[HN Gopher] Scale Model of Boeing 777-300ER, Made from Manila Fo...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Scale Model of Boeing 777-300ER, Made from Manila Folders
        
       Author : uticus
       Score  : 357 points
       Date   : 2024-12-27 16:53 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.lucaiaconistewart.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.lucaiaconistewart.com)
        
       | 0_____0 wrote:
       | Someone made a comment here regarding magic recently that this
       | reminded me of.
       | 
       | Sometimes you can make something appear magical by spending far
       | more time on the effect than anyone would ever think to do.
       | 
       | Stunning work. I admire and envy the focus.
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | The same can be true of magic.
         | 
         | Penn and Teller's Fool Us had a couple of contestants per year
         | that did a trick the hardest way possible. A couple times they
         | gave the person the prize even though they knew how it was
         | done. Like the people who "shuffled" an entire deck into a
         | specific order, and/or used precise cuts rather than using
         | marked cards or swapping the deck.
         | 
         | There have been a couple people they've had back three times
         | even if they knew how they did it, because they're just so
         | good.
        
           | ska wrote:
           | > Sometimes you can make something appear magical by spending
           | far more time on the effect than anyone would ever think to
           | do.
           | 
           | This is as good a definition of stage magic as anything, I
           | suspect.
        
             | hinkley wrote:
             | Comedy has some of the same. Some comedians look like
             | they're just rambling through random ideas that have popped
             | into their heads, when in fact it's a patter they've been
             | practicing for months and months. I have a lot of respect
             | for the ones who can hide the seams between their various
             | jokes and make them look like the funny uncle at family
             | gatherings just riffing off of people or themselves for an
             | hour.
        
               | ajcp wrote:
               | It's funny you say that because whenever I see a standup
               | special and the comedian seems to randomly be prompted by
               | something they see in the audience/off camera that leads
               | them down a bespoke, yet perfect response/thread I have
               | to think they are just making the prompt up.
        
               | bb88 wrote:
               | What if you can do that with magic and comedy both at the
               | same time? You get someone like Markobi.
               | 
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJX-z0O9TOE
        
               | sneak wrote:
               | It takes a huge amount of skill and talent to effectively
               | ape Lennart Green.
        
           | the_af wrote:
           | To be clear: if they absolutely know how the magician did it,
           | they do NOT award the prize.
           | 
           | They do award the prize if they know there's more than one
           | way the person could have done it, but they cannot tell for
           | sure which one was it.
           | 
           | And they make it clear their show is not about the prize
           | anyway, it's about the wonder of watching cool magic acts.
           | The prize is a gimmick (but still, it's always fair and never
           | staged).
           | 
           | They always celebrate good magic, regardless of whether they
           | can figure it out or not.
        
           | stevage wrote:
           | Yeah or the guy who can pour a whole deck of cards onto the
           | table and grab the right card out of the air. It's not a
           | trick, he's just insanely practised at it.
        
       | lisper wrote:
       | The detail on this thing is just insane. The amount of time and
       | effort put in is comparable to what it takes to build an actual
       | aircraft.
       | 
       | [UPDATE] Just to clarify: building an actual jetliner is
       | obviously orders of magnitude harder than building this model.
       | But I think building this model is probably comparable to
       | building a light aircraft like this one:
       | https://www.vansaircraft.com/rv-14/
        
         | 4gotunameagain wrote:
         | The amount of time and effort spent in this is impressive, but
         | orders of magnitude away from being comparable to building an
         | actual modern airliner.
         | 
         | We are talking about millions of man hours spread all over the
         | globe and throughout the years.
        
           | lisper wrote:
           | Oh yeah, I should clarify: I didn't mean that building this
           | model was comparable to building an actual airliner. But I do
           | think it's comparable to building, say, an RV-14
           | (https://www.vansaircraft.com/rv-14/).
        
           | Loughla wrote:
           | Jesus can you relax? Sometimes statements aren't meant to be
           | taken exactly literally. I don't mean to be hateful but what
           | do you get out of being needlessly pedantic? Obviously
           | there's more time actually spent on modern airliners. OP is
           | using it as an analogy to show that it's a complicated
           | process, and isn't saying that it's scientifically 1 to 1
           | exact.
           | 
           | It's this type of comment that makes people be needlessly
           | careful on this site more than any other. When you know there
           | is someone just waiting to correct you when you use a simple
           | turn of phrase.
        
