[HN Gopher] 2k-year-old wine and the uncanny immediacy of the past
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       2k-year-old wine and the uncanny immediacy of the past
        
       Author : benbreen
       Score  : 234 points
       Date   : 2025-01-15 21:35 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (resobscura.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (resobscura.substack.com)
        
       | bglazer wrote:
       | Nice article about artifacts that make the past more immediate,
       | that allow us to connect our experiences to people hundreds or
       | thousands of years ago.
       | 
       | My favorite example is the writings of Onfim, who was a little
       | boy in the 1200s in present day Russia whose scribbling and
       | homework were exquisitely preserved on birch bark fragments. It's
       | so immediately recognizable as a little boy's endearing doodles
       | about knights and imaginary beasts, yet its 800 years old.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onfim
        
         | morkalork wrote:
         | I like the adorable animal shaped sippy cups for babies:
         | 
         | https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/science/prehistoric-baby-...
        
         | romanhn wrote:
         | Wow, haven't seen this before, thank you. Amazing that the
         | writing can still be read by a modern reader (that said, really
         | helps to know what it's supposed to say though). The note I
         | found most relatable is the one with greetings to his
         | classmate.
        
           | ge96 wrote:
           | Do some eyebrows convey emotion or coincidence? (near bottom
           | of page)
           | 
           | Edit: I'm also curious how much time (thousands of years) for
           | there to be noticeable difference in the capability of the
           | brain like abstract thinking. Language may be the real
           | problem.
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | > I'm also curious how much time (thousands of years) for
             | there to be noticeable difference in the capability of the
             | brain like abstract thinking.
             | 
             | It's not thousands of years. French Canadians are enriched
             | for some of the same brain-related defects that Ashkenazi
             | Jews can get; we assume for the same reasons.
        
               | Vampiero wrote:
               | Which defects? What reasons? _Who is assuming?_
        
               | thaumasiotes wrote:
               | You know, you can just look these things up. This isn't
               | some piece of obscure trivia.
               | 
               | > Which defects?
               | 
               | Ashkenazi Jews are prone to a whole host of genetic
               | defects that affect the brain, of which the most famous
               | is Tay-Sachs.
               | 
               | > What reasons?
               | 
               | A lifestyle focused on commerce as opposed to foraging or
               | agriculture.
               | 
               | > _Who is assuming?_
               | 
               | Everyone, basically.
               | 
               | In the case of the Ashkenazi Jews, as far as we can tell
               | they've been like that for as long as records of the
               | group have existed. But the French Canadian
               | specialization in commerce postdates the discovery of
               | North America.
        
               | DiggyJohnson wrote:
               | Uhhhh what?
        
         | methyl wrote:
         | I've had similar feeling when realizing that the bells that we
         | sometimes hear in old cities of Europe are exact same bells
         | producing exact same sound as 1000 years ago
        
         | zehaeva wrote:
         | Similarly, when I read Meditations by Marcus Aurelius I was
         | struck by how normal everything seemed. While he was an Emperor
         | the everyday banality of what he talked about going through
         | 2,000 years ago was amazing.
         | 
         | Humans really haven't changed that much at all.
        
           | thesz wrote:
           | > Humans really haven't changed that much at all.
           | 
           | I guess you are quoting Woland from The Master and Margarita
           | [1], the words he said in a show at the Variety theater.
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Master_and_Margarita
           | 
           | Woland is _the_ Satan in the novel. What he said has a deeper
           | meaning, but superficial one is most probably wrong.
        
             | willy_k wrote:
             | I think they're just saying that humans haven't really
             | changed much at all, if I had to guess they weren't
             | referencing any one quote. The only thing that's really
             | changed is the tools we can use, but we've made little
             | (some would say backwards compared to certain reference
             | points) progress in why and what we use them for.
        
             | jazzyjackson wrote:
             | I don't know that OP was quoting a Russian satire but I'm
             | glad you turned me onto the book, I never would have heard
             | of it but sounds intriguing. There's a wealth of covers to
             | choose from on eBay, Goodreads lists over 1,200 editions. I
             | got the one with the cat holding the playing cards smoking
             | a cigar while a topless woman sails past the moon on a
             | flying pig. at least I think it's a pig. Published in '97
             | by Picador.
        
