[HN Gopher] Moon
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Moon
        
       Author : todsacerdoti
       Score  : 1224 points
       Date   : 2024-12-17 17:26 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (ciechanow.ski)
 (TXT) w3m dump (ciechanow.ski)
        
       | doctoboggan wrote:
       | As a big fan of both the Moon and ciechanow.ski this article is
       | right up my alley.
       | 
       | During the 2024 solar eclipse I was explaining to people how an
       | eclipse _must_ occur during a new moon, and this article would
       | have really helped. The discussion also made me realize how
       | little most people spend thinking about the solar system and the
       | relationship between the moon, sun, and earth. These things
       | fascinate me (I think it 's just the sheer scale of it all), and
       | I hope to be able to get more people interested as well. The
       | solar eclipse was great for that!
        
         | halyconWays wrote:
         | People are impressed if you can name the current moon phase and
         | tell them what it'll be next. But it only takes a mental model
         | of where the sun, earth, and moon orbits are relative to each
         | other. I also find people are intrigued by the concept of
         | earthshine, and often haven't noticed it until you point it
         | out.
        
         | lifestyleguru wrote:
         | > solar eclipse I was explaining to people how an eclipse must
         | occur during a new moon
         | 
         | Hey, that's the first the time I realized this.
        
           | rqtwteye wrote:
           | And a lunar eclipse only during full moon.... These
           | constraints made it easier to predict eclipses in the past.
        
         | BoxOfRain wrote:
         | The really satisfying thing for me was when I was on a sailing
         | course and was instructed in how the moon causes the tides, and
         | how the phase of the moon corresponds to springs and neaps.
        
       | sbaner2k wrote:
       | the author is different gravy
        
       | rogual wrote:
       | This is what JavaScript is for.
        
       | halyconWays wrote:
       | We like the moon! Because it is so close to us.
        
         | buildsjets wrote:
         | And now I want a hot toasty sandwich.
        
       | wcrossbow wrote:
       | The Moon also plays currently a very special role in my life and
       | my work days are dictated to a large extent by the current Moon
       | phase :)
       | 
       | It's not discussed in the article but we have detailed models
       | (ROLO[0] and LIME[1]) for how much light is reflected from the
       | Moon and can be captured by a telescope. Like this one can
       | radiometrically calibrate a telescope, that is, find a mapping
       | between the digital numbers coming out from the sensor and actual
       | radiance values.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.usgs.gov/media/files/rolo-lunar-model-and-
       | databa... [1] https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3649/2024/
        
         | triyambakam wrote:
         | > my work days are dictated to a large extent by the current
         | Moon phase
         | 
         | Could you explain further?
        
           | wcrossbow wrote:
           | At my current employer, Kuva Space, I'm among other things
           | responsible for the commisioning and in orbit calibration of
           | the payload. The Moon is a major calibration target for us,
           | and between waxing and waining crescents I spent a lot of
           | time analyzing Moon shots to perform radiometric calibration
           | and camera parameter optimizations. The Moon doesn't know
           | about weekends and images are not always downlinked at the
           | most convenient times so that makes my life a bit more
           | hectic.
        
       | gclawes wrote:
       | Moon should be a state
        
       | 725686 wrote:
       | You might also enjoy minutephysics video:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBcxuM-qXec
        
       | guax wrote:
       | Is there a name for this category of website? I am seeing content
       | like this -- elaborate, animated, interactive -- more often here
       | and I wonder if its part of a new corner of the internet I am not
       | familiar with. Looks dope.
        
         | rom1v wrote:
         | I think this category is named ciechanow.ski.
        
         | banannaise wrote:
         | It's hypertext - a text-based format enhanced with other
         | elements.
        
           | nuancebydefault wrote:
           | Amazing idea!
        
             | lifestyleguru wrote:
             | There are even dedicated markup and scripting languages for
             | this. I predict this technology will be hot in 2025.
        