             | psygn89 wrote:
             | Maybe the person is on the spectrum or something and has
             | trouble with understanding nuances and figurative language,
             | who knows.
        
         | wslh wrote:
         | Your point was clear to me, we can say that at the individual*n
         | (n>=1) level of effort is comparable.
        
       | Liftyee wrote:
       | I cannot begin to comprehend how this was put together.
       | Unbelievable amounts of dedication must have been involved.
        
       | ComputerGuru wrote:
       | (2014)
       | 
       | I remember seeing this when it was first making the rounds
       | (though I thought it was earlier than '14, but that's what all
       | the press links date to). Incredible.
        
         | mzs wrote:
         | He's been at it since May 2008 and the latests updates on
         | instagram are from this year:
         | https://www.instagram.com/luca.iaconi.stewart/
        
           | ComputerGuru wrote:
           | Thanks for (possibly) vindicating my memory! I recall seeing
           | this circa 2010 +/- a year or so.
        
       | polishdude20 wrote:
       | How does he come up with the 2d designs? They need to all fit
       | together right? I feel like there some missing step between the
       | reference material and the 2D illustrator designs.
        
         | gavmor wrote:
         | I'm interested in this, too! I've been mulling over the design
         | of 3D puzzles from 2D, laser-cut MDF.
        
           | gibspaulding wrote:
           | Look into Fusion360. I've used it for similar projects in the
           | past with some success.
        
           | noduerme wrote:
           | I've never tried it, but I wonder if designing in 3D and then
           | printing out UV maps would be a good way to go? You'd at
           | least end up with all the polygons and an outer shape to cut
           | out, although whether you could fold paper along the edges is
           | another story.
        
         | SvenL wrote:
         | On one page he mentioned that the airline supplied material
         | which he used to create the designs in Adobe Illustrator.
        
         | gibspaulding wrote:
         | This threw me off too. Sure Illustrator is probably a better
         | tool for this than pen and paper, but it seems like far from
         | the best choice. I guess that just makes this all the more
         | impressive.
        
       | ninalanyon wrote:
       | If only I had this degree of focus and willingness to work so
       | hard on all the boring bits!
        
         | fsckboy wrote:
         | > _all the boring bits_
         | 
         | your problem is not focus or willingness, it's being motivated
         | by excitement rather than perfection. it's about the object,
         | take yourself and how you feel out of the equation.
        
           | berkes wrote:
           | This is also a personality trait. Where ADHD has this in the
           | extreme.
           | 
           | I, having ADHD, cannot do any task if it's not motivated by
           | excitement and newness (or forced by raw discipline, which is
           | extremely energy consuming).
           | 
           | Your comment sounds like "it's just a matter of changing your
           | mindset". Maybe I read that wrong. But I know it's not just
           | mindset changing. It's, e.g. with ADHD fundamentally wired
           | into a brain.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | For people that enjoy this type of work, what you call the
         | boring bits are the exciting parts.
        
         | 0_____0 wrote:
         | The act is the reward. If you can convince yourself this is
         | true for various things, you get really good at them fast.
        
       | BillSaysThis wrote:
       | If he adds AI, can he make it fly?
        
         | SAI_Peregrinus wrote:
         | With the application of sufficient force, any object can be
         | made to fly at least once. No AI necessary.
        
       | froggertoaster wrote:
       | Humans are just amazing.
        
       | qwertox wrote:
       | This is the kind of work billionaires should pay millions for as
       | if it were a painting, and display it proudly.
        
       | hk__2 wrote:
       | At first I was confused by this "Made from Manila folders" which
       | I didn't know; I thought these folders were some kind of
       | information from something that happened in Manila, and that the
       | author did the scale model based on what he had found in them
        
         | loloquwowndueo wrote:
         | Yeah and goldbeater's skin is not literally the skin of the
         | actual person who beats the gold :)
        
       | fnord77 wrote:
       | hope this ends up in a museum
        
       | ffitch wrote:
       | it's very inspiring!
       | 
       | I wonder why manila envelopes. does envelope paper have
       | properties uniquely fitted for this kind of modeling, or is it
       | just nice color and suitable weight?
        
