[HN Gopher] Republishing my Simpsons fan site, twenty years later
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Republishing my Simpsons fan site, twenty years later
        
       Author : zebomon
       Score  : 192 points
       Date   : 2025-01-05 22:44 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bingeclock.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bingeclock.com)
        
       | Waterluvian wrote:
       | >I had more fun being creative online when the stakes were so low
       | that it seemed that just by playing I had already won something.
       | 
       | I've been thinking about this on and off a lot these past years.
       | 
       | I think part of it is that when your time has no value, nothing
       | you choose to do is a waste.
       | 
       | That's not to suggest your time needs to be worth nothing. But
       | that you stop perceiving your time as having intrinsic value. My
       | kids succeed where I fail all the time. They'll spend hours on
       | projects that have been done far better by other people already.
       | But they just don't think about those facts. They're not
       | relevant. Their time is not being valued in anything other than
       | the feeling of "I want to do this thing."
        
         | MPSimmons wrote:
         | We see opportunity cost as such a danger, and you're right, it
         | probably holds us back from enjoying life quite a lot.
        
         | pryelluw wrote:
         | Have you seen the Python Atlanta website ? https://pyatl.dev
         | 
         | I built it and it's pretty bad. Even with the power of the
         | Wordpress template I managed to make a bad website. But I spent
         | too much time thriving for perfection. And this one sort of
         | works which is better than a non existent site that might work
         | better.
         | 
         | Perfect is the enemy of done.
        
           | Waterluvian wrote:
           | Exactly.
           | 
           |  _Now_ I've seen it. And I've seen it because it exists. If
           | you didn't make it and never finished it, I wouldn't have
           | seen it.
        
             | pryelluw wrote:
             | This is the latest iteration after multiple Django based
             | rewrites. Last night I was looking into just running a wiki
             | but that would require more time, which I don't want to
             | spend. More important things to do like finding speakers
             | for the group events.
        
         | flpm wrote:
         | I think the problem is the pressure to "monetize" projects that
         | today's internet puts on everything: either monetize the
         | attention (ads) or by generating expertise (the "personal
         | brand"). Back then it was just for fun, so it looked and felt
         | more human and less corporative. We need to make the web human
         | again, specially now with generative AI.
        
         | unethical_ban wrote:
         | My dad has saved snippets from the newspaper that he read over
         | the years. One of those snippets he gave to me is stuck to my
         | refrigerator.
         | 
         | >What I strive for and to a degree achieve as a craftsman wood
         | turner has its roots in the idea expressed by Ralph Waldo
         | Emerson: The reward of a thing well done is to have done it."
         | This feeling cannot be abandoned. (Richard H. Montague, Groton,
         | Vt.)
         | 
         | I don't know what paper or magazine this came from, probably
         | Fine Woodworking, probably 1980s. It has the same spirit many
         | of us are talking about. The joy in doing something is doing
         | it, not making money on it or being the best at it. In the
         | Internet era, if you only take joy from being the best at a
         | hobby or task online, you will never be happy.
        
         | ToDougie wrote:
         | > My kids succeed where I fail all the time. They'll spend
         | hours on projects that have been done far better by other
         | people already. But they just don't think about those facts.
         | They're not relevant. Their time is not being valued in
         | anything other than the feeling of "I want to do this thing."
         | 
         | Watching my boys grab some paper and a marker and sweat quietly
         | over a desk for 30 minutes only to walk over and hand me some
         | crude drawing of "a little buddy I can put on my desk" always
         | has me rethinking my station in life. Maybe I shouldn't be so
         | tough on them.....
        
       | lathiat wrote:
       | Somehow, the (much less impressive) Star Trek fan site I created
       | in 2000 when I was 13 is _still_ online.
       | 
       | I've long since lost access to it but the freeservers mob I
       | hosted it with have somehow kept the sites from way back then all
       | around and online still to this day. It's a little painful and
       | factually incorrect (I called the movie Generations a series!)
       | but gives me a good laugh: http://stvoyager.iwarp.com/
        
         | pryelluw wrote:
         | I tried to sign the guestbook but could not. Didn't expect it
         | to work but would have been nice.
         | 
         | Wish guestbooks were still a thing. Visiting my site to find a
         | new message was always a treat.
        
