[HN Gopher] Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case ...
___________________________________________________________________
Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French
Chefs(2008)
Author : kelseyfrog
Score : 10 points
Date : 2025-01-09 22:47 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (pubsonline.informs.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (pubsonline.informs.org)
| nl wrote:
| The abstract sounds interesting. Is the paper available?
| Aloha wrote:
| Yes, I missed it the first time too - there is a big download
| button on the left side of the webpage.
|
| Linked for convenience-
| https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/epdf/10.1287/orsc.1070.03...
| azepoi wrote:
| Yes: About->view pdf
|
| (On mobile)
| nestorD wrote:
| Intriguing! But, being familiar with a domain that work of a mix
| of copyright and norm based intellectual property (magic). It is
| a mess in that people who do not care will abuse the system with
| little retribution, while people who care often do not dare do
| thing because the rules are too fuzzy to know if something is
| fine.
| empath75 wrote:
| Magic has insiders and outsiders that have access to and
| distribute tricks, the insiders being, roughly, "people who
| perform magic for a living", and outsiders being, roughly,
| "youtubers and hobbyists".
|
| Penn and Teller make a lot of noise about not being afraid of
| the Magic Castle and revealing tricks, but the only tricks
| they've really exposed are the really old tricks like the Cup
| and Balls where knowing how it's done doesn't really spoil it
| very much, and most magicians don't care about that kind of
| thing very much, especially since there have been books
| explaining how to do it for literally hundreds of years
| including magic kits you can buy at any book store.
|
| What _really_ annoys magicians are people publishing tutorials
| for original tricks that are still being performed by the
| person that developed them, and most of them think that if the
| method is going to be published, it should be published by the
| performer through normal "magic store" channels. Outsiders,
| OTOH, don't care at all about any of that and frequently
| publish tutorials and exposures for tricks on youtube, and
| don't really suffer any negative consequences for it because
| they're not working magicians and don't intend to be.
|
| It's actually really similar to the way that EDM producers and
| DJs work. They all are playing "other people's music", and a
| lot of them make unauthorized remixes and bootlegs of other
| people's work, but they also have a network of dj-to-dj music
| distribution where producers give out exclusive demos of their
| newest songs and remixes (some original and legit, some not) to
| other djs that they're friendly with, and if you were to send
| out copies of someone _else's_ illegal remix, you'd get black
| listed and lose out on gigs and getting any songs from other
| DJs in that network in the future.
| Aloha wrote:
| This is very very interesting.
|
| It reminds me of how furries treat IP, art theft is a big no-no,
| but sharing is encouraged and a community norm.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-01-12 23:00 UTC)