[HN Gopher] Wuppertal's suspended monorail proved its doubters w...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Wuppertal's suspended monorail proved its doubters wrong [video]
        
       Author : ohjeez
       Score  : 111 points
       Date   : 2024-12-19 15:07 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | ordu wrote:
       | So, it seems a falling elephant wouldn't splash if it splashed
       | into the river.
        
         | jhoechtl wrote:
         | A reverence to areal event
         | https://youtu.be/IrMNQP4sJnA?si=M13ENQoLMY5PTFyj
        
           | itronitron wrote:
           | you seem to have linked an Ad
        
       | mikewarot wrote:
       | My grandfather emigrated from Vohwinkel in 1921. I imagine he
       | rode it quite a bit while training as a locksmith. I've always
       | wanted to see it in person.
       | 
       | I found the address he used to live at... it's an empty lot on a
       | corner. 8(
        
       | skrebbel wrote:
       | Last xmas my kids and I stayed over in Wuppertal on the way back
       | home from family just to check out the Schwebebahn and it didn't
       | disappoint! It makes what would otherwise be a relatively
       | ordinary Ruhrgebiet-style German city (ie mostly ugly), a
       | uniquely beautiful walk. It's also awesome that the Schwebebahn
       | is just regular public transport. You can get up into one of the
       | stops, buy an obscenely cheap ticket (like 1 euro per person or
       | something, I forgot), and ride it out.
       | 
       | I liked being under it even more than being on it - the
       | combination of the post-WWII buildings with the nature around the
       | river and the early industrial Schwebebahn heavy metal design
       | gives the riverside a very unique, slightly dieselpunk,
       | atmosphere.
       | 
       | I wouldn't say it's worth a trip on its own but it was definitely
       | worth a detour for us!
        
       | pixelpoet wrote:
       | I love the Schwebebahn, and there's this funky song about it :D
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6Ifi3wl550
        
         | martin_a wrote:
         | Check out meelman, he's a rap artist from Wuppertal, the
         | Schwebebahn is a reoccuring theme in his songs:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6jDQpSOdoc
        
       | badgersnake wrote:
       | I went for a ride back in March of this year. It's a cool piece
       | of engineering.
       | 
       | We rode it to the Engels museum and the sculpture park, Wuppertal
       | was worth the day trip from Cologne.
        
       | echelon wrote:
       | I wish we had more monorails and viaducts. They're useful, leave
       | the ground infrastructure unimpeded, and are honestly beautiful
       | to look at.
        
         | ajmurmann wrote:
         | I think they are good in limits. I love the occasional one, but
         | as a very common solution I'd prefer elevated walkway systems
         | like in Hong Kong which leaves the sun and view to pedestrians.
         | Of course the occasional monorail is a huge win and, add you
         | say, beautiful
        
         | resoluteteeth wrote:
         | I think the main problem with suspended monorails is that
         | they're more expensive to build unless the tracks are already
         | going to have to be elevated for 100% of their length due to
         | other constraints.
         | 
         | As long as that's the case, it doesn't seem like they really
         | have any significant disadvantages compared to normal trains.
         | 
         | But otherwise, by choosing a monorail you're going from being
         | able to run some parts of the tracks on the ground with very
         | little cost/effort to not being able to run any of them
         | directly on the ground for very little benefit aside from
         | looking cool.
        
           | xg15 wrote:
           | I think the movie Minority Report had a really cool concept
           | of a sort of "semi-suspended" railway: The machinery that
           | connected to the rails could rotate all around the train car,
           | so depending on the environment, the tracks could go below
           | the car, above the car, or even beside the car, which would
           | allow it to use sheer walls as "ramps".
           | 
           | I'm not sure if something like this would in any way be
           | physically feasible, but if yes, it might solve the cost
           | problem, because part of the rails could then be run on the
           | ground.
           | 
           | (Maybe a less sci-fi version would be a "hybrid" car that has
           | a second set of wheels on the underside and could switch
           | between ordinary and overhead rails as needed?)
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | Going all elevated is good as it gets you out of traffic and
           | thus allows for more speed. The problem is sometimes you want
           | to go undergroud. The other problem is while material costs
           | should be cheaper there is no standard and so you but more
           | custom parts and them when something wears out you pay one
           | off prices to replace it. use standard rails and you can buy
           | more mass produced parts which brings your cost down.
        