               | voihannena wrote:
               | It's such a great book, both hilarious and sad at times.
               | I also went to eBay to search for a copy before realizing
               | I already own the book.
        
               | gunian wrote:
               | Where is ChatGPT when you need it smh think of the time
               | wasted instead of diving deep into a masterpiece
        
               | internet_points wrote:
               | The one translated by O'Connor and Burgin? That's a good
               | translation.
        
             | rcxdude wrote:
             | I'm sure it's been said at many points by many people,
             | fictional or real. It's not a particularly unique insight
             | (especially amongst historians and archeologists), though
             | one I think that bears repeating often as it's easy to lose
             | sight of it.
        
             | zehaeva wrote:
             | For as well read as I am, I am not so clever to quote the
             | works that have influenced me.
             | 
             | No, I am afraid that I was being more of a follower of
             | Wallace here, I was being sincere with my words. I truly do
             | marvel that humans really haven't changed that much at all.
        
           | whenc wrote:
           | We come mentally of age when we discover that the great minds
           | of the past, whom we have patronized, are not less
           | intelligent than we are because they happen to be dead --
           | Cyril Connolly, The Unquiet Grave
        
             | alexvoda wrote:
             | Does that(the patronization) happen frequently? I far more
             | frequently witness people lionizing people of the past in
             | all sorts of benign and malign ways.
        
           | bigstrat2003 wrote:
           | One of the things which really brought that into focus for me
           | was when I was old enough to look past the flowery language
           | of Shakespeare and understand the meaning of what the
           | characters were going through. It first hit me when I
           | realized that Hamlet's famous "to be or not to be" speech was
           | really about him wanting to commit suicide, but being afraid
           | that he might go to hell. It's not really an earth shattering
           | insight, but as a young man it blew my mind. I had never
           | really thought about the fact that humans living in the past
           | might have had the same psychological struggles and problems
           | we still have to confront to this day.
           | 
           | Honestly, learning about how little humans have changed
           | throughout history has been both one of the most delightful
           | and sad things I have learned. It's wonderful to think about
           | the real kinship we have with people long since dead, but
           | it's also sobering to realize we still make a lot of the same
           | mistakes despite their example. But regardless of whether
           | it's good or bad, I find the relatable humanity of historical
           | people to be endlessly fascinating.
        
             | Terr_ wrote:
             | > has been both one of the most delightful and sad things I
             | have learned
             | 
             | Reminds me of this exchange between an adoptive maternal
             | figure and a troubled youth with low self-esteem.
             | 
             | > "[He] is a great man. [...] I don't confuse greatness
             | with perfection. To be great anyhow is... the higher
             | achievement." She gave him a crooked smile. "It should give
             | you hope, eh?"
             | 
             | "Huh. Block me from escape, you mean. Are you saying that
             | no matter how screwed up I was, you'd still expect me to
             | work wonders?" _Appalling._
             | 
             | She considered this. "Yes," she said serenely. "In fact,
             | since no one is perfect, it follows that all great deeds
             | have been accomplished out of imperfection. Yet they were
             | accomplished, somehow, all the same."
             | 
             | -- _Mirror Dance_ by Lois McMaster Bujold
        
               | adynaton wrote:
               | Vorkosigan Saga is one of the most underrated sci fi
               | universes. It should be way more popular.
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | I like the extreme modesty in the wikipedia article:
         | 
         | > One of the drawings features a knight on a horse, with
         | Onfim's name written next to him, stabbing someone on the
         | ground with a lance, with scholars speculating that Onfim
         | pictured himself as the knight.
        
         | edgarvaldes wrote:
         | Not as old, but I loved reading about this:
         | 
         | 350 year old paper cuttings found under Sutton House
         | floorboards go on display [0]
         | 
         | It really feels immediate
         | 
         | [0] https://museumsandheritage.com/advisor/posts/350-year-old-
         | pa...
        
         | gunian wrote:
         | Kids had school 800 years ago? If he didn't work in the fields
         | musta been rich
         | 
         |  _insert David Lynch quote about red ants_
        
           | bearded_comrade wrote:
           | It seems like that region had a particularly high literacy
           | rate. Texts from all classes and genders were found. The kid
           | could have been a peasant.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novgorod_Republic#Literature_a.
           | ..
        
