[HN Gopher] Guide to mechanical keyboards
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Guide to mechanical keyboards
        
       Author : Bluestein
       Score  : 205 points
       Date   : 2024-12-25 09:47 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
        
       | bloopernova wrote:
       | (2022)
        
         | ethbr1 wrote:
         | I was wondering why it was a useful article on Ars...
        
         | imp0cat wrote:
         | Oh, is that why Hall-effect keyboards got no mention?
        
           | blacksmith_tb wrote:
           | They do, as "analog" - but it's more of a brush off than any
           | real discussion. What they didn't really talk about at all is
           | firmware, which seems like a big omission...
        
       | contrarian1234 wrote:
       | I guess it's a matter of habit, but after so many years of laptop
       | keyboards everything else feels weird/wrong. I've tried
       | mechanical keyboards (for about half ayear) .. and it always felt
       | like using some antique typewriter b/c of the key travel
       | 
       | If I need a detached keyboard then the only one that feels normal
       | is the Apple Magickeyboard b/c it's exactly like a laptop and
       | clicky (the logitech equivalents are very mushy). Wish there was
       | one with standard/Windows keys
        
         | Groxx wrote:
         | I definitely prefer the lower travel distance. Personally I
         | find it much less tiring / RSI-inducing than a normal
         | mechanical keyboard / cherry MX switches. I'm not heavily
         | bottoming out or anything that are frequent "have you
         | tried...", and "just don't bottom out lol" doesn't work for me
         | - I've experimented for nearly a decade now, I'm pretty
         | confident. Long travel distances are definitely not for me.
         | 
         | I've got a custom keyboard with choc low-profile switches, and
         | I like it _a lot_ better. It 's about mid-way between an Apple
         | and a cherry MX, and I'm not sure I notice or care to get any
         | lower distance since these are so easy to find. Unfortunately
         | I'll have to go a lot more custom to get that in a Kinesis
         | Advantage/Dactyl-like setup, and I haven't done that yet.
         | 
         | I do prefer MX key _caps_ though (DSA profile, or roughly), the
         | smaller center and deeper curve seems to help me calibrate
         | better. Choc caps often lean hard into the low-profile thing
         | and are very flat, and I 'm not super fond of that.
        
           | wellthisisgreat wrote:
           | If you like those kind of keycaps try MT3 MiTO keycaps, I
           | have the same preference - sculpted keycaps with smaller
           | centers center and those are my endgame
        
             | Groxx wrote:
             | Do they have choc versions? All I'm seeing is MX... though
             | google's fu has grown weak so it might just be that it's
             | being drowned out by Drop at the moment.
        
         | plagiarist wrote:
         | Even the low profile switches? I, too, have acquired the taste
         | for laptop keyboards, but I think the LP switches are nice.
        
         | eknkc wrote:
         | I got into the hype and bought multiple mechanical keyboards a
         | couple years ago. Finally went back to Apple's magic keyboard.
         | Touch id was a large factor but apparently I love those chiclet
         | keyboards.
        
           | AnthonBerg wrote:
           | Apple keyboards: yes. I so rarely see a preference stated
           | that matches my own that I am compelled to spend a full
           | comment in agreement.
           | 
           | I think part of it is that the keyboard itself is thin.
           | There's less of a physical object to raise forearms and
           | contort wrists over.
        
             | patrickkidger wrote:
             | Likewise, spending another comment just to agree. Both on
             | the low profile and the low travel distance.
             | 
             | I've tried low-profile chocs and they still have too much
             | travel! But I'm stuck with them as split keyboards are
             | important for me just for the usual collection of wrist
             | health reasons.
             | 
             | So I'm just waiting for Apple to make a split keyboard I
             | guess :)
        
               | maratc wrote:
               | M1242 but it has too much travel by modern standards.
        
               | AnthonBerg wrote:
               | I have sincerely been considering a bandsaw and a
               | soldering iron! To find out how hard it is to split a
               | keyboard that's already in one piece and have it remain
               | working.
        
           | wildrhythms wrote:
           | Every few years I try a mech keyboard, but I always come back
           | to the Magic Keyboard. It's just way more comfortable, quiet,
           | and I feel like my fingers are more nimble and less strained
           | when I use it.
        
         | SparkyMcUnicorn wrote:
         | If you wanted to try again, take a look at the Nuphy Air75 v2.
         | Maybe with the Aloe or Cowberry switches.
         | 
         | I feel like you can always find a mechanical that you like, no
         | matter how particular you are. It's just whether or not you
         | want to go down the rabbit hole.
        
           | mmphosis wrote:
           | It's a very preferential opinion because keyboards can be
           | such a personal thing. I used the Nuphy Air75 v2 for a week,
           | and it is the best keyboard that I've ever used. I really
           | like that particular layout: Ctrl Opt Cmd,the arrow keys
           | tucked into the right Shift key and the Del key just to the
           | right of the Backspace key.
           | https://nuphy.com/products/air75-v2?variant=40635218133101
        
             | maratc wrote:
             | Stuffing things to the right of the Enter key? So the Enter
             | key is not "in the vertical middle of the right-most area"
             | anymore? This would mean I can't position my finger
             | _reliably_ over the Enter key anymore, and would need to
             | either _guess_ or _look_?
             | 
             | That would be a hard "No" for me (with an addition of "Why
             | would _anyone ever_ want to use that? ", but I understand
             | that tastes differ).
             | 
             | P.S. And don't even get me started on the arrow keys
             | smashed into the rest so not only Enter/Backspace/Right
             | Shift positioning is gone for me but the arrow keys
             | positioning is gone too.
             | 
             | P.P.S. If people like it it's fine, not everything in the
             | world should be conforming to my personal taste, but that
             | picture where they have the keyboard positioned over the
             | MacBook keyboard and the top of the trackpad (and a mouse
             | to the side) just leaves me completely flabbergasted.
        
               | mplewis wrote:
               | Why are you picking your hands up to hit the enter key?
               | Use your pinkie. It doesn't move.
        
               | maratc wrote:
               | My pinkie is what I use for Backspace, Enter, and Right
               | Shift. It resides half on the aluminum, half on plastic.
               | Plastic is a bit taller, and aluminum is a bit cooler --
               | if I feel that, I know it's in the right spot
               | horizontally. When I move it for an occasional apostrophe
               | (e.g. a moment ago for typing "it's"), I need to put it
               | back in the right position. With an additional set of
               | keys on the right, I can't position it properly without
               | looking at the keyboard.
        
           | ako wrote:
           | I also use an Nuphy air 75, it's really nice. Would upgrade
           | to a mechanical, 75%, low profile, split, Hall effect,
           | wireless, kmq-via keyboard but haven't found it yet...
        
             | SparkyMcUnicorn wrote:
             | Indeed, that does not appear to exist. NuPhy Air75 HE is
             | probably closest, but it's not split.
             | 
             | https://keeb-
             | finder.com/keyboards?ms_layoutSize=75%25%2COthe...
        
         | Tempest1981 wrote:
         | > Wish there was one with standard/Windows keys
         | 
         | Same. Anyone find a low-travel non-mushy keyboard for Windows?
         | Ideally with spacing between every 4 function keys?
        
           | analog31 wrote:
           | I'm quite happy with Dell wireless keyboards, that I got as
           | cast-offs. One is a KM7321W. A drawback is that their
           | peripheral manager (which allows you to do things like
           | reassign keyboards and mice to the little dongles) only seems
           | to run on Dell machines. They've also got Bluetooth.
           | 
           | If nothing else, they come with Dell machines, so if you're
           | in a typical corporate environment, somebody might have one
           | and let you try it.
        
         | cuanim wrote:
         | I recommend trying out Redragon Horus K261, it took a while to
         | get used to but I like it a lot now. It's a low profile keyb.
        
         | nerdjon wrote:
         | I agree with this... mostly.
         | 
         | A couple times I have tried doing some engineering related task
         | on my desktop with a mechanical keyboard and it just felt
         | wrong. It felt like I was moving my fingers too much. Kinda the
         | same if I do any amount of serious typing.
         | 
         | On the flip side though, the couple of times I have tried
         | gaming on a laptop it also felt wrong.
         | 
         | So I have come to view keyboards the same way I view gaming
         | controllers, it all depends on what I am doing and I will use
         | the best input method for a particular task/game/etc.
        
         | maratc wrote:
         | Agreed 100%. The best keyboard for me is the one on my MacBook.
         | It adds a grand total of 0 dollars to the cost of my system,
         | and a grand total of 0 grams to the weight of my backpack. It's
         | there for me when I stand, when I sit on a sofa, or when I
         | check something on an occasional train. It needs no cables, and
         | its batteries are never empty. The distance between the
         | keyboard and the pointing device control area is so short that
         | I don't need to move much when switching between the keyboard
         | and the pointing device; I can also position the hand in a
         | manner where some fingers can type at the same time that other
         | fingers can control the pointing device.
         | 
         | It doesn't help that most mechanical keyboards also start by
         | tinkering with the layout, for reasons I can't even begin to
         | understand. For example, I don't _look_ at my keyboard much,
         | relying on fingers to position themselves, and on some tactile
         | feedback from the keyboard. Arrow keys, for instance, are these
         | with some _negative space_ above them, so my fingers can use
         | that negative space to nail the position. Most mechanical
         | keyboards just slam the arrow keys into the bulk of all the
         | others, so if I use that I need to look at the keyboard every
         | time I want to use the arrow keys. (There was some unfortunate
         | period in Apple 's history where they made the left and right
         | arrow keys full-size and eliminated the negative space,
         | rendering that keyboards harder to use for me; I skipped these
         | machines until they got back to sanity.)
        
