[HN Gopher] Why Recursion Pharmaceuticals abandoned cell paintin...
___________________________________________________________________
Why Recursion Pharmaceuticals abandoned cell painting for
brightfield imaging
Author : abhishaike
Score : 63 points
Date : 2024-12-12 16:08 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.owlposting.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.owlposting.com)
| Mistletoe wrote:
| I find this fascinating. I used to do high content screening of
| cells with machines like the Perkin Elmer Operetta and lots of
| dyes. I would have never thought machine learning would make us
| go full circle back to brightfield.
|
| The meat of this article:
|
| > The trend of ML in general over the past 15~ years has been to
| strip away more and more of the biases you've encoded about your
| dataset as you feed it into a model. Computer vision went from
| hand-crafted interpretable features (e.g. number of circles,
| number of black pixels when thresholded, etc), to hand-crafted
| uninterpretable features (e.g. scale invariant feature
| transform), to automatically extracted uninterpretable features
| (e.g. hidden dimensions of a convolutional neural network). In
| other words, the bitter lesson; pre-imposing structure on your
| data is useful for a human, but detrimental to a machine.
|
| The gist of it I understood is that ML could already tell and
| label the organelles and cell structure in brightfield imaging
| without the dyes and that adding those on top just muddled and
| hindered it.
| whatshisface wrote:
| It makes a lot of sense in retrospect because all the
| structures are visible on the brightfield image - it's just
| more annoying for a human being to pick out the features on
| thousands of slides.
|
| I wonder what the dye budgets and spectral bands will go to now
| that there is no need to mark the boundary of the nucleus. I
| bet there are a lot of things that are not visible in the
| refractive index that you could dye.
| _ihaque wrote:
| My team did part of the work described in TFA, AMA.
| shaunregenbaum wrote:
| Do you guys have high hopes for video data? Were there early
| results that showed promise for kinetic data?
| _ihaque wrote:
| Yes, we (and plenty of others) have prior data showing that
| perturbations (things that you can do to cells, like knocking
| out genes or putting drug-candidates on them) have different
| effects at different times, so we are excited to see the
| potential for time course imaging.
|
| Note that "video" is a little different here than the way we
| all usually think of it - think "minutes or hours between
| frames" not "frames per second".
| _ihaque wrote:
| I should point out that we are hiring! Software engineering,
| data science/ML, and IT positions are available in Salt Lake
| City, Toronto, New York, and London:
|
| https://job-boards.greenhouse.io/recursionpharmaceuticals
| selimthegrim wrote:
| Do you guys have a cooldown period for applications?
| ldsldslds wrote:
| they dont respond to cold apps in my experience, except
| canned rejection after a few months for some reason
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2024-12-15 23:01 UTC)