[HN Gopher] Donut Lab's next-generation in-wheel motors
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Donut Lab's next-generation in-wheel motors
        
       Author : klemola
       Score  : 29 points
       Date   : 2025-01-08 07:19 UTC (15 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.donutlab.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.donutlab.com)
        
       | dscottboggs wrote:
       | At first I was like "this is crazy, those are going to be crazy
       | expensive, they'll never make it" and then I realized we're not
       | the customers, at least not willingly
       | 
       | https://www.donutdefence.com/
        
         | unwind wrote:
         | The Oruga Unitrack [1] is listed as one of their case-studies,
         | it looks awesome and I would really like to see it move.
         | 
         | I found [2] on YouTube, but it doesn't seem to contain any
         | actual video of the vehicle (and the voice-over says "unit-
         | rack" rather than "uni-track" which I didn't love).
         | 
         | 1: https://oruga.eu/#unitrack
         | 
         | 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clL4sDXxvWQ
        
         | rco8786 wrote:
         | Looks like they're targeting "civilian" products as well
         | https://www.vergemotorcycles.com/
        
       | numpad0 wrote:
       | Looks like one of many "shovels for gold diggers" unitized motors
       | for robotic dogs and humanoids. There's been a lot of such
       | compact all-in-one motor units from China lately.
        
       | vlachen wrote:
       | I spent a number of years designing outer-runner direct drive
       | permanent magnet motors for industrial equipment and I've got
       | some questions.
       | 
       | Cheifly, bearings. They're not shown in any of the oh-wow images,
       | but these will likely be the most expensive component of each
       | motor. Big bearings are expensive, and to accept the loading of
       | normal wheel operation, these will have to be pretty beefy.
       | That's not even discussing operational life and maintenance.
       | 
       | After you've stuffed a pair of angular contact roller bearings
       | into this "wheel", you're going to want to keep salt water and
       | road grime from entering those bearings, so what do you use as a
       | seal? Whatever you use is going to be big, expensive, and suck up
       | huge amounts of power due to the large contact surface.
       | 
       | Finally, once you've got big ass bearings and big ass seals, how
       | do you have enough room to put a decent amount of copper in
       | there? Power in these things always amounts to maximizing the
       | amount of copper in the space, and I just don't see room for it.
        
       | tetris11 wrote:
       | I guess I'm not really following. The engine's in the wheel?
        
         | klemola wrote:
         | Yeah. In fact, the article linked below[1] is more informative
         | than the page I linked. TL;DR: there's a big reduction to the
         | overall weight of an EV using these, but they do add to the
         | unsprung mass of the vehicle (the weight below suspension, as
         | mentioned in another comment).
         | 
         | [1]: https://www.cnet.com/home/electric-vehicles/this-donut-
         | shape...
        
       | lelanthran wrote:
       | Maybe they thought of this, but I didn't see any mitigation for
       | the unsprung mass problem that these motors bring.
        
         | notjulianjaynes wrote:
         | If the weights are listed on the are to be believed, this
         | shouldn't be an issue. It says 40 kg for a 21" wheel. A quick
         | Google is telling me that a regular old steel wheel from a
         | truck of the same size is around 50 to 80 lbs (23-36 kg).
         | 
         | That said, I was already thinking 630 kw per wheel was a pretty
         | incredible claim before I realized these are apparently not
         | much heavier than a non-mptorized wheel. These have to be some
         | marketing department numbers or something. 630 kw is roughly
         | 850 horsepower.
        
           | vlachen wrote:
           | There's a whole lot of marketing speak, finger waggling, and
           | wishful thinking in what I am seeing here.
           | 
           | Copper is heavy. So is silicon steel. So are high strength
           | magnets.
           | 
           | I love the idea, but this one's going to have a real world
           | bite in the ass once they get it out of the lab.
        
             | humptybumpty wrote:
             | Well, you can already buy one:
             | https://www.vergemotorcycles.com/
        
               | vlachen wrote:
               | Well _that_ is interesting.
               | 
               | I still have my doubts, but I wish them luck. I've always
               | wanted to get Kenada's bike.
        
