[HN Gopher] Hyundai to offer free NACS DC EV adapters to enhance...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hyundai to offer free NACS DC EV adapters to enhance charging
       convenience
        
       Author : gnabgib
       Score  : 29 points
       Date   : 2024-12-23 20:28 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.hyundainews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.hyundainews.com)
        
       | dylan604 wrote:
       | So this is just the adapter. That's fine I guess if doing the
       | absolute minimum to make the thing work is the way they want to
       | go, but some people like to express themselves by doing more.
       | 
       | I don't remember which car company (Ford maybe??) is paying for a
       | home charger install at the buyer's home (I'm assuming a single
       | family dwelling type of restriction). Clearly trying to entice
       | more sales. So the ad kind of worked, except not so well that I
       | remember exactly which maker it is doing this. Good job ad guys!
        
         | drewnick wrote:
         | Ford is offering the home charger installation, or a $1000
         | public charging credit. I'm trying to shop for one of these
         | trucks right now, and my sense is that the dealers are not a
         | big fan of EVs and are almost actively working against Ford.
         | The buying process is extremely painful compared to my last two
         | purchases from pure EV manufacturers.
        
           | GiorgioG wrote:
           | Sure they're against them - they're much simpler to service
           | and most likely significantly more reliable. Given that
           | dealers typically make most of their money on service
           | (repairs) than on sales of vehicles, it's no wonder they're
           | more likely to be biased against EVs. I have an ICE F-150
           | (2016) and I can't fathom only having 240ish miles of range.
           | I'll wait 5 years for the 450 mile version.
        
             | NotSammyHagar wrote:
             | depending on model, already have 320 miles
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_F-150_Lightning.
             | 
             | They now test them doing things like going 70 mph without
             | stopping, got 270 miles
             | https://insideevs.com/reviews/598000/ford-f150-lightning-
             | ran.... EPA doesn't drive them that steadily that fast on
             | their test run. The new Tesla model 3 (highland) gets 370
             | miles on that test.
        
               | GiorgioG wrote:
               | Chevy's RST Silverado can do 450 miles, but it's nearly
               | $100k.
        
           | eagerpace wrote:
           | It's not your imagination. GM and F are awful about this.
           | They even significantly curtailed their plans for training
           | and updating dealers to support EVs better.
           | 
           | https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/13/ford-ends-ev-dealership-
           | prog...
           | 
           | It's an under-appreciated intangible "innovation" from Tesla
           | that you can order a car as simply as you can order from
           | Amazon. People hate car dealers with good reason.
        
           | NotSammyHagar wrote:
           | Well of course dealers don't want to sell you EVs. They have
           | far far less maintenance than an ICE car. There are less
           | options on many of them. And the biggest reason is that they
           | know their customers who try 'non-dealer' sellers like Tesla,
           | Rivian, and Lucid are far happier overall. And the EVs plus
           | dealers are clearly not matching the good things that come
           | from Tesla or Rivian. Another example, there's basically no
           | need for an annual service visit. The dealers are trying to
           | make kind of silly service visits, charging $100 to rotate
           | the tires. https://www.insideevsforum.com/community/index.php
           | ?threads/s...
           | 
           | There are problems with no-dealer companies, when they are in
           | initial stages it can be hard to get repairs if there is no
           | local service center. Rivian is still growing a lot and can
           | get behind, Tesla seems to have basically built out enough
           | service in a lot of places but also can get behind. But even
           | real auto dealers can get behind too.
        
             | cogman10 wrote:
             | I have a Tesla and my interaction with the local service
             | center has been pretty much as good as my prior
             | interactions with a trusted mechanic.
             | 
             | The dealer model is just regulatory capture. It's a dumb
             | middle man that provides no value beyond what the
             | manufacturer can do. It's only there because dealers tend
             | to be over represented in state and federal officials. So,
             | of course, they keep and create regulations which penalize
             | direct sales.
        
