[HN Gopher] Balatro dev swings at PEGI for rating it 18 because ...
___________________________________________________________________
Balatro dev swings at PEGI for rating it 18 because of its 'evil
playing cards'
Author : galleywest200
Score : 22 points
Date : 2024-12-16 21:30 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.pcgamer.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.pcgamer.com)
| legitster wrote:
| > "teaches--by way of images, information and gameplay--skills
| and knowledge that are used in poker ... this knowledge and skill
| could be transferred to a real-life game of poker."
|
| > He doesn't even like poker all that much--me either, for the
| record, though I adore Balatro, even if I am cursed with
| incredibly bad luck
|
| I feel like I am missing something - is there like a cultural
| moment or something against poker? I played it all the time
| growing up, almost never for money, and there were absolutely
| zero qualms from anyone - church, school, grandma - anyone.
|
| It's kind of shocking that PEGI really has a problem with
| gameplay mechanics like poker hands and probabilities. I get that
| poker has a more direct connection to casinos, but that would be
| like giving Madden an 18+ because it teaches football. (That
| might lead to "skill and knowledge" transferrable to sports
| betting, don't you know!)
| zamadatix wrote:
| I think anything tied to gambling got a big black eye after
| everyone got constant access to the internet with epayments. Be
| it loot boxes or traditional gambling the accessibility to any
| where any time money gambling games created a more negative
| image than the space had previously.
| danudey wrote:
| This would make sense if, as mentioned in the article, loot
| boxes were also considered problematic. Unfortunately, loot
| boxes in FC are 3+ even though they're linked to actual
| gambling addiction, whereas poker-like roguelike mechanics
| are 18+ even though you never lose a cent of real money (and
| the game doesn't teach you enough about poker to actually
| play poker).
| chrismcb wrote:
| Poker had always had a bad reputation. Has nothing to do with
| the Internet, just gambling in general.
| chrismcb wrote:
| Poker, while considered a game of skill, had a direct
| connection to gambling, and hence the negative connotation.
| Poker isn't very interesting of it isn't played for stakes
| (whether it is money or something else) in fact what is the
| point to it, if you aren't playing for something?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-12-16 23:02 UTC)