[HN Gopher] Silk - Interactive Generative Art (2011)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Silk - Interactive Generative Art (2011)
        
       Author : bluemars
       Score  : 82 points
       Date   : 2024-12-19 19:55 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (weavesilk.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (weavesilk.com)
        
       | n2d4 wrote:
       | For those on mobile, either go on a desktop or change your user
       | agent so you get to use the website instead of an ad for a $3
       | app.
       | 
       | Interesting strategy to make a cool free website with the
       | potential to go viral, and then act like it's behind a paywall
       | for only some part of the population. Is this common?
        
         | nkozyra wrote:
         | The site itself works for me on mobile, though.
        
         | SamBam wrote:
         | I feel like this is unlikely to go viral -- these drawing apps
         | have been around for over a decade.
        
           | tyleo wrote:
           | This one has been popular for a decade IMO. I remember
           | playing with it in college. To my mind this is the viral one
           | and there are some additional knock offs.
        
         | crystal_revenge wrote:
         | Software engineers who measure their income in multiples of
         | median household income refusing to pay _$3_ for an app that
         | has been entertaining people for over a decade now never ceases
         | to surprise me.
         | 
         | Maybe if you're considering changing your user agent to play
         | with this, you're interested enough to spend $3. I did about 5
         | years ago and still get enjoy that app.
         | 
         | Personally I would love a world were a tiny trickle of the
         | revenue software developer generate would trickle down to
         | people making cool things for fun. Who knows, if that happened
         | we might have more developers out there doing thing _other_
         | than trying to sell ads.
        
           | andai wrote:
           | I refuse to use the web without adblock but most of the
           | websites (or apps I use) are supported by ads. What do?
           | 
           | A few have a "pay to remove ads" option, but most do not, and
           | the ones that do, I use infrequently enough that I can't
           | justify the price. There seems to be no good solution for
           | paying for the "long tail" of content and services.
           | 
           | Clay Shirky wrote an essay (I forget which one) on this
           | subject like 20+ years ago, about how the main issue with
           | micro transactions isn't even technical but it's the mental
           | cost associated with each transaction.
           | 
           | I think this could be solved if the system were "set it and
           | forget it" -- you give it a weekly budget and it just
           | distributes it among the sites you spend the most time on.
           | 
           | Brave browser actually tried something very similar with
           | their BAT (with their own ads instead of user provided
           | funds), but it never caught on.
        
             | dr_dshiv wrote:
             | Yet we tip 15%+ -- so it is clearly cultural
        
         | itishappy wrote:
         | Looks like just apple devices. It runs fine for me on
         | Chrome/Android and using a number of other agents I've tried.
         | Amusingly, the "download on the app store" button with apple
         | logo is present on the desktop version of the site as well.
        
           | aspenmayer wrote:
           | Many desktop apps on macOS are distributed via the App Store
           | also.
        
       | dcdgo wrote:
       | Very nice!
        
       | Netherland4TW wrote:
       | This has been around since 2011 at least, I remember playing this
       | in the apple store at the mall when I was bored waiting for my
       | parents. Cool to see it resurface on HN!
        
       | yurivish wrote:
       | Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2089615
        
         | kapitalx wrote:
         | I totally remember that post. I think I spent 30 minutes just
         | clicking around on it back then. Very nice.
        
       | w_for_wumbo wrote:
       | It'd be cool to see a 3D version of this that creates objects
       | that you could print on a 3D printer. I think there's something
       | so memorizing and satisfying with this type of symmetry.
        
         | cush wrote:
         | Holy scope creep
        
           | andai wrote:
           | It's like, one extra float? ;)
           | 
           | For real though, I had an amazing realization in the shower
           | one time that I could implement 3D rotation without learning
           | linear algebra (or god forbid quaternions) by just doing
           | three 2D rotations. A few hours later I had a rotating
           | monkey!
        
             | sleeplessworld wrote:
             | Yes. You did do that. But the monkey wasn't too happy. And
             | you have been banned from the zoo. So was it really the
             | correct approach? ;-)
        
             | tlarkworthy wrote:
             | And then you discovered gimble lock, and to fix that you
             | just need one extra float...
        
       | kridsdale1 wrote:
       | This is a Winamp visualizer.
        
       | foxes wrote:
       | Wow thats from a time when generative art meant programming to do
       | something and not ai slop
        
       | RohitLakh wrote:
       | First time hearing about this and it's very memorizing. Lofi
       | music in the background and you are set.
        
       | xeckr wrote:
       | I see people ITT saying "memorizing", do they all happen to mean
       | "mesmerizing"?
        
         | shric wrote:
         | I see people ITT saying "all", do they both happen to mean
         | "both"?
        
           | xerox13ster wrote:
           | Do you mean person ITT saying all? Whether it's two people or
           | a dozen people, if there are people ITT, using the same word,
           | then they're all using the word.
        
         | leobg wrote:
         | They ,,could of" meant that.
         | 
         | :-)
        
       | mycodendral wrote:
       | I think I found this on stumbleupon when I was really stoned back
       | in the day
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-20 23:02 UTC)