           | stetrain wrote:
           | In the last 5 years the only real service my EV has had is a
           | 12V battery replacement (done under warranty), cabin air
           | filters, wipers/wiper fluid, and tire rotations.
           | 
           | And those can pretty easily be done DIY or at a local tire
           | shop.
           | 
           | I can imagine why dealerships may not be pleased, and have
           | heard about other EV brands having things like recommended
           | $300 annual service visits where the dealership basically
           | does the above items and checks for software updates. I guess
           | some people will pay it and that might help keep the
           | dealerships from being too mad about the changes.
        
         | ajp wrote:
         | When I was shopping for a new car, Hyundai had an offer for a
         | free Lvl 2 home charger (though not installation) with the new
         | car purchase on the Ioniq 6.
        
           | semi-extrinsic wrote:
           | To be fair, a Level 2 charger probably costs them less than
           | $200, it's not a crazy thing to throw in with a $50 000 car.
        
             | srockets wrote:
             | [delayed]
        
         | tw04 wrote:
         | This has nothing to do with at-home charging. This is so that
         | Hyundai's that have already been sold can utilize NACS high
         | speed chargers (Tesla). And to future proof them as other
         | vendors move to the NACS standard.
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | I never claimed this had anything to do with at-home
           | charging. I'm comparing this incentive to another car
           | company's incentive. Hyundai is trying to make charging the
           | EV less of a hassle. That incentive is still much less
           | convenient than the other car company paying for a charger in
           | your home.
        
             | tw04 wrote:
             | Hyundai does have an in home charger incentive.
             | 
             | But again, that has literally nothing to do with this. This
             | isn't about "making charging more convenient", it's about
             | ensuring owners are future proofed.
             | 
             | The people this is targeted at already bought a Hyundai,
             | this isn't about enticing new buyers.
        
             | stetrain wrote:
             | You said they are "doing the absolute minimum to make the
             | thing work is the way they want to go" which is a strange
             | thing to say about offering a free adapter for DC fast
             | charging for their existing customers.
             | 
             | Maybe it makes sense if you assume that's the only thing
             | Hyundai is doing in the realm of making EV charging easier.
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | it was a very strained reference to Office Space and
               | pieces of flair
        
         | r00fus wrote:
         | Absolute minimum would be working with Tesla to ensure your
         | vehicles are permitted to charge at SuperChargers but require
         | your customers to buy an adapter ($200) so free adapter is
         | definitely a step up in my book.
         | 
         | I'm not sure what installing an L2 home charger does for anyone
         | who has range anxiety for trips. Most people who have an EV and
         | can install an L2 charger (ie, life in a SFH that they own)
         | probably already have done so.
        
           | aidenn0 wrote:
           | I still use a L1 charger in a SFH because an overnight charge
           | at L1 speeds is 3x my daily driving usage, so I haven't
           | bothered to hire an electrician.
        
           | peutetre wrote:
           | > _working with Tesla to ensure your vehicles are permitted
           | to charge at SuperChargers_
           | 
           |  _Permitted_ is a funny perspective. You should be demanding
           | compatibility in charging infrastructure.
           | 
           | Incompatible infrastructure makes EVs worse than ICE
           | vehicles. All brands of charger must charge all brands of EV,
           | just as all brands of fuel station fuel all brands of ICE
           | vehicle. Anything less is backward and primitive.
           | 
           | Europe sorted this out a long time ago. Slowly North America
           | is getting there by standardizing on CCS with the J3400 plug.
        
         | kccqzy wrote:
         | Hyundai also had an in-home charger installation incentive.
        
         | SideburnsOfDoom wrote:
         | > doing the absolute minimum to make the thing work is the way
         | they want to go
         | 
         | It isn't the way they are going, no. Hyundais and Kias in the
         | USA will have native NACS ports in all 2025 models onwards.
         | Starting with Ioniq 5 shipping in Q1 2025, I believe.
         | 
         | Adapters are the short-term "stopgap".
         | 
         | Sources:
         | 
         | "Hyundai Is About To Have More EVs With NACS Plugs Than Tesla
         | ... In the United States, all-new or refreshed Hyundai EVs will
         | come exclusively with a NACS port, beginning in Q4 2024."
         | 
         | https://insideevs.com/news/742221/hyundai-kia-genesis-nacs-c...
         | 
         | "Hyundai's first EV with native Tesla Supercharging is the new
         | Ioniq 5"
         | 
         | https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/3/24235272/hyundai-2025-ioni...
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | So they are not selling the rest of the 2024 inventory
           | anywhere? That's the incentive on getting people to buy the
           | '24 model. They need all the help they can get to clear the
           | '24s out so more '25s can take their place on the lot.
           | 
           | buyer: "I like the '24, but the charging port is
           | inconvenient"
           | 
           | seller: "Fret not, we offer this handy dandy adapter. Please
           | please please buy this car"
        