             | gunian wrote:
             | How likely is that vs works written by the rich folk
             | survive? A cursory GPT search implies not a lot of medieval
             | works written by poor people in general
        
               | int_19h wrote:
               | The point is that it's not your average medieval polity.
               | Novgorod was a merchant republic in which literacy was
               | seemingly held in high esteem in and of itself, resulting
               | in a social pressure to acquire it. And then on top of
               | that they had access to plenty of birch bark, which
               | happens to be a very convenient and _cheap_ writing
               | material where it 's available, and does not require any
               | ink or fancy tools to use; just a sharp stylus.
               | 
               | As far as survival, because of how common birch bark
               | notes were in Novgorod, they were used for mundane
               | everyday matters like instructions to servants to
               | purchase such and such goods, or even just a one-liner
               | greeting, and a lot of those were then discarded and
               | ended up buried underground. So, again, a very different
               | slice compared to the more typical story of expensive
               | manuscripts in libraries, or personal correspondence of
               | nobility.
        
         | internet_points wrote:
         | Or the rune-rods which were "the medieval snapchat"
         | https://www.nrk.no/vestland/gamle_-norske-ord-for-kjonnsorga...
         | (google translate isn't half bad on this article)
         | 
         | or a more PG version
         | https://sprakprat.no/2017/06/22/middelalderkvinner-og-runeku...
         | where a rune-rod simply says "Gyda says you have to come home"
         | (I guess hubby had been out too late with his no-good friends?)
        
         | sriacha wrote:
         | Wonderful, here's another similar example I saw recently, 14000
         | year old cave art doodling by kids:
         | https://www.science.org/content/article/enigmatic-cave-art-w...
        
       | abeppu wrote:
       | The inscription on the Sword of Goujian, the translation for
       | which is displayed in the article, says that the King of Yue made
       | and used the sword himself. How literally do people with
       | knowledge of the period take that? Is it surprising / unlikely
       | for a king of that period to make anything themselves, especially
       | something so ornate, rather than commission it?
        
         | tokai wrote:
         | Well kings have always said they made/build anything they
         | ordered. I would simply not believe Yue's claim. It's much like
         | the things Wolfram "creates".
        
         | rsynnott wrote:
         | Well, everyone needs a hobby :)
         | 
         | Here's another one, different king, similar inscription:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spear_of_Fuchai - seems likely it
         | should be read more as "caused this to be made".
        
         | codemonkey-zeta wrote:
         | Julius Caesar made the dang calendar. People had a lot of free
         | time.
        
           | rsynnott wrote:
           | That was kind of his job (as pontifex maximus), tho.
        
         | scottLobster wrote:
         | When you have some sort of divine right to rule, the most
         | money, a palace filled with servants and responsibilities that
         | can be neglected with no immediate consequences, well you have
         | a lot of free time.
         | 
         | That said, while it's possible this King was really into
         | swordsmithing, more likely he's just taking credit for the work
         | or something gets lost in the translation. Like if Elon said he
         | "built the Falcon 9". It's not explicitly true, he certainly
         | wasn't machining parts or writing code for it, but he was
         | involved enough that no one would really call it a lie either.
        
           | ryandrake wrote:
           | > Like if Elon said he "built the Falcon 9". It's not
           | explicitly true, he certainly wasn't machining parts or
           | writing code for it, but he was involved enough that no one
           | would really call it a lie either.
           | 
           | Yea, that would be the way I read it: He "built" the sword
           | just like the executives of your company "built" its
           | products. It's like those home remodeling TV shows, where the
           | remodelers don't really do anything besides write checks and
           | drive around talking on their phones to other people who
           | don't really do anything either. All the actual building is
           | done by silent building contractors who are mostly off-
           | camera.
        
             | OJFord wrote:
             | I don't even think it's an foreign concept or lost to time
             | - Trump said he would build a wall (and 'did' a bit,
             | afaiu?); British PMs have said they'll build Hinkley Point,
             | HS2, Northern powerhouses, etc. It's understood what their
             | role is in building such a thing, I think it's just the
             | unfamiliarity with kings commissioning swords that makes
             | that example read more literally, and if it were something
             | more unusual then the language would be less ambiguous
             | ('used swords he _even_ made himself ').
        
