and India could be added.
        
       | kubb wrote:
       | As an EU citizen, what are my chances of being able to get a visa
       | if hired by an American company?
        
         | DiggyJohnson wrote:
         | What industry, size of company, and role(s) are you targeting?
        
           | kubb wrote:
           | I'm a senior SWE in big tech. Targeting big to mid tech and
           | financial companies or startups. I'm weighing my options in
           | case of layoffs and whatnot.
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | Schedule a consultation with me or another immigration
             | attorney to go over your options (because a detailed
             | analysis is required) but likely your only real option will
             | be the O-1 and as senior SWE at big tech, you should be
             | able to qualify for an O-1 or take steps to qualify for an
             | O-1.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | If you are currently employed abroad by a related company, then
         | the L-1 visa might be an option. If you are not, then -
         | assuming that you are not from a country with its own visa,
         | such as Australia, Canada, Chile, Mexico, and Singapore - the
         | potential options are the E-1/E-2, H-1B, and O-1.
        
           | kubb wrote:
           | L-1 is primarily for intracompany transfers, right?
           | 
           | O-1 would require demonstrating acclaim - not sure how that
           | is done.
           | 
           | E1/2 - the significant trade part isn't that clear to me. Not
           | sure who qualifies.
           | 
           | H1B is a lottery.
           | 
           | I can't quite gauge my chances to be honest.
        
             | angott wrote:
             | Just apply for jobs, and the immigration attorneys hired by
             | your prospective employer will figure it out. U.S.
             | immigration by employment is sadly almost entirely based on
             | petitions filed _by your employer_. The choice of which
             | visa pathway to pursue is not up to you.
             | 
             | If you're curious: the vast majority of Europeans currently
             | moving to the U.S. for tech jobs typically do so on L-1A or
             | L-1B visas. To qualify, you must work for at least 12
             | months at the European subsidiary of a U.S. company before
             | being transferred to a U.S. office. There are the
             | occasional O-1 cases but you need significant work
             | experience and recognition to qualify. Lawyers will
             | definitely ask you questions to determine whether you are a
             | good candidate for it.
             | 
             | In the past, H-1B was a way more common route, especially
             | when there was no lottery or at least when selection odds
             | were higher. However, with current lottery odds at just
             | 10-15%, many companies now prefer hiring you abroad and
             | then going for an L-1. As long as you satisfy the foreign
             | work requirement, you are more or less guaranteed approval
             | for an L-1 and there is no uncertainty.
             | 
             | Companies also love transferring employees on L-1 because
             | unlike H-1B it is an employer-tied visa. This means you
             | cannot switch to a different employer, effectively locking
             | you in for the duration of your employment until you obtain
             | a green card, if and when that happens. Keep that in mind
             | if you are offered an L-1: you should carefully consider
             | the green card pathways offered by your employer before you
             | move.
        
       | kelh wrote:
       | How often do you see bootstrapped founders get an O-1? How much
       | revenue do they typically have before applying?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | All the time and there's no explicit revenue or funding
         | requirement. In the O-1 context, the company-related
         | requirements are minimal; it's much more about the
         | applicant's/beneficiary's qualifications.
        
       | kujin88 wrote:
       | Hi Peter, thank you for doing this AMA. I am on H1B and I
       | recently lost my job. I only have about 50 days left to get a new
       | job but I have a spouse who is on his own H1B. I wanted to see
       | and find out legal and smooth options to buy more time for myself
       | to find a new job - If anything, it would be those options that
       | do not need me to leave the country and get stamping, if at all.
       | My country of citizenship is India, by the way. If you can help
       | us out, it would be really great. Thank you.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | The best and easiest option because your spouse is in H-1B
         | status is to apply to change your status to dependent H-4
         | status using USCIS Form I-539. As long as this is filed during
         | your grace period, you can remain in the U.S. while the
         | application is pending/until it is approved.
        
           | safog wrote:
           | What happens if / when you eventually find a job? Can you
           | file another change of status to a H1B? Does the status of
           | the original change of status app matter? (e.g., can you
           | apply for a COS to H1 while the COS to H4 is still pending?)
           | 
           | Thank you!
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | Yes, a COS from H-4 to H-1B is an option. However, if the
             | H-4 COS is still pending, you might not be able to get the
             | H-1B petition approved as a change of status but all this
             | means is that to "activate" the approved H-1B petition, you
             | would need to leave the U.S. and reenter with your existing
             | visa stamp (obtained through the previous company) or leave
             | the U.S. and apply for an H-1B visa (if you don't have a
             | valid H-1B visa stamp obtained through the previous
             | company).
        
       | TeeMassive wrote:
       | What is the typical route for Canadians to work in the US tech
       | sector?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Canadian and Mexican citizens have their own visa
         | classification, the TN, and so this is almost always the first
         | option to look at because it is often very quick and easy (and
         | relatively cheap) to get. Other work visa options for Canadians
         | (and the citizens of most countries) are the E-2, L-1, and O-1.
        
           | a_square_peg wrote:
           | I understand there is updates being made to the space export
           | control rules (https://www.space.commerce.gov/new-space-
           | export-control-rule...) regarding space/satellite components
           | that were previously classified as ITAR. I've been curious to
           | know if this will enable Canadians to apply to some
           | space/aerospace technology companies in the US that were
           | restricted to US citizens only?
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | We've done a lot of work for satellite and space weather
             | companies and the feeling I've gotten from my clients is
             | that these changes will open up jobs at space/aerospace
             | technology companies for foreign nationals but right now,
             | it's too early to tell.
        
               | a_square_peg wrote:
               | Thanks for sharing!
        
       | RobertRoberts wrote:
       | I have a friend who is a foreigner, and is in a master's CS
       | degree program in the US. He's married to an American woman as of
       | a few months ago.
       | 
       | What is the reasonable amount of time it should take for him to
       | be able to get a green card and work here in the US?
       | 
       | And is there something he can do to help expedite any process(es)
       | (maybe not a greencard?) so he can legally work and support
       | himself and his new family?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Largely because of the Biden administration's policy of waiving
         | the in-person interview requirement in marriage-based green
         | card cases, the process has been very fast over the last 4
         | years, often taking less than 6 months from the time of filing
         | until the approval of the green card application. If the new
         | administration brings back the interview requirement, then I
         | suspect that the processing time will go back to what it was
         | before, which typically was at least 1 year. While a green card
         | applicant is waiting for their green card application to be
         | reviewed and approved, they will receive a temporary work card.
         | The processing of work card applications is all over the place
         | but has been better over the past 2 years and can take less
         | than 3 months now (although it also can take much longer).
         | There is a way to request expedited approval of a work card
         | application but the standard is high. Instructions for
         | requesting expedite review of an immigration application are
         | available on the USCIS web site.
        
           | RobertRoberts wrote:
           | Thank you!
        
       | blindriver wrote:
       | How viable is the effort to overturn birthright citizenship?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | It's in the Constitution (14th Amendment) I would say extremely
         | unlikely.
        
           | willmadden wrote:
           | I wouldn't. The wording of the 14th Amendment is ambiguous
           | and was arguably misinterpreted by the courts.
           | 
           | "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND
           | (capitalized for emphasis) subject to the jurisdiction
           | thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
           | wherein they reside."
           | 
           | If they can get the SCOTUS to reconsider United States v.
           | Wong Kim Ark from 1898 it could go either way - the court is
           | conservative and public sentiment has shifted.
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | I still think it's extremely unlikely. In other immigration
             | contexts, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" has been
             | interpreted to exclude only diplomats and those not subject
             | to the laws of the U.S. even though they are in the U.S. So
             | children born in the U.S. to diplomats aren't considered
             | citizens at birth.
        
               | willmadden wrote:
               | The same is true for people born into war zones not fully
               | under US control. I still wouldn't write this off. All it
               | takes is a compelling argument for a new interpretation
               | of "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof".
               | 
               | It's pretty easy to make a compelling argument.
               | 
               | The 14th Amendment was intended to address the
               | citizenship status of freed slaves and their descendants
               | post-Civil War. It was not meant to apply to the children
               | of immigrants, particularly those who were not legally
               | present or had not pledged allegiance to the U.S.
               | 
               | A stricter interpretation of "subject to the
               | jurisdiction." means it should require complete,
               | exclusive allegiance to the U.S., which might not apply
               | to children of undocumented immigrants due to their
               | parents' legal status or nationality.
               | 
               | You could also argue that the current interpretation
               | dilutes national sovereignty by automatically bestowing
               | citizenship without a clear reciprocal pledge of
               | allegiance from the parents.
               | 
               | The fact that children of diplomats do not automatically
               | gain citizenship due to not being "subject to the
               | jurisdiction" in the fullest sense could be expanded to
               | include children of undocumented immigrants, arguing that
               | these parents, too, are outside full U.S. jurisdiction.
               | 
               | Finally, United States v. Wong Kim Ark was decided under
               | different circumstances. The socio-political context has
               | changed. This could be used to justify revisiting the
               | original interpretation.
        
