[HN Gopher] Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards
        
       Author : Bluestein
       Score  : 65 points
       Date   : 2024-12-25 09:47 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
        
       | bloopernova wrote:
       | (2022)
        
         | ethbr1 wrote:
         | I was wondering why it was a useful article on Ars...
        
         | imp0cat wrote:
         | Oh, is that why Hall-effect keyboards got no mention?
        
           | blacksmith_tb wrote:
           | They do, as "analog" - but it's more of a brush off than any
           | real discussion. What they didn't really talk about at all is
           | firmware, which seems like a big omission...
        
       | contrarian1234 wrote:
       | I guess it's a matter of habit, but after so many years of laptop
       | keyboards everything else feels weird/wrong. I've tried
       | mechanical keyboards (for about half ayear) .. and it always felt
       | like using some antique typewriter b/c of the key travel
       | 
       | If I need a detached keyboard then the only one that feels normal
       | is the Apple Magickeyboard b/c it's exactly like a laptop and
       | clicky (the logitech equivalents are very mushy). Wish there was
       | one with standard/Windows keys
        
         | Groxx wrote:
         | I definitely prefer the lower travel distance. Personally I
         | find it much less tiring / RSI-inducing than a normal
         | mechanical keyboard / cherry MX switches. I'm not heavily
         | bottoming out or anything that are frequent "have you
         | tried...", and "just don't bottom out lol" doesn't work for me
         | - I've experimented for nearly a decade now, I'm pretty
         | confident. Long travel distances are definitely not for me.
         | 
         | I've got a custom keyboard with choc low-profile switches, and
         | I like it _a lot_ better. It 's about mid-way between an Apple
         | and a cherry MX, and I'm not sure I notice or care to get any
         | lower distance since these are so easy to find. Unfortunately
         | I'll have to go a lot more custom to get that in a Kinesis
         | Advantage/Dactyl-like setup, and I haven't done that yet.
         | 
         | I do prefer MX key _caps_ though (DSA profile, or roughly), the
         | smaller center and deeper curve seems to help me calibrate
         | better. Choc caps often lean hard into the low-profile thing
         | and are very flat, and I 'm not super fond of that.
        
           | wellthisisgreat wrote:
           | If you like those kind of keycaps try MT3 MiTO keycaps, I
           | have the same preference - sculpted keycaps with smaller
           | centers center and those are my endgame
        
             | Groxx wrote:
             | Do they have choc versions? All I'm seeing is MX... though
             | google's fu has grown weak so it might just be that it's
             | being drowned out by Drop at the moment.
        
         | plagiarist wrote:
         | Even the low profile switches? I, too, have acquired the taste
         | for laptop keyboards, but I think the LP switches are nice.
        
         | eknkc wrote:
         | I got into the hype and bought multiple mechanical keyboards a
         | couple years ago. Finally went back to Apple's magic keyboard.
         | Touch id was a large factor but apparently I love those chiclet
         | keyboards.
        
           | AnthonBerg wrote:
           | Apple keyboards: yes. I so rarely see a preference stated
           | that matches my own that I am compelled to spend a full
           | comment in agreement.
           | 
           | I think part of it is that the keyboard itself is thin.
           | There's less of a physical object to raise forearms and
           | contort wrists over.
        
         | SparkyMcUnicorn wrote:
         | If you wanted to try again, take a look at the Nuphy Air75 v2.
         | Maybe with the Aloe or Cowberry switches.
         | 
         | I feel like you can always find a mechanical that you like, no
         | matter how particular you are. It's just whether or not you
         | want to go down the rabbit hole.
        
           | mmphosis wrote:
           | It's a very preferential opinion because keyboards can be
           | such a personal thing. I used the Nuphy Air75 v2 for a week,
           | and it is the best keyboard that I've ever used. I really
           | like that particular layout: Ctrl Opt Cmd,the arrow keys
           | tucked into the right Shift key and the Del key just to the
           | right of the Backspace key.
           | https://nuphy.com/products/air75-v2?variant=40635218133101
        
         | Tempest1981 wrote:
         | > Wish there was one with standard/Windows keys
         | 
         | Same. Anyone find a low-travel non-mushy keyboard for Windows?
         | Ideally with spacing between every 4 function keys?
        