         | simonw wrote:
         | https://explorabl.es/ calls them "Explorable Explanations".
        
       | max_ wrote:
       | This is the future of STEM education.
       | 
       | Well written, decently comprehensive interactive documents.
       | 
       | I think such formats should be prioritised instead of textbooks
       | for creating learning materials.
       | 
       | I am really surprised almost no one is doubling down on something
       | like this. Brilliant comes close, but its not at this level.
       | 
       | Everyone in Edtech seems to be running towards AI gimmicks.
       | 
       | Thank you Ciechanowski!
        
         | simonw wrote:
         | I've seen these called "explorables" or "explorable
         | explanations" before and I really like them. I've been
         | collecting notes on them here:
         | https://simonwillison.net/tags/explorables/
         | 
         | Here's the website that coined the term: https://explorabl.es/
        
           | BuyMyBitcoins wrote:
           | Thank you for collecting and sharing these. I was so
           | impressed by the submission that my first thought was to find
           | some repository that contains the samples of a similar
           | caliber.
        
           | jasonjmcghee wrote:
           | This is a really nice collection. Thanks for putting them
           | together. I'm very partial to this writing style as well.
           | 
           | I took a crack at making it slightly nicer to write this
           | style of blog post via markdown with codeblocks you can mark
           | to execute instead of display (and hot reload + gist
           | rendering support)
           | 
           | It makes the source easy to read, even on GitHub preview,
           | etc.
           | 
           | It's what I've been using to write my recent posts.
           | 
           | https://github.com/jasonjmcghee/mdxish
           | 
           | But at the end of the day, content itself and the code that
           | powers it is more important than any framework you might use.
        
             | simonw wrote:
             | That's a really neat system. Reminds me of Observable
             | Framework, which I tried here
             | https://github.com/simonw/observable-framework-
             | experiments/b... to create this:
             | https://simonw.github.io/observable-framework-
             | experiments/pa...
        
               | jasonjmcghee wrote:
               | ah ` echo` is smart - I didn't realize that would
               | properly render in markdown editors / github, hence the
               | comment approach.
               | 
               | That observable system you made here sure renders
               | beautifully.
        
         | BuyMyBitcoins wrote:
         | I consider Kerbal Space Program to be the most rewarding game I
         | have ever played. Going into this page I was already somewhat
         | familiar with many of the concepts it presented because I had
         | encountered them during gameplay. However, having the ability
         | to modify parameters was very helpful for visualizing different
         | kinds of gravity assists. The game does not provide a way to do
         | this, so it augments my understanding massively.
         | 
         | I agree that these interactive learning materials are
         | incredibly promising towards actually understanding what is
         | being presented. In other words, this is how I actually grok
         | the concept.
        
         | mattkevan wrote:
         | Brilliant.org[1] does a good job of using explorables in their
         | learning materials, some of the best I've seen in that
         | category.
         | 
         | That said, Ciechanowski is on another level entirely.
         | 
         | [1] https://brilliant.org/
        
         | triyambakam wrote:
         | I do think that explorables are useful in understanding, but
         | man I feel overwhelmed with them. I feel like I do my t know
         | when and where to stop. I feel less anxious with a plain PDF or
         | similar. I guess it's a skill issue.
        
         | n42 wrote:
         | > I am really surprised almost no one is doubling down on
         | something like this.
         | 
         | I've thought a lot about this - every time a new one is posted.
         | I wish we could live in a world where this is STEM education. I
         | think that, ultimately, it's just very high labor cost, and
         | edtech is not known for being highly lucrative.
         | 
         | Bartosz does these as a labor of love, and the world is better
         | off for it.
        