               | wqaatwt wrote:
               | Swords are usually made a by a single or a handful of
               | people at most.
               | 
               | Nuclear power plants or walls that are supposed to cover
               | an entire border require thousands of workers and
               | engineers. At that point the organizational/management
               | aspects, acquiring of funding etc. become much more
               | important than the direct contribution of any specific
               | engineer or craftsman.
        
           | keybored wrote:
           | > It's not explicitly true, he certainly wasn't machining
           | parts or writing code for it, but he was involved enough that
           | no one would really call it a lie either.
           | 
           | Or you've been taught well.
        
           | libraryofbabel wrote:
           | _Who built the seven gates of Thebes?_
           | 
           |  _The books are filled with names of kings._
           | 
           |  _Was it the kings who hauled the craggy blocks of stone?_
           | 
           | - Bertolt Brecht, _Questions of a Worker who Reads_
        
         | klik99 wrote:
         | Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if he actually made it himself
         | (though I agree the inscription is hardly proof). We have this
         | view of Kings as fat, lazy bureaucratic blowhards because we're
         | closest to the tailend of the history of monarchy. When this
         | King was around there were a lot more regional leaders who
         | fought and strength was admired the most, if a King was seen as
         | weak he had just as much internal attempts that were way more
         | physical than the political coups of today. You could not be a
         | king or survive being a king without being a good fighter and
         | knowing a bit about how weapons are made and used.
        
         | Frummy wrote:
         | Even recent kings have this grand education from the best of
         | the best if not from actual geniuses, examples abound like
         | Alexander the great and Aristotle, and usually there's other
         | examples in wikipedia articles for most recent kings, even
         | without tutoring here's a list of books that could have been
         | used to educate royalty in less ancient times than this case
         | but of course maybe a book wont teach craftsmanship
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirrors_for_princes
         | 
         | The elite/aristocracy of these old ages was at the top for
         | reasons that make some sort of sense even though it could be
         | violent it would be perhaps not completely uncorrelated with
         | ability, if a prince is born into it they'd sometimes get
         | taught multiple languages, music, poetry, on top of the
         | reasonable politics and warfare, strategy etc. As for
         | craftsmanship that is a good question since it's working with
         | ones hands but with the examples here so far it would make
         | sense if they could just get instructed by the best craftsmen
         | as well to learn that too of course this is maybe too far
         | backwards and another continent to extrapolate
        
         | kragen wrote:
         | I don't think anyone knows enough about the period to answer
         | that question. Our main written source is the Annals of Spring
         | and Autumn (Chun Qiu ), from Lu (not Yue
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yue_(state)) which spends 18000
         | words on 242 years, in chronological order. For many of those
         | years it simply says something like "Zhong " ("locusts"). It
         | does not go into any detail on questions like which hobbies the
         | kings of other countries spent their spare time on, and that's
         | a difficult thing to infer from archaeological evidence, too.
         | The written records of Yue were destroyed by order of Qin Shi
         | Huang  in the Fen Shu Keng Ru .
         | 
         | So we kind of have to guess. My guesses are not the most
         | informed.
         | 
         | The sword (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_of_Goujian) is
         | bronze, so it was probably cast (you _can_ forge bronze but the
         | cost /benefit ratio is terrible). You could imagine a king
         | pouring the hot bronze into the mold--that would be much
         | quicker than forging an iron sword--but you probably wouldn't
         | want him to make a habit of it, because contaminants in the
         | metals would expose him to arsenic vapor, though this sword in
         | particular is almost arsenic-free.
         | 
         | Then all that's left is sharpening the blade, which any warrior
         | has to be good at, and what is a king if not a warrior
         | foremost? So it's plausible that a king might have put in most
         | of the work embodied in the blade himself, with a grindstone,
         | even if he didn't go around casting bronze regularly.
        
         | int_19h wrote:
         | It wouldn't be unprecedented. Every now and then you get a
         | monarch who just happens to like doing something with his
         | hands. It's rare enough that it's usually specifically noted
         | when it happens, but e.g. consider Peter the Great of Russia,
         | who famously partook in building ships for his fleet as a
         | carpenter (although in his case it seems to have been driven
         | more by relentless perfectionism and dissatisfaction with
         | quality of other people's work).
        
       | dmix wrote:
       | The bakers stamp on the bread is interesting branding
       | 
       | https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_...
        