         | cuanim wrote:
         | I recommend trying out Redragon Horus K261, it took a while to
         | get used to but I like it a lot now. It's a low profile keyb.
        
       | casenmgreen wrote:
       | I hear insanely positive reviews of Hall effect, on the basis of
       | being able to have different key behaviours _depending how far
       | down you press the key_.
       | 
       | So simple example, in a game, walk is a half press and run is a
       | full press.
       | 
       | You could imagine also semi-colon a half press and full colon
       | from a full press.
        
         | jsheard wrote:
         | While you _can_ assign multiple actions to one key with hall
         | effect, the biggest benefit (for gaming at least) is what they
         | call rapid trigger actuation. The idea is that instead of the
         | key triggering and releasing at a specific point in its travel,
         | it reacts to a _change in direction_ so you can instantly
         | switch from pressed to released or vice versa at any point in
         | the keys travel.
        
         | wellthisisgreat wrote:
         | I've been eyeing a Hall effect board, but having used
         | Swiftpoint Z mouse which has that pressure-based activation on
         | several buttons, I must admit it's the kind of feature that's
         | good on paper.
         | 
         | At least for me, it's pretty hard to consistent reproduce "half
         | press" and "full press" and if I wanted to do a "long press" I
         | can easily set it up in QMK for any mechanical keyboard
        
           | minimaxir wrote:
           | With hall effect keyboards you can set the starting actuation
           | of a "half press".
           | 
           | e.g. a start actuation of 0.5mm and full press of 3.0mm gives
           | enough room to avoid false positive full presses.
        
         | AnthonBerg wrote:
         | I just want one to use as a MIDI keyboard.
         | 
         | I'm a tracker kid. Jeskola Buzz ftw. Give me velocity-sensitive
         | QWERTY and I will finally be complete.
        
           | Bluestein wrote:
           | > velocity-sensitive QWERTY
           | 
           | Gosh. Would have never considered such a thing ...
           | 
           | PS. Also, perhaps, coupled with some sort of OSD-autocomplete
           | based on key press velocity ...
           | 
           | ... could be interesting just for typing. Messy, but
           | interesting ...
        
           | d12345m wrote:
           | Yes! Also, if I could use a rotary encoder knob to input midi
           | cc information, I'd be happy.
        
         | minimaxir wrote:
         | I am extremely happy with the new Keychron K2 HE
         | (https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-k2-he-wireless-
         | ma...) and am surprised hall effect keyboards didn't get
         | mentioned in the original post. Even if the advantages are more
         | gamer-oriented, setting low actuation distances and getting
         | immediate keypress response is also a productivity plus, after
         | getting practice to avoid making typos when you'd normally lay
         | your fingers on other keys.
         | 
         | The one-key-multiple-actions is useful but also does require
         | some muscle memory tweaks.
        
           | casenmgreen wrote:
           | Ah, Keychron.
           | 
           | I looked at getting one of theirs.
           | 
           | The web-site is insanely confusing and completely fails to
           | explain the differences between keyboards. It took _two days_
           | of work to figure out what was going on and how keyboards
           | varies and so which model I actually wanted.
           | 
           | I also found their site condescending and annoying - stupid
           | banners which were permanently present on product pages on
           | every little keyboard image saying I can't remember what now
           | - something like "selling quickly so buy now". They're not
           | there any more, far as I can see, so I can't check. Maybe
           | someone else remembers them?
        
       | hummerbliss wrote:
       | I use split keyboards and finding a mechanical split keyboard
       | without the ortho linear configuration seem to be hard. I just
       | want a mechanical split keyboard with hot swappable keys with
       | staggered (normal) keyboard.
        