       | jcims wrote:
       | This is wonderful!!! Generalizing here but we really do take the
       | moon for granted.
       | 
       | I bought a 'big ass telescope' a few years ago in an effort to
       | bootstrap a hobby that I'd flirted with for decades but never
       | really committed to. It's a Celestron 11" SCT and I really had no
       | idea what I was getting into. When I think of space I think of
       | things that are really small in the night sky, planets, galaxies,
       | nebula...(turns out most of them aren't *that* small and I
       | overshot the targets I had in mind)
       | 
       | I kept trying to photo galaxies and star clusters and all of
       | these exotic things but had a bunch of trouble with tracking with
       | long exposures. Out of frustration I ended up just pointing it at
       | the boring ol' moon to at least get used to the equipment and
       | workflows.
       | 
       | I fell in love with Luna.
       | 
       | The magnification of this scope really allowed me to explore the
       | surface in a way I never had before. I got to know the 'map' and
       | suddenly related to our celestial neighbor in a whole new way. It
       | was also the very first image I was actually not embarrassed to
       | share - https://imgur.com/a/t9b1Uug
       | 
       | I since then improved my knowledge and technical skill but the
       | month of the moon at the end of 2021 was really pretty
       | spectacular for me.
        
         | PUSH_AX wrote:
         | It's a lovely shot.
        
         | swifthesitation wrote:
         | It really is a great shot. I always daydream of showing today's
         | technology to the great the great minds from centuries ago. Not
         | sure why, but I do.
        
           | mettamage wrote:
           | And I'm here for it! :D
        
           | jcims wrote:
           | I'm sure it's different for everyone but I think it would
           | just be the unbridled enthusiasm and love for the subject
           | that they would show, the tidal dopamine surge of all the
           | mysteries that have been unlocked, the validation of all the
           | mysteries that remain. It would be amazing.
        
         | js2 wrote:
         | An 11" SCT is a commitment to use. Do you have it on a
         | permanent mount?
        
           | jcims wrote:
           | No, but i did just get a wedge so I could start tinkering
           | with polar alignment.
           | 
           | I also bought a Seestar S50 last year and have been having an
           | absolute blast with it. Feels like a renaissance in astronomy
           | is upon us.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | Welcome to the hobby (even if a few years late). Pretty much
         | everyone has the same experience as you. You buy the telescope,
         | and then realize you need to buy a telescope for your telescope
         | to use as a guide scope for accurate tracking for longer
         | exposures.
         | 
         | However, those long exposures are much more likely to get
         | photobombed by an airplane or satellite. So you're really
         | better off taking shorter exposures with the highest ISO you
         | can get away with, and then just stacking them.
         | 
         | I have a much wider scope that I can do 30s exposures unguided
         | before trailing starts to become noticeable. If you can get
         | away with 15s, you'd be amazed at what you can achieve with
         | newer sensors.
         | 
         | Just some hints to help the disappointment at bay and maybe get
         | you playing with the toys
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | > I fell in love with Luna.
         | 
         | Too bad advertisers will turn it into a giant Pepsi logo when
         | they get the chance.
        
           | pavel_lishin wrote:
           | Don't do their work for them.
        
           | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
           | It is not yet time for subsidized time.
        
         | gowld wrote:
         | Is there an information resource to find local telescope owners
         | who give access to the public for viewing?
         | 
         | (startup/app idea!)
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | Just search for local star parties in your area. Although, be
           | willing to bend the definition of local depending on how
           | light polluted your area is. My local is 4 hours away. Also,
           | some colleges have viewing nights available. Even in light
           | polluted areas, you can still see things for public viewings.
           | They just suck for anyone wanting to image.
           | 
           | There are tons of sites listing them, but I doubt there's an
           | absolute exhaustive list as it's all self-reporting to each
           | of the sites. Your app idea would just be another in a list
           | of places, sort of like the xkcd app about yet another
           | standard.
           | 
           | https://www.go-astronomy.com/star-parties.htm
           | 
           | https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-resources/annual-
           | starg...
        