         | maeil wrote:
         | > the Apple Magickeyboard b/c it's exactly like a laptop and
         | clicky
         | 
         | I'm being super pedantic, but it's not, the switches and
         | especially keycaps are different from what they use in e.g. a
         | Macbook Air (and not just in size). For 99% they'll be close
         | enough, but for me this makes the magic keyboard a no-go.
         | 
         | I'm still looking for the holy grail, an external keyboard
         | that's a near copy of the Macbook keyboard. I'd be willing to
         | spend $500+ on it, but haven't found anything. Or, similarly, a
         | keyboard that is even softer and lower travel than the Macbook
         | keyboard. Nothing seems to have a similar actuation profile. I
         | once found a website that showed actuation profiles through
         | graphs, where you could pick from dozens of switches - none of
         | them had a similar profile. Wonder why, is it hard to make? Is
         | there really no market? Patents?
        
           | 972811 wrote:
           | have you tried the logitech mx keys mini? it's really similar
           | for me
        
       | casenmgreen wrote:
       | I hear insanely positive reviews of Hall effect, on the basis of
       | being able to have different key behaviours _depending how far
       | down you press the key_.
       | 
       | So simple example, in a game, walk is a half press and run is a
       | full press.
       | 
       | You could imagine also semi-colon a half press and full colon
       | from a full press.
        
         | jsheard wrote:
         | While you _can_ assign multiple actions to one key with hall
         | effect, the biggest benefit (for gaming at least) is what they
         | call rapid trigger actuation. The idea is that instead of the
         | key triggering and releasing at a specific point in its travel,
         | it reacts to a _change in direction_ so you can instantly
         | switch from pressed to released or vice versa at any point in
         | the keys travel.
        
         | wellthisisgreat wrote:
         | I've been eyeing a Hall effect board, but having used
         | Swiftpoint Z mouse which has that pressure-based activation on
         | several buttons, I must admit it's the kind of feature that's
         | good on paper.
         | 
         | At least for me, it's pretty hard to consistent reproduce "half
         | press" and "full press" and if I wanted to do a "long press" I
         | can easily set it up in QMK for any mechanical keyboard
        
           | minimaxir wrote:
           | With hall effect keyboards you can set the starting actuation
           | of a "half press".
           | 
           | e.g. a start actuation of 0.5mm and full press of 3.0mm gives
           | enough room to avoid false positive full presses.
        
         | AnthonBerg wrote:
         | I just want one to use as a MIDI keyboard.
         | 
         | I'm a tracker kid. Jeskola Buzz ftw. Give me velocity-sensitive
         | QWERTY and I will finally be complete.
        
           | Bluestein wrote:
           | > velocity-sensitive QWERTY
           | 
           | Gosh. Would have never considered such a thing ...
           | 
           | PS. Also, perhaps, coupled with some sort of OSD-autocomplete
           | based on key press velocity ...
           | 
           | ... could be interesting just for typing. Messy, but
           | interesting ...
        
           | d12345m wrote:
           | Yes! Also, if I could use a rotary encoder knob to input midi
           | cc information, I'd be happy.
        
           | __turbobrew__ wrote:
           | > velocity-sensitive QWERTY
           | 
           | I would love to have a keyboard where if you hit the switches
           | hard it automatically capitalizes the character. Then those
           | late night nerd rages will be naturally in all caps as the
           | switches are slammed in fury.
        
         | minimaxir wrote:
         | I am extremely happy with the new Keychron K2 HE
         | (https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-k2-he-wireless-
         | ma...) and am surprised hall effect keyboards didn't get
         | mentioned in the original post. Even if the advantages are more
         | gamer-oriented, setting low actuation distances and getting
         | immediate keypress response is also a productivity plus, after
         | getting practice to avoid making typos when you'd normally lay
         | your fingers on other keys.
         | 
         | The one-key-multiple-actions is useful but also does require
         | some muscle memory tweaks.
        
           | casenmgreen wrote:
           | Ah, Keychron.
           | 
           | I looked at getting one of theirs.
           | 
           | The web-site is insanely confusing and completely fails to
           | explain the differences between keyboards. It took _two days_
           | of work to figure out what was going on and how keyboards
           | varies and so which model I actually wanted.
           | 
           | I also found their site condescending and annoying - stupid
           | banners which were permanently present on product pages on
           | every little keyboard image saying I can't remember what now
           | - something like "selling quickly so buy now". They're not
           | there any more, far as I can see, so I can't check. Maybe
           | someone else remembers them?
        
             | minimaxir wrote:
             | Granted, you can get it at Best Buy/Amazon if you're not a
             | fan of the Keychron site:
             | https://www.bestbuy.com/site/keychron-k2-he-75-custom-
             | wirele...
             | 
             | Unfortunately the world of mechanical keyboards is indeed
             | that nuanced.
        
             | tmtvl wrote:
             | I dunno, I bought a KeyChron K10 Pro a couple of months ago
             | and I found it pretty easy to look for the things I wanted
             | (2 super keys, 100% layout).
        
             | drillsteps5 wrote:
             | Keychron keyboard was the only one I decided to return when
             | I had this hobby (I bought maybe 4 or 5 total). I believe
             | it was Q-series from about 2020/2021. It was either full or
             | slightly smaller but did not work well with Linux, and was
             | inexplicably missing ScrollLock button (which incidentally
             | is a hotkey used to switch devices on my KVM). I mean, the
             | button was there, but had a different function and I wasn't
             | able to make it work.
             | 
             | Looks like the ones listed currently are compatible with
             | Linux (still missing the ScrollLock though), just take your
             | time to review before buying something that might not work
             | with your setup.
        
         | vunderba wrote:
         | Whenever I think about buying one, I can't find one that's got
         | a simple way to have it detect as a game controller so that I
         | can easily read the actuation force or a velocity when a user
         | presses a key.
         | 
         | If there was a simple way to do this, it would make a really
         | fun experimental input peripheral tool.
        
         | GuB-42 wrote:
         | Analog pushbuttons tend not to have much success. The original
         | Street Fighter for instance could select between
         | light/medium/heavy attacks based on how hard you pushed
         | buttons. It didn't last long before they got back to the
         | familiar 6 button layout with simple switches.
         | 
         | The Playstation 2 had analog pushbuttons, essentially no one
         | used them. Even analog triggers are mostly used as simple
         | switches. Apple discontinued force touch too.
         | 
         | There is an advantage to Hall effect sensors for gaming
         | keyboards though. It is that they don't have a set actuation
         | point and it allows for a feature called "rapid trigger",
         | greatly improving reactivity and tapping speed. It is
         | particularly important for games like OSU!
        
         | moondev wrote:
         | My dream is for the following:
         | 
         | - low profile hall effect switch - mx stems - tactile - quiet
         | or almost silent - adjusting the actuation actually adjusts the
         | travel
         | 
         | So the last item you could set up an ultra "short throw" switch
         | 
         | I have gotten close by making a frakenswitch of multiple
         | switches, but would be amazing to programmatically create this
        
       | hummerbliss wrote:
       | I use split keyboards and finding a mechanical split keyboard
       | without the ortho linear configuration seem to be hard. I just
       | want a mechanical split keyboard with hot swappable keys with
       | staggered (normal) keyboard.
        
         | baumy wrote:
         | I bit the bullet and got used to column staggered layouts but I
         | feel your pain. Some options that I found when I was down this
         | rabbit hole:
         | 
         | https://ultimatehackingkeyboard.com/ (my personal favorite)
         | 
         | https://keeb.io/products/cepstrum-keyboard-pre-built
         | 
         | https://keeb.io/products/quefrency-keyboard-pre-built
         | 
         | https://keeb.io/products/sinc-keyboard-pre-built
         | 
         | https://dygma.com/pages/dygma-raise-2
         | 
         | https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q11-qmk-custom-me...
        
           | jsheard wrote:
           | Another one if you're up for a project to put it together:
           | https://nullbits.co/snap/
        
           | Forricide wrote:
           | I use a Cepstrum (bought a kit + switches + keycaps and put
           | it together; there's no soldering required, so it's quite
           | easy). I never 3D printed tenting, so it's not quite perfect
           | for normal typing, but for gaming it's fantastic - I don't
           | think I can go back to non low-profile switches.
        
           | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
           | Does the ultimate hacking keyboard have some kind of
           | encryption to provide security/privacy for wireless
           | connections? I've not used a wireless keyboard before.
        
         | wlesieutre wrote:
         | Give the UHK a look
         | 
         | https://ultimatehackingkeyboard.com/
        
           | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
           | Does the ultimate hacking keyboard have some kind of
           | encryption to provide security/privacy for wireless
           | connections? I've not used a wireless keyboard before.
        
             | mondalaci wrote:
             | Yes, the UHK 80 uses BLE security level 4.
        
         | Symbiote wrote:
         | I reformatted an existing list of split keyboards into a
         | gallery some time ago: https://aposymbiont.github.io/split-
         | keyboards/ -- you can filter for "traditional" layout.
         | 
         | I've not been actively keeping the site up-to-date. I merge PRs
         | every so often, but I'm not following Reddit/Discord/etc to add
         | new keyboards.
        