               | anigbrowl wrote:
               | Are you seriously suggesting that undocumented immigrants
               | are _immune_ from US jurisdiction in some respect? This
               | sounds like a reverse version of the odd legal theories
               | proffered by sovereign citizens as to why they should not
               | be subject to judgements in US courts.
        
             | pockmarked19 wrote:
             | Are you saying aliens are not subject to US jurisdiction
             | while here? Like "sovereign citizens"? That's what it seems
             | like you're saying.
        
               | proberts wrote:
               | Diplomats (not all foreign nationals) and their families
               | who remain subject to the laws of their own country.
        
               | pockmarked19 wrote:
               | Thanks, that's interesting to know! Although my comment
               | was addressed to willmadden, and I think they just do not
               | know what jurisdiction means.
        
             | dragonwriter wrote:
             | > The wording of the 14th Amendment is ambiguous?
             | 
             | It is only ambiguous read in a vacuum. Read in the comtext
             | of the US legal tradition in which it was written and the
             | way the prior English common law tradition was incorporated
             | into that tradition, it is...rather unambiguous. (Most
             | notably, its exactly how the Supreme Court had applied the
             | principles of English common law involved in multiple
             | citizenship cases before the 14th Amendment establishing a
             | uniform Constitutional rule for birthright citizenship was
             | drafted and ratified. )
             | 
             | > If they can get the SCOTUS to reconsider United States v.
             | Wong Kim Ark from 1898 it could go either way.
             | 
             | Sure, if they can get the court to ignore the clear meaning
             | of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" in the context in
             | which it was written, it can go either way. But _Wong Kim
             | Ark_ isn 't like _Roe_ and the line of cases descended from
             | it, its not controversial even within the kind of
             | conservative legal tradition that dominates the court.
             | 
             | The Trump Administration could probably get such a case
             | before the Court if it really wanted to, but even this
             | court I can't see splitting more favorably to overturning
             | the status quo on this point than 8-1 against.
        
             | anigbrowl wrote:
             | I am not an immigration lawyer, but I am very interested in
             | immigration law and the effort to overturn this precedent
             | in particular, an interest whch goes back more than 15
             | years; so I have done a _lot_ of reading on this argument.
             | 
             | The whole phrase about 'subject to the jurisdiction
             | thereof' refers to the fact that foreign diplomats (and
             | often, their families) are not subject to the jurisdiction
             | of their countries of residence, a concept known as
             | diplomatic immunity. This sometimes leads to people with
             | diplomatic privileges avoiding legal consequences that
             | would otherwise result in fines or custodial sentences, as
             | in this recent case:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Harry_Dunn
             | 
             | Regular, not-diplomatic people of foreign origin who are in
             | the US _are_ subject to the jurisdiction of US courts like
             | anyone else. I have never found any legal justification for
             | the opposite view other than the intense desire of the
             | proponent for things to be different. Usually people who
             | want to sweep aside this precedent rely on an 18th century
             | book called _The Law of Nations_ by Swiss legal theorist
             | Emer Vattel, which opts for a concept of _de jure_
             | (naturalized) citizenship rather than _jus soli_ (of the
             | soil) citizenship as exists here and in some other
             | countries. They argue that it was a very popular book in
             | its day and that Washington, Jefferson, and other founders
             | of the US had certainly read it. when asked why they didn
             | 't just write this into the Constitution you usually get a
             | hand-wavey answer about how it was so obvious they didn't
             | see any need (at best) or the person just stops responding
             | or gets mad (at worst).
        
               | tacostakohashi wrote:
               | Yep, it's pretty nonsensical. Presumably those that hold
               | the view that children of undocumented immigrants born in
               | the United States are not citizens also hold they view
               | that they are immune to prosecution for crimes by the
               | United States for the same reason, but they don't seem to
               | talk about that much.
        
           | erehweb wrote:
           | I agree with other commenters that the meaning is clear. But
           | I think they underestimate how far the Supreme Court is
           | willing to go to torture the meaning of the Constitution.
           | Hopefully I am wrong.
        
         | throwaway111119 wrote:
         | I've read a few different standards for revoking birthright:
         | 
         | 1. Probably the weakest notion is to revoke birthright going
         | forward on children born in US to parents without legal status.
         | 
         | 2. A stronger notion seems to be the revocation of birthright
         | going forward on children born in the US to parents with green
         | cards but not yet US citizenship. This seems to be a popular
         | form of jus sanguinis in some EU countries.
         | 
         | 3. I'm not sure how serious is the talk about revocation of
         | birthright retroactively for all those born on US soil but to
         | parents who at the time only had green cards.
         | 
         | Does anyone have an idea of the momentum behind the stronger
         | forms of revocation?
        
       | FractalCheetah wrote:
       | What are potential challenges to getting an employment-sponsored
       | EB2 visa, as an EU citizen with a Master's degree and more than 5
       | years of relevant work experience?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Sorry. This is a bit too vague. Can you focus your
         | question/clarify your concerns?
        
       | yuvalr1 wrote:
       | Can you describe the changes that we are anticipated to see as a
       | result of the change in the administration?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | He's promised to make a lot of changes immediately, the
         | majority concerning illegal immigration and border security.
         | I'd recommend going to npr.org. There are good summaries there.
        
       | Etheryte wrote:
       | A few questions regarding the EB-5 visa. Is this still a
       | realistic path to a green card, and if so, how complicated is the
       | process if you want to take the targeted economic area route
       | through a regional center? Do the investments through a regional
       | center usually persist, or in other words, how high is the risk
       | of the underlying business going bankrupt based on real
       | experiences? There's plenty of articles about all of this online
       | of course, but would be interested in hearing any first hand
       | experience you might have.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | The EB-5 is still an option although the process largely
         | depends on the regional center/entity that you are going
         | through and requires that you do real due diligence like you
         | would any major investment. The EB-5 is also an area that at
         | various times has been shut down or delayed because of
         | government concerns about fraud and criminal activity.
        
           | ruckfool wrote:
           | Hi, I looked at the regional centre-dependent EB5 process but
           | pivoted to the EB5 direct investment route. I have now
           | bootstrapped a single food truck, and we are looking forward
           | to launch it next month. Can such kind of business setup
           | qualify me for O1 instead ? At my day job, I am a software
           | manager in FAANG.
        
             | Etheryte wrote:
             | O1 requires you have considerable outstanding achievements
             | [0], such as widely recognized international rewards, being
             | featured in major publications, scholarly articles, or etc.
             | I don't see how a food truck would help you qualify for any
             | of those. Demanding a high salary, which I assume you do at
             | FAANG, would only tick one box, but to qualify you need to
             | tick at least three.
             | 
             | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_visa#Requirements
        
               | proberts wrote:
               | As applied, although still high, the O-1 requirements are
               | easier than they appear so it's always worth evaluating
               | particularly for the founder of a business. And an O-1
               | can be for almost any occupation, from a hair colorist to
               | a cancer researcher.
        
               | Etheryte wrote:
               | Thanks for explaining, I was not aware of that, that's
               | interesting.
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | It's surprising to many people what backgrounds/jobs can
             | qualify for O-1 classification so it's not inconceivable
             | that your creation of the food truck business could be a
             | platform to get you an O-1. This would require an O-1
             | analysis of your qualifications and this business.
        
       | jppope wrote:
       | I've been really curious about the economics of US immigration
       | for foreign workers in information work (software, data, etc).
       | 
       | What are the primary drivers of someone wanting to immigrate to
       | the US vs working remotely, and on the corporate side what is the
       | incentive to sponsor immigration with great outsourcing
       | available? Obv. Hardware or physical professions are NOT the
       | same. Personally, I'm happy to move for work, but many people
       | seem reluctant to leaving their family, friends, and life for a
       | job. How much of a factor does signaling play into it in your
       | opinion? How much of a factor do business conditions in the
       | United States impact things?
        
       | pigtailgirl wrote:
       | did a startup -- had wrong visa class -- angry employee called
       | CBP -- got picked up passing through JFK -- 10 year ban -- is
       | permission to reapply actually a thing or a dead-end process? --
       | thanks --
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | It is an option but it's complicated and not easy so consult an
         | immigration attorney.
        