         | baumy wrote:
         | I bit the bullet and got used to column staggered layouts but I
         | feel your pain. Some options that I found when I was down this
         | rabbit hole:
         | 
         | https://ultimatehackingkeyboard.com/ (my personal favorite)
         | 
         | https://keeb.io/products/cepstrum-keyboard-pre-built
         | 
         | https://keeb.io/products/quefrency-keyboard-pre-built
         | 
         | https://keeb.io/products/sinc-keyboard-pre-built
         | 
         | https://dygma.com/pages/dygma-raise-2
         | 
         | https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q11-qmk-custom-me...
        
           | jsheard wrote:
           | Another one if you're up for a project to put it together:
           | https://nullbits.co/snap/
        
           | Forricide wrote:
           | I use a Cepstrum (bought a kit + switches + keycaps and put
           | it together; there's no soldering required, so it's quite
           | easy). I never 3D printed tenting, so it's not quite perfect
           | for normal typing, but for gaming it's fantastic - I don't
           | think I can go back to non low-profile switches.
        
         | wlesieutre wrote:
         | Give the UHK a look
         | 
         | https://ultimatehackingkeyboard.com/
        
         | Symbiote wrote:
         | I reformatted an existing list of split keyboards into a
         | gallery some time ago: https://aposymbiont.github.io/split-
         | keyboards/ -- you can filter for "traditional" layout.
         | 
         | I've not been actively keeping the site up-to-date. I merge PRs
         | every so often, but I'm not following Reddit/Discord/etc to add
         | new keyboards.
        
         | sockbot wrote:
         | Kinesis makes regular layout split keyboards.
        
           | muststopmyths wrote:
           | I own a freestyle RGB split keyboard and it's the best I've
           | used since the OG Microsoft Natural kyboards for ergonomics.
           | 
           | They're also comparatively better priced than others of its
           | kind.
        
         | Groxx wrote:
         | Kinesis generally makes good stuff, and this one has normal
         | cherry MX switches so you've got access to nearly any keycap
         | you want: https://kinesis-ergo.com/shop/freestyle-pro/
        
         | wellthisisgreat wrote:
         | keeb.io keyboards are the best for that kind of thing. I ended
         | up going the ortho route and designed my own keyboard (I needed
         | extra columns as all the ergo split orthos end at ; key)
         | 
         | But before that I bought all the non-ortho splits (Kinesis,
         | Goldtouch, etc.)and keeb.io were by far the most versatile. I
         | recommend Quefrency for compact layout (my fav is V3 where you
         | could still customize the bottom row) and Sinc for regular
         | size. I used Quefrency when traveling and Sinc in the office.
         | Happy to answer any questions!
        
         | ivanjermakov wrote:
         | Any reason to not go with column-stagger? It felt good
         | immediately after a decade on traditional row-stagger
         | keyboards.
        
       | ashton314 wrote:
       | The most important thing to look for (imo) is _programmability_.
       | You want a board that supports QMK or ZMK firmware. This lets you
       | set up stuff like mod-tap, macros, mouse keys, etc. Mod tap is my
       | favorite thing ergonomics-wise: v and m act as shift when held,
       | normal letters when tapped. Really takes the strain off my
       | pinkies. I also like having a navigation layer: hjkl in this
       | layer act like vim-layout arrow keys.
       | 
       | I use a ZSA Moonlander. Best investment ever.
        
         | mikae1 wrote:
         | _> The most important thing to look for (imo) is
         | programmability._
         | 
         | This. In Plasma I swap some keys, but when I switch to TTY the
         | keys are not swapped. Frustrating. This should clearly be done
         | at hardware/firmware level.
        
           | wongogue wrote:
           | Have you tried Kmonad?
        