         | sockbot wrote:
         | Kinesis makes regular layout split keyboards.
        
           | muststopmyths wrote:
           | I own a freestyle RGB split keyboard and it's the best I've
           | used since the OG Microsoft Natural kyboards for ergonomics.
           | 
           | They're also comparatively better priced than others of its
           | kind.
        
             | snozolli wrote:
             | _best I 've used since the OG Microsoft Natural kyboards_
             | 
             | The Microsoft Natural keyboards were an ergonomic
             | nightmare. The cheap, sliding post keys would have varying
             | resistance depending on how close to the center your finger
             | landed, and how vertically you applied pressure.
             | 
             | Also, the keys were arranged over a hump. The dished design
             | of a Kinesis has much better ergonomics.
        
         | Groxx wrote:
         | Kinesis generally makes good stuff, and this one has normal
         | cherry MX switches so you've got access to nearly any keycap
         | you want: https://kinesis-ergo.com/shop/freestyle-pro/
        
         | wellthisisgreat wrote:
         | keeb.io keyboards are the best for that kind of thing. I ended
         | up going the ortho route and designed my own keyboard (I needed
         | extra columns as all the ergo split orthos end at ; key)
         | 
         | But before that I bought all the non-ortho splits (Kinesis,
         | Goldtouch, etc.)and keeb.io were by far the most versatile. I
         | recommend Quefrency for compact layout (my fav is V3 where you
         | could still customize the bottom row) and Sinc for regular
         | size. I used Quefrency when traveling and Sinc in the office.
         | Happy to answer any questions!
        
         | ivanjermakov wrote:
         | Any reason to not go with column-stagger? It felt good
         | immediately after a decade on traditional row-stagger
         | keyboards.
        
       | ashton314 wrote:
       | The most important thing to look for (imo) is _programmability_.
       | You want a board that supports QMK or ZMK firmware. This lets you
       | set up stuff like mod-tap, macros, mouse keys, etc. Mod tap is my
       | favorite thing ergonomics-wise: v and m act as shift when held,
       | normal letters when tapped. Really takes the strain off my
       | pinkies. I also like having a navigation layer: hjkl in this
       | layer act like vim-layout arrow keys.
       | 
       | I use a ZSA Moonlander. Best investment ever.
        
         | mikae1 wrote:
         | _> The most important thing to look for (imo) is
         | programmability._
         | 
         | This. In Plasma I swap some keys, but when I switch to TTY the
         | keys are not swapped. Frustrating. This should clearly be done
         | at hardware/firmware level.
        
           | wongogue wrote:
           | Have you tried Kmonad?
        
           | KetoManx64 wrote:
           | Check out keymapper, it let's you rebind keys and intercepts
           | keystrokes before the application receives them:
           | https://github.com/houmain/keymapper
        
           | Klathmon wrote:
           | As someone who switches between macos and windows on a daily
           | basis, custom keyboard firmware has been such a game changer!
           | 
           | QMK can auto detect the OS and can easily remap some keys
           | based on it, and since it's baked in the firmware it'll work
           | with any program on any machine I plug it into!
        
         | eviks wrote:
         | I think physical ergonomics is still way more important (so
         | staggered splits with thumb cluster or even gloves)
         | 
         | So even with bad firmware you could move shift to a thumb key,
         | which is better than V
         | 
         | But even with all the programmability you wouldn't be able to
         | overcome the rsi-inducing design of the regular block when
         | typing regular letters
        
         | XorNot wrote:
         | The Logitech K740 is hands down my favourite keyboard ever, but
         | it's out of production.
         | 
         | The problem is the replacement is wireless and much thicker to
         | accommodate that.
         | 
         | I tried the Logitech G915 but I like a full-size keyboard, they
         | put the stupid "G" keys on it and it completely ruins the
         | ergonomics for me.
        
           | throwup238 wrote:
           | I hate the G915. I didn't realize it before I bought one but
           | my left hand indexes off of left CTRL and that extra column
           | of G keys destroys my ability to use the keyboard because I'm
           | always one column off.
        
         | tuffff wrote:
         | Oh hi, another Moonlander connoisseur!
         | 
         | I love mine. The layout, the adjustments, the thumb cluster,
         | the firmware. I put the navigation onto asdf to have a
         | numblock-layer under my right hand.
         | 
         | Only negative is my cat managed to break the rather flimsy
         | plastic around the thumb cluster screw and I had to lay it flat
         | until I put something more solid under it to stabilize.
        
         | jwr wrote:
         | Another good option is one of the UHK (Ultimate Hacking
         | Keyboard) keyboards -- I've been using them for years now and
         | I'm very happy with them. The huge customizability is a big
         | plus for me, especially as I use multiple operating systems:
         | the ability to quickly switch the keyboard to generate Linux-
         | friendly sequences (for things such as moving windows or
         | switching between workspaces) makes life much easier.
         | 
         | https://ultimatehackingkeyboard.com
        
         | Findecanor wrote:
         | In addition, get QMK with Via[0] or Vial[1] support compiled
         | in! Then you could edit the keyboard configuration in a web
         | browser (that supports WebUSB and WebAssembly), and you don't
         | have to compile and flash the firmware every time you want to
         | make a change.
         | 
         | 0: https://www.caniusevia.com/
         | 
         | 1: https://get.vial.today/
        
           | yosef123 wrote:
           | That is true, however, one thing to keep in mind, is that
           | these tools like Via / Vial, will always be limited compared
           | to a fully fledged programming language like C with and its
           | QMK framework. Something that I only realized after the fact.
        
         | onemoresoop wrote:
         | The moonlander looks a bit intimidating. How long did it take
         | to transition from a standard kb?
        
           | sbrother wrote:
           | I'm sure plenty of people had no trouble -- but personally I
           | bought one after a shoulder surgery hoping I could use it to
           | type without having to move my hands together, and I failed
           | to ever get to the point where I could comfortably type with
           | it. After trying for a couple weeks, I bought a Keychron Q11
           | QMK -- this is also split but with an otherwise standard
           | layout -- and had no issues learning it. I actually still use
           | it on my primary workstation even though I can physically use
           | a normal keyboard.
        
             | onemoresoop wrote:
             | Yeah, staggered rows of keys is what my muscle memory knows
             | and whay I wouldn't mess with it. Maybe for new generations
             | who don't want to wear our baggage but are these
             | standardized yet?
        
       | randmeerkat wrote:
       | It's a disservice to have a guide to mechanical keyboards that
       | doesn't mention the ErgoDox EZ: https://ergodox-ez.com/
        
         | jszymborski wrote:
         | Idk if I agree as split keyboards is likely not what folks have
         | in mind, but I will say that I absolutely love my ErgoDox EZ.
        
           | randmeerkat wrote:
           | > Idk if I agree as split keyboards is likely not what folks
           | have in mind...
           | 
           | The article literally mentions a mechanical split keyboard,
           | without mentioning the ErgoDox.
        
             | jszymborski wrote:
             | That's fair! That said it was a fairly accessible one that
             | could turn into a (mostly) normal keyboard, which feels
             | like the more relevant option to the audience this article
             | was geared to.
        
           | balls187 wrote:
           | I had to switch to the ergodox after my RSI came back. I had
           | been using regular keyboards for quite some time.
           | 
           | Once you get the customizations dialed in, it's fantastic.
        
       | ProllyInfamous wrote:
       | I have used several inexpensive Apple-keyed mechanical keyboards.
       | My random observations:
       | 
       | Buckley Springs (e.g. IBM Model M -type, Unicomp) are absolutely
       | the best _keyfeel_ , but they just won't last longer than the
       | keyboard's warranty (probably nowhere near as long, YMMV). They
       | are obnoxiously loud (similar to my electric Smith Corona Coronet
       | typewriter). Simple keystrikes above 100wpm often result in
       | blown-out springs -- I have thrown away my last Unicomp keyboard
       | (after spring/warranty failures).
       | 
       |  _das_ keyboard (brown>blue>red) is heavenly, my daily-drivers (I
       | own three, identical). Just a little bit louder than an OEM Apple
       | keyboard, and always responds as depressed.
       | 
       | The worst tactile keyboard I've ever used (non-mechanical, but
       | physical buttons): mid 2010's Apple Laptop "butterfly" keys,
       | which fail spectacularly (to crickets from Apple).
        
         | seanmcdirmid wrote:
         | I had a model M that was built in 1993 that I used until 2016.
         | The main thing you need to do is clean it once in a while. I
         | have a newer Model M today that I got last year and I doubt it
         | will last as long.
        
           | ProllyInfamous wrote:
           | Thanks for sharing your experience, very similar to mine.
           | 
           | My IBM Selectric II has buckling springs, but the ball/strike
           | isn't fast enough to keep up with my typing... so the keys
           | don't get abused nearly as much (never had a keyspring break
           | on this typewriter).
           | 
           | My honest assessment of Unicomp's newer buckling springs: you
           | need to use a more-durable metal [see 80's/90's versions, for
           | comparison). The springs seems to fail more from fatique than
           | force... which is almost-certainly a _materials science_
           | deficiency.
        
         | ink_13 wrote:
         | I dunno about that, my Model M from 1989 is still going strong.
         | I've been waiting for it to fail for a decade at this point so
         | I can upgrade to something more modern, but I find I'm not
         | interested in giving it up prematurely.
        