       | tushgaurav wrote:
       | I am a Indian software developer and i currently work as in a YC
       | Startup, how hard to find a job in a US? Should I try or its
       | better to find Indian companies?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | The options are limited (H-1B, L-1, and O-1, typically) but
         | oftentimes there's a solution; this will depend on your
         | qualifications and the company's profile.
        
         | elintknower wrote:
         | Just apply for any job at Tesla lol
        
       | babyent wrote:
       | My friend is on h1b. Can he join me as a co founder?
       | 
       | He has done zero work/contribution so far because he is tied to
       | his sponsor.
       | 
       | I would like to have him as a co founder and would like any
       | advice you can offer. Thanks!
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | It's possible but there are a lot of factors to consider/issues
         | at play which are impossible to go through in this forum so you
         | and he should consult an immigration attorney.
        
         | pcl wrote:
         | In 2011, we hired someone on an H1B at the startup where I
         | worked. It was a straightforward process. The paperwork added a
         | couple weeks to the process, and IIRC it cost $10k or so in
         | legal fees, but for a great hire, it was definitely not a
         | meaningful barrier.
         | 
         | We were already incorporated as a C corp. I would imagine that
         | some sort of incorporation will be pretty much a requirement.
         | 
         | (IANAL)
        
           | proberts wrote:
           | Thanks. It's more complicated when the H-1B beneficiary is a
           | founder/owner.
        
       | Tteriffic wrote:
       | Most posted job positions in the US, that I see, explicitly state
       | they will not sponser candidates. But how receptive are they to
       | TN visa candidates and do you see that attitude changing in the
       | near future?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | That's mostly a knee-jerk ignorant position since it's
         | oftentimes very easy, fast, and inexpensive to hire a Canadian
         | in TN status. So it's a process of somehow getting through to
         | someone at the company to educate them not to pass on a good
         | candidate simply because they're Canadian. Which of course is a
         | lot easier said than done.
        
           | xordon wrote:
           | Does this also apply to Mexican's wanting to get a TN as
           | well, I've heard the process is slightly different?
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | It's a different process for Mexicans because they're not
             | visa exempt like Canadians and so have to get a TN visa at
             | a U.S. Consulate.
        
         | midnightmonster wrote:
         | The law firm I work for (as lead software engineer) did the TN
         | thing for a Canadian software engineer hire for my team last
         | year. [I was not involved in the paperwork but] my
         | understanding is we got an immigration lawyer to help us write
         | everything the right way, since we had not done it before (and
         | lawyers specialize), and it was not especially expensive and it
         | all worked out quite quickly.
        
       | fiduciarytemp wrote:
       | I received notice of a successful i140 application (for eb1a) in
       | September 2022 and have been waiting for the past 2.5 years for
       | the dates to become current. The dates haven't moved past Feb 22
       | for the past 6 months or so. Any speculation on how these dates
       | may move under the new administration?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | That's a complete unknown, unfortunately, but to be clear,
         | short of changing the green card law, there's little that an
         | administration can do to impact the movement of the cutoff
         | dates.
        
       | javier123454321 wrote:
       | I have an idea for a startup in which the current company that I
       | am a full-time employee for could be a potential customer. It
       | would be a tool to facilitate some of the workflow that we've had
       | an issue with, but nothing related to the industry in which we
       | operate. We didn't really sign a non-compete or an NDA, but I am
       | very curious if there is some kind of basic guideline for
       | potential conflict of interest in a situation like this. Besides
       | the immediately obvious things like never work on it with company
       | equipment or during work hours.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | It's good that you have flagged this potential issue but I
         | can't advise since that's outside my area; you should consult
         | an employment lawyer.
        
       | _jules wrote:
       | hi Peter, thanks for doing this. My parents were rejected twice
       | for B1/B2 visa (under section 214b I think) - both times before I
       | was a LPR (I had valid visa). Recently the country of citizenship
       | was announced to be joining VWP - as one of the question is "have
       | you even been refused US visa", is it a lost battle for them?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | No, it's not a lost battle. Unfortunately, their ESTA
         | applications likely will be rejected outright because of their
         | past B-1/B-2 visa application denials. But it's still possible
         | that they could get B-1/B-2 visas. They should apply again but
         | given their previous denials, they should consult an
         | immigration attorney.
        
           | _jules wrote:
           | Just to make sure I understand the recommendation: US based
           | immigration attorney for a tourist visa? (I don't want to
           | sponsor them and they have no intention of moving here - they
           | just want to visit and see us & the kids).
        
       | golergka wrote:
       | I'm working on my O1 visa and I'm nervous about my portfolio. I'm
       | a developer with plenty of experience, but never spoke at
       | conferences, blogged, or was public. I hires lawyers for the
       | paperwork, but the publicist they recommended me started doing
       | "articles" that just scream fake. I decided to get my own, real
       | stuff instead.
       | 
       | What things are the best from POV of effort/benefit? Open source
       | projects, talks, podcasts, blogging, posts on community sites
       | like devs? Trying to build my own dev-centric twitter, YouTube,
       | something else? I know how to build stuff, but I know very little
       | about all of this stuff.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Podcasts, blogs, posts matter little and talks are only
         | marginally helpful. The lowest hanging criteria are essential
         | roles for distinguished organization, high compensation, press,
         | and judging (either serving as a reviewer for an academic
         | journal or conference or serving as a judge at a competition or
         | event, such as a hackathon or startup/business competition). By
         | the way, your gut is right; USCIS is sensitive to
         | fake/manufactured press and this can undermine an otherwise
         | strong petition.
        
           | golergka wrote:
           | Thank you! What kind of press would I go for? And how would
           | an engineer typically get to the judging roles like these?
        
       | legitster wrote:
       | Some family friends are part of a diaspora seeking asylum from
       | Russia. Their hearing dates all fall inside 2026.
       | 
       | Part of their asylum plea is admission to activities that Russia
       | criminalized during the invasion of Ukraine - draft dodging,
       | dissemination information about the invasion, and sending aid
       | money to their relatives in Ukrainian.
       | 
       | If they were deported back to Russia, their asylum plea would
       | ostensibly be used as an admission of guilt.
       | 
       | With the change in administrations, there is a lot of
       | consternation in the community that their hearing will go badly
       | or be cancelled altogether. Is there any indication what will
       | happen with these cases yet?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | I've heard about those concerns but there's really no clear
         | indication yet how asylum applicants from Russia will be
         | treated by the new administration.
        
       | aaraujo002 wrote:
       | I am filing an EB1-A petition with a law firm. The law firm says
       | that based on their recent experience, EB1-A cases that have
       | requested Premium Processing (PP) have a lower approval rate and
       | a higher RFE rate.
       | 
       | While the statistic may be true, is there a causation between PP
       | and RFE/denial or is it just that cases created in a rush with PP
       | might simply get more RFE or denial?
       | 
       | Thanks
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | With all due respect, the firm's data is 100% anecdotal and I
         | would say meaningless. There's no reliable data on this
         | question since there's no control studies (and can't be) on the
         | relative merits of filing EB1As with or without premium
         | processing. We file 99% of our EB1As with premium processing
         | because most of our clients don't want to wait 6 months to hear
         | back from USCIS.
        
       | cabronerp wrote:
       | Hi Peter, thanks for doing this!
       | 
       | We have a co-founder who is from the UK. We are a Delaware
       | company. Is there an easy way for 1/ paying him and 2/ taking
       | SEIS investment from UK investors? Sorry if I'm misunderstanding
       | what an immigration attorney knows about
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | No worries. These aren't really immigration companies but I
         | know from experience that founders/employees living abroad can
         | get paid directly by U.S. companies (this is a payroll issue,
         | not an immigration one) or through third-party entities,
         | oftentimes referred to as Employers of Records (or EORs), like
         | Deel or Remote.
        
       | tvcx wrote:
       | I'm a citizen of an EU country that meets the Visa Waiver
       | criteria. I'm working for a startup based in the USA. I'm one of
       | the earliest employees, hence a great asset to the company. I'm
       | considering emigrating sometime in the future but I'm unsure what
       | needs to happen to enable it. Is a company-sponsored visa the
       | only option? How inclined are startup founders to sponsor work
       | visas? I'm convinced this is not attainable now, we've got a
       | product to build, I'm only speculating for "when we make it".
       | Separately, how are startup employees treated when it comes to
       | trying to convert the work visa to a green card? The definitions
       | for EB-1, EB-2 are very interpretable. Thank you!
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | In my experience, because of the competition for talent,
         | startups often are more open to employing foreign nationals
         | than many large, established companies. The terms EB-1, EB-2,
         | etc. refer to green card categories and the green card process
         | takes a while so that's probably not the initial path toward
         | working in the U.S. The likely visa options will be the L-1 (as
         | a transferee) or an O-1 and oftentimes founding engineers or
         | early stage employees qualify for the O-1 or can take steps to
         | qualify. Both the L-1 and O-1 require company sponsorship.
        