         | Aloha wrote:
         | I think it was the equivalent of a tax stamp
        
           | binarycrusader wrote:
           | My recollection from a previous article was that in many
           | cases, ovens were communal, so the mark was so that they knew
           | which items belonged to a particular baker:
           | 
           | https://wheatbeat.com/bread-stamps/
        
             | pezezin wrote:
             | That is correct. In my home country, Spain, such ovens
             | still exist, although nowadays they are few and far
             | between. The few people who still use them keep signing
             | their bread, a tradition that goes back to at least the
             | Ancient Egypt. You can read a bit more in this Wikipedia
             | article (no English version, sorry)
             | 
             | https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sello_de_pan
        
               | dmix wrote:
               | Interesting, do you have to stamp it at a certain point
               | in the baking process? I'm guessing after it expands at a
               | certain point
        
               | rcostin2k2 wrote:
               | At certain religious events, even today, Orthodox
               | Christians serve a handmade bread that has such a seal
               | applied after it is shaped into a cross but before it
               | rises and is baked in the oven. Once it rises, the mark
               | expands but remains clearly visible after baking.
        
             | gunian wrote:
             | I guess the share your home BS started hundreds of years
             | before my time makes life seem more futyl
        
         | LeftHandPath wrote:
         | It is! I found the sword quite fascinating as well. The older
         | Chinese lettering on it looks really neat, too
        
         | j_bum wrote:
         | Agreed, this was the most poignant object for me in the
         | article!
        
         | int_19h wrote:
         | While we're on the subject of ancient bread, ACOUP had a nice
         | and extensive series of posts detailing how it was made and
         | distributed, with a lot of info on Romans specifically:
         | 
         | https://acoup.blog/2020/07/24/collections-bread-how-did-they...
        
       | mcswell wrote:
       | 41 AD was a very good year.
        
       | insane_dreamer wrote:
       | While the tomb was sealed it wasn't a vacuum, so how did the
       | liquid not evaporate over time?
        
         | Karellen wrote:
         | Looking at the images in the article, I think c), d) and e) in
         | the first group, and the close-up image a couple of paragraphs
         | later, are all the same item.
         | 
         | So. e) looks like d) with a top covering taken off. And, from
         | the curved "handles" visible in c), e) and the close-up, they
         | could all be the same glass vessel. We can see in c) that the
         | vessel does have a lid. In e) and the close-up, there appears
         | to be a residue where the lid rested against the container.
         | 
         | So it's possible that liquid from the jar got to the join,
         | evaporated, and left behind a substance that sealed the
         | container against further evaporation?
         | 
         | You'd probably have to read the full report for an actual
         | explanation, but that's my guess from what's reported in the
         | linked article itself.
        
           | chrisco255 wrote:
           | The vessel was probably sealed intentionally by the Romans.
           | They certainly knew how to seal wine and glass containers.
           | But it was also in a lead case and the tomb itself was sealed
           | allowing for very little air transfer over the years.
        
       | thom wrote:
       | I agree these objects (just like colourised photos) help bridge
       | the distance to the past. But I've had the same experience purely
       | with text. If you read Cicero's letters and diaries, and then
       | just imagine him - suffering writer's block, wracked with anxiety
       | and self-doubt, desperate for his friends to cheer him up - as a
       | neurotic, terminally-online Twitter user, it fits perfectly and
       | breathes life into his every word.
        
       | teddyh wrote:
       | It is always fascinating when Americans re-discover that old
       | things actually exist.
       | 
       | But, as they say, an American thinks that 100 years is a long
       | time while a European thinks that 100 miles is a long way.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Please don't post nationalistic flamebait to HN. That's a
         | pretty insulting variant of it.
         | 
         | (I love the adage you quote, though. When I first heard it it
         | said "Canadian" and "Englishman", which probably says something
         | about how far back it goes.)
        
         | poulpy123 wrote:
         | I didn't even notice the author was American. You don't need to
         | be one to be fascinated by archaeology.
        
       | ThinkingGuy wrote:
       | One of the most interesting parts of Pompeii for me was seeing
       | the area where they've restored a vineyard, to the point of
       | planting the rows of vines in the exact spots that held vines
       | 2000 years ago. While large areas of the city consists of ruins
       | of buildings that you kind of have to infer the layout of from
       | the floorplans, the vineyard was the one of the spots where I
       | most felt like I was looking back in time, and seeing the spot
       | more-or-less as it would have looked in 79CE.
        