         | yread wrote:
         | > turns out most of them aren't _that_ small
         | 
         | I haven't realized Andromeda is 4x bigger than the Moon until I
         | tried to take a picture of it
         | 
         | https://mikkolaine.blogspot.com/2014/01/size-of-deep-sky-obj...
         | (not my picture)
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | Similarly, I came to learn some selenography writing a "voxel"
         | (well, ray-casting) web game ... where you shuttle about the
         | moon from crater base to crater base.
         | 
         | I became kind of fascinated with the craters, names of the
         | craters (and history of those names), the "dark-side" and all
         | the wild topology there. (Although I think I have tiles for the
         | entire Moon, you don't have the fuel to get there.
        
       | bradarner wrote:
       | This is why the internet is amazing!
       | 
       | Awe-inspiring. Beautiful.
       | 
       | How does the author build these pages? Looks like it is React.
       | The entire blog must be custom built, no? Or is this built on top
       | of an existing CMS?
        
         | maest wrote:
         | Hand crafted, artisanal JavaScript.
        
         | adrianh wrote:
         | No React to be found (and good riddance). It's two vanilla
         | JavaScript files:
         | 
         | https://ciechanow.ski/js/base.js
         | 
         | https://ciechanow.ski/js/moon.js
        
           | bradarner wrote:
           | Cheers...Chrome dev tools must have tricked me.
           | 
           | Also nice that the author didn't minify it. Interesting to
           | read through.
        
           | undebuggable wrote:
           | Funnily, this JavaScript would not pass through most modern
           | job interviews.
        
           | TrackerFF wrote:
           | 17.6k LOC just for one post to educate and entertain people.
           | Beautiful.
        
         | jasonjmcghee wrote:
         | You definitely don't need a CMS for a blog. I'd expect most
         | HNer blogs you see here are either html files or markdown
         | processed/styled into html files. I bet various templating
         | solutions are popular too, which just output html files.
        
       | akshayrajp wrote:
       | wake up babe new ciechanow.ski article dropped
        
       | xnx wrote:
       | The very first interactive element is a great example of why
       | ciechanow.ski is so great. Similar animations from other sources
       | would probably limit to 28 frames and fake the image (using a
       | simple mask). On ciechanow.ski there are hundreds(?) of frames
       | and uses a bump map(?) to show accurate crater shadows on the
       | moon's surface.
        
       | parpfish wrote:
       | years back i came across this moon-related modeling problem on
       | stackoverflow (i'm not the original poster)[0] and it's stuck
       | with me that this seems like something that should have an easy
       | solution.
       | 
       | An HN thread about how cool the moon is seems like a good place
       | to resurface it.
       | 
       | But the question is this:
       | 
       | The crescent of the moon face is tilted based and the angle of
       | that tile depends on the viewer's latitude on earth. Is there an
       | equation that maps viewer latitude to the tilt of the moon
       | crescent?
       | 
       | [0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22392045/calculating-
       | moo...
        
       | axus wrote:
       | One thing I've noticed while looking at the Moon, the "dark" part
       | is lit enough to see that it's an orb and not really being eaten
       | by darkness. This webpage doesn't do that, I guess it's from a
       | different perspective without the earth shining on the Moon.
        
         | ribcage wrote:
         | I often wonder if it's just my imagination or is it really like
         | that. I am still not sure.
        
         | pierrec wrote:
         | I guess you alreay know this, but for reference this is caused
         | by earthlight (light diffused and reflected by the earth):
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthlight_(astronomy)
         | 
         | Sometimes it's clearly visible, but often I agree that it's
         | hard to tell if you're imagining it or not.
        
         | jval43 wrote:
         | There's a short paragraph on "earthshine" towards the end.
        
       | RALaBarge wrote:
       | Thank you, I am going to show parts of this to my daughter!
        
         | d42muna wrote:
         | This cracks me up. "Look at these beautiful orbital paths.
         | Cover your eyes when it's explaining the barycenter. Cover your
         | eyes!"
        