       | synack wrote:
       | Any advice for online forum operators regarding the UK Online
       | Safety Act taking effect in March?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Sorry. My expertise is limited to U.S. immigration law.
        
       | a2code wrote:
       | Will YC and startups be more or less agreeable on remote work?
       | Will the new administration cause changes to remote work?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | I can't comment on YC and startups and while the administration
         | likely will make changes to the H-1B law and process, I don't
         | see major changes in how remote work is viewed and treated.
        
       | antithesis-nl wrote:
       | Yeah, so, any chance you could do a monthly-or-so post that
       | explains, in legal terms (of course!) why referring to an entire,
       | diverse bunch of _people_ as  "H1Bs" (which, as you know, is just
       | a _visa class_ and pretty much, as you also know, the only path
       | to legally entering the US as an immigrant without family ties
       | or, well, the future-Head-Guy-or-one-of-his-cronies fancying you)
       | is, like, a crime against humanity?
       | 
       | Because that has always been a trope amongst HN commenters (a
       | large subset of which is supposed to be future HN founders), and
       | it bothers me. A lot.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | I don't agree with that view/trope since my clients (granted, a
         | limited dataset) are hiring H-1B workers because they believe
         | that they are the best candidates.
        
           | scarface_74 wrote:
           | I am not as anti H1B as the original poster and have no
           | animosity toward my H1B visa coworkers. But let's be real.
           | There are thousands of unemployed citizens that could do the
           | work just as well especially when you consider how many work
           | for WITCH companies.
        
           | keybored wrote:
           | What "best" means could be unpacked.
           | 
           | - Just best for the job
           | 
           | - Best retention since the visa is tied to the employer
           | 
           | - Best price, i.e. lower wage
           | 
           | All of that amounts to "best" without outright lying.
           | 
           | The bell curve (people tend to narrowly focus on IQ when it
           | comes to "best for the job") should look the same everywhere.
           | So it seems a bit roundabout to look all over the world when
           | you have a "culture fit" in your own backyard.
           | 
           | So it does seem to just come back to mutually beneficial
           | exploitation of the employee. But the clients never have to
           | talk about it in such plain terms.
        
         | trevorhinesley wrote:
         | It sounds like that term ("H1Bs") is simply shorthand for
         | foreign citizens that are potential candidates for U.S. work
         | via an H1B visa. Why is that bothersome?
        
         | csa wrote:
         | > why referring to an entire, diverse bunch of people as "H1Bs"
         | 
         | Even though you seem to be getting downvoted aggressively, I'm
         | going to provide a short, good-faith reply.
         | 
         | First, I'm not Peter, and I'm not an immigration lawyer, but I
         | can provide insight as someone who knows and has worked with
         | many H1Bs.
         | 
         | Second, this thread covers the major points, imho:
         | 
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/AskALiberal/comments/1huxnn1/why_is...
         | 
         | For tech folks in particular, I think that there are two
         | particular pain points that cause H1Bs to be referred to
         | pejoratively sometimes (which I think is what your underlying
         | issue is with):
         | 
         | 1. Companies like Infosys that are gaming the system
         | aggressively, often times using dark patterns. Net loss for the
         | economy, and unnecessary stress on the immigration system,
         | imho.
         | 
         | 2. Qualified Americans losing their jobs (e.g., relatively
         | recent layoffs) and struggling to find work. Meanwhile, H1Bs
         | remain employed and new ones are added regularly. This doesn't
         | pass the sniff test of "lack of talent" in the domestic market.
         | Additionally, folks on the inside know that the reality is that
         | either the company is gaming the hiring/h1b system and/or the
         | company has a broken hiring process.
         | 
         | Note that I don't necessarily advocate for a rapid and
         | aggressive culling of h1b workers like some do, but the h1b
         | system could definitely use some improved oversight and/or
         | refined regulation. It's being abused at scale by multiple
         | actors.
        
       | mark3141 wrote:
       | What's your perspective on when the EB-3 and EB-2 rest-of-world
       | priority dates will move into 2024, considering they haven't
       | changed much since April 2023?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Unfortunately, I just don't know and usually when I guess
         | (because it's just a guess like everyone else), I'm wrong.
        
       | FightingFrog wrote:
       | Hello, thank you for hosting this! I'm applying for green card
       | based on marriage. I've prepared i130, i485, i130a, i864, i131,
       | i601, i765, i693. Is there any form/documents I'm missing? Is
       | there any very crucial marriage, financial, or legal status proof
       | that tends to be overlooked by applicants? Thank you!
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Unfortunately, I can't provide that advice since I'm not
         | representing you and your wife and don't "own" the case and
         | know all the facts. All I can say generally is that it's
         | important to provide financial documents (such as tax returns
         | and W-2s/1099s), evidence of the bona fides of the marriage,
         | and evidence of past and present immigration status.
        
           | GummyCharger wrote:
           | Thank you a lot. Were Trump to sign new executive orders
           | regarding immigration today, would that affect the current
           | instructions on USCIS website immediately?
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | That depends on the wording of the EO but they could take
             | effect immediately.
        
       | elephant81 wrote:
       | Thanks Peter. With an American wife, and an Australian Passport,
       | what would you recommend as the best path to move to the US?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | An E-3 requires a job offer but with a job offer, the E-3 is
         | much faster, easier, and cheaper than a marriage-based green
         | card application. After you are here, if you decide that you'd
         | like to make your permanent home here, you can apply for a
         | green card even if you are in E-3 status. That just shouldn't
         | be your intent now when applying for an E-3 visa.
        
       | _xerces_ wrote:
       | Do you feel the H1B system denies jobs to Americans or suppresses
       | wages for those with jobs?
        
         | chronic7300690 wrote:
         | > Do you feel the H1B system denies jobs to Americans or
         | suppresses wages for those with jobs?
         | 
         | Yes.
         | 
         | If you have a problem with that, move to Europe.
         | 
         | The US is known for making money. Not for taking care of its
         | citizens.
        
           | cscurmudgeon wrote:
           | So zero data give by you to support your view that H1B lowers
           | wages (as usual, because data shatters the fake narrative H1B
           | lowers wages).
           | 
           | So according to you                 1. H1B lowers wages,
           | 2. America is known for making money       3. Yet more
           | professionals from Europe want to move to the US than the
           | other way around (as seen in this thread)
           | 
           | Don't you see how 2 and 3 contradict 1?
           | 
           | Also, despite H1B why are developer salaries higher in the US
           | than in Europe?
           | 
           | https://4dayweek.io/salary/software-engineering-europe-vs-
           | un...
           | 
           | Are European companies exploiting their workers?
        
             | chronic7300690 wrote:
             | > Don't you see how 2 and 3 contradict 1?
             | 
             | Nope.
             | 
             | Because even with the lower H1B wage, it is still 3x higher
             | than Europe.
             | 
             | Europeans know this. Americans know this. And you know
             | this.
             | 
             | > Are European companies exploiting their workers?
             | 
             | Nope.
             | 
             | It just turns out, ambitious Europeans don't give a shit
             | about work life balance. Hence the desire to move to US.
        
               | cscurmudgeon wrote:
               | How does Ukraine's work-life balance look like now and
               | before the war?
               | 
               | The story of the ant and grasshopper has been taught for
               | ages.
        
           | americasonly wrote:
           | You are the one who should be leaving the country with this
           | attitude or destroying the country
        
       | cafed00d wrote:
       | I'm on an H1B visa since 2017. I extended in 2021 and again in
       | 2023 (thanks to approved I-140). But my visa stamp in my passport
       | is from 2017 which expired in 2020. I haven't made efforts to get
       | another stamp mainly because of the pandemic in 2020 and long
       | appointment backlogs thereafter.
       | 
       | Is there a necessity to always keep a valid visa stamp in my
       | passport? Apart from the ease of travel are there any other
       | reasons to always keep a current visa stamp in my passport? I do
       | have all valid I-797 documents of status and have kept my status
       | current all the time.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | There's no requirement to maintain a valid H-1B visa but under
         | certain circumstances having a valid H-1B visa stamp can make
         | it easier to change H-1B employers.
        
       | theyinwhy wrote:
       | Hi Peter, a European (Hungary) colleague of us visited Iran once
       | and does not receive any Visa (tourist,...) because of that. He
       | does not even receive answers to his renewed applications. Is
       | there anything he can do?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | It's very difficult to get past this issue. We have Iranian
         | citizen clients and non-Iranian citizen clients who have
         | visited Iran whose visitor and work visa applications have been
         | pending for more than a year. One option is for your colleague
         | to ask his federal representative to reach out to the
         | Consulate. This is done all the time but to be clear, it
         | usually doesn't help but there's really nothing else to do. In
         | the non-tourist visa application context, some people file
         | mandamus actions, which oftentimes help but I think such an
         | action would just accelerate the denial of the visitor visa
         | application.
        