           | lathiat wrote:
           | Ha ha thanks :) yeah the guest book was an external service.
           | Along with the image based hit counter :)
        
         | hypercube33 wrote:
         | These are the best. Thank you. anyone have any xfiles sites?
        
           | bitwize wrote:
           | I'm looking for a character shrine for Akane from _Ranma 1
           | /2_ myself.
        
             | Cthulhu_ wrote:
             | https://wiby.me/?q=Akane+Ranma came up with
             | https://geocities.restorativland.org/Tokyo/Pagoda/3879/,
             | does that count?
        
               | bitwize wrote:
               | That's perfect!
        
           | wil421 wrote:
           | Smoking man theories were the best!
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | Excellent work, ^-KewLGuY-^. I'd say that's the most "13-year-
         | old in the 2000s" nick ever, but that honor probably goes to
         | xXSephiroth666Xx. Yours is up there though.
         | 
         | Eric S. Raymond recently posted some xeets about how
         | retrocomputing nostalgia is due, in part, to wistfulness for
         | the Cambrian explosion in personal computers, where every
         | little two-bit company comes up with their own wildly different
         | design. The design space hadn't been fully explored yet, and
         | the future seemed pregnant with endless possibility. Then as
         | people figured out what worked and what didn't in the computer
         | design space, the PC sorta won, and it made much more sense to
         | build a PC clone and take advantage of the huge PC hardware and
         | software ecosystem. Raymond predicts that a similar coalescing
         | on proven designs will happen with 3D printers.
         | 
         | Of course, ESR believes in the need for government slightly
         | less than he believes in the need for redemption through the
         | blood of Christ the Saviour, so he overlooks a critical forcing
         | factor in this cycle of exploring the solution space followed
         | by settling on proven designs: regulation. Cars were much
         | cooler before the 1970s because the Clean Air Act was passed in
         | the 1970s. There was an initial struggle period during which
         | American autos shipped with anemic engines and features
         | designed to compensate for lack of performance, until
         | technologies like fuel injection became the norm, but again the
         | automakers coalesced into a set of a few designs that both
         | worked and fulfilled the obligations imposed by regulatory
         | bodies... to the point where it's awful hard to tell a Toyota
         | RAV-4 from a Honda CR-V just by looking.
         | 
         | I think the internet has gone through a similar exploratory vs.
         | coalescing phase. Back in the 90s and 2000s, HTML and PHP let
         | you create anything, so people created everything. And threw it
         | up on a server, and it was wonderful. So many individual
         | corners of the web with their authors' own perspectives. Now...
         | well, regulation is definitely coming but in the meantime there
         | are things with the force of regulatory bodies you have to
         | worry about. You HAVE to do https which means you need a
         | certificate. You HAVE to have a CDN and CloudFlare protection
         | or else you'll be slashdot-effected or DDoS'd to oblivion. You
         | can't even run an email server anymore without jumping through
         | the hoops it takes to convince major providers you're not a
         | spam farm. These are things you have to either think about
         | yourself or pay someone to think about them for you. So the web
         | has coalesced on a few best-practice designs and service
         | providers. And most people just set up Wix or Shopify pages or
         | Facebook groups anyway.
         | 
         | And that's why the 90s/2000s web has such nostalgic power. We
         | could do anything from our armchairs with a bit of HTML and
         | maybe some programming and sysadmin skills. But those days are
         | gone. Maybe we're better off for it.
        
           | toast0 wrote:
           | > You HAVE to do https which means you need a certificate.
           | 
           | This is kind of true, but, getting a cert isn't a big deal
           | anymore. If you're not a big company, a free cert works fine.
           | 
           | > You HAVE to have a CDN and CloudFlare protection or else
           | you'll be slashdot-effected or DDoS'd to oblivion.
           | 
           | DDoS is hard to manage, but otherwise it shouldn't be too
           | hard to handle a /. kind of event if your page is reasonable
           | and you make use of the abundance of modern computing... 1G
           | cheap hosting is out there.
           | 
           | > You can't even run an email server anymore without jumping
           | through the hoops it takes to convince major providers you're
           | not a spam farm.
           | 
           | Yeah, this one sucks a lot. But, email is dead, so...
        
             | MrVandemar wrote:
             | > But, email is dead, so...
             | 
             | What an extraordinary claim!
             | 
             | My job, today, is dealing with a vast influx of various
             | types of email that all need categorising and a range of
             | different actions. Not very dead at all from where I'm
             | standing.
        
