[HN Gopher] How Typing Transformed Nietzsche's Consciousness
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How Typing Transformed Nietzsche's Consciousness
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 24 points
       Date   : 2024-12-04 19:08 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (thereader.mitpress.mit.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (thereader.mitpress.mit.edu)
        
       | exprofmaddy wrote:
       | This story is also told in Nicholas Carr's bestseller 'The
       | Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains'
       | https://www.nicholascarr.com/?page_id=16
        
       | namaria wrote:
       | Small nitpick
       | 
       | > It took hold of human consciousness 3,000 years ago and changed
       | it, with the written word representing thought itself.
       | 
       | Writing is at least about 5500 years old.
        
         | setopt wrote:
         | Sounds like they count from approximately the origin of the
         | first "alphabet" (including vowels), while writing itself is
         | much much older.
         | 
         | Btw, I recommend anyone who hasn't looked at it before to read
         | up a bit on the history of writing. It shocked me a bit that
         | writing has only been _independently_ invented 4 times in known
         | human history (Egypt, Middle East, China, Mesoamerica), with
         | all other writing systems being either inspired or derived from
         | nearby systems.
         | 
         | The English/Latin alphabet, for example, is a distant
         | descendant of the Phoenician abjad, which itself was ultimately
         | derived from Egyptian Hieroglyphs. Some traces are left today,
         | like the letter "A" looking a bit like an up-side down bulls
         | head with horns... because it actually descends from the
         | hieroglyph for bull.
         | 
         | Interestingly, Arab, Hebrew, and Indic scripts are all derived
         | from the same Phoenician ancestor, despite how different they
         | all look today...
        
           | codpiece wrote:
           | Thank you, this is fascinating! Do you have any recommended
           | reading?
        
           | rpastuszak wrote:
           | > Interestingly, Arab, Hebrew, and Indic scripts are all
           | derived from the same Phoenician ancestor, despite how
           | different they all look today...
           | 
           | Same with Thai or... Mongolian - a not so distant cousin of
           | Aramaic!
           | 
           | The fun thing about Mongolian is that to notice its
           | similarity to Aramaic, you'll need to tilt your head by 90
           | degrees.
           | 
           | Compare this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_script#
           | /media/File:M...
           | 
           | With this: https://www.avesta.org/fonts/index.html
           | 
           | Now look at the first picture again and tilt your head.
           | 
           | I'm a bit embarrassed to admit that, although I studied
           | Middle Persian and Avestan (both of which rely on a variant
           | of Aramaic), it took me almost 15 years to notice that. Now,
           | it's impossible to unsee.
        
       | jauntywundrkind wrote:
       | > _To be precise, he purchased a top-of-the-line portable
       | Malling-Hansen writing ball, which was sent specially to him from
       | its inventor in Copenhagen._
       | 
       | Wikiepdia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hansen_Writing_Ball
        
       | etyp wrote:
       | Nietzsche is a very interesting example since there is a very
       | obvious shift in his philosophy from The Birth of Tragedy to,
       | say, The Gay Science. I understand the argument that the style of
       | writing noticeably changes, and I'd be okay attributing that to
       | "automated writing," but a lot of the shift in Nietzsche's work
       | feels like a pretty drastic shift in ideology. I'm not convinced
       | that shift entirely, or even largely, comes from the shift in
       | medium.
        
       | killjoywashere wrote:
       | Typing has a certain reward function to it: that snap-snap-snap
       | is satisfying. I wonder if he just got addicted to it?
        
       | quantadev wrote:
       | For someone who writes all day every day, their ability to
       | explore ideas is somewhat limited by the speed of their writing
       | mechanism (hand v.s. machine), because they're not really "just
       | sitting and thinking" most of the time but trying to "capture
       | each thought" before moving to the next idea, which is laborious
       | and slow.
       | 
       | So simply by being able to move faster along the process means
       | you can fit more ideas into your short term memory, because
       | you're traversing thru the ideas at a faster rate. Once you can
       | fit more ideas in, then each idea can have room to become more
       | complex. I think that's the "mechanism" (pun intended) by which
       | your consciousness/intelligence improves simply by being able to
       | write faster.
       | 
       | It's probably partially also why stimulant drugs can make people
       | appear more intelligent. The faster you move thru ideas, the more
       | information you can fit into working/reasoning memory. It's the
       | same thing as lengthening the "context window" in an LLM btw.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2024-12-04 23:00 UTC)