           | theyinwhy wrote:
           | Thank you very much for your time Peter!
        
       | initialg wrote:
       | I am on H1b visa now. I filed my PERM one month ago. According to
       | some people, it takes 1 year and a half to get my PERM approved
       | and it takes another month to get my I-140 approved. But I want
       | to jump ships soon. If I leave my current company, I will have to
       | start everything over again (Prevailing Wage Determination, Labor
       | Market Test, PERM). I feel I'm stuck in this company. What are
       | the things I could do?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Not much, unfortunately, other than by applying for a green
         | card on your own, one that's not tied to a specific employer,
         | such as a national interest waiver (or NIW) green card
         | application or an extraordinary ability (or EB1A) green card
         | application. Because there's no way around losing the PERM if
         | you leave now.
        
       | smiley0687 wrote:
       | Thank you for doing this. I don't know if this is part of your
       | expertise. I am planning of incorporating the holding of my start
       | up in Delaware, the startup is located in Dubai (I am a resident
       | there, German origin, my co-founder US passport holder). As we
       | are planning on targeting US investors we decided to have the
       | holding in Delaware. Now the question is, what are the potential
       | tax implications for a company from the outside incorporating a
       | holding in Delaware. (1) Is the operational business taxable in
       | the US? Is there a threshold? Or would it only play a role once
       | we would potentially sell the company? The feedback we are
       | receiving is not very straightforward. (2) I am aware that my
       | confounder obviously needs to report to the IRS, but would him
       | holding an Us passport also have an impact on the company or this
       | is completely separate?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Unfortunately, these very important tax
         | questions/considerations are outside my area of expertise.
        
       | justinpombrio wrote:
       | Any idea how the executive orders will effect trans people
       | renewing their passports?
       | 
       | A trans friend already changed the gender marker on his passport,
       | and it's expiring in two years. He's deciding whether to renew it
       | ASAP or wait. Any guess how likely it is to come back with the
       | wrong gender marker, or get stuck in a bureaucratic mess?
       | 
       | Thank you so much for doing these! No worries if this question is
       | outside your wheelhouse.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | It's not really within my area since this question concerns the
         | rights of citizens but this is something I've been concerned
         | about because we have a lot of LGBTQ clients who are eligible
         | for or in the process of applying for citizenship. I suspect
         | that there will be clarity about this soon and I suspect that
         | it won't be favorable to trans people.
        
       | amoshebb wrote:
       | Two Canadian cofounders want to start a company in the USA, is
       | O-1 the only option? Is TN a possibility?
        
         | winter_blue wrote:
         | Recent amendments to work visa rules published in the federal
         | register (and that took effect on January 17, 2025) enables
         | being a founder of a company while on an H-1B, and perhaps
         | might similarly allow that for a TN, but Peter Roberts or
         | another expert would likely know best about it.
        
           | proberts wrote:
           | Thanks. The law never has explicitly prohibited founders from
           | qualifying for H-1B or TN status but there have been
           | challenges and the changes mentioned above will make it
           | easier for founders to qualify for H-1B status and I think
           | make it easier for founders to qualify for TN status. In
           | fact, we recently had a founder obtain a TN through CBP and
           | her status as a founder was front and center in her
           | application.
        
       | hannibal529 wrote:
       | Do you foresee Canadians applying for TN/H1-Bs facing more
       | obstacles in the new administration?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Definitely not H-1Bs (at least no different from non-
         | Canadians). The TN could be impacted, however. My biggest fear
         | is that the administration will limit TN renewals to filings
         | with USCIS (and not allow renewals with CBP) like it did years
         | ago to Canadian L-1 renewals. That change was a negative game-
         | changer for Canadians in L-1 status. I am also concerned that
         | the administration will simply make it tougher for Canadians to
         | qualify for TN status.
        
       | lterrac wrote:
       | Hello, I am a computer science research engineer with 2 years of
       | experience in a non-U.S. big tech company research center in
       | Europe. Before that, I worked as a research fellow at the
       | university after I got my master degree. During that time I
       | published 4 papers, and I was a reviewer for a CS journal (even
       | though I actually reviewed only 1 paper). I actually have 60-70
       | citations of my works (if it might be relevant in any way). What
       | are my chances to get an O-1 visa? Thanks in advance for your
       | time
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Very high.
        
       | adrianpluis wrote:
       | Any tips or suggestions for a DACA recipient with a year left in
       | Uni for Computer Science, here in the states? I am nervous about
       | my career post-school and am wondering if you could shed some
       | insight as to what my options might be. Thank you for your time.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | We represent a lot of DACA recipients and the options of moving
         | to another status are very fact-specific, depending on their
         | status at the time of entry, their qualifications, their
         | country of citizenship, etc. A year isn't a lot of time as we
         | all know so I would recommend scheduling a consultation with an
         | immigration attorney soon.
        
           | adrianpluis wrote:
           | Understood thank you for your help.
        
       | nand_gate wrote:
       | Thanks for doing this, Peter. What is a good route for an English
       | national looking to move their profitable software business to
       | the US? E-2? Would this be a path to long-term tax residency in
       | America?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | The E-2 visa is usually a very good and pretty easy option as
         | long as the investment is enough (typically at least $100k USD)
         | and there's a good business plan. I can't comment on tax
         | residency.
        
       | enragedcacti wrote:
       | What are your thoughts on the future of the Laken Riley Act's
       | provisions on empowering State AGs to sue the federal government
       | over immigration enforcement, both in terms of constitutionality
       | and in terms of outcomes if signed into law and upheld?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | I'm not a fan but I haven't really analyzed the
         | constitutionality of these provisions although the arguments
         | I've heard regarding their unconstitutionality make sense to
         | me.
        
       | matthewmorgan wrote:
       | Do you believe there are such a thing as nations, or merely
       | different economic zones?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | The law distinguishes between the two so from a practical
         | standpoint for me, the answer is yes.
        
       | away_im_thrown wrote:
       | Hi Peter,
       | 
       | First of all, I wanted to thank you for taking the time and
       | offering your help for the community! I had a couple of
       | questions. For context, I'm Iranian and I've been a green card
       | holder for the past 10 years, 5 of which I've been residing
       | continuously inside the US.
       | 
       | 1. I'm planning to apply for my citizenship this summer. Do you
       | think there would be any complications with my naturalization
       | given the current political climate and that Trump's now in
       | office? Since my green card is also expiring around that time,
       | would you recommend that I request its renewal separately or
       | would I be fine waiting to apply for citizenship right away?
       | 
       | 2. After obtaining my citizenship, I'm also planning to petition
       | a visa for my fiance (which is also an Iranian living inside
       | Iran). Do you think that request would still be processed same as
       | before during this new administration? Would requesting for a
       | spouse visa be any better if we were to get married sooner?
       | 
       | 3. Would it be any better if my fiance were to apply for a
       | college/university in the US instead? I'm asking this because
       | I've heard rumors that Trump would be much easier on student
       | visas than immigration visas.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | 1. I would recommend applying to renew your green card as well
         | because it's not clear how long the naturalization process will
         | take under the new administration. Regarding potential
         | complications, last time he was in office, I didn't see any
         | extra issues/delays with my Iranian clients becoming citizens.
         | 2. This process could be impacted because she's outside the
         | U.S. and it's easier for the administration to impact those
         | outside the U.S. seeking immigrant (green card) visas through a
         | U.S. Consulate than to impact those in the U.S. seeking to
         | obtain green cards through USCIS. I don't think it matters
         | whether you get married sooner. 3. Possibly but as you know,
         | even Iranians applying for F-1 students visas can be subject to
         | significant delays.
        
       | akktor wrote:
       | Hi Peter! Thank you for doing this.
       | 
       | I'm a software engineer with 3 years of experience and a MSc
       | degree in computer science. I'm currently working in a big tech
       | company in the UK and I would like to move to the US in the near
       | future. At the moment I'm more leaning toward an L1 because I
       | don't have to go through the lottery but I'm exploring other
       | scenarios. Would you recommend trying to move to the US with an
       | L1 or an H1B? Does an L1 provide a path to a GC? What are the
       | cons of an L1 visa compared to an H1B?
       | 
       | Again, many thanks!
        