         | duskwuff wrote:
         | One interesting recent discovery at Pompeii was what appears to
         | have been, for all intents and purposes, a fast food restaurant
         | - complete with a serving counter set up much like a modern-day
         | steam table. Many of the original wall paintings are intact -
         | it's not hard to imagine what it would have looked like, and
         | it's surprisingly familiar.
         | 
         | https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/12/archaeologists-excav...
        
           | gunian wrote:
           | Make fast food great again respect the ancestors
        
       | sedatk wrote:
       | "All this has happened before, and all this will happen again"
       | --Battlestar Galactica (originally from Peter Pan though)
        
         | taneliv wrote:
         | "What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what
         | will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun."[1] from
         | Ecclesiastes 1:9. Apparently the quote not only describes the
         | phenomenon, but has become witness to itself.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/16462/jewish/Ch...
        
           | dyauspitr wrote:
           | Just as it was before, so it will be again. -Vashista
           | 
           | The same events will repeat in every Yuga -Vishnu Purana
           | (1.3.1-2)
        
       | NL807 wrote:
       | How on earth did the wine not evaporate out of the vessel over
       | such a long period of time?
        
         | chrisco255 wrote:
         | The vessel was made of glass and airtight. It was also in a
         | lead case in a sealed tomb underground.
        
       | CyberDildonics wrote:
       | I can't wait to read about the uncanny immediacy of the
       | unreasonable effectiveness of the timeless aesthetic of the past.
        
       | pea wrote:
       | I'm curious how dangerous it would be to drink the wine?
        
         | temp0826 wrote:
         | Wine? More likely vinegar I'd guess
        
           | postexitus wrote:
           | Oh mon dieu, since when did Spanish make anything other than
           | vinegar. ah ah ah.
        
         | tmountain wrote:
         | Probably not that dangerous. The ethanol has likely evaporated
         | leaving behind vinegar and unpleasant byproducts. There's a
         | risk of mold and bacterial contamination depending on how well
         | the seal has remained intact. Depending on the process used,
         | it's possible the wine could contain lead salts (for
         | sweetness), which are toxic. I doubt it would kill you, but
         | it'd likely be very unpleasant to drink.
        
       | myrandomcomment wrote:
       | OMG! The only question is did anyone try it?
        
         | carlob wrote:
         | According to wikipedia:
         | 
         | > Analysis of mineral salts in the wine revealed a high
         | concentration of potassium salts, indicative of the cremains in
         | the wine
         | 
         | I kinda wanted to try it too before I read this.
        
       | scaglio wrote:
       | Fascinating! The wine discovery reminds me one scene from the
       | book 'The Dark Forest'[0] when the protagonist drinks a wine from
       | some centuries before... spoiler: it wasn't good.
       | 
       | [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Forest
        
       | metalman wrote:
       | The most profound story of this type is the account of finding a
       | leaf, in 10's of million year old clay, that when exposed, was
       | green, but then very very rapidly oxidised and crumbled.Ref: from
       | somewhere in the great lakes region? 90's mag, likely sciam.Also
       | similar storys of other very ancient soft tissues, somewhat
       | contentious, though it is understood that,unless lithified,
       | ancient organic remains are exceptionaly fragile and do crumble
       | quickly without meticulous and complicated preservation
       | tecniques, the three common reasons for presevation in situ are
       | freezing ,water saturation, or drying/mumification. The shear
       | volume of artifacts that humans have, and are leaving behind,
       | insures plenty of interesting finds availible into the far
       | future.
        
         | throwaway63203 wrote:
         | There are a few unconfirmed stories about people eating mammoth
         | meat that had been frozen in ice for thousands of years
         | 
         | https://strangeanimalspodcast.blubrry.net/2023/12/04/episode...
        
       | poulpy123 wrote:
       | The thing that surprised me the most was to discover that there
       | was patchouli perfume. I always associated it hippies and the
       | hippie trail from the 60s and was thinking it was from Asia
        
         | poulpy123 wrote:
         | After checking patchouli is indeed a south Asian plant, that is
         | not endemic from the Mediterranean area, so it's even more
         | fascinating than the wine
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-01-17 23:01 UTC)