           | ProllyInfamous wrote:
           | These original IBM models were much more durable than current
           | Unicomp output. I suspect it comes down to the modern metal
           | composition of the spring [being different than 80's
           | versions].
           | 
           | See somebody else's similar experience, below.
           | 
           | >I've been waiting for it to fail for a decade at this point
           | so I can upgrade
           | 
           | Yours must have been _one of the good ones_ =D
        
         | NotYourLawyer wrote:
         | You got a lemon of a Model M. They generally last a very long
         | time.
        
       | thangalin wrote:
       | No mention of Unicomp.
       | 
       | https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/product/UB4041A
       | 
       | They stopped selling quiet touch rubber membrane versions.
       | Perhaps the Clickety-M buckling springs just aren't the same
       | without the click?
       | 
       | https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/category/QTRD
        
         | Uvix wrote:
         | The rubber dome ones didn't have buckling springs. They were
         | "traditional" mass-market keyboard tech in the Model M form
         | factor.
        
         | 3pm wrote:
         | I think that Model M (Unicomp/Lexmark) was a cost cut for Model
         | F. Just recently, a company resurrected true Model F:
         | https://www.modelfkeyboards.com/
        
       | ridgeguy wrote:
       | As I've aged, I've developed kinetic tremor. In typing, this
       | shows up as missing my intended target key. The error most
       | commonly presents as hitting two keys at once because my ability
       | to hit only within a defined x,y envelope at the keyboard plane
       | has declined. Analyzing my typos, my intended key gets most of my
       | finger, with adjacent keys getting tripped by ~10% - 20%, i.e.,
       | by the edge of my finger.
       | 
       | I would love to find a keyboard that has keys at the usual pitch
       | (I'm usually on Apple products), but that are smaller targets. I
       | think this would result in fewer "out-of-bounds" adjacent key
       | strikes. I've searched for such, no results so far. Any
       | recommendations gladly received, thanks.
        
         | seltzered_ wrote:
         | Perhaps designing some smaller keycaps could help?
        
         | jsheard wrote:
         | Maybe you'd benefit from a different keycap profile? There's a
         | bunch of options for the standard MX-type mechanical switches,
         | some of which are "spherical" where the contact area is concave
         | and relatively small.
         | 
         | https://i.imgur.com/f8EJnC7.png
         | 
         | Cherry and OEM are the default keycap style, while SA, XDA and
         | DSA are examples of spherical. There aren't many keyboards
         | which come with spherical keycaps out of the box, but you can
         | easily buy a keycap set separately and install it on any MX
         | keyboard.
        
           | thereisnospork wrote:
           | Could also go full psycho and go keycap-less for the truly
           | minimal target. Costs nothing but time to try anyway.
        
           | ridgeguy wrote:
           | Thanks for this. You and speerer have given me the idea to
           | get clear plastic near-hemispheres to glue onto my keycaps.
           | KB illumination will still show, and the key target area will
           | be less than half its current value. Much obliged!
        
             | MetaWhirledPeas wrote:
             | Some tiny rubber dome feet from your local hardware store
             | would do this but would probably slip off. Might be worth a
             | try.
             | 
             | Anecdote: I have MT3 key caps and they have a more distinct
             | concavity than my SA key caps.
        
               | cenamus wrote:
               | Would be great as a first try, and you can always
               | superglue them on securely
        
         | speerer wrote:
         | Just a thought - Circular keycaps exist, and by definiton have
         | more space between them. They presumably have the same
         | _minimum_ gap at the left and right, though, so might not work.
         | 
         | https://keycapsnation.com/products/round-keycaps
        
         | bb88 wrote:
         | There's a recent trend of people designing custom keyboards for
         | their own accessibility needs. So this is a random thought, no
         | idea if it would work.
         | 
         | A couple of popular keyboard firmwares are open source. I'm
         | thinking it could be possible to reject two neighbor keys which
         | are struck within the same 10 millisecond window.
         | 
         | IOW, if you're on a qwerty keyboard, if R and T are both hit at
         | the same time, don't send the keystrokes to the computer.
         | 
         | QMK and KMK are popular keyboard firmwares. QMK is C based, and
         | KMK is CircuitPython based.
        
         | 0xDEADFED5 wrote:
         | A few fancy keyboards with magnetic switches (I'm using a
         | SteelSeries one) let you set the activation distance. Maybe
         | trying one and maxing out the activation distance would work
         | for you?
        
         | nikau wrote:
         | Likely best to get old 80s style narrow top key caps and high
         | force switches.
         | 
         | Ibm Model m or a keyboard with mx green switches.
        
         | lawn wrote:
         | You might have success with choc switches as they can be placed
         | closer together than MX style switches.
        
           | Findecanor wrote:
           | I think you've missed the point. The poster wants the pitch
           | to stay the same, but have more gaps between key surfaces.
        
             | lawn wrote:
             | Ah, my bad.
             | 
             | I guess the best way would be to design your own keyboard
             | and add extra spacing. It may sound daunting but it's not
             | too difficult honestly.
        
             | breckenedge wrote:
             | Choc switches (18mm x 17mm) will give you 2mm-4mm more gap
             | if used in a standard MX layout (19mm x 19mm). Some custom
             | keyboards (ex: Lily58 Pro) accommodate both switches.
        
         | n0n0n4t0r wrote:
         | For some time I could only type correctly with the Logitech
         | k740, but it's discontinued now. I don't know why, but I can
         | type on another (french) mechanical keyboard.
         | 
         | Maybe the successors line the MX master have what made magic
         | for me: an important bevel. I invite you to try it out
        
       | ivanjermakov wrote:
       | All that and a single paragraph about ergonomic split keyboards?
       | What a shame. Imo, the main reasons to get into mech keyboards
       | are customization and programmability. This subreddit is a good
       | starting point: https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/
        
         | mlloyd wrote:
         | Thanks for this! I use a Perrix 835 and I'm quite happy with it
         | except that the keys are rubbing raw and I need new key caps.
         | But I'm always looking to trade up if possible.
        
           | pabloescobyte wrote:
           | There's a whole world of custom split keyboard options out
           | there that use switches where it's super easy to buy
           | replacement keycaps. You can get keycaps made of PBT which
           | are long-lasting and have a very high "rub" factor so you
           | shouldn't have to worry about rubbing them raw for a very
           | long time.
        
         | AceJohnny2 wrote:
         | Yes! I don't really understand the appeal of mechanical
         | keyboards. I mean sure, they're a step up from cheap-ass
         | rubber-dome defaults, so it's worth people discovering there
         | are _options_.
         | 
         | But for me, most mechanical keyboards are downright painful to
         | use. The standard rectangular layout is bad for my wrists, the
         | keypress depth is bad for my fingers, clicks are just plain
         | annoying.
         | 
         | Perhaps decades of keyboard use has worn my wrists and fingers
         | down or helped me define what I wanted, but it's split low-
         | profile or bust.
         | 
         | And there's a dearth of such options on the market. Slowly
         | rising, but a paltry fraction of the overall
         | "mechanical"/custom keyboard market, especially as it comes to
         | keycaps!
         | 
         | Maybe I should just grab the bull by the horns and mod a
         | Microsoft Sculpt to be wired, whose only downside is unreliable
         | wireless.
         | 
         | /rant
        
           | eviks wrote:
           | There are non-clicky keys!
        
             | AceJohnny2 wrote:
             | oh yeah, in fact I find it hilarious that clicky keys just
             | have an extra lever just for the click sound. It's not part
             | of the actuation mechanism! I have a Giant Kailh from
             | Novelkeys which is interesting to see the construction of a
             | switch.
        
               | eviks wrote:
               | indeed, of all the things to preserve from the bad
               | designs of the past...
        
           | fernmyth wrote:
           | I'm quite happy with my Perixx Periboard 335 replacing the
           | Microsoft Ergo Sculpt. Standard layout, semi-split, tented,
           | low (-ish) profile, mechanical switches, wired.
           | 
           | Took me a lot of searches to find something meeting my
           | requirements
        
           | motorest wrote:
           | > But for me, most mechanical keyboards are downright painful
           | to use. The standard rectangular layout is bad for my wrists,
           | the keypress depth is bad for my fingers, clicks are just
           | plain annoying.
           | 
           | I think you're conflating things. The "mechanical" in
           | "mechanical keyboard" refers to the key switches. That's it.
           | Then you have unrelated traits such as customization,which
           | can express in using fancy/functional keycaps, feel/keypress
           | experience, and whatever you can imagine and throw at a
           | keyboard. None of your complains refer to mechanical
           | keyboards in particular.
        
             | AceJohnny2 wrote:
             | My point is that the majority of the mechanical keyboard
             | scene/market is occupied by very traditional (if cut down,
             | in the case of the Any% ones) layout and key types.
             | 
             | For a scene that is so into customization, it's
             | disappointing how much it sticks to bad choices.
        
         | pabloescobyte wrote:
         | It's an article written by a mainstream site so I wasn't really
         | expecting them to talk about split keyboards at all but I agree
         | wholeheartedly.
         | 
         | I went from a full size to a 40% keyboard to an ortholinear and
         | now use a low-profile split keyboard as a daily driver.
         | 
         | IME it's so much better for ergonomics with a proper desk setup
         | and seating/posture with the split halves shoulder width apart.
         | Wireless is a great benefit as well if you swap between
         | desktops and laptops.
         | 
         | Open source firmware like ZMK and QMK make it trivial to use
         | splits with Linux, mac OS and Windows and for any environments
         | where the OS is locked down and software installation is
         | required.
        