           | lelanthran wrote:
           | > If the weights are listed on the are to be believed, this
           | shouldn't be an issue. It says 40 kg for a 21" wheel. A quick
           | Google is telling me that a regular old steel wheel from a
           | truck of the same size is around 50 to 80 lbs (23-36 kg).
           | 
           | I'm skeptical; They say 40kg, but I think that's just for the
           | motor, not the entire wheel. I working off the (maybe
           | incorrect)[1] assumption that the 40kg doesn't include the
           | steel/mag rim and the tyre.
           | 
           | As far as a 21" standard mag wheel, the tyre alone is around
           | 12kg, so quite believable that a standard wheel with tyre
           | would weigh maybe 30kg. However this still means that putting
           | a tyre on a 40kg wheel is going to take it to +52kg.
           | 
           | [1] Just the minimum metal and rubber needed for a 21" wheel
           | to maintain its shape and structure should be around 30kg.
           | Maybe this motor is structurally round already, so doesn't
           | need any rim to reinforce it?
        
         | archontes wrote:
         | I'm thinking about the motorcycle motor. If they're really
         | lighter than competing motors, I don't see the downside of
         | using them like a traditional motor, taking the weight savings,
         | putting it inside a sealed cavity, and coupling it to a
         | driveshaft. Simplifies some of the other problems with sealing
         | and bearings mentioned elsewhere, avoids unsprung mass.
        
       | pbronez wrote:
       | Pretty powerful stuff. The Model Y Long Range AWD has a pair of
       | motors that deliver Peak Power of 286 kW and Peak Torque of 510
       | N[?]m. Donut's claims their Automotive (21") motor can 2.2x the
       | Power (630kW) and 8.4x the Torque (4300 Nm)
       | 
       | That's high enough that I have to assume it's for all four
       | wheels... if it's for a single wheel, then an all wheel drive
       | vehicle would have 2520Kw Power + 17,200 Nm Torque, which is 1.6x
       | more than the most powerful production car in the world: the
       | Lotus Evija (1,500 kW).
        
         | pbronez wrote:
         | This page [0] says "Donut Platform empowers hypercars [...]
         | Delivering 1,500kW and 9,000Nm of total wheel torque, with
         | acceleration from 0-100km/h in under 2 seconds"
         | 
         | I don't see how you go from a single 286kW/510Nm hub motor x4
         | gets you 1500kW/9000Nm instead of 2520Kw/17200Nm. Wonder what
         | the limitations are + what nonsense they are trying to pull in
         | their single motor stats.
         | 
         | [0] https://www.donutlab.com/industries/
        
       | exabrial wrote:
       | There's a concept called "unsprung mass", which basically
       | destroys handling of all vehicles from race cars to trucks.
       | Basically the greater the unsprung mass, the harder it is to damp
       | the input into the suspension because of the inertia of the
       | moving suspension components themselves. An ideal suspension has
       | zero undamped mass, and all input to the suspension is a direct
       | result of contact with the surface the vehicle is traveling on.
       | 
       | There is zero chance this tech will make it into sports cars
       | unless it can beat the weight of a magnesium or AL alloy rim.
       | Even casual vehicles like minivans have rim weight minimized for
       | comfort.
       | 
       | Not an expert :) just watched enough Donut media on youtubes :P
        
         | westmeal wrote:
         | One thing to add, while your wheels and tires are a big chunk
         | of the weight here - you also have the uprights/knuckle and the
         | wheel hub, bearing, brakes, rotor etc etc. All of that adds up
         | quick. Most times if you are looking to reduce this on a car
         | you will have the most gains (or losses haha) switching to an
         | aftermarket wheel. No wonder the manufacturers slapped alloys
         | on their cars too!
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | "The unsprung mass (colloquially unsprung weight) of a vehicle
         | is the mass of the suspension, wheels or tracks (as
         | applicable), and other components directly connected to them.
         | This contrasts with the sprung mass (or weight) supported by
         | the suspension, which includes the body and other components
         | within or attached to it. Components of the unsprung mass
         | include the wheel axles, wheel bearings, wheel hubs, tires, and
         | a portion of the weight of driveshafts, springs, shock
         | absorbers, and suspension links.
         | 
         | ...
         | 
         | The unsprung mass of a typical wheel/tire combination
         | represents a trade-off between the pair's bump-absorbing/road-
         | tracking ability and vibration isolation."
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsprung_mass
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-01-08 23:02 UTC)