               | Cthulhu_ wrote:
               | It's like claiming Skype is dead but my last job was at a
               | small company with many international customers and Skype
               | was still their daily driver for international calls.
        
               | metalman wrote:
               | I see the above discussion as a describing a process,
               | very much like evolution, with web sites bieng the
               | species of interest, and how they are bieng shaped by,
               | internal competition, for resouces (and prey), errr food,
               | preditors, parisites, and environomental changes. neat!
        
               | noirscape wrote:
               | Email will never die, no matter how much most people want
               | it to do so. The protocol is arguably the best proof of
               | "worse is better", which is why it's held out for so
               | long.
        
               | afpx wrote:
               | Unless there's something important, I check my email
               | about once a week these days. Otherwise it's just for
               | authentication.
        
               | ta1243 wrote:
               | Work vs leisure.
               | 
               | I rarely send emails for leisure, but I send and receive
               | dozens a day for work, both internal and external.
        
               | Dalewyn wrote:
               | Depending on if you work or not, I feel there's a _bigly_
               | dissonance in the perceived prevalence of email, phone
               | calls, and other such traditional(?) channels of
               | communique.
               | 
               | Most of them have clearly died in private life, but in
               | the professional life you will be literally worthless if
               | you aren't reachable by email, telephone, snail mail,
               | perhaps even the fax machine.
        
             | Aardwolf wrote:
             | > Yeah, this one sucks a lot. But, email is dead, so...
             | 
             | Really? These days, can't even login to some services (like
             | Steam) without them sending you an email to confirm the
             | login (some services even do this even if you already have
             | other 2FA...)
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | The DS9 theme MP3 is still functional!
        
         | na4ma4 wrote:
         | It's kinda funny how your site has outlasted most of the sites
         | on the Links page :)
        
         | rapind wrote:
         | The good internet is alive! You just can't find it is all
         | (google).
        
         | bamboozled wrote:
         | I wish this was still what the internet was and not a bunch of
         | walled garden xitter links I'll never ever read.
         | 
         | I love your website. You've inspired my to put my blog back
         | online in 2025 and document some of the things I plan to build.
        
           | fsflover wrote:
           | > I wish this was still what the internet was
           | 
           | Here you go: https://wiby.me.
        
             | Cthulhu_ wrote:
             | I've got the "surprise me" link bookmarked for a random
             | distraction, it's great!
        
             | bamboozled wrote:
             | Incredibly cool, thanks
        
         | Tomte wrote:
         | I'm so happy the Lurker's Guide
         | (http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/) is also still online.
        
           | tessellated wrote:
           | I was there, when it was still in creation.
           | 
           | jms is such a treasure. Listening to his autobiography,
           | narrated by Peter Jurasik, is wholeheartedly recommended.
        
         | tobiasbischoff wrote:
         | OMG thats cringe
        
         | ben_w wrote:
         | Ah, I remember that colour scheme. I used similar in my goth
         | phase, when I had a geocities page.
        
         | wil421 wrote:
         | My old website had a bunch of random stuff about DBZ. I still
         | can't figure out how to find my old geocities site.
        
           | lkbm wrote:
           | If you remember the neighborhood(?)
           | https://geocities.restorativland.org/ may help, since you can
           | browse through screenshots+titles by neighborhood.
           | 
           | But I remember my exact address, and it's not there.
           | Archive.org has it, but you'll need your exact address.
        
         | SilasX wrote:
         | Our rival high school's debate/drama team made a website c.
         | 1999, and by some miracle, Tripod keeps it up:
         | 
         | https://mcneilforensics.tripod.com
        
         | coffeecantcode wrote:
         | This rocks, love finding stuff like this.
         | 
         | It appears the domain you used for your guestbook has been pass
         | off to some sort of pharmaceutical information page in
         | Scandinavia, I found that funny.
        
       | santoshalper wrote:
       | Nice nostalgia piece overall, but I especially enjoyed this line:
       | "The distinction between noise and signal becomes decreasingly
       | apparent the further one gets from their source."
       | 
       | Very succinct and insightful. I will use that in the future.
        
         | zebomon wrote:
         | Thank you for your kind words!
        