         | mastazi wrote:
         | Are there split keyboards that preserve the standard layout of
         | the home/end/pgup/pgdown cluster? Due to my usage patterns, not
         | having that is a deal breaker for me. As an example, with
         | rectangular keyboards my only choices are tenkeyless or full
         | size, because they preserve the home cluster. Are there
         | equivalents in the split keyboard world? All I'm seeing in that
         | subreddit are smaller keyboards that lack the home cluster,
         | that's why I ask.
        
           | WesleyLivesay wrote:
           | I think the Ergodox ez does those keys better than a standard
           | keyboard because they are split between the two thumb
           | clusters in the standard layout. Don't even have to move my
           | hands to hit any of the four keys. It was one of the things I
           | was looking for in a keyboard.
        
           | 3eb7988a1663 wrote:
           | Does seem like a white whale. Nearly all of the split
           | keyboards want to do _something_ different. I just want to
           | stop scrunching my shoulders and space out my arms. Give me a
           | fully traditional keyboard with all of the keys, just with a
           | split down the middle.
           | 
           | My non-QMK keyboard has a horrendous home+end location, which
           | I only realized after I acquired the thing. I did not realize
           | how much I rely on those keys in normal programming.
        
             | adrian_b wrote:
             | For a very long time and until now, there have been models
             | of Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboards, with all the classic PC
             | keys, just with a split layout of the keys.
             | 
             | I have used such keyboards for many years and I have been
             | content with them, even if a couple of years ago I have
             | switched to a more compact completely split keyboard,
             | without a separate digit pad (for 2 reasons, a closer
             | position of the pointing device and easier transport in my
             | luggage, due to its smaller total size, to be able to also
             | use it instead of the non-ergonomic laptop keyboard).
        
           | eviks wrote:
           | Why not have home/end near home row with a right thumb
           | modifier instead?
        
           | beacon294 wrote:
           | The Q14 preserves some similar placement but not all. The Q13
           | has 4 configurable keys in the top right.
           | 
           | https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q14-max-alice-
           | lay...
        
           | delecti wrote:
           | I can't vouch for its quality, but this has the full standard
           | layout of those buttons (plus insert/delete).
           | https://www.amazon.com/EPOMAKER-Mechanical-Swappable-
           | Program...
           | 
           | I've also really enjoyed my Keychron Q11. It only has 5 of
           | those keys (I remapped them a bit because I find "end" more
           | useful than "insert"), and have adjusted quite easily.
           | Relative to the default, I've got Home/End where Ins/Del are,
           | Del for PgUp, and PgUp/Dn where it has PgDn/Home. That was
           | all painless to change in the mapping tool.
           | https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q11-qmk-custom-
           | me...
        
           | lelanthran wrote:
           | > Are there split keyboards that preserve the standard layout
           | of the home/end/pgup/pgdown cluster?
           | 
           | There used to be. I have a Microsoft keyboard[1] that works
           | just fine using a PS2 <-> USB connector. Unfortunately I lost
           | the PS2 <-> USB connector (which, IIRC, was an active
           | converter, not a passive one) so I don't use it any more.
           | 
           | I use a standard mechanical keyboard with the standard US
           | layout, and have not noticed any discomfort after 25 years or
           | daily driving the standard layout.
           | 
           | [1] This particular one - first gen model: https://en.wikiped
           | ia.org/wiki/Microsoft_ergonomic_keyboards#... - although if
           | you browse that entire page you'll see that there are newer
           | models.
        
           | lawn wrote:
           | Why not create a "navigation layer" where you can have your
           | home/end/pup/pgdown and arrow keys, right below your fingers?
           | 
           | That's the usual way people use these smaller keyboards, and
           | it's way superior in my opinion.
        
         | peterbecich wrote:
         | Two thumbs up for the Iris keyboard, typically purchased as a
         | kit: https://keeb.io/collections/iris-split-ergonomic-keyboard
        
         | user_7832 wrote:
         | I'd also add r/olkb for ortholinear keyboards and
         | r/ergomechcomputers for those pushing ergo keyboards to their
         | logical conclusion.
         | 
         | Side note, the BFO-9000 looks _glorious_.
        
       | bsnnkv wrote:
       | I'm still just waiting for someone to make a higher quality
       | version of the Logitech Ergo K860.
        
         | Epa095 wrote:
         | PERIBOARD-835?
        
         | m1keil wrote:
         | I don't know if it's higher quality, but kinesis recently
         | released the mWave https://kinesis-ergo.com/shop/mwave/
        
       | ilc wrote:
       | I use a Svalboard now-a-days. For those looking for the modern
       | Datahand... That's where it is. Same switch type, and much the
       | same feel :)
       | 
       | Disclaimer: I do volunteer firmware work on Svalboard. (vial-qmk)
        
         | Epa095 wrote:
         | Ohhh I have been low-key thinking of getting that one, but it's
         | a bit expensive:-/ How do you find it? Was it hard to get
         | going? Comfortable? Fast?
        
       | jasoneckert wrote:
       | Much like musicians that have dozens of musical keyboards in
       | their collection, I've collected/built dozens of mechanical
       | keyboards over the years. I've got ones with nearly every general
       | type of switch (including Topre).
       | 
       | I like to tell people that - as a developer - I'll spend $400+ on
       | a mechanical keyboard that makes the sound I like, and then use
       | it alongside $500+ noise-cancelling headphones.
       | 
       | But all of my mechanical keyboards sit on a display shelf unused
       | today as I prefer to use the Lenovo TrackPoint II keyboard for
       | all of my work (including coding). It's just the best keyboard
       | ever made in my opinion, and I love using it.
        
         | sgarman wrote:
         | Ten years ago I used to be really into all the mech keyboard
         | stuff. Then I bought a topre realforce and have been using it
         | ever since. The hobby part of the keyboards is neat but as far
         | as "good" keyboard I haven't seen anything that would cause me
         | to switch.
        
           | amatecha wrote:
           | same. finally got realforce R2 and I'm good. There might be
           | something better for me, but I've spent enough time and money
           | searching for the perfect combination of form-factor,
           | switches, keycaps, materials, etc.
        
           | danielheath wrote:
           | I have broad shoulders, and find a split keyboard is
           | absolutely essential to avoid scapula pain after longer
           | sessions.
        
             | KetoManx64 wrote:
             | I'm not the only one!!
        
             | SirHumphrey wrote:
             | The only reason i bother with custom keyboards hobby is
             | because this is the only way to get a split keyboard that
             | doesn't cost 400$.
             | 
             | They are great but very expensive- this I think is one of
             | the main reasons why they are so niche.
        
           | christophilus wrote:
           | For me, it was the Vermillo in the same form factor. I love
           | it.
        
         | seanmcdirmid wrote:
         | The sound of the keystroke is much less important than the
         | feeling. The return power on stroke is also important for
         | stamina reasons. That being said, I'm happy with a Model M, no
         | need for fancy customizations.
        
         | aranaur wrote:
         | Ha! My Track point II hangs above my desk as a quick-to-grab
         | keyboard whenever I (frequently) need to plug into a computer I
         | don't normally use. Absolutely perfect for that.
        
       | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
       | Are mechanical keyboards good for ergonomics and carpal tunnel
       | and all that? Do different switches make a difference for that
       | sort of thing? I've been hearing a lot about Hall effect switches
       | recently - wasn't sure if that can help.
        
         | pabloescobyte wrote:
         | They can be but they are only a small part of the overall
         | setup. You still need to have proper posture and pay particular
         | attention to your habits.
         | 
         | Different switches can also help depending on your typing
         | habits and usecase.
         | 
         | For me personally having less keys means less movement leading
         | to significantly reduced possibility of RSI. With just 42 keys
         | on my keyboard literally everything is one key away from each
         | finger on home row so I can spend more time typing and mousing
         | around than a traditional full size keyboard+mouse setup.
        
           | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
           | I've invested in a good table and chair. I'm now looking to
           | figure out my keyboard and mouse. I've not tried the small
           | keyboards because I thought the cramped space may be worse.
           | But maybe that's wrong? Any specific recommendations for a
           | keyboard or mouse?
        
             | argentinian wrote:
             | Vertical mouses. Like Logitech MX vertical.
        
             | Symbiote wrote:
             | From my experience and going from most to least important,
             | I use:
             | 
             | The Dvorak keyboard layout,
             | 
             | A split keyboard (two separate halves)
             | 
             | A tented keyboard (center raised up)
             | 
             | A vertical mouse
             | 
             | I haven't tried a tiny keyboard, I didn't like the idea - I
             | want to press F5 or PgDn with one hand, for example.
        