         | bobthepanda wrote:
         | Monorails are only really beautiful in jurisdictions that don't
         | require emergency walkways along the length. If a place
         | requires that, then the visual bulk is no different from a
         | normal railway.
        
           | Animats wrote:
           | Maybe. Compare the Las Vegas Monorail with aerial sections of
           | BART. But BART is heavy rail, with serious speed and
           | capacity.
        
       | martin_a wrote:
       | I've studied in Wuppertal and have very fond memories of the
       | Schwebebahn.
       | 
       | Some people get very sick while riding it, which is probably due
       | to the train slightly swinging in its stations. That's rather
       | unsual and some bodies can't handle it that well.
       | 
       | It was always funny to "test" who is affected by that with new
       | students during their first week.
       | 
       | If you have the chance: Ride the Schwebebahn from end station to
       | end station and have a look at the city from above. Wuppertal is
       | probably a good example of and old industrial city struggling to
       | find its way into modern times.
        
       | ttepasse wrote:
       | There is a semi-famous video from 1902 recording a ride on the
       | then new Schwebebahn. MoMa digitised it and someone on Youtube
       | did a side-by-side-recording of 1902 vs. 2015:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TqqdOcX4dc
       | 
       | There are two other suspended monorails in the Ruhr are, both
       | driver-less and shorter, built in the 80s and 90s by Siemens, the
       | H-Bahn at Dortmund University and the Skytrain at Dusseldorf
       | Airport. I drove the H-Bahn daily, because computer science back
       | then was distributed all about the campus. Still have fond
       | memories about it. (Less so about the degree.) The Tim Traveller
       | on Youtube recently did a video about it:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Kwpj1UOrhs
        
         | asyx wrote:
         | I lived in the student housing at the... southern campus? The
         | apartment buildings that are in Eichlingenhofen. But I went to
         | the FH not the TU which is in the other site of campus. I spent
         | a lot of time on the H-Bahn. It's super cute and feels kinda
         | sci-fi-ish.
        
       | namibj wrote:
       | Notably the system works for substantially larger swinging angles
       | (the structure gets somewhat heavier to leave that much more free
       | space), and one could bank the track in turns, too. Together some
       | impressive g forces could be archived; 1 horizontal g for a total
       | of sqrt(2) would be barely beyond the wuppertal geometry's
       | capabilities; 2 horizontal g for sqrt(3) total are still fairly
       | realistic if the passengers/cargo tolerate.
       | 
       | You basically save having to go through mountains to keep speed,
       | as you can go through a curvy valley.
        
         | bobthepanda wrote:
         | Passengers have fairly low tolerance for forces on a daily
         | traveling mode of transport. Your average commuter wants to be
         | able to hold a hot coffee without scalding themselves.
        
           | dmkolobov wrote:
           | Genuine question: wouldn't we still be able to do that? Im
           | imagining similar behavior to swinging cup of water around on
           | a string. The liquid experiences the same acceleration and
           | "settles" within the new orientation of the container.
        
             | kfarr wrote:
             | Yes the same as an airplane turning, you don't spill your
             | coffee on a banked turn
        
               | jerkstate wrote:
               | so long as the turn is coordinated!
               | https://pilotinstitute.com/turn-coordinator/
        
         | slow_typist wrote:
         | 2 g horizontal results in sqrt(2^2+1^2)g = sqrt(5)g swinging
         | out at tan^(-1)(2) = 63.5 degrees from the perpendicular
         | direction (probably overswinging a bit depending on track
         | design and speed). Would be good fun on a commute. Hopefully
         | the inner part of the superstructure doesn't come out of the
         | ground.
        
       | porphyra wrote:
       | A lot of people are very against "gadgetbahns" which are
       | unorthodox means of transportation that are often quite
       | expensive. But I love these unique vehicles! And it is very
       | satisfying when one of them actually works out in an economical
       | sense.
        