         | brit_in_america wrote:
         | I assume L1B because you mentioned "engineer" instead of
         | "manager."
         | 
         | I'm currently on an L1B visa, which is a three-year dual-intent
         | visa extendable for another two years. This should provide
         | ample time to initiate and complete a Green Card application
         | under Employment-Based 2nd preference.
         | 
         | However, I would consider choosing the H1-B visa for the
         | following reasons:
         | 
         | It's getting harder to get L1-B because USCIS are asking more
         | questions about if a candidate has specialized knowledge to
         | meet the requirements.
         | 
         | The processing times for Green Cards and PERM are increasing
         | and five years might not be enough in the near future. In that
         | case you would need a very cooperative employer to allow you to
         | continue the application via Consular Processing from the UK.
         | 
         | My own Green Card application began in 2022, and I'm not likely
         | to receive it until 2026 due to the substantial backlog for
         | applicants from the Rest of the World (ROW) category, which
         | includes British-born individuals.
         | 
         | On an L1 visa, you'll be tied to your current job until either
         | your Employment Authorization Document (EAD) arrives and you
         | have portability under AC21, you're approved for an H1-B visa
         | with a different employer (which will reset your Green Card
         | application timeline); or you're approved for a Green Card.
         | 
         | If you switch to an H1-B visa, you have the flexibility to
         | change jobs before your Green Card is approved. You can also
         | retain your Priority Date (PD), which represents your position
         | in the Green Card queue, although you'll need to restart all
         | the steps of the process again. Additionally, your H1-B visa is
         | extendable indefinitely after receiving an approved I-140
         | petition.
         | 
         | This immigration system here is a mess and it's getting worse.
         | Not to discourage you but this is the worst time for Brits to
         | move here.
        
           | proberts wrote:
           | I was assuming that you qualified equally for both visas but
           | from an outcome standpoint, if the employing U.S. company
           | doesn't qualify as a "blanket L" company, then it can be very
           | tough to get an L-1B visa (which is for professionals/non-
           | managers) because the process goes through USCIS. So, from an
           | outcome standpoint, unless the employing U.S. entity
           | qualifies as a blanket L company, it's much easier to get an
           | H-1B visa.
        
             | brit_in_america wrote:
             | I was rejected initially without a blanket petition and
             | then approved after the blanket petition was in place.
             | 
             | My experience matches exactly what you have said.
             | 
             | One benefit I forgot to mention of L1 is that spouses can
             | work incidental of status. L2S is essentially an open work
             | permit but is tied to the validity of the L1 visa.
        
           | uhuruity wrote:
           | The problem with the H1B is, of course, winning the lottery.
           | The odds are poor and generally getting worse each year. The
           | L1B may be the only realistic option
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | The main advantage of the L-1 relative to the H-1B is that
         | there's no lottery so the U.S. company can sponsor you for an
         | L-1 at any time. The main advantages of the H-1B relative to
         | the L-1 is that it's transferable from one company to another
         | and can be renewed indefinitely if you are in the green card
         | process. Regarding which one is better from a green card
         | perspective, the response is that your underlying status has no
         | bearing on your green card options so both are fine.
        
         | thiagocmoraes wrote:
         | My personal experience, and I think the optimal case, is to
         | come on L1 but apply to H1B via consular interview. This way,
         | if you're ever fired from your job, you use the H1B to get
         | authorization to work in a new company (need to leave the US
         | and get a visa in a consulate), while keeping L1 benefits as
         | possible (spouse can work and no lottery).
        
           | uhuruity wrote:
           | Could you elaborate on this a bit more? If your company
           | sponsors you to come on an L1 visa, how can you
           | simultaneously apply for an H1B? And in any case, how can you
           | get the H1B at all without winning the lottery (assuming your
           | employer is subject to the cap)?
        
       | sockeye123 wrote:
       | I am on a TN visa and recently got a promotion which elevated my
       | title but largely kept my responsibilities the same. My old title
       | had the name of my TN profession in it, the new one is adjacent
       | but does not. Could this cause issue? I travel with the form I
       | received from USCIS through mail-in TN renewal.
       | 
       | Related, I'm waiting in the green card backlog with a completed
       | PERM. Will this title change affect that?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Whether a new or amended TN is required depends on the job
         | duties, not the title, so it appears that your TN should remain
         | valid. But you should speak with your company's attorney about
         | what you should carry with you when you travel and how you
         | should respond to questions about your job. The same is largely
         | true for your PERM application unless possibly the promotion
         | puts you in a significantly higher comp bracket or
         | significantly changes your place in the company's hierarchy.
        
       | swyx wrote:
       | some incomplete notes on my recent o1 . i recommend minn at
       | lighthousehq, tell her i said hi
       | https://github.com/swyxio/swyxdotio/issues/477
        
         | mark3141 wrote:
         | I've heard good things about LighthouseHQ from friends. The
         | founder agreed to look my case over but then ghosted me.
         | Unclear why, but I followed up and didn't hear back so
        
           | mkim383 wrote:
           | Hi Mark -- Minn here. So sorry for my miss here. Drop me a
           | line at minn@lighthouseh[dot]com to reconnect. We've worked
           | with hundreds of applicants, many in the YC community and
           | happy to see how we can help!
        
       | mizzao wrote:
       | If a US very early-stage startup hires a Canadian and grants them
       | restricted common stock (similar to what founders get), what are
       | the implications for them (1) from a Canadian tax perspective*
       | and (2) if they move to the US later on*?
       | 
       | *(1) e.g. is there anything like the 83(b) election or similar.
       | 
       | *(2) how do 83(b)s work for folks that might move to the US
       | later, especially given "might" ?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | All good questions but outside my limited area of expertise (US
         | immigration). You should consult an international tax expert.
        
       | mizzao wrote:
       | What do you think will change for folks who are paroled under
       | Uniting for Ukraine (https://www.uscis.gov/ukraine)?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | That's a really good question and of concern to a lot of
         | people. No one knows at this point but the concern is that the
         | new administration will kill the program or at a minimum
         | modify/restrict it.
        
       | mdhb wrote:
       | What a shit time to think about moving to the US.
        
         | TheBlight wrote:
         | Why do you say that?
        
           | mdhb wrote:
           | No reason at all...
           | 
           | https://bsky.app/profile/drrosena.bsky.social/post/3lg75xw2q.
           | ..
        
       | highcountess wrote:
       | Are there any pitfalls to prepare for or avoid for people trying
       | to get their parents permanent residency/green cards?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | These tend to be pretty straightforward easy applications.
         | There really are no gotchas in this context.
        
       | proberts wrote:
       | Great questions and comments. Thank you! I'm taking a break until
       | around 3 pm EST and then will return for several more hours.
        
       | ishyfishyy wrote:
       | Do you think nonimmigrant worker petition adjudication is
       | stricter at land borders, pre-flight inspection stations by CBP
       | as compared to a filing with USCIS?
       | 
       | How common is it for CBP to deny entry / readjudicate a petition
       | if a worker has an approved USCIS petition and an approval
       | notice?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Adjudications vary considerably from land crossing to land
         | crossing and from airport in Canada to airport in Canada but as
         | a very general rule, it's easier to get a TN through CBP at a
         | land crossing or airport than through USCIS but this also
         | depends in part on specific TN occupation being applied under
         | and the applicant's background. It's rare but not unheard-of
         | for CBP to deny entry to a Canadian with an approved TN
         | petition. Again, the risk varies by land crossing and airport
         | with Pearson probably the worst and to be avoided if there's
         | any concern.
        
       | kobevr wrote:
       | Hi Peter, Thank you so much for doing this.
       | 
       | I just moved to the USA as J2-Dependant. I have already submitted
       | form I-765 to get a work permit (EAD) but this can take between 3
       | and 4 months. A European company that just opened an office in
       | the USA would love to hire me but might not want to wait that
       | long. Is there anyway to speed up the process by them sponsoring
       | me?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | There would have to be a visa that you qualify for that the
         | company could sponsor you for, such as an O-1 or a country-
         | specific visa, but given how long such a process likely would
         | take, even if you qualified for another visa, you probably
         | wouldn't get it much faster than the J-2 work card.
        
       | joshdavham wrote:
       | Any pitfalls to watch out for for Canadians on the TN?
       | Specifically during this next administration?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | We just have to keep our eye on this because almost certainly
         | there will be changes whether to the application process or to
         | the application/interpretation of the regulations.
        