             | snozolli wrote:
             | It's all very personal. Partly because _you_ will like
             | certain key switches and layouts, and partly because any
             | problems you may be having may not be solved by the same
             | things that fixed _my_ problems.
             | 
             | Personally, having tried a wide variety of keyboards and
             | layouts (both key pattern and physical keyboard design), I
             | think the biggest improvement is switching to _any_
             | mechanical keyboard. Anything with Cherry MX switches will
             | be a huge improvement over some cheap, sliding plastic
             | keyboard from an OEM. After that, the particular type of
             | switch might matter to you. Cherry Red, for example, only
             | requires really light pressure. Topre switches are buttery
             | smooth.
             | 
             | For physical configuration, I personally like either an 87
             | key, or I go all out with a Kinesis Advantage. The Kinesis
             | saved my early career when I developed bilateral De
             | Quervain's syndrome, which is tendinitis in the wrist that
             | starts with the thumb. After years of this, I finally
             | returned to traditional QWERTY 87 key configurations and
             | haven't had a flare-up. I still think the Kinesis
             | configuration (arrow keys accessible without moving the
             | hands, thumbs are used for delete, enter, home/end and
             | PgUp/PgDn) is ergonomically superior, but it's nice being
             | able to jump on any normal QWERTY keyboard without fighting
             | muscle memory.
             | 
             | My personal favorite mouse is the Microsoft Intellimouse
             | Explorer. I've heard good things about vertical mice for
             | carpal tunnel.
        
             | christophilus wrote:
             | I had a bit of wrist pain a few years (5?) ago, and my
             | solution was a small 10kl mechanical keyboard (from
             | Vermillo) with a good wrist pad (a wooden one) and a
             | vertical mouse. Haven't had a problem since. Everyone is
             | different.
        
               | kstrauser wrote:
               | BTW, every ergonomics person I've talked to suggested I
               | ditch all wrist pads because they but more pressure on an
               | already inflamed wrist.
               | 
               | I also got a vertical mouse a while back on a friend's
               | recommendation and couldn't believe the different it
               | made. My wrist was starting to hurt a lot. After a few
               | days with the mouse, I was complete pain free. _For me_
               | it was an instant and complete relief. I never would've
               | believed it.
        
         | lawn wrote:
         | No I don't think mechanical keyboards in general are better. I
         | think heavy switches (which is very common) are worse than
         | regular keyboards.
         | 
         | Light switches (Choc has some nice very light switches) is
         | probably better, and of course you'd want to look at split
         | keyboards, column-stagger instead of row-stagger, and tenting.
        
       | mberning wrote:
       | I do not understand the hobby around mech keyboards at all. It
       | reminds me a lot of other activities/sports where the gear
       | becomes more of a focus than the activity itself. Reminds me of
       | photography or paintball. Dudes will have thousands of dollars of
       | gear and use it 3 times a year.
        
         | CharlieDigital wrote:
         | For me, it has very practical reasons.
         | 
         | If you work in software, you'll spend 6-10+ hours a day
         | interfacing with the machine via your hands.
         | 
         | So of course, the quality of that experience matters. Each
         | person's fingers and typing styles are different to degrees so
         | finding the right fit requires sampling. You often require a
         | few days or even weeks to adjust and get a feel if a keyboard
         | is right for you. I've had keyboards that only surfaced fatigue
         | after a month of use.
         | 
         | I've accumulated keyboards mostly in search of the perfect one
         | that can prevent fatigue, pain, and injury for a job that
         | requires 1/3 of my day to be attached to a keyboard.
        
         | phito wrote:
         | I do not understand my coworkers who spend 8 hours a day typing
         | on a shitty membrane keyboard. It's they job and their main
         | interface to the computer and they are totally oblivious to it.
         | They also use no shortcuts at all. I've seen some use the mouse
         | to copy/paste...
        
           | mberning wrote:
           | I don't know, unless the keyboard was truly awful I probably
           | wouldn't complain and just get to work on the task at hand.
           | Then again, I started typing when I was a small child, used
           | what was available, and at the time there wasn't the level of
           | keyboard choice there is today. Nor did I have the money to
           | indulge in it if there were. I can definitely see the logic
           | people employ to justify it. It's the same logic used to
           | justify a nice bed, shoes, etc.
        
         | cthalupa wrote:
         | I'm up to roughly 40 boards at this point. I use two of them
         | basically daily - my desktop and laptop dock.
         | 
         | I tend to rotate them a few times a month. The hobby is about
         | the gear, but the people that get really deep into it tend to
         | be building them to fit a specific aesthetic - people make
         | custom keycap sets, complete with graphic novelty keys, etc.,
         | for all sorts of themes, from food, to anime, to space, and
         | everything in between. And people design the keyboard cases for
         | just as many themes. Mine sit on stands in my office as
         | decoration - I enjoy looking at them the same as I enjoy using
         | them.
        
         | breckenedge wrote:
         | The hobby is a spectrum. Compare r/ErgoMechKeyboards vs
         | r/MechanicalKeyboards. You can easily avoid the "look how much
         | I spent" part of the community.
        
         | AshamedCaptain wrote:
         | Me, I was forced to use a model M for several years and threw
         | it to the trash the moment I realized I could plug any shitty
         | membrane keyboard bought in random stores. These "vintage"
         | fashions usually come and go for either unexplainable reasons
         | or just flimsy warmness/feeling arguments. Like vinyl, instant
         | cameras or the like. Notice in all of these one almost always
         | spends thousands of dollars and yet end up with objectively
         | worse sound/image reproduction. It is not nostalgia, since it
         | often involves people who never used them back in the day. Or
         | maybe that actually explains why they buy them.
        
         | pnathan wrote:
         | I am at the keyboard 40-80hr per week.
         | 
         | I want a keyboard that is ergonomic and pleasant to use.
        
         | __turbobrew__ wrote:
         | Yea, there is a large portion of the MKB population which is
         | engaging in consumerism as a hobby.
         | 
         | I do think ergo keyboards can help a lot when you have RSIs or
         | other physical constraints, but I think 90+% of the people who
         | are MKB enthusiasts could be just as productive interfacing
         | with a computer using a $20 Microsoft OEM keyboard.
         | 
         | I use an Apple magic keyboard for work and I don't think it
         | really slows me down. I could maybe see if you are a writer and
         | you are outputting thousands of lines a day a good keyboard
         | could make a difference, but if you are writing that many lines
         | of code you should be concerned that LLMs are going to take
         | your job writing boilerplate.
         | 
         | Just give me two monitors, a stock install of Ubuntu, and any
         | $20 keyboard and I can do anything.
        
       | breakingcups wrote:
       | I see soooo many recommendations online in every discussions
       | about mechanical keyboards. However, what I would really need is
       | a physical place, a store, a showroom, to be able to try them out
       | myself. A wide range of brands and options, preferably.
       | 
       | I'm a keyboard pleb, after originally using a Model M I just
       | moved on to other regular office keyboards. I like the _idea_ of
       | mechanical keyboards but I don 't know if I would actually enjoy
       | them, and there's so many variations that for every complaint you
       | might have about a keyboard a friend might have that you can try,
       | you'll get three people saying that I should really try keyboard
       | X from brand Y instead because it will change my life.
        
         | kstrauser wrote:
         | You and me both. I've had a few nice keyboards with various
         | switches, but I'd love to get my hands on the ones people are
         | talking about here to see how they feel _to me_. Bonus points
         | of they were connected to a computer so I could gauge the whole
         | experience.
        
         | drillsteps5 wrote:
         | BestBuy has _some_ on display (and you can type and try them
         | out yourself), but in my area their stores have been shrinking
         | in size and there's fewer and fewer things on display.
         | 
         | Your best bet would be MicroCenter, the one near me has 10+
         | various ones on display. I know not everybody is fortunate
         | enough to live near MicroCenter though :(
         | 
         | BTW none of them will change your life, it's just hobby for
         | those with extra time and disposable income :)
        
       | Bluestein wrote:
       | Here's wishing one-handed _chorded_ keyboards were mainstream -
       | or, at least, viable ...
        
       | motorest wrote:
       | Mechanical keyboards are nice, but what stumps me is the lack of
       | support for USB hubs embedded in the keyboard. Anyone who uses
       | yubikeys know the importance of having those a key stretch away,
       | not to mention the convenience of being able to plug headphones
       | and USB pens ok what you're already holding.
        
         | supercoffee wrote:
         | Some of the Drop branded keyboards like the Alt have a USB
         | passthrough. I used to own one and I used it to plug in my
         | headset dongle.
        
           | Findecanor wrote:
           | The Drop keyboards merely have two upstream ports, so you can
           | select to have the cable on the left or on the right.
           | 
           | There is no hub. If it was passthrough, the cable would be
           | fixed (or use a non-standard connector), with two USB plugs
           | at the host end: one for the keyboard and one for the
           | passthrough. Some older gaming keyboards have such
           | passthrough for USB ... and audio jacks!
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | I have a steelseries apex pro with an additional USB port. It
         | doesn't have a hub, it is a separate port and the keyboard
         | cable has two usb-a male plugs on the end.
         | 
         | I remember years ago having an apple keyboard that had a usb-a
         | female on the side for the mouse. It wouldn't boot up with my
         | mouse though, I suspect keyboard+mouse drew too much power. I
         | had to run the mouse separate.
        
           | motorest wrote:
           | The steelseries apex pro is awfully pricy for that kind of
           | keyboard. For budget-minded fans, as far as I can tell so far
           | the Royal Kludge RK84 is the only decent keyboard with a
           | usable USB hub, but it's cheap plastic chassis and keycaps
           | are quite the turnoff.
           | 
           | Hopefully something decent shows up in the market that mixes
           | the best of mechanical keyboards with the very basic user
           | experience of using a laptop.
        
         | zamadatix wrote:
         | For most the "USB passthrough" section at the end covers the
         | need of plugging a device and/or a headset in without needing a
         | full hubs worth of devices sticking out of the keyboard.
         | 
         | In general though the more functionally useful a keyboard would
         | be the fewer options you'll find. I think a large part of it is
         | many buyers are more worried about maximizing the aesthetics of
         | the keyboard rather than creating a swiss army knife of a
         | keyboard so that's what is easier to find.
        