         | bluGill wrote:
         | They generally work. However if you go with standard and thus
         | cheaper technology you can get more transit for the same money.
         | Transit should be about getting people places not the
         | interesting vehicels.
         | 
         | That is why so many are against gadgetbahns.
        
           | lmm wrote:
           | They generally aren't real proposals in the first place (see
           | hyperloop). They're usually vaporware used to frustrate a
           | real transit proposal, analogous to e.g. deflecting proposals
           | to move to a memory safe language by saying that you're going
           | to use a safe subset of C++ that's going to be defined and
           | standardised real soon now.
        
             | bluGill wrote:
             | Excep c++ is standard, we hake alot of it and plenty of
             | people who know it. You have instead made the counter my
             | arguement. Sometimes new is better and you need to move on.
             | However the safe c++ subset (if it arrives and works as
             | promised) might be better because we have all that c++ and
             | rust doesn't interoperate with it well. (again rust would
             | be better if we had it in 1970 but we didn't.)
        
           | whatever1 wrote:
           | Yes let us buy more city buses. Have 10 ton beasts destroying
           | the streets while carrying on average 5 people in the slowest
           | and most delayedway imaginable.
        
             | emchammer wrote:
             | I don't think you meant for your comment to be so
             | sarcastic. I live in the exurbs, not exactly the sticks,
             | but on the outskirts of a major city and on the way to a
             | significant medium-city city. I have seen pictures on
             | English Russia, where there were catenary-powered tramways
             | in what looked like Siberia in the 1950s or 1960s. I
             | imagine how life would be here and now if there were two
             | bus services at the nowhere stoplight near my house. One
             | east-west, one north-south, running at convenient 15 minute
             | intervals around the clock. It would be neat if there were
             | a convenient ride to my workplace in the next city. I view
             | riding the bus as having a chauffeur for $2.75. I saw some
             | maps created by amateurs called Fantasy NYC Subway, where
             | there were so many lines that they went up to double Greek
             | letters. I have lived in NYC, and there is not even a one-
             | seat train ride to the airport, nor always a taxi ride that
             | does not have "trouble" with my debit card which goes away
             | when I take a pic of his license. These monorails and
             | suspended trains and such were done 100 years ago. People
             | tried them. I have seen animes where the entire premise is
             | about romance due to missed trains in nowhere places. For
             | some reason none of these things happen in the United
             | States.
             | 
             | The picture I was thinking of is the second one down, after
             | the advert: https://englishrussia.com/2019/01/18/nice-tram-
             | photos-from-t...
        
             | bluGill wrote:
             | A bus with 5 people is already better than a car and they
             | often hold many more people for part of the trip. what
             | buses need is management that isn't there as a cushy reward
             | for politics but instead there for trasit. A well run bus
             | is the suburbs should be seeing 50-60 riders per hour off
             | peak (most for 10 minutes) but when you run a but as poorly
             | as many cities do it is no wonder nobody rides.
        
       | Halian wrote:
       | Needs more woopers. 'o'
        
       | pfdietz wrote:
       | Wuppertal is an unusually elongated, "linear" city, isn't it?
       | Along the Wupper valley. I could see that being appropriate for a
       | monorail; does it extend along the long axis?
        
         | skrebbel wrote:
         | Yes. It goes over the river.
        
       | hohoho3688583 wrote:
       | unspeakable
        
       | croemer wrote:
       | Lol, I first parsed the title as "the monorail _project_ having
       | been suspended" (=halted)
        