       | edferda wrote:
       | I haven't read the article but Bartosz articles are so good and
       | enjoyable to read that I get excited whenever I see a new one pop
       | up. I have already set some time aside tonight to read it with
       | care.
       | 
       | Bartosz if you are reading this: thank you so much for these
       | articles. You truly are an inspiration and I can only hope one
       | day I get to be as good a communicator as you are.
        
       | eitau_1 wrote:
       | On an unrelated note, on the Sunday we had a major lunar
       | standstill i.e. the full Moon at its highest orbit (as seen from
       | northern hemisphere). It happens every 18.5 years.
        
       | empath75 wrote:
       | I can't tell you how excited I get everyone time he does a new
       | one of these. They have all the delight and wonder of a child's
       | pop-up book, but with the depth of a college text book.
       | Consistently one of the best things on the internet.
        
       | dheera wrote:
       | Related personal story:
       | 
       | On January 6, 2023, at approximately noon, I happened to take a
       | flight from Svolvaer, Norway to Bodo, Norway, which, took me from
       | 21.8 degrees latitude to 22.8 degrees latitude, which took me
       | from [just inside polar night] to [just inside daytime].
       | 
       | I saw the moon at takeoff and the sun at landing.
       | 
       | It was an absolutely miraculous, specatular coincidence -- the
       | latitudes I was flying over, the time, the date, the moon phase,
       | the flight path.
       | 
       | This flight allowed me to have a full 3D view of space -- the
       | moon, the Earth, the sun, all within an hour.
       | 
       | It was the first time I felt that the moon and sun weren't just
       | discs flying around the sky randomly, but rather that I was the
       | one flying through space, had a 3D sense of where the moon was
       | behind me and where the sun was peeking ahead of me, and that the
       | Earth felt curved as I moved out of the view of the moon and into
       | the view of the sun.
       | 
       | My pictures and whiteboard illustration:
       | 
       | https://imgur.com/TYFAdoP
        
       | belfalas wrote:
       | The moon is so interesting, easy to forget how much it affects
       | life on Earth because we see it all the time.
       | 
       | Like others in the thread, I have a telescope and it's a
       | wonderful experience pointing it skyward while it's still light
       | out and the moon is visible. Then I can really see all the
       | craters and "pock marks" on the surface. (My telescope isn't good
       | enough to be able to see anything during a full moon, it all just
       | becomes washed out.)
        
       | MaxGripe wrote:
       | De revolutionibus orbium coelestium
        
       | divbzero wrote:
       | What an amazing exploration, from watching the sun set over moon
       | craters in the first graphic to the simulation of how the Moon
       | formed and the lucid explanations of tidal locking and axial
       | precession.
       | 
       | As with many of the author's posts, the underlying code can be an
       | interesting read as well: https://ciechanow.ski/js/moon.js
        
       | throw-the-towel wrote:
       | ciechanow.ski on the frontpage? Instantly upvoted.
        
       | siavosh wrote:
       | It really is a marvel. I'm grateful society has such subject
       | matter experts, that they have the technical skills to share it,
       | have a passion to share it, and dedicate the time and effort to
       | do so at such a level.
        
         | mbb70 wrote:
         | Bartosz Ciechanowski is a subject matter expert of everything,
         | given enough time: https://ciechanow.ski/archives/. I still
         | remember reading 'Gears' and being completely blown away.
        
       | Terr_ wrote:
       | There's a collection of little facts I imagine being useful if a
       | human got stranded somewhere in the universe and helpful aliens
       | weren't sure where to take you. Without books and electronics,
       | what could you memorize that would help them search and identify
       | Sol/Earth in their big astral database?
       | 
       | This is one of them, the seemingly-pure-coincidence of solar
       | eclipses where the apparent size of the moon equals the apparent
       | size of the sun.
       | 
       | Ratios in general would be handy, since they would not depend on
       | difficult-to-calibrate units: The moon is ~1/6 times the mass of
       | our Earth; the biggest planet Jupiter/#5 is 2.5x the mass of all
       | the rest and 5.2x the distance from the sun compared to Earth/#3,
       | etc.
        
