[HN Gopher] Backdooring Your Backdoors - Another $20 Domain, Mor...
___________________________________________________________________
Backdooring Your Backdoors - Another $20 Domain, More Governments
Author : mooreds
Score : 228 points
Date : 2025-01-12 16:01 UTC (6 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (labs.watchtowr.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (labs.watchtowr.com)
| Lammy wrote:
| To avoid my comment being entirely a terminology nitpick I will
| say this is very cool work that I would be too afraid of CFAA to
| ever attempt. Especially funny to see four parasites on one
| government domain. Do skiddies not excise other skiddies'
| backdoors when pwning systems so they can have them all to
| themselves?
|
| > We then hooked that up to the AWS Route53 API, and just bought
| them en-masse. Honestly, it's $20, and we've done worse with
| more.
|
| > We're incredibly grateful for the support of The Shadowserver
| Foundation, who have agreed yet again to save us from our own
| adventures and to take ownership of the domains implicated in
| this research and sinkhole them.
|
| I wish we could collectively stop using the terms "buy" and "own"
| with regard to domains. Try "leased" or "rented". If they could
| be bought then they wouldn't have been available again for this
| exercise.
| Its_Padar wrote:
| Technically this is a dupe as this has been submitted twice
| before in the last week
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42658405
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42633273
| blendergeek wrote:
| It only counts as a dupe if it received discussion/upvotes last
| time.
| catoc wrote:
| The first link is also watchtwr, but a different post
| Thorrez wrote:
| I wonder what would happen if they exploited these webshells'
| backdoors to delete the webshells...
| abound wrote:
| If you're the FBI (and maybe also have a court order), you can
| do this [1]. If you're a grey hat hacker in Russia, you can
| maybe do this [2]. If you're a random person in the US, you're
| likely exposing yourself to a lot of (CFAA) risk.
|
| As the authors of this post note, they were careful to only
| receive + log traffic and not otherwise send interesting
| responses/engage with the webshells.
|
| [1] https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2024/02/fbi-
| removes-m...
|
| [2] https://www.zdnet.com/article/a-mysterious-grey-hat-is-
| patch...
| busymom0 wrote:
| Slightly off topic but what's going on with the font for the "y"
| character in this article? It sticks out like a sore thumb.
| sosborn wrote:
| It's the font design: https://abcdinamo.com/typefaces/favorit
| busymom0 wrote:
| Looks like the font provides an "alternative y" which looks
| normal. But the default one has that ugly broken look.
| npteljes wrote:
| I think some fonts do this so that they have a distinguishing
| feature. Fonts seem to be a very saturated market, so this
| might help being noticed in a crowd of sameness and copycats,
| and many people don't look at a font otherwise either, even
| people who use them in designs.
|
| I think the sticking out part is supposed to irritate somewhat,
| but it still needs to make some sense, like a hot take. I
| noticed some online personalities use the same strategy with
| pronunciation, consciously and consistently mispronouncing
| specific words, play up their accent. Media analysts also
| recognize verbal tics as a trope, for similar effect.
|
| Back to fonts, another site that I remember using a similar
| thing is the Genius lyrics site. For a long time, while
| establishing their presence, they used the square character
| forms from the Programme font, which you can see on my link.
| They still use Programme, but use the normal forms for some
| time now though, presumably, because it was indeed irritating,
| and it hurt legibility.
|
| https://www.typewolf.com/programme
| 8organicbits wrote:
| I find this sort of thing bothers me often enough that I've
| disabled downloadable_fonts. I think of the web as a place
| where I read things, so custom fonts that hurt readability are
| undesirable. I get why designers want a unique style, but I
| rarely want that as an end user.
| fn-mote wrote:
| I loved this write up. Light-hearted. Conscious of the impact of
| any disclosure. Everything substantiated, but not taking
| themselves too seriously. Enjoying read, and at the same time
| talking about a serious issue.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-01-12 23:00 UTC)