       | randmeerkat wrote:
       | It's a disservice to have a guide to mechanical keyboards that
       | doesn't mention the ErgoDox EZ: https://ergodox-ez.com/
        
       | ProllyInfamous wrote:
       | I have used several inexpensive Apple-keyed mechanical keyboards.
       | My random observations:
       | 
       | Buckley Springs (e.g. IBM Model M -type, Unicomp) are absolutely
       | the best _keyfeel_ , but they just won't last longer than the
       | keyboard's warranty (probably nowhere near as long, YMMV). They
       | are obnoxiously loud (similar to my electric Smith Corona Coronet
       | typewriter). Simple keystrikes above 100wpm often result in
       | blown-out springs -- I have thrown away my last Unicomp keyboard
       | (after spring/warranty failures).
       | 
       |  _das_ keyboard (brown>blue>red) is heavenly, my daily-drivers (I
       | own three, identical). Just a little bit louder than an OEM Apple
       | keyboard, and always responds as depressed.
       | 
       | The worst tactile keyboard I've ever used (non-mechanical, but
       | physical buttons): mid 2010's Apple Laptop "butterfly" keys,
       | which fail spectacularly (to crickets from Apple).
        
         | seanmcdirmid wrote:
         | I had a model M that was built in 1993 that I used until 2016.
         | The main thing you need to do is clean it once in a while. I
         | have a newer Model M today that I got last year and I doubt it
         | will last as long.
        
         | ink_13 wrote:
         | I dunno about that, my Model M from 1989 is still going strong.
         | I've been waiting for it to fail for a decade at this point so
         | I can upgrade to something more modern, but I find I'm not
         | interested in giving it up prematurely.
        
       | thangalin wrote:
       | No mention of Unicomp.
       | 
       | https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/product/UB4041A
       | 
       | They stopped selling quiet touch rubber membrane versions.
       | Perhaps the Clickety-M buckling springs just aren't the same
       | without the click?
       | 
       | https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/category/QTRD
        
         | Uvix wrote:
         | The rubber dome ones didn't have buckling springs. They were
         | "traditional" mass-market keyboard tech in the Model M form
         | factor.
        
         | 3pm wrote:
         | I think that Model M (Unicomp/Lexmark) was a cost cut for Model
         | F. Just recently, a company resurrected true Model F:
         | https://www.modelfkeyboards.com/
        
       | ridgeguy wrote:
       | As I've aged, I've developed kinetic tremor. In typing, this
       | shows up as missing my intended target key. The error most
       | commonly presents as hitting two keys at once because my ability
       | to hit only within a defined x,y envelope at the keyboard plane
       | has declined. Analyzing my typos, my intended key gets most of my
       | finger, with adjacent keys getting tripped by ~10% - 20%, i.e.,
       | by the edge of my finger.
       | 
       | I would love to find a keyboard that has keys at the usual pitch
       | (I'm usually on Apple products), but that are smaller targets. I
       | think this would result in fewer "out-of-bounds" adjacent key
       | strikes. I've searched for such, no results so far. Any
       | recommendations gladly received, thanks.
        
         | seltzered_ wrote:
         | Perhaps designing some smaller keycaps could help?
        
         | jsheard wrote:
         | Maybe you'd benefit from a different keycap profile? There's a
         | bunch of options for the standard MX-type mechanical switches,
         | some of which are "spherical" where the contact area is concave
         | and relatively small.
         | 
         | https://i.imgur.com/f8EJnC7.png
         | 
         | Cherry and OEM are the default keycap style, while SA, XDA and
         | DSA are examples of spherical. There aren't many keyboards
         | which come with spherical keycaps out of the box, but you can
         | easily buy a keycap set separately and install it on any MX
         | keyboard.
        
           | thereisnospork wrote:
           | Could also go full psycho and go keycap-less for the truly
           | minimal target. Costs nothing but time to try anyway.
        
           | ridgeguy wrote:
           | Thanks for this. You and speerer have given me the idea to
           | get clear plastic near-hemispheres to glue onto my keycaps.
           | KB illumination will still show, and the key target area will
           | be less than half its current value. Much obliged!
        
