[HN Gopher] Laser technique measures distances with nanometre pr...
___________________________________________________________________
Laser technique measures distances with nanometre precision
Author : westurner
Score : 16 points
Date : 2025-01-14 03:32 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.newscientist.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.newscientist.com)
| westurner wrote:
| > _optical frequency comb_
|
| "113 km absolute ranging with nanometer precision" (2024)
| https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05542 :
|
| > _two-way dual-comb ranging (TWDCR) approach_
|
| > _The advanced long-distance ranging technology is expected to
| have immediate implications for space research initiatives, such
| as the space telescope array and the satellite gravimetry_
| sitkack wrote:
| I am only two pages in, but I want to say this paper is very well
| written. People should give reading it a try reading (with LLM
| assistance).
|
| If this technique could be adapted to existing optical fiber
| infrastructure, we could see the effects of fiber optic cable
| stretch and deformation in realtime.
| kragen wrote:
| "Vast" really shouldn't have been eliminated from the title,
| because interferometers have been measuring distances with
| nanometer precision since even before there were lasers, and
| lasers have been used in interferometers since the first laser in
| 01960. Victorian-era interferometers, commonly used for grinding
| telescope mirrors, could only measure distances of a few meters
| with precision in the hundreds of nanometers.
|
| However, laser interferometers were already quite good; LIGO,
| most famously, detected gravitational waves by measuring strains
| of around 10-20 over a distance of 1120 km, which works out to a
| change in distance of less than 0.000012 nanometers, much less
| than the width of a proton.
|
| The news here actually seems to be that "A new way to gauge
| distance using lasers can measure lengths of more than 100
| kilometres ... To continue reading, subscribe today with our
| January sale." So, uh, I don't know, maybe the reporter wasn't
| familiar with LIGO and thought that nanometer-precision
| interferometry over kilometers was new? Sitkack, you say there's
| a paper somewhere?
| stavros wrote:
| Oooh it's the guy with octal years!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-01-16 23:00 UTC)