       | ethagnawl wrote:
       | Tangential but timely: I haven't watched the Simpsons regularly
       | in about 20 years. However, my internal clock still sounds an
       | alarm every Sunday night about 15 mins before showtime.
        
         | macintux wrote:
         | You've reminded me of how intensely frustrating it was to be a
         | fan of a TV show pre-WWW and pre-streaming, when networks would
         | shuffle shows between different days and times, trying to find
         | the perfect lineup (or trying to accelerate the demise of an
         | underperforming series).
        
           | Scoundreller wrote:
           | In Toronto, we had a slight advantage where the TV channel
           | that played most of the Fox content (Global TV on NTSC
           | channel 6) bled into the tunable FM range so you could at
           | least listen to it on your car radio (or any FM radio for
           | that matter).
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/87.7_FM
        
             | ethagnawl wrote:
             | That is so cool. I'd not heard of this "phenomenon" before.
        
               | macintux wrote:
               | I ran into this a couple of different ways growing up.
               | 
               | As with Toronto, on some FM radios I could catch a local
               | Indianapolis TV station. Don't remember which station
               | off-hand.
               | 
               | More concerning, on my boombox, I discovered that could
               | pick up some local cordless phone calls in my
               | neighborhood.
        
       | stavros wrote:
       | I rehosted my Tolkien fanpage from 1999 or so:
       | https://tolkien.stavros.io
       | 
       | I also have my personal website from back then somewhere.
        
         | exitb wrote:
         | This is the most responsive website I've visited in a long
         | while.
        
           | stavros wrote:
           | Well, it is the finest artisanal HTML the 90s had to offer.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | Resources like the Simpsons Archive aka SNPP, the episode
       | capsules particularly, which are just a collection of lengthy
       | text files written decades ago but filled with treasure trove of
       | insights and searchable references/quotes, are one of the rare
       | simple gems of the Internet that I hope last forever.
        
         | zebomon wrote:
         | I hope so too! Jouni is still active and recruiting maintainers
         | here: https://simpsonsarchive.com/about.html
        
         | stuartd wrote:
         | I hadn't realised this had resurfaced after snpp.com went down!
         | Pleased to see I'm still listed as a contributor to the
         | computer list -
         | https://www.simpsonsarchive.com/guides/computers.file.html
        
       | 101008 wrote:
       | This touches me so deeply... I had a similar experience in the
       | sense that I too created a fansite for something I really enjoyed
       | back then (first with Frontpage, then iframes, then PHP), and now
       | that evolved a lot and I kind of become an expert on that (and a
       | business on itself, I am generous!)
       | 
       | But while I was doing that, being a 10 years old, my best friend
       | had his own Simpson fansite, so this triggered a lot of
       | nostalgia. I when I visited yoru website and I saw the Buttons
       | sections, oh my god. I wanted to cry. Thank you so much, I don't
       | know how to thank you. I'm in love with the fansites from
       | 2000-2005, and this was a trip.
        
         | zebomon wrote:
         | You are very welcome! It makes me so happy to hear that I could
         | add a little to your day. Frontpage was my first IDE as well!
        
       | runsonrum wrote:
       | I love it! I will take a closer look at some stage.
       | 
       | I have a full set of the Burger King promo figures still in the
       | plastic which I just recently pulled out of storage box to show
       | my young son.
        
       | qup wrote:
       | The first website I ever built, where I learned HTML, was a
       | Goldeneye 007 N64 fan site. I had all the cheats, all the
       | walkthroughs, all the funny jokes and animated gifs. I misspelled
       | "license to kill" in the url I created at angelfire.
       | 
       | Angelfire has a lot of sites from back then (~1999?), but not
       | mine.
       | 
       | The site wasn't even that bad by modern standards. Had a frames
       | layout, vertical frame on the left for the nav. I didn't know
       | about server side includes yet.
        
         | amatecha wrote:
         | Nice! If you remember the full URL, it's very possible it's on
         | archive.org. My first couple websites are on there, fortunately
         | (or unfortunately, considering how dorky they are hahah)
        
           | qup wrote:
           | I've looked extensively, I don't think it exists. I can't
           | remember exactly how I misspelled it, though, so there's this
           | little glimmer of hope in my mind still.
        
             | amatecha wrote:
             | ahh dang! maybe you've got the URL in an old email
             | somewhere? only thing I could think of... fingers crossed
             | for you!
        