         | speerer wrote:
         | Just a thought - Circular keycaps exist, and by definiton have
         | more space between them. They presumably have the same
         | _minimum_ gap at the left and right, though, so might not work.
         | 
         | https://keycapsnation.com/products/round-keycaps
        
         | bb88 wrote:
         | There's a recent trend of people designing custom keyboards for
         | their own accessibility needs. So this is a random thought, no
         | idea if it would work.
         | 
         | A couple of popular keyboard firmwares are open source. I'm
         | thinking it could be possible to reject two neighbor keys which
         | are struck within the same 10 millisecond window.
         | 
         | IOW, if you're on a qwerty keyboard, if R and T are both hit at
         | the same time, don't send the keystrokes to the computer.
         | 
         | QMK and KMK are popular keyboard firmwares. QMK is C based, and
         | KMK is CircuitPython based.
        
       | ivanjermakov wrote:
       | All that and a single paragraph about ergonomic split keyboards?
       | What a shame. Imo, the main reasons to get into mech keyboards
       | are customization and programmability. This subreddit is a good
       | starting point: https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/
        
         | mlloyd wrote:
         | Thanks for this! I use a Perrix 835 and I'm quite happy with it
         | except that the keys are rubbing raw and I need new key caps.
         | But I'm always looking to trade up if possible.
        
           | pabloescobyte wrote:
           | There's a whole world of custom split keyboard options out
           | there that use switches where it's super easy to buy
           | replacement keycaps. You can get keycaps made of PBT which
           | are long-lasting and have a very high "rub" factor so you
           | shouldn't have to worry about rubbing them raw for a very
           | long time.
        
         | AceJohnny2 wrote:
         | Yes! I don't really understand the appeal of mechanical
         | keyboards. I mean sure, they're a step up from cheap-ass
         | rubber-dome defaults, so it's worth people discovering there
         | are _options_.
         | 
         | But for me, most mechanical keyboards are downright painful to
         | use. The standard rectangular layout is bad for my wrists, the
         | keypress depth is bad for my fingers, clicks are just plain
         | annoying.
         | 
         | Perhaps decades of keyboard use has worn my wrists and fingers
         | down or helped me define what I wanted, but it's split low-
         | profile or bust.
         | 
         | And there's a dearth of such options on the market. Slowly
         | rising, but a paltry fraction of the overall
         | "mechanical"/custom keyboard market, especially as it comes to
         | keycaps!
         | 
         | Maybe I should just grab the bull by the horns and mod a
         | Microsoft Sculpt to be wired, whose only downside is unreliable
         | wireless.
         | 
         | /rant
        
         | pabloescobyte wrote:
         | It's an article written by a mainstream site so I wasn't really
         | expecting them to talk about split keyboards at all but I agree
         | wholeheartedly.
         | 
         | I went from a full size to a 40% keyboard to an ortholinear and
         | now use a low-profile split keyboard as a daily driver.
         | 
         | IME it's so much better for ergonomics with a proper desk setup
         | and seating/posture with the split halves shoulder width apart.
         | Wireless is a great benefit as well if you swap between
         | desktops and laptops.
         | 
         | Open source firmware like ZMK and QMK make it trivial to use
         | splits with Linux, mac OS and Windows and for any environments
         | where the OS is locked down and software installation is
         | required.
        
         | mastazi wrote:
         | Are there split keyboards that preserve the standard layout of
         | the home/end/pgup/pgdown cluster? Due to my usage patterns, not
         | having that is a deal breaker for me. As an example, with
         | rectangular keyboards my only choices are tenkeyless or full
         | size, because they preserve the home cluster. Are there
         | equivalents in the split keyboard world? All I'm seeing in that
         | subreddit are smaller keyboards that lack the home cluster,
         | that's why I ask.
        
       | bsnnkv wrote:
       | I'm still just waiting for someone to make a higher quality
       | version of the Logitech Ergo K860.
        
         | Epa095 wrote:
         | PERIBOARD-835?
        
       | ilc wrote:
       | I use a Svalboard now-a-days. For those looking for the modern
       | Datahand... That's where it is. Same switch type, and much the
       | same feel :)
       | 
       | Disclaimer: I do volunteer firmware work on Svalboard. (vial-qmk)
        
         | Epa095 wrote:
         | Ohhh I have been low-key thinking of getting that one, but it's
         | a bit expensive:-/ How do you find it? Was it hard to get
         | going? Comfortable? Fast?
        
