[HN Gopher] The Antikythera mechanism - 254:19 ratio
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Antikythera mechanism - 254:19 ratio
        
       Author : 082349872349872
       Score  : 148 points
       Date   : 2024-12-15 18:46 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (leancrew.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (leancrew.com)
        
       | zefhous wrote:
       | I'm just here to fulfill the Hacker News rule that any post
       | mentioning the Antikythera Mechanism must have a comment linking
       | the excellent Clickspring build videos.
       | 
       | https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZioPDnFPNsHnyxfygxA0to4R...
        
         | beeforpork wrote:
         | Thank you! I was waiting for it so I could click on it again.
         | :-)
        
         | mattbillenstein wrote:
         | Excellent videos - and the one thing that sticks with me was
         | the speculation that watchmaking and the processes that it
         | requires eventually leads to the type of technology we have
         | today. I think the line goes if the greeks of that era had been
         | allowed to progress another 300-400 years, they may have been
         | able to land on the moon...
        
         | etrautmann wrote:
         | This is why I love HN, thanks for sharing
        
       | sgt101 wrote:
       | https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0024x0g
       | 
       | Up to date and with a very good discussion of the 254:19 gearing.
       | 
       | Also much more detail on the history of the mechanism.
        
       | Alex3917 wrote:
       | If you're in Athens, the Herakleidon museum has not only an
       | exhibit about this, but about all sorts of other advanced Greek
       | technology: coin-operated vending machines, drink-serving robots,
       | water-powered telegraphs, etc. While this specific device may (or
       | may not) have been a one-off, it's undeniable that ancient Greece
       | was basically the real-life version of a Steampunk-based society.
       | (With the caveat that ancient Persia probably had similar
       | technology at one point also, but most of that has since been
       | destroyed by the British and others throughout history.)
        
         | hyhconito wrote:
         | Oh damn it. Missed that one entirely. I will have to come back
         | again.
        
           | jcims wrote:
           | Same!!!
           | 
           | I just asked chatgpt "Based on what you know about me, what
           | do you think I would be interested in seeing in Athens?"
           | 
           | The Herakleidon Museum was third on the list. May have to try
           | this again in the future.
        
             | hyhconito wrote:
             | Never thought of using it for that.
             | 
             | Annoyingly I'm in Athens right now but flying back tomorrow
             | way too early to sneak a visit in :(
        
               | jcims wrote:
               | That airport is a bit of a haul. :/
        
               | hyhconito wrote:
               | Was even worse last week. Got off plane and metro was on
               | strike.
        
             | dwighttk wrote:
             | what does chatgpt know about you?
        
               | fragmede wrote:
               | As you chat with it, it'll pick up random details from
               | conversations (eg owns a cat) and stick it into a limited
               | memories folder, which can be manually inspected and
               | cleared out as desired.
        
         | Terr_ wrote:
         | > water-powered telegraphs
         | 
         | This phrasing oversells it a bit too much: The water wasn't a
         | power source and there was no long distance movement of it.
         | 
         | They signaled between users with the light of a burning
         | handheld torch, and the duration of the light corresponded to
         | predefined messages.
         | 
         | Water was used at each end for independent stopwatches, to
         | measure the duration of the light. It's easy to imagine an
         | equivalent system using sand hourglasses.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_telegraph#Greek_hy...
        
       | hyhconito wrote:
       | Ha literally just saw that this morning in the National
       | Archaeological Museum in Athens! Lurking here paid off. A good
       | read.
        
       | meew0 wrote:
       | > I've always liked blogging about calendrical things, but I
       | don't remember doing anything on the Metonic cycle before. If I
       | had written faster, I could've published it on Friday the 13th.
       | Too bad.
       | 
       | On the other hand, you published it during a full moon. That's at
       | least slightly appropriate given the subject matter :)
        
       | casenmgreen wrote:
       | I was living in Athens, and visiting the museums, and I had no
       | idea - I walked around a corner in the National and pow - the
       | Mechanism, _THE_ Mechanism, was there, _right in front of me_.
       | 
       |  _WOW_.
       | 
       | Also, Elgin marbles need to be returned. Parthenon is defaced by
       | their absence.
        