         | idlewords wrote:
         | These are folders, not envelopes. They are pretty stiff and
         | hold their shape well. I bet any light card stock would do, but
         | everyone of a certain age has experience with these folders;
         | the fact that they're so basic makes this achievement extra
         | special.
        
           | ffitch wrote:
           | I meant the folders, sorry!
           | 
           | Is age the factor here? feels like they're just as ubiquitous
           | today as they were when the author was in high school.
           | 
           | I certainly appreciate the idea of crafting something special
           | out of seemingly boring material, but the remark that they
           | were taught to model with this paper in school made me wonder
           | of it does have advantages over basic paper or cardstock.
        
             | 0_____0 wrote:
             | I think it may be that it's a fairly uniform thickness
             | across manufacturers, whereas if you are getting cardstock
             | from different places you would need to pay attention to
             | paper weights (gsm).
        
       | pseingatl wrote:
       | The model looks cleaner than the aircraft's business class IRL,
       | if recent videos are to be believed.
        
       | idlewords wrote:
       | To restore balance we need someone to make Manila folders out of
       | a 777.
        
         | UniverseHacker wrote:
         | And then a full scale flying 777 from Manila folders
        
           | datavirtue wrote:
           | Elons next project.
        
       | delichon wrote:
       | "The Ultimate Paper Airplane | WIRED"
       | 
       | Ahem. https://newatlas.com/great-paper-airplane-project/21961/
       | 
       | IMHO the actual flight characteristics of the aircraft are inputs
       | to the `ultimate?` predicate function.
        
       | kepler1 wrote:
       | Made out of manilla file folders is approximately correct for the
       | state of Air India's fleet right now.
        
       | polairscience wrote:
       | I'll comment on something different. His website is clean and
       | awesome. Attention to detail just like the model. Love it.
        
       | sema4hacker wrote:
       | Exactly how many millions of hours did this take?
        
         | stevesimmons wrote:
         | The Singapore Airlines clip says that one took 750 hours and
         | had 3000 parts.
        
       | aaronax wrote:
       | For something vaguely similar, as in a meticulous way of making a
       | 3D object out of 2D materials with fine details, I recommend the
       | Metal Earth products (puzzles?) as I find them to be quite
       | rewarding. The complexity is probably two orders of magnitude
       | less--think 10-20 hours to assemble the pre-designed and cut
       | pieces.
        
       | einpoklum wrote:
       | I sympathize with how he must feel thinking about the 777-8 and
       | 777-9 entering service soon, displacing the 300ER...
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_777X
        
       | exabrial wrote:
       | These planes are incredible to ride on. AA runs a Charlotte <->
       | Munich flight... the Premium Economy exceeds expectations for the
       | money, like sleeping in a lay-z-boy.
        
         | foooorsyth wrote:
         | Premium economy to MUC out of CLT always annoys me because the
         | legs that hold the seats up can _possibly_ be right in the
         | middle of your under-seat space, making putting a briefcase
         | under the seat in front of you impossible (the legs are
         | unevenly spaced throughout the row so not all seats lose the
         | space). They also have those fold-down footrests that I never
         | actually use and take up more space. Paying more for a seat in
         | which I might not even be able to access my work laptop is a
         | bit annoying.
         | 
         | Man, I sound like a diva.
        
           | exabrial wrote:
           | I feel like any class of seating except business suffers from
           | that "near seat storage shortage". I tend to carry a soft
           | sided satchel instead of a case for the reasons you state: it
           | can be jammed pretty much anywhere
        
       | datavirtue wrote:
       | I would get a high from the first two or three seats...and
       | then....I would abandon the project.
        
       | zombiwoof wrote:
       | Amazing
        
       | andrewshadura wrote:
       | I've looked up what the hell is a manila folder, and it turned
       | out to be a paper folder looking exactly like a Windows folder
       | icon, even with a matching yellowish colour. Maybe I grew up and
       | lived in all the wrong countries, but I've never seen such a
       | folder in my life.
        
       | matthewmcg wrote:
       | This is wonderful. The loving dedication to getting the details
       | right reminds me of the mechanic that built a functional scale
       | model of a Ferrari 312PB race car as shown on this classic Top
       | Gear episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeUMDY01uUA
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-27 23:00 UTC)