       | MomsAVoxell wrote:
       | I've made a day trip to Wuppertal, specifically for the purpose
       | of taking this train. I grew up on the other side of the planet
       | in a completely different culture, but in my youth I saw a
       | "telescreen article" during some film matinee pause, about this
       | "quaint, German thing" and as I grew older and found myself
       | actually living in Germany, one of my first thoughts was "I
       | wonder if that thing still exists" .. so I was very happy to
       | learn it was still in operation, indeed.
       | 
       | Germany is a land full of beautiful little towns and cities and
       | settlements which deserve to be explored with the proper tempo.
       | On a particularly sunny day I drove to Wuppertal from the village
       | I'd moved to in the Ruhr, in my beat up Citroen (that's another
       | quaint European device worthy of a story), deciding to eschew the
       | autobahn and instead take the older country roads where I could,
       | and for an hour or so I was transported back to another Germany,
       | the pre-war late 19th century land of much promise, whose roads
       | and paths were set, seemingly, with a far greater sense of
       | aesthetics than the speedy efficiency-worshipping channels of the
       | highways. So many little roads and lanes which 'felt' as if the
       | original architects were bovine in nature, or perhaps based on an
       | ancient feeding route of deer and boar.
       | 
       | When I arrived in Wuppertal, I was immediately impressed with
       | this technological marvel that had been suspended in the space
       | above 700-year old houses and buildings from another time. It
       | felt so futuristic and hopeful, and it _was futuristic and
       | hopeful_ - and more important to the Germans, _useful_ as a
       | device for getting around the serpentine Wuppertal construct. I
       | parked the Citroen in the lower part of the town, watching it
       | deflate itself like some Lucas'ian landracer, walked up to the
       | nearest Schweberbahn station, and took the thing all the way up
       | and down the Wupper. It was delightful, at first, seeming to be
       | so whimsical and expensive, but as we reached the end of the
       | line, I was struck by how suddenly mundane the experience had
       | become.
       | 
       | It was _normal_ to fly over the river, suspended, above the
       | height of a regular commute, curving through the spaces between
       | buildings rather than under them, and I was delighted to
       | recognize the buildings - now a hundred years older - that I had
       | seen in the original film, still in place yet somehow cleaner
       | than I'd remembered. Even still, in a matter of an hour, I'd
       | experienced that whiplash of "this is the future (of the past)
       | .." straight to "this is normal now (yet weird) .." so many of us
       | technologists endure -- but in this case, it was with a device
       | from an entirely different century. It was archaic futurist
       | whiplash, not at all entirely like the modern kind, but similar
       | somehow.
       | 
       | I took it back down to my Citroen, noting the gravity change
       | along the way, and found I had a new form of respect for even
       | that vehicles' weird, quaint, suspension. (That particular model
       | raised and lowered itself according to speed, you see..)
       | 
       | That trip to Wuppertal was one of the very first events in my
       | life in Germany which gave me so much more respect for the German
       | people than the post-war indoctrination and cultural distrust I'd
       | experienced as a kid growing up in a state that was once at war
       | with the place.
       | 
       | If you ever get a chance to visit Germany, a day trip outside the
       | realm of the autobahn is highly recommended.
       | 
       | Simply get lost in the place.
       | 
       | Because of Wuppertal I became finely tuned to appreciate the
       | German instinct for preservation of older things, while also
       | somehow managing to integrate technological progress which
       | doesn't just supplant the surroundings, but eventually enhances
       | them.
        
       | pvorb wrote:
       | If you learn about the Wuppertal suspended monorail, you should
       | also read about Tuffi, the elephant that jumped off of it in
       | 1950.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuffi
        
         | czottmann wrote:
         | The video contains a segment about Tuffi.
        
       | dagurp wrote:
       | This is an opportunity to use the world's least used emoji
        
       | FlyingSnake wrote:
       | Wuppertal Schwebebahn is wonderful to watch in person. Sometimes
       | my ICE goes through Wuppertal and it looks cyberpunk when the
       | conditions are right.
       | 
       | Many people don't know that Margao, Goa also planned and tested
       | the same H-Bahn system. I witnessed these Skybuses when I was
       | visiting Margao back then. It was an interesting experiment which
       | failed unfortunately.
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/SUarfX3BrIg
        
       | whatsthatabout wrote:
       | Seeing Wuppertal on the start-page of hackernews wasn't something
       | on my bingo card lol
        
       | Traubenfuchs wrote:
       | https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/ungluecke/schweres-...
       | 
       | No thanks. I prefer my vehicles not to be able to fall 12 metres
       | to the ground by default.
        
         | eliaspro wrote:
         | If you'd apply those kind of risk calculations to other means
         | of transport, you should have a thousand more reasons to never
         | ever get close to a car, yet taking a ride in one.
        
       | cocodill wrote:
       | Wuppertal's monorail is so phenomenal that it is much older than
       | the city.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-22 23:02 UTC)