       | alsodumb wrote:
       | Hey Peter! Thanks for doing this!
       | 
       | I'm trying to understand the dual intent nature of O1A. I'm a PhD
       | student with EB2-NIW and EB1A approved. Unfortunately, I am not
       | expecting a green card in the next 6-12 years due to my country
       | of birth.
       | 
       | I am eligible for O1A, but it seems like the dual-intent of O1A
       | seems to be in grey area unlike H1B. Would I have any issues with
       | O1A stamping in foreign embassies or during reentry given that I
       | filed I-140 and showed immigration intent? Or is it safe to
       | assume that O1A is also dual intent? Thanks!
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | It is grayish but during the past 20 years I've only had one
         | instance where the Consulate pushed back on the issuance of an
         | O-1 visa because the applicant had an approved I-140. That was
         | over 10 years ago and even in that case, the O-1 was eventually
         | issued. So, for all intents and purposes, the Consulates view
         | the O-1 as a dual intent visa. Also, there's some preparation
         | that you can do before applying for your O-1 visa and attending
         | your O-1 visa appointment to minimize the risk if this issue is
         | raised by the Consulate.
        
           | alsodumb wrote:
           | Thank you so much for the response! Could you share a bit
           | more on what the preparation looks like? It's something I've
           | seen vaguely mentioned in forums but no one shared the
           | specifics of the prep. Thanks!
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | That would require a short discussion - give and take - and
             | I'd be happy to prepare you when you get to that point.
        
               | alsodumb wrote:
               | Thank you! I'll talk to the startup that's hiring me soon
               | to set up a consult with you through formal channels.
               | Appreciate the responses here!
        
         | bhasi wrote:
         | If EB1A is approved, my understanding is that the applicant
         | becomes "current" and eligible for the green card at once
         | without any waiting in the queue regardless of country of
         | birth. Is that not correct?
        
           | alsodumb wrote:
           | There's a cap on how many EB1 green cards they give out per
           | year, and there's also a per country cap within that cap (no
           | country cannot cross 7% of total cap)
           | 
           | Unfortunately, there are a lot of EB1C greencard applicants
           | from my country (India) as the bar for L1 and EB1C is pretty
           | low. Since all EB1 visas (EB1A, EB1B, and EB1C) are counted
           | together towards the cap, that means that even though I
           | required a muncher higher bar to qualify for EB1A, I have to
           | wait in queue with all the EB1C applicants who applied before
           | me.
           | 
           | Based on my estimate, it'll be more than 6 years (or even
           | more) for EB1A priority date to come to late 2024.
        
             | proberts wrote:
             | For those from China and India, based on the current
             | backlogs, the process would take about 4-5 years; for those
             | from every other country, there is no backlog in this
             | category so the process could take less than 1 year.
        
       | papichulo4 wrote:
       | Hey Peter! I wanted to thank you for doing this. I just got my
       | green card last year, and it all kind of started with me asking
       | you a question about H1B caps in a thread like this almost a
       | decade ago. Super appreciate you doing this for people that are
       | dreaming of a better future, dreaming of the American dream.
       | 
       | Wish you the best!
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Wow. That's so nice to hear. Thanks!
        
       | aio2 wrote:
       | How's it going?
        
       | hoerzu wrote:
       | What are better chances O1 or H1B? Still need apply for a visa
       | waiver due to a record on my file.
       | 
       | For O1 - I have a company
       | 
       | - I'm getting published soon (Springer Nature. I only have a
       | Bachelor in Science)
       | 
       | - I have articles written about me
       | 
       | - I published 2 articles in a large newspaper
       | 
       | - I was a judge at a hackathon
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Without knowing all the details, it looks like you should have
         | a solid O-1.
        
       | annavdoro wrote:
       | Right now there are many cases with visa administrative
       | processing taking several years after o1 approval. Any changes
       | expected here?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | I haven't seen that. The delays I've seen are for those from
         | certain countries (such as Iran or Russia) or for those whose
         | area of expertise/study is subject to export control
         | laws/concerns.
        
           | yeputons wrote:
           | > whose area of expertise/study is subject to export control
           | laws/concerns.
           | 
           | Does that intersect significantly with a typical startup?
           | Maybe machine learning researcher or engineer. Or an
           | information security specialist, like a white hat hacker.
        
       | road_to_freedom wrote:
       | I got 221g administrative processing denial for L1-B recently. I
       | work at FAANG. From your experience is there any chance that this
       | will clear itself soonish or that's kinda the end of the story? I
       | know a few stuck waiting for more than a year. Is such an outcome
       | likely for me?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | This depends on the reason for the 221g. Security-related
         | reasons can take a while but often 221gs these clear quickly.
         | What's the reason?
        
           | road_to_freedom wrote:
           | The reason wasn't specified. Are they supposed to specify the
           | reason like security check?
           | 
           | The officer told me to send CV, job offer and support letter
           | on email. Even though these were available at the interview
           | so this ask looks to me more like a facade.
        
             | yeputons wrote:
             | Sounds like the typical "administrative processing". They
             | typically do not give any reason, just that they "need a
             | bit more information" and "the processing typically
             | concludes in 60 days or less". You may be lucky and that is
             | the case, you may be unlucky and it is stuck for years.
             | Even if you're from e.g. the developer of curl from Sweden
             | in 2016, not a nuclear physicist Russia or Iran in 2025:
             | https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2020/11/09/a-us-visa-
             | in-937-days...
             | 
             | I've heard about a person waiting for 4 years for their
             | B-1/2 U.S. visa recently.
             | 
             | I haven't heard a single story where any kind of feedback
             | or realistic timeline was provided to anyone, be it the
             | applicant, the employer, a lawyer, a congressman. Not once.
        
       | hnbrg718 wrote:
       | Hi Peter, thank you so much for your work and for doing these
       | AMAs! I am a PhD student on an F1 at a US university who would
       | very much like to stay after graduation. Without going into too
       | much details, I think I would have a strong O1 or EB-2-NIW
       | application (top US school, multiple publications, awards,
       | reviewing) upon graduation, but I am worried about leaving it
       | until then to start the process as I know it can be very time
       | consuming. What, if anything, can I do to "get the ball rolling"
       | _before_ I graduate? I presume starting an EB-2-NIW application
       | would not be feasible at this point, for example, but please
       | correct me if I 'm wrong. Ideally I would enter the job market
       | with a non-employer-specific green card, so that I don't have the
       | additional stress of having to worry about being kicked out.
       | Thank you all the work you do!
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Having a PhD is less important than the other stuff -
         | publications, awards, etc. - so there's no need for you to wait
         | until you graduate to start the process. As a first step, I
         | would recommend that you get your qualifications evaluated now
         | because it's possible that you could pursue an EB1A now or an
         | NIW at a minimum.
        
           | hnbrg718 wrote:
           | That's good to know - thank you so much, Peter!
        
       | jlouage wrote:
       | Hi Peter, I am moving to US with a L1A visa, and my family L2. I
       | can apply for EB1-C directly after arriving to US?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Yes, assuming that you qualify, there's no waiting period but
         | to be clear, the EB1C petition is filed by your employer, not
         | you.
        
       | hhthrowaway1230 wrote:
       | > The H-1B program applies to employers seeking to hire
       | nonimmigrant aliens as workers in specialty occupations or as
       | fashion models of distinguished merit and ability.
       | 
       | What do I need to become a fashion model?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | If you're being serious, you should sign with an agency as a
         | first step.
        
       | nottorp wrote:
       | Just curious... are H1-B holders still tied to their employer or
       | have the conditions relaxed?
       | 
       | Can anyone point me to some current (human readable not legalese)
       | explanation of what you can do with the H1-B?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | H-1B visa holders are tied to their sponsoring employer. Do you
         | mean what they can do outside their H-1B employment? What other
         | things are you interested in doing?
        
           | nottorp wrote:
           | > H-1B visa holders are tied to their sponsoring employer.
           | 
           | Thanks, that answered my question. I have no intention of
           | working in the US at the moment, just keeping myself informed
           | in case i ever change my mind.
           | 
           | Tbh I thought some random HNer would post an explanation
           | before you got to this.
        
       | tomp wrote:
       | If you get an O1 visa, does it have an expiration date? Or can I
       | use it later (in a few years, e.g. when the baby grows a bit
       | older)?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | An initial O-1 visa is valid for up to 3 years and can be
         | renewed indefinitely in 1- or 3-year increments.
        
       | tombert wrote:
       | Hi Peter,
       | 
       | My wife has a green card, and has since October of 2021. We have
       | filed the paperwork for her to get citizenship in November of
       | last year, but of course these things take time to process.
       | 
       | Due to the anti-immigration rhetoric of the incoming Trump
       | administration (particularly against Mexico), I am extremely
       | worried that this might end up with delays or even a halting of
       | the citizenship process.
       | 
       | Are my fears founded?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | I don't think so. She's already an LPR and during his last time
         | in office, other than some processing delays, in my experience,
         | applications that were supposed to get approved got approved.
        
       | strambino242 wrote:
       | What percentage of new STEM hires are immigrants and what
       | percentage are US citizens or greencard holders?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | I don't know but that's an interesting question and I would be
         | very interested to know the answer.
        