         | sneak wrote:
         | They're not putting them outside again; they'd be inside in the
         | Acropolis museum. The Parthenon (blown up as it is) would still
         | be missing them.
        
           | euroderf wrote:
           | Speaking of which, where's the apology from Turkiye for
           | storing ammo there ?
        
         | globnomulous wrote:
         | Elgin marbles don't need to be returned and are safer in the
         | UK.
        
           | lioeters wrote:
           | > In 2021, UNESCO concluded that the UK government had an
           | obligation to return the marbles and called upon the UK
           | government to open negotiations with Greece.
           | 
           | > Asked about the possible return of the Marbles, the British
           | Culture Secretary, Michelle Donelan replied: "I can
           | sympathise with some of the arguments but I do think that is
           | a very dangerous and slippy road to embark down."
           | 
           | > ..Fulfilling all restitution claims would empty most of the
           | world's great museums - this has also caused concerns among
           | other European and American museums.
        
       | atmosx wrote:
       | > My sketch of the Sun-Earth-Moon system assumes a heliocentric
       | solar system, something that wasn't known to the Greeks of the
       | first century BCE.
       | 
       | I am not sure this is entirely accurate. According to Wikipedia:
       | 
       | > The notion that the Earth revolves around the Sun had been
       | proposed as early as the 3rd century BC by Aristarchus of
       | Samos,[1] who had been influenced by a concept presented by
       | Philolaus of Croton (c. 470 - 385 BC). In the 5th century BC the
       | Greek philosophers Philolaus and Hicetas had the thought on
       | different occasions that the Earth was spherical and revolving
       | around a "mystical" central fire, and that this fire regulated
       | the universe.[2] In medieval Europe, however, Aristarchus'
       | heliocentrism attracted little attention--possibly because of the
       | loss of scientific works of the Hellenistic period.[b]
       | 
       | Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism
       | 
       | Contrary to the recent revisionist version of the "dark ages",
       | they were pretty dark if you were a Greek of the Hellenistic
       | period, an Athenian 5th century BC or a Roman the next 500-800
       | years. Loss of philosophical (locked in monasteries) and
       | technical knowledge is common and Heliocentrism or the blood
       | circulation system (Egyptians during the Ptolemy era had
       | knowledge comparable to the one we will acquire again 18th
       | century) are two prime examples.
        
         | arp242 wrote:
         | You can argue semantics on this, but "wasn't known to the
         | Greeks of the first century BCE" is basically accurate, or
         | certainly "accurate enough" for this context. All of the
         | heliocentric writers were basically little more than "this idea
         | some guy had", and geocentric views as described by e.g.
         | Aristotle were dominant.
        
           | globnomulous wrote:
           | If that's true, then by the same reasoning you're also saying
           | that heliocentrism wasn't known to the Europe of (insert any
           | time before the mid 1600s), because it was little more than
           | an idea some guy had, not dominant or accepted.
           | 
           | But nobody would characterize the history of the science that
           | way, because it simply isn't true. "Wasn't known to the
           | Greeks" is inaccurate, particularly in its historical
           | context, since science and philosophy were often "little more
           | than 'this idea some guy had.'"
        
           | noncoml wrote:
           | Does geocentric go hand in hand with flat earth?
           | 
           | Because it was pretty common scientific knowledge that earth
           | was round back then. A knowledge that got lost during the
           | dark ages.
           | 
           | For example: In the third century BCE , Eratosthenes, a Greek
           | librarian in Alexandria , Egypt , determined the earth's
           | circumference to be 40,250 to 45,900 kilometers (25,000 to
           | 28,500 miles) by comparing the Sun's relative position at two
           | different locations on the earth's surface.
        
             | zardo wrote:
             | > A knowledge that got lost during the dark ages.
             | 
             | Any examples of that? I've heard it called a myth.
        
               | atmosx wrote:
               | Google "the Galileo Affair".
        
               | zardo wrote:
               | I meant specifically that the Earth is roughly ball
               | shaped.
        
               | ithkuil wrote:
               | I suggest you read about it again. It was about geo-
               | centric vs helio-centric models. It was not about flat vs
               | globe.
               | 
               | The geo-centric model assumed the earth was spherical but
               | it didn't rotate or otherwise move.
        