       | jasoneckert wrote:
       | Much like musicians that have dozens of musical keyboards in
       | their collection, I've collected/built dozens of mechanical
       | keyboards over the years. I've got ones with nearly every general
       | type of switch (including Topre).
       | 
       | I like to tell people that - as a developer - I'll spend $400+ on
       | a mechanical keyboard that makes the sound I like, and then use
       | it alongside $500+ noise-cancelling headphones.
       | 
       | But all of my mechanical keyboards sit on a display shelf unused
       | today as I prefer to use the Lenovo TrackPoint II keyboard for
       | all of my work (including coding). It's just the best keyboard
       | ever made in my opinion, and I love using it.
        
         | sgarman wrote:
         | Ten years ago I used to be really into all the mech keyboard
         | stuff. Then I bought a topre realforce and have been using it
         | ever since. The hobby part of the keyboards is neat but as far
         | as "good" keyboard I haven't seen anything that would cause me
         | to switch.
        
           | amatecha wrote:
           | same. finally got realforce R2 and I'm good. There might be
           | something better for me, but I've spent enough time and money
           | searching for the perfect combination of form-factor,
           | switches, keycaps, materials, etc.
        
           | danielheath wrote:
           | I have broad shoulders, and find a split keyboard is
           | absolutely essential to avoid scapula pain after longer
           | sessions.
        
         | seanmcdirmid wrote:
         | The sound of the keystroke is much less important than the
         | feeling. The return power on stroke is also important for
         | stamina reasons. That being said, I'm happy with a Model M, no
         | need for fancy customizations.
        
       | blackeyeblitzar wrote:
       | Are mechanical keyboards good for ergonomics and carpal tunnel
       | and all that? Do different switches make a difference for that
       | sort of thing? I've been hearing a lot about Hall effect switches
       | recently - wasn't sure if that can help.
        
         | pabloescobyte wrote:
         | They can be but they are only a small part of the overall
         | setup. You still need to have proper posture and pay particular
         | attention to your habits.
         | 
         | Different switches can also help depending on your typing
         | habits and usecase.
         | 
         | For me personally having less keys means less movement leading
         | to significantly reduced possibility of RSI. With just 42 keys
         | on my keyboard literally everything is one key away from each
         | finger on home row so I can spend more time typing and mousing
         | around than a traditional full size keyboard+mouse setup.
        
       | mberning wrote:
       | I do not understand the hobby around mech keyboards at all. It
       | reminds me a lot of other activities/sports where the gear
       | becomes more of a focus than the activity itself. Reminds me of
       | photography or paintball. Dudes will have thousands of dollars of
       | gear and use it 3 times a year.
        
       | breakingcups wrote:
       | I see soooo many recommendations online in every discussions
       | about mechanical keyboards. However, what I would really need is
       | a physical place, a store, a showroom, to be able to try them out
       | myself. A wide range of brands and options, preferably.
       | 
       | I'm a keyboard pleb, after originally using a Model M I just
       | moved on to other regular office keyboards. I like the _idea_ of
       | mechanical keyboards but I don 't know if I would actually enjoy
       | them, and there's so many variations that for every complaint you
       | might have about a keyboard a friend might have that you can try,
       | you'll get three people saying that I should really try keyboard
       | X from brand Y instead because it will change my life.
        
       | Bluestein wrote:
       | Here's wishing one-handed _chorded_ keyboards were mainstream -
       | or, at least, viable ...
        
       | motorest wrote:
       | Mechanical keyboards are nice, but what stumps me is the lack of
       | support for USB hubs embedded in the keyboard. Anyone who uses
       | yubikeys know the importance of having those a key stretch away,
       | not to mention the convenience of being able to plug headphones
       | and USB pens ok what you're already holding.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-28 23:01 UTC)