       | ddtaylor wrote:
       | Thanks, Peter.
       | 
       | Do you think a state like Oregon can continue to have a state
       | constitution it does with support for immigration as a sanctuary,
       | etc. or is Oregon supposed to be more duty bound by local state
       | constitution? What happens when they are mutually exclusive or
       | the federal government gives orders that are unlawful locally?
       | Does this become a 10th amendment issue?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | Good question and I don't know the answer but this is sure to
         | be a battleground in the coming years, states refusing to
         | enforce federal law or to act as agents of the federal
         | government.
        
       | gist wrote:
       | Unclear to me why this info can't be (at this point it's the 20th
       | AMA by Peter Roberts) in a faq format.
       | 
       | Sure it's helpful. But it seems on the surface to be lead
       | generation for an attorney and
       | 
       | I'm sure there are tons of other professionals (legal or
       | otherwise) that would like the same free advertising.
        
       | eaglehead wrote:
       | Hi Peter, I am wondering what's the best way to move from O1 to
       | Green Card? I have my own startup which has sponsored by O-1 visa
       | but need to get a green card to stay in the Bay Area long term. I
       | am a Canadian Citizen if that helps.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | For founders, the two options are EB2 national interest waiver
         | and EB1A extraordinary ability and which path to choose will
         | require an analysis of your background and the company. EB1A is
         | much faster but the bar is much higher although many founders
         | who've created "successful" companies qualify.
        
       | uhuruity wrote:
       | Thanks for doing this Peter. I have two questions, advice on
       | either/both would be much appreciated!
       | 
       | 1) Partner moved to the US in L1B status, after 2-3 years
       | successfully adjusted to L1A status, based on having been
       | promoted and perhaps been initially misclassified. Would they be
       | eligible for the EB1C green card?
       | 
       | 2) How can an individual on the STEM OPT extension best work on
       | their own entrepreneurial ventures? Would it be sufficient to
       | incorporate as a C-Corp and have 1-2 Americans on the Board, with
       | the authority to fire me, serving as my supervisors? They have
       | relevant work experience and could easily be my manager in a
       | corporate environment. Or do they have to own >50% of the company
       | too?
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | 1. The EB1C has the additional requirement that the applicant's
         | employment abroad also must have been managerial or executive
         | (which at the end of the day means people management). This is
         | where those who move from L-1B to L-1A sometimes fall short. 2.
         | This requires a discussion unfortunately because if you look at
         | the websites of 10 different schools, you will get 10 different
         | views on whether an F-1 can get STEM OPT through their own
         | company. My reading of USCIS guidance is that STEM OPT can be
         | obtained through an F-1's own company as long as there is a
         | supervision/training component to their employment.
        
       | esel2k wrote:
       | Thanks, so many interesting answers. As an European working for a
       | US tech company - regular visiting but world traveler as my
       | passion. Is there officially a list of countries one should not
       | visit (just tourism) that could harm career prospects while
       | working for a US company for visas? Thank you.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | This is a moving target but at a minimum any country on Trump's
         | soon-to-be travel ban list might cause problems down the road.
        
       | d3nj4l wrote:
       | Hey Peter, been reading these threads for a while and really
       | appreciate your support. I'm on STEM OPT and I want to keep my
       | options open in case I don't get an H1b by the time it ends. What
       | realistically are my options without affecting my future chances
       | at a green card? I've heard that pathways like Day 1 CPT can lead
       | to future I140 denials, which make me skeptical of going down
       | that route.
        
         | proberts wrote:
         | The nonimmigrant visa applications of those who get day 1 CPT
         | tend to be scrutinized more closely but as long as the program
         | is real, the visas eventually get issued. And the same for
         | green card applications. While this might result in greater
         | scrutiny, green cards get issued if the program is real. So if
         | you go this route, just make sure it's a legit program
         | (classes, homework, tests, etc.). The other option is the O-1.
         | Of course I don't know your background but the O-1 is one
         | option those who don't get selected in the lottery look at.
        
       | robertwt7 wrote:
       | Hi Peter! Thanks for doing this! I've been watching this thread
       | and reading for so many times but now I have a question.
       | 
       | If I come from Australia with an E3 visa, what is the pathway for
       | me to get a greencard? On the US Gov website, the E3 visa is a
       | non-immigrant visa. does this mean that I can't convert to H1B or
       | greencard if I came with E3 visa?
       | 
       | Thankyou
        
       | proberts wrote:
       | Thank you again for the great questions and discussion. I'm
       | taking a break now and will return in about an hour. If I miss
       | any questions before the AMA ends today, I'll do my best to
       | respond tomorrow
        
       | tonymet wrote:
       | We are working to apply for n-565 for my mother in law who has
       | been a working American citizen for 50 years. She now needs
       | naturalization records to apply for Real Id and continue domestic
       | travel.
       | 
       | The issue is that she had a divorce and name change, and we can't
       | find her name change record with the county superior court. N565
       | requires the name change evidence
       | 
       | We have tried FOIA request to US CIS and no records were found
       | 
       | Can we use her 50 year social security contribution record as
       | evidence of the name change ? What other pieces of evidence could
       | we present ?
       | 
       | Is there a hearing or more dynamic forum we could present the
       | case to ? The forms for naturalization and real id have narrow
       | and rigid qualifications .
        
       | pylua wrote:
       | My company is flying over architects / project members for design
       | meetings from other countries for small meetings over the course
       | of of a week. Does this usually require a work visa ?
        
       | t-awayfor2day wrote:
       | Hi Peter, Thank you for the AMA! I am reposting here because my
       | earlier comment was killed [0] and you probably haven't seen it.
       | 
       | I am a STEM postdoctoral researcher currently in the first year
       | of my STEM OPT, and I am planning to apply for a green card in
       | the coming months alongside my STEM OPT extension. After
       | consulting with an immigration lawyer, I have been advised to
       | pursue the NIW EB-2 category.
       | 
       | I would greatly appreciate your insights on the following
       | questions:
       | 
       | 1. Based on your experience, how would you rank the importance of
       | the following evidence in supporting an NIW EB-2 application
       | (from most to least important)?
       | 
       | - Citations
       | 
       | - Competitive awards and fellowships
       | 
       | - Experience as a peer reviewer
       | 
       | - Letters of recommendation
       | 
       | - Expert opinions (independent letters of recommendation)
       | 
       | - Research in an area of high importance to the United States
       | 
       | 2. The legal fees quoted by my lawyer seem very high compared to
       | figures I've found elsewhere online. Given my current severe
       | financial constraints, I was wondering if you could share what
       | you consider a reasonable range for all legal fees associated
       | with an EB-2 application (NIW I-140 petition, Adjustment of
       | Status, RFEs).
       | 
       | 3. If you have worked with any immigration lawyers or firms that
       | would be appropriate for cases like mine and that you would
       | recommend, I would be very grateful for your suggestions.
       | 
       | Thank you so much for your time and advice. I truly value your
       | perspective and any guidance you can provide as I navigate this
       | process.
       | 
       | 0. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42772058
        
       | webdev_fromDS wrote:
       | Hi Peter, thanks for doing this!
       | 
       | My employer has been helpful to file for my green card. I
       | recently got "CERTIFIED" on my PERM and the lawyers are working
       | to get my I-140 ready to file. I have some publications as first
       | author and as a co-author is a highly respected journal.
       | 
       | I wanted to know if there is a path to move from EB2 to EB1? If
       | there is, what would be the requirements to qualify? I ask this
       | my I-140 priority date is late 2024, and the current date for my
       | nationality is 2012. EB1 current date seems to be 2022. Is it
       | possible to move to EB1 and carry over the priority date from the
       | (hopefully approved) I-140?
       | 
       | Many thanks! I have read several of your AMAs and found them
       | helpful!
        
       | doctorpangloss wrote:
       | How do you square away your relationship with Y Combinator, which
       | has been by all means positive, with the eager collaboration of
       | its leadership with the most anti-immigrant administration in
       | history?
        
       | kevinfinnerty34 wrote:
       | Hi Peter! Thanks for doing this.
       | 
       | I'm a college dropout working as a SWE at one of the FAANG
       | companies in Europe.
       | 
       | I understand that there are two paths I can take -- getting
       | transferred by my company on an L-1B or try to compensate a
       | degree with 12+ years of experience for an H1-B. Do you have any
       | tips for people without degrees from what you've seen in
       | practice? How often do you see people without a degree getting
       | any of the visas?
       | 
       | Is there any chance I can get an o1 without a degree if I have a
       | really good resume (10+ YOE at very-well-known companies)?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-01-20 23:00 UTC)