         | stetrain wrote:
         | > That's fine I guess if doing the absolute minimum to make the
         | thing work is the way they want to go
         | 
         | They're also switching all of their EVs to use native NACS
         | ports next year for the North American market. New customers
         | won't need this adapter, their cars will come with an adapter
         | in the other direction (CCS to NACS).
         | 
         | They also have various offers at different times for including
         | a home charger + installation and/or free charging credits at
         | Electrify America stations.
         | 
         | https://www.hyundainews.com/en-us/releases/3945
         | 
         | https://www.hyundaiusa.com/us/en/special-programs/electrify-...
         | 
         | They are also part of the IONNA group which is going to be
         | building a lot of DC fast chargers across North America.
         | 
         | https://www.hyundainews.com/en-us/releases/4071
        
         | zacharycohn wrote:
         | It was Hyundai. Hyundai gives you a free ChargePoint charger
         | and $600 towards installation. (or at least they did a year ago
         | when I got my Ioniq 5)
        
           | aidenn0 wrote:
           | They did not offer that with my Kona Electric purchased this
           | year. Probably because they are offering a $7500 rebate to
           | match the rebates for US produced cars.
        
       | nothercastle wrote:
       | Anyone know when sign ups actually come online?
        
         | quadog wrote:
         | It says Q1 of 2025.
        
       | ponector wrote:
       | While other vendor offer a device with which you can hack and
       | drive Hyundai/Kia vehicles within few minutes.
       | 
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/electricvehicles/comments/1durgih/h...
        
         | zacharycohn wrote:
         | And almost every other brand of car, EV or ICE.
        
       | 0xbadcafebee wrote:
       | I'm amazed there isn't more talk about how bad the nationwide
       | charging infrastructure is. Non-Tesla public chargers are a
       | disaster. Terribly engineered, buggy as hell, constantly failing,
       | perpetually out of date, improperly configured, insecure. As
       | someone who has worked with them, I would probably not buy an EV
       | at all unless I could use the Tesla chargers, so thank god that's
       | an option now.
        
         | rpgwaiter wrote:
         | Non-tesla infra has gotten a lot better over the past couple
         | years, at least according to this one YouTube EV road trip I
         | watched recently: https://youtu.be/ouPiwt5hxXQ
        
           | sipjca wrote:
           | It's still not great. I drove I5 North for the holidays and
           | at one stop there was an hour+ long wait at Electrify
           | America. Only 3/4 stalls working and a queue 5 or 6 deep to
           | charge. At the same stop there were 12+ Tesla chargers and no
           | issue with wait and not fully occupied
        
             | VBprogrammer wrote:
             | I don't have an electric car (not against it in principle
             | but waiting for the right time).
             | 
             | One thing that always bothers me is that, from what I've
             | seen, queuing for charging seems to be based on
             | coordination and trust between EV drivers. Surely it would
             | make far more sense to have some kind of virtual queuing
             | system built in. Then when a charger becomes free it
             | automatically sends you an alert and gives you some period
             | to connect to the charger.
             | 
             | Longer term, I would hope charging stations would be
             | designed with a layout which lets cars queue sensibly.
        
         | LeoPanthera wrote:
         | Since you don't own an EV, you probably haven't noticed how
         | much better they've got in the past year. There's been a huge
         | improvement, and many of them are now considerably faster than
         | Tesla chargers, especially if you have an 800v car.
        
       | Upvoter33 wrote:
       | I have a Hyundai Ioniq 5, and as such, applaud this.
       | 
       | That said, it won't affect my life much. I mostly commute, and
       | for that, just trickle charge at home (very slow) or plug in at
       | work when I need a faster boost. It's funny how little range
       | anxiety matters if you don't drive long range.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-23 23:01 UTC)