         | NoboruWataya wrote:
         | Mine was a Linkin Park fan website, also hosted on Angelfire
         | from around then. IIRC frames were the subject of a holy war at
         | the time. I thought they were magical and had the same frames
         | layout as you, but read a lot of stuff about how they were
         | awful design so I created both frames and noframes pages (the
         | latter having the nav bar across the top).
         | 
         | It was a lot of fun. When I discovered JS I started playing
         | around with alerts, which surely would have driven my visitors
         | mad if I had any.
        
           | mettamage wrote:
           | I definitely drove my visitors mad with my DBZ website. When
           | I started making my Linkin Park website, I made the layout in
           | photoshop
        
             | qup wrote:
             | Flaming text was all the rage then. I had a page about how
             | to do that on my E/N website. In paint shop pro
        
       | waltbosz wrote:
       | When I created the website for the Ultimate Simpsons Doom II mod,
       | I published it at tripod.com. It's still there 22 years later
       | https://waltersgameboy.tripod.com/simpdoom/
       | 
       | I miss the old Internet.
        
       | ryanwhitney wrote:
       | > I vaguely knew C++ to be the more powerful language but
       | regardless of that, it seemed cursed because it was more steps
       | away than PHP from building things that I could put on the
       | internet.
       | 
       | Still true!
        
       | amatecha wrote:
       | Random "early web Simpsons memory": in 1995 when I was taking a
       | course to learn HTML, I had a great time browsing the web with
       | "super-fast" ISDN (this was amazing at the time), and downloaded
       | the Itchy & Scratchy song, in .au format. The filename was
       | itchscra.au -- pretty sure I remember this because I spent so
       | long trying to embed the audio into my web page and make it
       | automatically play, which I don't think I ever got working haha
        
       | viccis wrote:
       | Tables were big for web design back then but tbh a lot of modern
       | CSS frameworks remind me a lot of that old school table design.
        
       | yapyap wrote:
       | So this is the homegrown Simpsons stuff people are talking about
        
       | torgeros wrote:
       | Huge shout-out to your dad for being a stay-at-home _dad_ in the
       | 00s!
        
         | zebomon wrote:
         | He was definitely ahead of his time then, and even more so in
         | the 90s!
        
       | MrsPeaches wrote:
       | Love the "Match-Ups" page:
       | 
       | https://gardnermcintyre.com/simpsonszip/view.php?page=matchu...
        
         | zebomon wrote:
         | Thank you! I remember having a great time putting that one
         | together!
        
       | dustincoates wrote:
       | My first website was a baseball fan site in the late 90s. I
       | discovered Google that way, because I had somehow reached the #1
       | result for "perfect game baseball" and got a lot of traffic
       | thanks to David Wells (or Cone, can't remember which).
       | 
       | The web was so amateur back then, that I even got an email from a
       | sports journalist asking if I accepted submissions from
       | freelancers.
        
       | elzbardico wrote:
       | Every time I am presented with something like that that reminisce
       | me of the 90's web, its innocence, and the unlimited potential it
       | presented, I am brought back to Jaron's Lenier book, "You are not
       | a gadget" and this often-cited quote out of it:
       | 
       | "If you want to know what's really going on in a society or
       | ideology, follow the money. If money is flowing to advertising
       | instead of musicians, journalists, and artists, then a society is
       | more concerned with manipulation than truth or beauty. If content
       | is worthless, then people will start to become empty-headed and
       | contentless"
        
         | JustBreath wrote:
         | Was there a time or place in where money flowed to musicians,
         | journalists, and artists instead of their managers?
        
       | boutell wrote:
       | Main content of each page not loading for me - maybe it's Flash?
        
         | zebomon wrote:
         | There were a few Flash tidbits buried as downloads I took down,
         | but the main content should all display, as it's just PHP
         | rolling out HTML aside from the rollover up top that uses JS.
        
       | tfinch wrote:
       | Thanks to oocities.org the ska-punk band I was in at school still
       | has it's glorious table based design
       | https://www.oocities.org/peat_bog_man/
        
       | ta1243 wrote:
       | Sadly my first major site (with a four-letter dot-com and
       | everything) went down before internet archive got to it.
       | 
       | The first, and indeed only, site I did for cash, dating back to
       | early 1997, was still hosted by claranet until 2009 - well after
       | the shop had bust
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-01-06 23:01 UTC)