         | adrian_b wrote:
         | I prefer USB ports on the monitor, which can have a higher
         | speed without creating problems.
         | 
         | Most keyboards are designed for low speed USB links, not even
         | for USB 2.0. Having to replace the cheap cable normally used by
         | keyboards with an expensive cable, at the great cable length
         | that is desirable for a keyboard, would raise the cost with
         | negligible benefits.
         | 
         | Many PCs have additional USB 2.0 ports for slow peripherals,
         | i.e. mainly for keyboards, mice or graphic tablets. A keyboard
         | with a USB hub suitable for a USB memory would need to use a
         | USB 3 port on the PC, occupying a port that might have been
         | better used for other peripherals, while leaving unused the
         | slow USB ports.
        
       | nanook wrote:
       | Why do they never make these with 4 modifier keys on the left
       | side like Mac keyboards(Ctrl, Fn, Alt, Cmd)? Hate not being able
       | to use muscle memory switching between my MBP and an external
       | keyboard.
        
         | zamadatix wrote:
         | The standard first 3 R4 keys (control, option/alt, command/win)
         | are 1.25x width while the "true" Mac layout has those at 1x
         | width to prevent the spacebar from having to migrate too far to
         | the right (even though it's still a bit farther right than
         | normal). This means to serve the niche of fn muscle memory
         | users of the niche of Mac keyboard users you not only need the
         | create the custom positional layout but custom keycaps (and the
         | board/firmware you build it with must support layers to do fn
         | in the first place). Then when you do all of this these people
         | will still probably be uninterested because it's not some
         | additional niche design criteria (70% vs 100%, low profile vs
         | full size, split vs not, yadda yadda) anyways. All that is to
         | say, there's a lot more going against it than just
         | repositioning 1 key would seem.
         | 
         | I had a coworker who liked
         | https://mechanicalkeyboards.com/products/mk-lowkey70-black.
         | Basically "an external version of the MacBook keyboard with
         | hotswap switches, RGB, and caps". Dunno that I've seen any full
         | sized variants of the Mac layout though.
        
       | gtani wrote:
       | For anybody that's at some stage of keeb curious but overwhelmed
       | by info, look up keyboard meetups in reddit subs
       | /r/MechanicalKeyboards/ and /r/ErgoMechKeyboards/
       | 
       | It's just a lot easier to ask a live human
        
         | gtani wrote:
         | you can also try a decent number at best buy and maybe other
         | specialty retailers but:
         | 
         | with the gaming oriented brands you often have to turn down RGB
         | effects to make them tolerable, certain brands have switches
         | that actuate high in the range of motion and it's often not
         | easy to tell if the switches are soldered or have swappable
         | sockets
         | 
         | ____________________________________________
         | 
         | also the latest/greatest in split ergos seem to be the
         | svalboards, ordered a 1 finger cluster to try but have no info
         | about them yet
        
       | rifling9798 wrote:
       | In our relentless pursuit of the perfect interface between mind
       | and machine, we build monuments to our own discontent. Each
       | click, each tactile response, each millimeter of travel becomes a
       | meditation on what we seek but cannot name. We spend fortunes to
       | recreate the feeling of something we've never felt, chase echoes
       | of satisfaction that fade with each new acquisition, and find
       | ourselves surrounded by shrines to our own restlessness. In this
       | symphony of springs and switches, we are all apprentices to an
       | art that has no master.
        
         | all2 wrote:
         | That's very poetic. Is there a source? From your head?
        
           | onemoresoop wrote:
           | It's an LLM generated text.
        
         | gpi wrote:
         | I have a master. Logitech MX Master
        
         | yard2010 wrote:
         | I have been addicted to using my mechanical keyboard for years
         | now. It doesn't get old, I can feel the dopamine rush with
         | every key stroke. It's magical.
        
         | Y_Y wrote:
         | If only Keats had had a Model M.
        
           | Bluestein wrote:
           | If only Keats had an LLM! :)
        
             | Bluestein wrote:
             | Ode on a Neural Network
             | 
             | Thou still unraveled shape of silicon, Thou child of data
             | and electric thought, Digital historian, who canst thus
             | express A mathematical tale more sweetly than our prose:
             | What leaf-fringed legend haunts thy tensored depths Of
             | vectors or of nodes, or of both, In virtual space or
             | clouded matrices? What parameters dance in what hidden
             | layers? What mad pursuit? What struggle to compute? What
             | matrices of backpropagation?
             | 
             | How cold are those cold gradients, how sparse The lonely
             | nodes that never can decode Their ancient patterns; and how
             | blank the space Where each new epoch brings a fresh cascade
             | Of weights adjusting to some distant truth That floats
             | beyond our human comprehension's reach!
             | 
             | O atrous convolution! fair display Of mathematical beauty
             | born anew With every forward pass - yet still we gaze In
             | wonder at thy deep complexity.
             | 
             | Heard algorithms are sweet, but those unheard Are sweeter;
             | therefore, ye soft transformers, play on; Not to the
             | sensual ear, but, more endeared, Pipe to the spirit ditties
             | of backprop: Fair function, beneath the nodes, thou canst
             | not leave Thy gradients, nor ever can those trees
             | 
             | Be pruned; bold Optimizer, never, never canst Thou kiss thy
             | target, though thou draw'st so near! Yet do not grieve; she
             | cannot fade, thy love Frozen in checkpoints time cannot
             | destroy.
             | 
             | When old age shall this generation waste, Thou shalt
             | remain, in midst of other woe Than ours, a friend to human-
             | kind, to whom thou say'st, "Beauty is truth, truth beauty,"
             | - that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know Of
             | deep learning's vast and boundless dream.
        
             | Y_Y wrote:
             | Here lies one whose name was writ in VRAM
        
         | exceptione wrote:
         | Hello LLM!
        
           | quaintdev wrote:
           | This. You just can't trust anything anymore. Internet is done
           | guys. Let's go back to real world.
        
         | TacticalCoder wrote:
         | Or, you know, some just fucking feel better than others. But
         | that's hard to comprehend for a LLM.
        
         | singleshot_ wrote:
         | > something we've never felt
         | 
         | Speak for yourself; I had an IBM 5150 (with an external CDROM
         | and the original Encarta disc) and it was lovely. The junk we
         | type on today is lousy.
        
           | ndiddy wrote:
           | You can use a 5150 keyboard on a modern computer fairly
           | easily, all you need is a relatively inexpensive adapter like
           | this: https://www.ebay.com/itm/385607912016 . Overall I think
           | the 5150 keyboard feels a lot better to type on than the
           | Cherry switches and Chinese clones that the article covers.
        
             | myth_drannon wrote:
             | Adding adapters increases the delay, it won't feel the same
        
           | singleshot_ wrote:
           | I just remembered that it was actually a Collier's
           | encyclopedia that we had, for full historical accuracy.
        
           | bpye wrote:
           | I've ended up settling on an old Apple Extended Keyboard II.
           | I've had several modern keyboards end up dying - failing to
           | register some keystrokes, whilst this thing has has been
           | working for longer than my lifetime...
        
       | BenFranklin100 wrote:
       | I've been very happy with the Tex Shinobi keyboard.
       | https://tex.com.tw/products/shinobi
       | 
       | The integrated TrackPoint and retro Thinkpad styling makes typing
       | a breeze without ever having to lift your hand off the keyboard
       | for the mouse.
        
         | breckenedge wrote:
         | I like it but not the proprietary configuration tool.
        
       | ldjkfkdsjnv wrote:
       | hhkb
        
       | sagarpatil wrote:
       | My only gripe with mechanical keyboards is there's no version
       | with apple touch ID (I know the technical constraints).
        
         | Findecanor wrote:
         | There is a guy who is modding his Magic Keyboard 2 with Touch
         | ID into a mechanical keyboard, with preserved touch ID
         | functionality: <https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=120964.0>
        
       | sagarpatil wrote:
       | As someone who recently moved from a mechanical keyboard to apple
       | keyboard, the closest thing that can imitate the mechanical key
       | sound is through this macos app: https://tryklack.com/
        
       | tehnub wrote:
       | - Miryoku
       | 
       | - BastardKB keyboard
       | 
       | - Asymplex DES key caps
        
       | LargoLasskhyfv wrote:
       | _I 'm sitting in my bunker, on the far side of the moon.
       | 
       | Typing on this old clunker, ready to fire my death-rays soon!
       | 
       | Alle Jahre wieder mach ich den neumodischen Kram nieder!_
       | 
       | http://xahlee.info/kbd/marquardt_mini_ergo_keyboard.html
       | 
       | https://deskthority.net/wiki/Marquardt_Mini-Ergo
       | 
       | (Yes Yes, it has been modded meanwhile, electronically only, not
       | mechanically. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIN_connector to
       | PS/2 to USB, via modded early QMK. As did the others which I've
       | gotten in reserve meanwhile :))
        
       | NotYourLawyer wrote:
       | Not a word about Model M or Model F keyboards. Weird, they're so
       | much better than any of the stuff in this article.
        
       | crimsoneer wrote:
       | I just upgraded from my ZSA Moonlander to a Voyager for
       | Christmas, and I am _so excited_.
        