               | atmosx wrote:
               | True, I didn't follow the thread closely, my bad.
        
             | landswipe wrote:
             | This guy Sagan's...
        
         | gattilorenz wrote:
         | > Egyptians during the Ptolemy era had knowledge comparable to
         | the one we will acquire again 18th century
         | 
         | Citation needed, especially given the "comparable".
         | 
         | The "dark age's revisionism" afaik doesn't claim that there was
         | no loss of technical and philosophical knowledge (not that the
         | average roman soldier would normally be a philosopher...), but
         | that it's limited to a few centuries. By the 12th and 13th
         | century it's very difficult to speak of dark ages.
        
           | atmosx wrote:
           | Thisnlink is not the one that I had in mind - a Wikipedia
           | link that talks specifically about blood circulation details
           | explained in ancient Egyptian mummification texts
           | rediscovered in Europe during that time - but in some sense
           | it is more accurate[^1].
           | 
           | [^1]: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4290745/
        
       | analog31 wrote:
       | Reminds me of finding a pair of gears in a box of lathe
       | accessories, with 50 and 127 teeth.
        
         | mauvehaus wrote:
         | For anyone who isn't aware: that's the pair of gears with the
         | smallest number of teeth (and by extension, largest teeth for a
         | given size pair of gears) in the ratio of 2.54:1.
         | 
         | As I'm not a machinist, I'm not going to try to explain just
         | where in the geartrain you'd use this pair to convert your
         | metric machine lathe into a US customary lathe, but that's what
         | they're for.
        
           | analog31 wrote:
           | There's typically a gear train that communicates the rotation
           | of the spindle to the threading mechanism. This is so that
           | you can turn a precise number of threads per unit length, and
           | to take multiple passes to reach the desired thread depth.
           | There's a multi-ratio gearbox that sets the thread pitch.
           | 
           | The 2.54 ratio lets you turn metric threads on a US machine,
           | with the help of tables in the manual for how to set all of
           | the levers. Machinists hate it, and these days will prefer to
           | buy a die for the occasional threading job.
        
             | mikewarot wrote:
             | I think if I had to do metric threads often, I'd switch to
             | an electronic leadscrew, like the one from Clough42.[1]
             | 
             | [1] https://github.com/clough42/electronic-leadscrew/wiki
        
             | mauvehaus wrote:
             | The remaining problem is that metric threads are specified
             | by the mm between peaks, whereas US customary threads are
             | specified by threads/inch.
             | 
             | It's not immediately obvious to me (not a machinist) that
             | the 127/50 ratio gets you the ability to cut metric threads
             | without a mess of other head-scratching because you're now
             | dealing with period instead of frequency.
        
               | analog31 wrote:
               | Indeed, the charts for cutting metric threads are
               | complex, and I'm not sure all of the standard pitches are
               | even possible.
               | 
               | The lathe that I use hasn't had its threading gears
               | installed in ages.
               | 
               | A weird historical tidbit is that after WWII a couple of
               | standards emerged for bicycle parts in Europe, where they
               | used metric diameters and inch thread pitches.
        
               | mauvehaus wrote:
               | The Italian bottom bracket threading standard is
               | completely insane. Like, how do you even cut that, and
               | why would anyone come up with that in preference to
               | literally anything else?
        
               | analog31 wrote:
               | The only thing I can imagine was a supply of American
               | machine tools from the rebuilding of Europe after a WWII.
               | You can always cut any diameter, only the thread pitches
               | are ruled by the capabilities of the lathe.
               | 
               | Also, left handed threads involve their own issues since
               | the spindle chuck wants to unscrew itself.
        
       | robertlagrant wrote:
       | Hah - I watched that Veritasium video the other day.
        
       | hoseja wrote:
       | I once heard that the mechanism was too fine/the gear train too
       | large that it could not possibly actually work without stripping
       | the gears or seizing due to friction.
        
         | floxy wrote:
         | Does anyone know if Clickspring ever finished making a copy of
         | the mechanism? Seems like the last update was from ~2 years
         | ago.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML4tw_UzqZE
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/@Clickspring/videos
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-16 23:02 UTC)