       | hosolmaz wrote:
       | Wake up babe, new Bartosz Ciechanowski post dropped
        
         | bbx wrote:
         | I saw the domain name and thought the same thing. Always an
         | event to see a new post of his.
        
         | MarcelOlsz wrote:
         | Meredith, clear the rest of my day.
        
         | askvictor wrote:
         | I was just thinking about him yesterday while browsing HN,
         | wondering when the next post would drop.
        
           | Cthulhu_ wrote:
           | There was a post earlier today about mechanical watches, of
           | course this site was linked again.
        
         | funksta wrote:
         | Easily one of the best sites on the internet, in my opinion
        
           | umvi wrote:
           | Yet if you ask front end devs they will say his website is
           | bad and full of anti patterns and bad practices like not
           | using npm, React, TypeScript, etc
        
             | Cthulhu_ wrote:
             | Vague appeal to authority; I'm hereby asking front end devs
             | to actually have a look and confirm the above.
        
               | micromacrofoot wrote:
               | it works fine on my machine, wontfix
        
               | n42 wrote:
               | this blog, its author and the work is being idolized
               | everywhere in this thread as artisanal and peak of craft.
        
               | VPenkov wrote:
               | Frontend dev here. Hats off to Ciechanowski as always.
               | The code is readable and works well, and looks written
               | with love. I wouldn't do it this way, but then again, I
               | wouldn't do this at all. Probably couldn't.
               | 
               | This is an example of frontend as a craft. I am confident
               | it was written with a model M keyboard and his home
               | office is referred to as an atelier.
        
         | andrepd wrote:
         | Early Christmas present!
        
       | praptak wrote:
       | The initial simulations might give you a slightly wrong idea
       | about the shape of Moon's orbit around the Sun. It doesn't form
       | any loops (you can see that in the later more precise simulation)
       | and is in fact convex (this one is a bit harder to see).
        
       | hassleblad23 wrote:
       | Ds
        
       | zombiwoof wrote:
       | Amazing
        
       | DiggyJohnson wrote:
       | Really excellent. Since I live in a high rise I've marked the
       | cardinal directions on the floor and walls and been trying to
       | develop a spatial intuition for the ecliptic, essentially trying
       | to be able to easily imagine myself tilted in the northern
       | hemisphere subtropics rotating around a sphere rotating around
       | the sun. End goal would be an automatic intuition of where to
       | look for the Sun, Moon, and all the visible planets. This sounds
       | insane typing it out but its very passive and genuinely
       | satisfying. Not being on the equator and the natural tilt of the
       | Earth are the two factors that make this most difficult, of
       | course.
        
         | FredPret wrote:
         | I get this. You've got me wondering how to get this project
         | Wife Approved Status
        
           | dmd wrote:
           | My wife came with 9 telescopes in various states of
           | disrepair.
        
           | andrepd wrote:
           | Nerds often marry other nerds ;)
        
         | seumars wrote:
         | Check out the North Paw Directional Anklet. It's basically a
         | compass that vibrates whenever you face magnetic north. From
         | what I've read people seem to develop a sense of direction
         | pretty quickly.
        
       | lizmutton wrote:
       | Another masterpiece I am sure!
        
       | hassleblad23 wrote:
       | Amazing!
        
       | syncsynchalt wrote:
       | Bartosz has a patreon where you can sponsor these works, and on
       | it he posts very detailed explainers of why and how he created
       | each page.
       | 
       | The one for Moon is at https://www.patreon.com/posts/on-
       | moon-118130286
        
         | seumars wrote:
         | Thank you for sharing! Big fan of Bartosz's articles and
         | somehow didn't think of looking him up on other platforms
        
           | 4gotunameagain wrote:
           | You don't have to, the link is at the end of the article :)
        
       | ustad wrote:
       | Holy crap! only afew hours ago i was scraping his site and
       | hoarding the delicious javascript. I wondered how long its been
       | since the airfoil post and, bam! , a new article! More juicy
       | javascript to hoard!
        