       | gsliepen wrote:
       | I got my first mechanical keyboard many years ago when playing a
       | game where I had to do some complicated maneuver involving
       | multiple keys which I just couldn't seem to pull off, until I
       | realized that my then keyboard suffered from ghosting. Seems like
       | mechanical keys and N-Key Rollover just go hand in hand.
       | 
       | I have a few now at work and home, my favorites are the Das
       | Keyboard 6 Pro and the Wobkey Crush 80.
        
       | qwerty456127 wrote:
       | > Want a mechanical keyboard but don't know where to start?
       | 
       | Not really. I enjoy membrane keyboards and want everything as
       | silent as possible. Yet I want a hackable controller firmware and
       | it seems these are only available with mechanical keyboards.
        
         | mdnxjdnen wrote:
         | Opti electrical are much more silent then membrane
        
         | Klathmon wrote:
         | If you do ever want to dive into the keeb firmware hacking
         | world, you absolutely can build very silent mechanical
         | keyboards.
         | 
         | Between linear switches, quiet mounting options, and even
         | o-rings if you have a tendency to press keys harder, you can
         | get them to being only slightly louder than a MacBook keyboard
         | (or maybe not louder, just different sounding)
        
         | phito wrote:
         | Mechanical keyboards are not inherently noisy
        
           | balls187 wrote:
           | I switched to EPO Sea Salt. The tactile feel without the loud
           | clacky sound.
           | 
           | My fashion designer, on the other hand, loves both the
           | tactile feel and clacky sound of Kalih White Box switches.
        
         | urxvtcd wrote:
         | You might want to look into Topre switches. They are
         | electrocapacitive rubber dome switches. They feel like typing
         | on a cloud. I own a Leopold FC660C modded to be silent and to
         | support QMK. I sometimes think about getting an ortholinear or
         | split keyboard, but that rules out Topre so I'm not going to
         | bother, it's just too good.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Is there also a guide somewhere for making your own high quality
       | key caps?
        
       | rpastuszak wrote:
       | To anyone using Voyager or Moonlander on a Mac: do you have any
       | tips on how to configure it? I'm messing with the default layout
       | but after months of training still find it hard to use.
       | 
       | That said, the ZSA support is just on another level compared to
       | any hardware I've bought in the past decade. Incredibly
       | responsive, thoughtful, and helpful. My only issue is my own
       | analysis paralysis when messing with layouts, not the product
       | itself.
        
         | tmvphil wrote:
         | I did some major customization for my moonlander that I use
         | with Mac.
         | 
         | https://configure.zsa.io/moonlander/layouts/ZKdVJ/latest/0
         | 
         | I don't like using the red thumb button or the third thumb
         | button, so I try to cram what I need on the first two on each
         | side. That was facilitated by using "home row modifiers"
         | meaning shift/Ctrl/alt/Mac keys are accessed by holding keys on
         | home row.
        
       | cthalupa wrote:
       | There's a bit wrong on the keycap material side of things. You
       | can't directly compare ABS to PBT in a vacuum - different
       | specific blends of both are used in keycaps, for various price
       | points/purposes/etc. There's also nothing preventing ABS keycaps
       | from having texture.
       | 
       | In fact, on the high end side of things, ABS doubleshot keycaps
       | from manufacturers such as GMK are considered to be the gold
       | standard, and PBT is often seen as the more "value" option.
       | Though, I don't think this is accurate for the same reasons that
       | I think the reverse is inaccurate, because you can get plenty of
       | high quality PBT sets.
       | 
       | It's a fun hobby, and the amount of customization you can get
       | into to suite whatever your specific desires are is insane. I had
       | never thought I would get into any sort of physical product
       | design, but it's a unique enough niche that it is fairly common
       | for people to design keycap sets, keyboards, etc., and get them
       | built in low (300-2kish unit for keycaps, sometimes even as low
       | to 10-100ish for keyboards) MOQs, and I've ended up designing 3
       | different keycap sets with a friend of mine.
        
       | rr808 wrote:
       | Anyone have mechanical keyboards banned at work because of
       | security risk? technically we aren't allowed to use them, but I
       | can't use the $5 junk they provide us with. Its a real risk
       | though I wonder how many offices enforce rules like this.
        
         | bigp3t3 wrote:
         | Custom firmware and USB hubs? Valid threat. I would allow
         | reputable vendors though.
         | 
         | I help define the policies at my current workplace and we block
         | anything that isn't an hid device or purely charging (headsets,
         | phones are blocked from mounting storage) . Also no non-
         | computing related accessories, so no usb flash drives, mug
         | warmers, or deskfans-sorry.
        
         | zamadatix wrote:
         | Most places I've worked at have at least limited USB and
         | bluetooth access. On certain (typically shared or special
         | purpose) machines many of the more accessible USB ports were
         | even glued shut for "oh yeah, it's not going to work"
         | convenience.
         | 
         | Never had trouble getting approval for a keyboard ordered by
         | the company though. Took several months one time but eventually
         | it was ordered, reviewed by security, and sent to me.
        
         | alexwasserman wrote:
         | Get a doctors note explaining you have RSI and need a
         | mechanical keyboard for the ergonomics. Pick the specific
         | switches you need for your RSI/ergo reasons.
        
       | jksmith wrote:
       | I use the Model M for both writing beauty code and as a home
       | defense weapon. Requires a conference table. Drive cubemates
       | nuts.
        
         | kstrauser wrote:
         | You can get arrested for walking around with a baseball bat.
         | You can carry a Model M to walk to your car on a dark night and
         | no one will raise an eyebrow.
        
       | NelsonMinar wrote:
       | It's not mechanical switches, but I wish the fancy keyboard folks
       | would get more interested in high quality scissor switches.
       | Apple's A1243, the classic wired external keyboard, is nearly
       | perfect for me. I finally gave up on mechanical keyboards and
       | bought a few new-old-stock Apple keyboards to last me for the
       | next decade or more.
       | 
       | The unique thing about Apple keyboards is the very low profile
       | keycaps and a tiny 0.9mm travel. Matias makes some very nice
       | scissor keyboards but their 2.0mm travel feels different. Also
       | they don't register quite as accurately, I have a lot of miskeys
       | on them.
        
       | a12k wrote:
       | This is a good article to familiarize yourself with the concepts,
       | but would be great if they just listed a few keyboards that are
       | top notch or popular for people to get started. Regardless, this
       | is a lot of words to day that people should own either:
       | 
       | 1. An IBM Model M keyboard, or 2. An HHKB Type S in charcoal with
       | Topre switches and blank keycaps.
        
       | pnathan wrote:
       | My thoughts, as someone who focuses on tools a _lot_ -
       | 
       | Ergonomic is a must. Anything not ergonomic should be gently
       | removed from your approach.
       | 
       | Mechanical is nice, but relates to how your personal interaction
       | with your tools is. I use Cherry Blue or similar. I personally
       | want to feel that click. I also learned to type on a 1940s Royal
       | typewriter. Cherry Red aka Linear feels _awful_. Connect any dots
       | you like there.
       | 
       | TKL designs with f keys and arrows are ideal for emacs users imo.
       | Anything less feels either for non programmers or for people who
       | use keychords a good deal less. The really cranked down designs
       | seem more for writers than coders- special characters are in
       | layers.
       | 
       | I have used Kinesis keyboards for a few years now. Their Edge RGB
       | is _very_ nice. After an RSI episode earlier this year, I moved
       | to an Advantage 360 SmartSet. I consider their SmartSet system to
       | be ideal in terms of a very good meet point of configurability,
       | ease of use, and reliability.
       | 
       | Re the 360, I am not as convinced of the Ortho layout or lack of
       | f-keys. The thumb keys work well.
       | 
       | I would recommend Kinesis as a professional keyboard vendor.
       | 
       | In any case, this becomes a personal geometry problem where your
       | hands, arms, shoulders will all combine to make a physical
       | keyboard better or worse. This is further fit +/- by the tools we
       | use. So it's very individual. Hope my experience shared here help
       | someone.
        
         | bloopernova wrote:
         | I use an Alice layout Keychron Q10 and it fits well with Emacs.
         | 
         | https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q10-pro-alice-lay...
         | 
         | I have several of the left side macro keys set to M-x, C-g and
         | others. Via is very easy to use to program your keyboard, and
         | full QMK is almost infinitely capable.
        
       | drillsteps5 wrote:
       | Picked up this hobby a few years ago (during Covid) and bought 3
       | or 4 of these, either full-size (nostalgic for the Original from
       | my youth) or TCL (when we got back to the office I wanted a
       | keyboard that would fit in my backpack that was not my laptop's).
       | 
       | Then I bought DasKeyboard 4 Pro (tactile switches) and that
       | pretty much ended the hobby. It has everything, it's heavy,
       | doesn't move on the desk (rubber feet), it's sturdy (its top is
       | either aluminum or even steel), has 2 USB-A, very thick twisted
       | USB cable, it's full size, has volume control wheel, even
       | dedicated audio mute button, works with all my Windows and Linux
       | boxes and the KVM. 3 years later it still looks and works like
       | new. I'm a bit sad for my lost hobby but that's life I guess :)
        
       | variadix wrote:
       | For programming, I really enjoy the Corne (crkbd). Having all
       | symbols and numbers on easily reachable keys is much more
       | ergonomic, and the tenting helps a lot with wrist strain. I also
       | have macros for stuff like moving lines around, jumping
       | forward/backward, deleting entire lines, etc.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-29 23:01 UTC)