       | vldmrs wrote:
       | His blog posts are always amazing, very detailed and
       | exceptionally visual
        
       | hassleblad23 wrote:
       | It is fascinating how much the Moon matters to us, yet it is
       | largely ignored.
        
       | hei-lima wrote:
       | Wonderful! A masterpiece.
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | Without even clicking I now know what it is going to be. Single
       | word title and lots of votes.
       | 
       | I wonder if single word titles helps with SEO
       | 
       | https://www.google.com/search?q=Moon
       | 
       | right on front page #7 . good job
        
       | 0wis wrote:
       | Wonderful ! Even if I am not super interested in the topic, the
       | explanations are so clear and the animations so nice that I have
       | admiration for the work done. Full mastery of the web medium that
       | makes an explanation way clearer that any paper could. Would love
       | to work on a similar projet on economics & personal finance.
       | Thanks for sharing !
        
       | mopsi wrote:
       | Something has gone terribly wrong when such beautiful, but
       | essentially simple interactive graphics feel like an expensive
       | and exotic gift, rather than something readily supported by
       | widely used editors. A decade or more ago, I would've turned to
       | Flash to create something like this, but now I wouldn't even know
       | where to start.
        
       | ricardobeat wrote:
       | I had to wait ten or fifteen minutes for a couple orbits to see
       | if it would stick, but a little moon formed in the accretion
       | example:
       | 
       | https://postimg.cc/Y4LTzLBk
       | 
       | This made me happy.
        
       | beeforpork wrote:
       | Great as usual!
       | 
       | But I do prefer metric units.
        
       | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
       | Related: last Sunday (December 15th) was the *luna*stice - the
       | northernmost endpoint of the moon's 18.6 year cycle during which
       | the rise/set points move between north and south. On Sunday it
       | was as far north as it gets, and for the next _generation_ it
       | will move slowly south and then back again.
       | 
       | This cycle has been known to some humans for more than 3000
       | years, and appears to have helped structure architecture/layout
       | at various American locations such as Chaco Canyon (New Mexico)
       | 1000 years ago. It takes a minimum of 3 generations to establish
       | the cycle, which indicates something about the level of social
       | and scientific organization in these societies.
        
       | erbdex wrote:
       | "And still, after all this time, the Sun has never said to the
       | Earth, "You owe me." Look what happens with love like that. It
       | lights up the sky."
       | 
       | -- Rumi
        
       | hubraumhugo wrote:
       | Ciechanowski is likely the best content producer of our time,
       | absolutely fascinating reads. Imagine having such a person as a
       | teacher - he could probably excite students about any scientific
       | topic.
       | 
       | I'd love to spend my time working on such articles when I'm
       | retired :)
        
       | markfsharp wrote:
       | Wow! Just wow! Very good.
        
       | thallavajhula wrote:
       | Huge fan of Bartosz. I love their posts. I saw the post link and
       | it instantly put a smile on my face 'cause I know I would love it
       | even before opening the link and the post did not disappoint.
       | 
       | In the 2nd graphic, they use of location to display the tiny
       | person on the globe _chef 's kiss_. The attention to details is
       | brilliant. I am 40% through with the post and I couldn't contain
       | my excitement to post here. This is lovely.
        
       | doawoo wrote:
       | as a kinesthetic learner I really cannot say how invaluable the
       | interactive widgets are, so wonderfully done.
        
       | Jun8 wrote:
       | I've always wondered how different human culture would be if we
       | had multiple moons. Related: the relationship between lunar and
       | menstrual cycles is an open question, eg see
       | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3716780/ or
       | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7840133/
        
       | unit149 wrote:
       | An order of magnitude above and below the speed of a falling
       | object - exporting the JSON file that has its unadulterated
       | gravitational force data. Dark matter and Newtonian mechanics are
       | epiphenomenal modes of interlocking processes.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-17 23:00 UTC)